Hi all,
From this week, I will change the QA status report delivering date from
Wednesday to each Monday.
*AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
*Based on the test plan:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan
100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the tests of
On 3/12/12 3:29 AM, lou ql wrote:
On 9 March 2012 18:10, eric beric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Disclaimer : the mail is not well quoted, so I'm not sure who I'm
answering. Apologies if ever my answer is not clear.
Le 9 mars 12 à 03:05, lou ql a écrit :
2. a dialog appears asking for
Hi,
the windows build bot still has problems with the new introduced build
prerequisite vcredist_**.exe
Can somebody with access to the build bots add the new requirements.
See
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is
not the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an
increased buildid.
It is still no a official RC because of the existing
Jürgen Schmidt [jogischm...@googlemail.com] kirjoitti:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is
not the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an
increased buildid.
On 3/12/12 10:05 AM, rjaas...@saunalahti.fi wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt [jogischm...@googlemail.com] kirjoitti:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is
not the latest working buildbot revision but
2012/3/11 Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au:
-Original Message-
From: Paolo Pozzan [mailto:pa...@z2z.it]
Sent: Sunday, 11 March 2012 7:02 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Translate] Users for Pootle Server
Il 09/03/2012 22:22, Rob Weir ha scritto:
On Fri, Mar
Hi,
On 09.03.2012 07:07, lou ql wrote:
Ubuntu 10.04
1. Launch oo3.4
2. Click File-open
3. enter http://9.123.153.36/webdav, then press Enter
4. enter username and password, the remote folder is opened.
5. select a .odt file then click Open, the selected document will open
6. with the document
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
but how can we best refute that statement?
Here's my idea: Respond to this note and
Hi
2012/3/12 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
How many years were you doing this before the project came to Apache?
Rob, my data:
* I was lead of L10N of OOo for pt-BR between 2001 - 2007;
* I was NL lead of pt-BR 2002 - 2009;
* I sent the patchs for support to pt-BR in the code;
* I was marketing
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:14:35PM -0800, Andrew Rist wrote:
I would like to set the date for shutting down these Oracle hosted
resources as March 15. (no Shakespeare references, please)
This will include mailing lists, mail forwarder, remaining web pages,
identity server.
are the mailing
Hi,
On 12.03.2012 13:50, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
but how can we best refute that statement?
On 3/12/12 1:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
but how can we best refute that statement?
Here's
Hello!
I loaded file and see no image. But the data seem to be merely in table form,
so why not use Calc?
May you can ge more help from forums:
http://user.services.openoffice.org/
regards
Risto
0@8O K:20 [bykova.m...@gmail.com] kirjoitti:
Good afternoon. I use the software openoffice. I
Hi Rob,
just in short form from vacation:
- Working on OpenOffice/StarOffice since 1996 (StarDivision)
- Quickly got responsible for all DrawingLayer tasks, mainly in
Draw/Impress team
- Added e.g. the first 3D engine, made office flicker-free, safe repaints,
MVC-separation
- Responsible for
On 12 Mar 2012, at 12:50, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
but how can we best refute that
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 12:50, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code
On 12 Mar 2012, at 15:38, Rob Weir wrote:
I'll decline your attempt to divert the conversation.
It's far from it Rob. It's a polite and serious question. No-one I know doubts
the experience of the former OpenOffice.org developers who joined this project,
so I am rather surprised to see you
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 15:38, Rob Weir wrote:
I'll decline your attempt to divert the conversation.
It's far from it Rob. It's a polite and serious question. No-one I know
doubts the experience of the former
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:14:35PM -0800, Andrew Rist wrote:
I would like to set the date for shutting down these Oracle hosted
resources as March 15. (no Shakespeare references, please)
This will include mailing
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots based
on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not the
latest working buildbot revision but I would like to
On 3/12/12 4:34 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 12:50, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
2012/3/12 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not
the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an
increased buildid.
Hi
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:57:00 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Simon Phipps
si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 15:38, Rob Weir wrote:
I'll decline your attempt to divert the conversation.
It's far from it Rob. It's a polite and
On 12.03.2012 13:50, Rob Weir wrote:
Here's my idea: Respond to this note and tell me how many years
experience you have working with OpenOffice.
I've been working on it since 2000.
My specialties are i18n, text, graphics, platform integration,
algorithms, performance, debugging, keeping
On 12 Mar 2012, at 16:08, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/12/12 4:34 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
Out of interest, where have you seen that statement from an authoritative
source? The former community seems spread between the AOO project and
LibreOffice to me, and all the comments I have seen (and
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:57:00 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Simon Phipps
si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 15:38, Rob Weir wrote:
I'll decline your attempt
Hi Rob,
Rob Weir schrieb:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
but how can we best refute that statement?
Here's my idea:
On 3/12/12 5:19 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 16:08, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/12/12 4:34 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
Out of interest, where have you seen that statement from an authoritative
source? The former community seems spread between the AOO project and
LibreOffice to
Hi Rob,
Le 12 mars 12 à 13:50, Rob Weir a écrit :
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base.
IMHO we should not spend too much of (our precious)
Hi to all,
previously I try to write to incubator.apache.org about this but encouted some
encoding problem of theme header, and I try again
So, the promlem is that ...
for a long time (about 6 years) there is a feature request conserns Date Format
representation as current one doesn't
I added those files and it's rebuilding now.
(I had that on my todo list for several days now, but thanks to this
little push, it's done now)
A.
