Re: [EXT] MySQL SDBC Connector

2012-10-12 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.10.12. 15:21 keltezéssel, Ariel Constenla-Haile írta:

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:50:21PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

Hi *,

I managed to build the MySQL Connector extension and make it work on

* CentOS 5.8 32 and 64 bits
* Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32 and 64 bits
* Fedora 15 32 bits and 17 64 bits
* Windows XP 32 bits
* Windows 7 64 bits (arch. does not matter on Win, AOO is a 32 bits
   application)

You can find the extension binaries on
http://people.apache.org/~arielch/extensions/aoo-my-sdbc/

These are supposed to be universal builds, that is, run on every
Windows version, and Linux distro (Linux base is CentOS 5 with glibc
2.5). Everyone is welcome to test if they work on their systems; by
work I mean it does not crash, I didn't fix any of the existing
issues, it was just a try-to-build-it (for now).

I also managed to build the Report Builder:
http://people.apache.org/~arielch/extensions/ReportBuilder.oxt

It is Good news :)
You plan to work on bug fixes in report builder?

Zoltan


and started fixing the PostgreSQL driver.

@Andrew: is there any chance to get that code contributed under the
Apache License?
http://www.openoffice.org/dba/drivers/postgresql/index.html#source
I couldn't find anywhere where the old cvs repor has gone; I've an old
copy of the sources, they all have Sun license headers, so I guess they
were transfered to Oracle.


Regards




Report builder (was:Re: [EXT] MySQL SDBC Connector)

2012-10-12 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.10.12. 16:29 keltezéssel, Ariel Constenla-Haile írta:

Hi Zlotan,

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:17:46PM +0200, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:

2012.10.12. 15:21 keltezéssel, Ariel Constenla-Haile írta:

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:50:21PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

Hi *,

I managed to build the MySQL Connector extension and make it work on

* CentOS 5.8 32 and 64 bits
* Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32 and 64 bits
* Fedora 15 32 bits and 17 64 bits
* Windows XP 32 bits
* Windows 7 64 bits (arch. does not matter on Win, AOO is a 32 bits
   application)

You can find the extension binaries on
http://people.apache.org/~arielch/extensions/aoo-my-sdbc/

These are supposed to be universal builds, that is, run on every
Windows version, and Linux distro (Linux base is CentOS 5 with glibc
2.5). Everyone is welcome to test if they work on their systems; by
work I mean it does not crash, I didn't fix any of the existing
issues, it was just a try-to-build-it (for now).

I also managed to build the Report Builder:
http://people.apache.org/~arielch/extensions/ReportBuilder.oxt

It is Good news :)
You plan to work on bug fixes in report builder?

I'm not sure yet, because studying/debugging the Java stuff may not be
that fun; on the other hand, working on the MySQL and the PostgreSQL
drivers has been really nice :) (I had to study-by-debugging the
MySQL/Connector C++, Connector C, and even parts of glibc to find out
why localhost connections didn't work on Linux).

The Report Builder, in its current state, seems to work fine on Windows,
on Linux I see mixing results, depending on the distro.

Unser windows I tested works in most cases.
Only thing which not works, the charts, if you open report with chart 
included it is fails with error:
Failed to parse the report - possibly caused by changes in Chart, 
which not followed in report buider.

I could sen my test database with chart in reports, to see that.
Best regards,
Zoltan



Regards




Re: [VOTE][PMC] PMC Chair

2012-10-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

[X] Andrea Pescetti (pescetti)
Zoltan

2012.10.05. 1:41 keltezéssel, Andrew Rist írta:
This is a call for vote on selecting the PMC Chair the Apache 
OpenOffice PMC.
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] the Apache 
OpenOffice podling needs to select a PMC to be listed in the TLP 
resolution.



Everyone in the community is encouraged to vote.  Votes from PPMC 
members and Mentors are binding.  This vote will run 72-hours.


