hi,
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo is ready now, how to get the
OOO340.hg file?
thanks
mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com
tel:54747
Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8,
Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193,
P.R.China
Hi Rob,
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 15:26 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
Reading binary file formats, including the legacy MS Office
formats, is notoriously difficult to do robustly.
Agreed.
2) That security reports should be sent to successor project's
security contacts.
..
3) We should list
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 15:26 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
Reading binary file formats, including the legacy MS Office
formats, is notoriously difficult to do robustly.
Agreed.
2) That security reports
hi,
1. how to access https://tools.services.openoffice.org/EIS2 ？
2. how to access http://hg.services.openoffice.org ?
thanks
mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com
tel:54747
Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8,
Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:45:34 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Security reports come from security
reporters. Can you tell us whether Red Hat, Inc. security
researcher Huzaifa Sidhpurwala is a TDF member and whether he
was reporting this issue under instructions from TDF?
Does it
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:45:34 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Security reports come from security
reporters. Can you tell us whether Red Hat, Inc. security
researcher Huzaifa Sidhpurwala is a TDF member and
On 10 Oct 2011, at 12:45, Rob Weir wrote:
No objections if you want to start a separate invitation-only security
discussion list. It would probably get some use. But we'll continue
to ask for security reports to come to ooo-security.i.a.o.
We appeared to reach consensus[1] on this issue
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 10 Oct 2011, at 12:45, Rob Weir wrote:
No objections if you want to start a separate invitation-only security
discussion list. It would probably get some use. But we'll continue
to ask for security reports to come to
Cross posting to the ooo-dev list, since they might be more familiar
with server-side use of OOo. Do we know of a regression in 3.3 with
resource leaks and PDF conversion?
-Rob
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Herter, Scott
scott.her...@napersoft.com wrote:
OpenOffice 2.4 was tested under
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Yes. I've read all the emails from last week.
Please can you answer my question, then, I am not interested in your
argument with Meeks.
S.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
orcmid note=Responses to Rob's questions in-line /
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 17:48
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Yes. I've read all the emails from last week.
Please can you answer my question, then, I am not interested in your
argument with Meeks.
I've
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:10:27 -0400:
we're supposed to subscribe to that list using our Apache alias.
Untrue.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:10:27 -0400:
we're supposed to subscribe to that list using our Apache alias.
Untrue.
Of course it is true. If you don't subscribe with something that is
in the alias
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I've restated, in more explicit form, what I think the consensus is.
It's hard to read your words that way, as they leave no room for anyone but
Apache committers. The clear consensus was for collaboration with the
StarOffice
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I've restated, in more explicit form, what I think the consensus is.
It's hard to read your words that way, as they leave no room for anyone but
Apache
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 10 Oct 2011, at 14:31, Rob Weir wrote:
This are not mutually exclusive options, Simon.
And I have very clearly never argued for an exclusive arrangement, Rob.
It's you that has, even if now you are attempting to
The discussion on how ooo-security would (or would not) work, and how
cooperation with other security teams would (or would not work) was quite
public and visible on ooo-dev.
How is it that this reciprocal action occurred and was made known to the
Apache OOo podling? And how is it that it was
orcmid note=more comments inline
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 06:10
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Publishing the PPMC Roster
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
On 10 Oct 2011, at 15:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
Back to the actual issue:
* for (A), AOOo clearly needs a private security list. We all agree.
* for (B), the legacy StarOffice ecosystem clearly needs a shared private
Concerning the continued use of securityt...@openoffice.org, there are two
issues
1. It is not clear what the fate of mailing lists @openoffice.org is
going to be, and whether they are reliably-operated in the meantime. It
would be great to have assistance in preserving the administration of
On 10 Oct 2011, at 16:03, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Now, how is détente to be achieved?
I suggest by mutually agreeing a list-user-managed venue for future
non-partisan collaboration in the spirit that previously existed on
securityt...@openoffice.org - please see the other message I just
Hi Shao;
--- On Mon, 10/10/11, Shao Zhi Zhao zhaos...@cn.ibm.com wrote:
hi,
1. how to access https://tools.services.openoffice.org/EIS2 ？
2. how to access http://hg.services.openoffice.org ?
It looks like (1) had an unrecoverable error :(.