On 3/12/2012 12:54 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
the windows build bot still has problems with the new introduced build
prerequisite
On 3/12/2012 6:31 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:14:35PM -0800, Andrew Rist wrote:
I would like to set the date for shutting down these Oracle hosted
resources as March 15. (no Shakespeare references, please)
This will include mailing lists, mail forwarder,
Opening up the editing of strings for all does not seem like a good idea.
We also need the translators to be properly identified in order to be able
to track translations to their original contributors.
Back in the good old days, the Brazilian community organized the
translation in a tree
On 3/12/2012 09:31, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:14:35PM -0800, Andrew Rist wrote:
I would like to set the date for shutting down these Oracle hosted
resources as March 15. (no Shakespeare references, please)
This will include mailing lists, mail forwarder, remaining
On 3/12/2012 9:14 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
2012/3/12 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not
the latest working buildbot revision but I would
The best response that can be given to such statements is a stable and
reliable binary release of Apache OpenOffice for as many platforms as
possible.
I like to think that AOO is not in a market-share competition with LO. Both
projects aim towards delivering a working, reliable office suite that
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 08:50 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
but how can we best refute that
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:24 PM, drew jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 08:50 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Kevin Sisco kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote:
My name is Kevin and I am an I T consultant from New Jersey, USA. I
am glad to be on this list and I certainly hope that I can bring
something of value to open office!
Hi Kevin, welcome to the Apache OpenOffice
On 03/12/12 13:42, Rob Weir wrote:
I'm not suggesting we argue with anyone. I'm suggesting we make
truthful positive statements about this project and the experience
level of its participants.
FWIW, and just my humble opinion ...
I don't think we should spend time discussing such arguments
yes, and: +1
(BTW, very little personal experience with actually using OOo; my
various employers have used and supplied MSO. But strongly in favor
of bucking monopolies.)
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
As said by several ones, let the code speak...
As long as there is no release, it will be too easy to say: look, there is
nothing concrete yet after so many months of incubation.
If people were saying only that we
Hi,
On 12.03.2012 14:33, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 12.03.2012 13:50, Rob Weir wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this
Hi All,
We have had a recent discussion in the forum (after another case) about the
problem where files are replaced with only hashes, leading to serious data loss.
Is there any plan to handle it or at least to double check the save process?
For the record: usually after a power loss, the
On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/12/12 14:48, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/12/12 13:42, Rob Weir wrote:
I'm not suggesting we argue
El día 12 de marzo de 2012 22:47, Hagar Delest
hagar.del...@laposte.net escribió:
Hi All,
We have had a recent discussion in the forum (after another case) about the
problem where files are replaced with only hashes, leading to serious data
loss.
Is there any plan to handle it or at least to
Hi,
On 12.03.2012 09:48, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots based on
the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not the latest
working buildbot revision but I would like to include an increased buildid.
It is still
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:47:42 +0100
Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi All,
We have had a recent discussion in the forum (after another
case) about the problem where files are replaced with only
hashes, leading to serious data loss. Is there any plan to
handle it or at least to
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I jest,of course.
But seriously, there are some claiming that all of the
OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache
has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy,
but how can we
Hi all,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:48:59AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev
snapshots based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed
revision). It is not the latest working buildbot revision but I
would like to include an
Hi Kay, Andrew, *
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:28:11PM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
Could someone at some point enlighten us as to WHY the latest revisions
aren't automatically scooped up by the buildbot?
The build bots pull the latest code every night.
Or amybe a wiki page on
this??? I
Hi all,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:00:34PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:14:35PM -0800, Andrew Rist wrote:
I would like to set the date for shutting down these Oracle hosted
resources as
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
I would like to set the date for shutting down these Oracle hosted resources
as March 15. (no Shakespeare references, please)
This will include mailing lists, mail forwarder, remaining web pages,
identity server.
On 12/01/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 10/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 04/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
After coordinating with Gianluca about some details, I've just opened
the issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-117
As you can see at the link above, we won't get an
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
are the mailing lists already dead? I tried to send an announce to the
ES mailing lists, announcing the creation of
ooo-general...@incubator.apache.org but it seems the lists are all dead,
even the web interface looks strange
http://openoffice.org/projects/es/lists
On 3/12/2012 5:27 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Ristandrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
I would like to set the date for shutting down these Oracle hosted resources
as March 15. (no Shakespeare references, please)
This will include mailing lists, mail forwarder,
I do feel that we need to continue to focus on the issues at hand. We
wouldn't want this project to fall into extinction after all these
years now would we?
On 3/12/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/12/12 13:42,
As far as keeping data safe, would it be practical to have the
software create stored session files? I guess this would be much
like a dump file on windows or simply a setting file on certain
editing programs. Just a thought.
On 3/12/12, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi All,
Hi Ariel,
I reported that problem, yes, the upgrade package is used for old OOo to
upgrade linux package.
Now it is missing in AOO 3.4 linux package.
My concerns are:
1. AOO 3.4 is the first release for AOO project, we can statement it, but
I don't think OOo users would buy in it.
As one
Le 12 mars 12 à 22:47, Hagar Delest a écrit :
Hi All,
Hi,
We have had a recent discussion in the forum (after another case)
about the problem where files are replaced with only hashes,
leading to serious data loss.
Is there any plan to handle it or at least to double check the save
61 matches
Mail list logo