For all purposes (2) is now covered by
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I have not found any visible place where Incubator PPMC rosters can be found
automatically.
I think it would be a good idea to have such a roster visible to the public
and, especially, this list.
You might want to
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
You might want to migrate/extend this discussion to imcubator general.
We've been working on a standard podlings XML file that would be used
in webpage generation. A standard per-podling XML file of, among
other
Hi Dennis,
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:03 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
How is it that this reciprocal action occurred and was made known to
the Apache OOo podling ?
Oh - it's quite simple, you ASF/OOo made your decision to not include
TDF guys, and we (without an endless mail thread)
Thanks for clarifying that the reciprocation was on the security @tdf list,
and not securityteam@ OO.o.
It was not easy to discern that from your preceding statements or any others
on this thread.
I certainly agree that the security @tdf can be as exclusive as it chooses.
Now I think it
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
Hi Dennis,
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:03 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
How is it that this reciprocal action occurred and was made known to
the Apache OOo podling ?
Oh - it's quite simple, you ASF/OOo made
What's this thread about - OOo/AOOo/TDF private security lists war
reloaded? ;)
To sum up:
- Apache mentors/PPMCs made clear that only AOOo committers can be on
the AOOo Security list (ooo-secur...@incubator.apache.org).
Regardless of whether or not this rule makes sense in this special case
Hi, Malte,
On 10/10/2011 12:33, Malte Timmermann wrote:
What's this thread about - OOo/AOOo/TDF private security lists war
reloaded? ;)
To sum up:
- Apache mentors/PPMCs made clear that only AOOo committers can be on
the AOOo Security list (ooo-secur...@incubator.apache.org).
Regardless of
On 10/10/2011 12:33 PM, Malte Timmermann wrote:
...snip...
- Which leaves us with 1 common list where we don't have such
restrictive rules, and can continue with our cooperation: The
old/original OOo security list securityt...@openoffice.org.
...snip...
To ask a practical question: is there
Hi,
Committed as revision 1179380, along with the odma header removal.
please revert this change, I'm going to work again on OOo OS/2 port
and I will change the license for OS2Bitmap.cxx
I hope to not be too late...
--
Bye,
Yuri Dario
/*
* OS/2 open source software
*
I can moderate securityt...@openoffice.org, and I have a list of current
subscribers, but I can't view/modify members.
The list is not part of the security project, but is a top level list in
the WWW project.
I will ask stx if a can give me the needed access rights.
For now - maybe I can
Hi TJ,
On 10.10.2011 18:51, TJ Frazier wrote:
Assuming that you are the mt listed as an administrator on the OO.o
security project, that should make you an owner of the securityteam ML.
In theory - but unfortunatly the list is not but of the security
project, but of the WWW project (because
Hi all,
my name is Yuri Dario and in the past years I worked on the os2 port
of OpenOffice.org; that work started with OOo 2.0 until version 3.2
released last year.
Now it is time to get back to OOo and update the code base to the most
current level, so I'd like to be invited (is this
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Yuri Dario mc6...@mclink.it wrote:
Hi all,
my name is Yuri Dario and in the past years I worked on the os2 port
of OpenOffice.org; that work started with OOo 2.0 until version 3.2
released last year.
Hi Yuri,
Welcome to the project and welcome to Apache!
Welcome Yuri!
--- On Mon, 10/10/11, Yuri Dario mc6...@mclink.it wrote:
Hi,
Committed as revision 1179380, along with the odma
header removal.
please revert this change, I'm going to work again on OOo
OS/2 port and I will change the license for OS2Bitmap.cxx
I have great sympathy for
Does anyone have a good example of a really slow spreadsheet document?
Preferably ones that was slow due to computation/calculation, and one
that is not merely slow due to size alone.
I was talking to someone earlier who had ideas for speeding up
spreadsheet computation through parallelization,
Although there seems to be some confusion in this area, I thought the LICENSE
file should be the Apache ALv2 license document alone and the NOTICE file
includes all of the third party stuff (as well as a simple ALv2 claim for the
overall combination).
I don't disagree with removing
On 10 October 2011 21:32, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Although there seems to be some confusion in this area, I thought the LICENSE
file should be the Apache ALv2 license document alone and the NOTICE file
includes all of the third party stuff (as well as a simple ALv2
Hi Rob,
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 12:19 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
It does not seem reasonable to publicly excoriate AOOo for having a
private security list restricted to members while you are
simultaneously and without notice proceed to enforce the same policy
for the TDF security list.
It
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:33 +0200, Malte Timmermann wrote:
old/original OOo security list securityt...@openoffice.org.
Which of course is highly sub-optimal, since it is an openoffice.org
branded list, soon to be Apache owned - which is not neutral. Apparently
we can't administer it
Yes;
I think Rob took the LICENSE file from Apache POI and
a lot of things that didn't belong there crept in.
I cleaned it but perhaps my commit didn't express it well.
Pedro.
--- On Mon, 10/10/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Although there seems to be some
confusion
Hi Rob;
If they want to design their own acid tests ...
Point them to the Matrix Market:
http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/
And if they want cool algorithms point them to
MTL:
http://www.osl.iu.edu/research/mtl/
and the Coin-OR OSI interface:
https://projects.coin-or.org/Osi
Pedro.
--- On
--- On Mon, 10/10/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Yes;
I'd recommend replacing with an authentic clean copy of the
license from some authoritative source, rather then trying
to guess what parts are wrong.
No problem. I took it from here:
Hi Rob,
just a remark:
In my private opinion it would make more sense to invest resources into
impementing a formula reference which points to expanded formula cells
(/edit/fill) like it is already done for formatting templates within the
sheet.
A slow sheet doesn't necessarily mean that
Am 10.10.2011 22:24, Rob Weir wrote:
Does anyone have a good example of a really slow spreadsheet document?
Preferably ones that was slow due to computation/calculation, and one
that is not merely slow due to size alone.
Database surrogate (complete madness in millions of xls files):
X1
Hi,
At one of the OOo conferences I vaguely remember there was a university
project that already parallelized computation of Calc sheets.
Unfortunately I cannot remember the project/university name anymore.
Probably having a look at the conference session drafts might give us
some more insight.
Hi,
I don't know who's in charge of this system (Maybe Stefan?) but
unfortunately it shows a database error message. I just encountered that
part of the historical conference data isn't hosted at
marketing.openoffice.org but on ooocon.org
Kind regards, Joost
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
snip
All I'm doing is suggesting that we treat AOOo security like we do
for every other Apache project.
Sounds great - lets have open-ness to other projects, and
cross-fertilisation of list composition
Michael,
When will the real CVE-2011-2713,
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-2713,
stand up and provide whatever clarity there is to be had about the
specific nature of the defect and the kind of exploit it was
vulnerable to until fixed in LO 3.4.3?
Until it is possible to
+1
-Original Message-
From: Michael Meeks [mailto:michael.me...@suse.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 13:54
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Vulnerability fixed in LibreOffice
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:33 +0200, Malte Timmermann wrote:
old/original OOo security list
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 10.10.2011 22:24, Rob Weir wrote:
Does anyone have a good example of a really slow spreadsheet document?
Preferably ones that was slow due to computation/calculation, and one
that is not merely slow due to size
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Joost Andrae joost.and...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
just a remark:
In my private opinion it would make more sense to invest resources into
impementing a formula reference which points to expanded formula cells
(/edit/fill) like it is already done for formatting
On 10 October 2011 21:41, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
...
It seems that are you asserting that the advice from the established
Apache security mechanism was to be as insular as possible though; is
that really the case ? are all other Apache projects security lists
Dear Rob,
Last time I encounter it, it was an Excel document with 15000+ empty
(and hence invisible) text frames. I suppose this was cause by many
users copy-paste without noticing it. And I got this complaint since
user does not notice this in MS Excel, which I assume that 15000+ text
Not to make too fine a point of it, but secur...@apache.org (another private
list) is automatically included on everything that happens on ooo-security
@incubator.apache.org. It is not like there is any absence of oversight.
Also, as a member of the ooo-security list, it never occurred to me
(cutting and snipping liberally to get to the worthwhile stuff)
On 10/10/2011 7:34 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 10 October 2011 21:41, Michael Meeksmichael.me...@suse.com wrote:
...snip...
b) Because other communities exist based on a common code base it
makes sense to attempt to build an
58 matches
Mail list logo