The balloting will be until UTC midnight Sunday, 7 October: 
2012-10-07T24:00Z.



[ ] Andrea Pescetti (pescetti)
[ ] Drew Jensen (atjensen)


The [DISCUSS] for this vote can be found at [2] and [3].  Note: Andrea 
has accepted the nomination - Drew has not responded.



[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel
[2]http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201210.mbox/%3c506a1e72.20...@oracle.com%3E 

[3]http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201209.mbox/%3c5064c859.9090...@oracle.com%3E 








Re: [VOTE] [PMC] Starting Membership for Apache OpenOffice PMC

2012-10-02 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

+1
Zoltan

2012.10.02. 0:38 keltezéssel, Andrew Rist írta:
This is a call for vote on selecting the following list as the 
starting membership for the Apache OpenOffice PMC, to be listed in the 
TLP resolution.  The voting is for the entire slate as listed.


   Apache OpenOffice PMC Starting Membership:
   Andre Fischer (af)
   Andrea Pescetti (pescetti)
   Andrew Rist (arist)
   Ariel Constenla-Haile (arielch)
   Armin Le Grand (alg)
   Dave Fisher (wave)
   Donald Harbison (dpharbison)
   Drew Jensen (atjensen)
   Ian Lynch (ingotian)
   Jürgen Schmidt (jsc)
   Kay Schenk (kschenk)
   Kazunari Hirano (khirano)
   Louis Suarez-Potts (louis)
   Marcus Lange (marcus)
   Oliver-Rainer Wittmann (orw)
   Pedro Giffuni (pfg)
   Peter Junge (pj)
   Raphael Bircher (rbircher)
   Regina Henschel (regina)
   RGB.ES (rgb-es)
   Roberto Galoppini (galoppini)
   Yang Shih-Ching (imacat)
   Yong Lin Ma (mayongl)


The balloting will be until UTC midnight Thursday,
   4 October: 2012-10-04T24:00Z.

   Approval requires a majority of +1 over -1 votes cast by members of 
the PPMC.


[  ] +1 approve
[  ]  0 abstain
[  ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons:


   The [DISCUSS] for this vote was enthusiastically in favor. There 
were no concerns expressed other than issues with the timeframe of 
discussions, which were suitably extended.  (note: All members of this 
list, except for Drew and Raphael, accepted their nomination to this 
list.  I have left Drew and Raphael on the list as neither declined, 
and they still have the ability to decline later)









Re: Some stats and observations on OpenOffice upgrades

2012-09-25 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.09.25. 21:06 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

I've been looking at the upgrade numbers, the downloads that are
triggered from upgrade notifications in the OpenOffice client.
Although we are not tracking how many times such notifications pop up
in the OpenOffice client we do know from Google Analytics how many
users click the link to get more information on the update, and how
many of these users actually download the upgrade.

The trends have been pretty steady, a slight peak when a release is
initially made, but a lingering steady state of upgrade requests even
several weeks later.

For example, let's look at the status for a single day, last
Wednesday, Sept. 19th.

On that date we had 164,752 total downloads of AOO.  Of those
downloads, it looks like 54% of them come from upgrading users.  The
remainder are either from new users, or existing users that went to
the website directly rather than from an upgrade notification.  (No
easy way of distinguishing these two).

The interesting thing is the breakdown by OpenOffice client version.

For the upgrade installs on Sept 19th we see:

31% of upgrades were from AOO 3.4.0

52% of upgrades were from OOo 3.3.0

15% of upgrades were from OOo 3.2.1

3% of upgrades were from OOo 3.2.0

Note the OOo 3.3.0 numbers.  Nearly 4 months after AOO 3.4 was
released we are still getting large numbers of OOo 3.3.0 users
receiving and responding to upgrade notifications, nearly 20,000/day.

I'm not sure how to explain this.  Upgrade notifications should
surface once a week.

Maybe:

A) Some users are sporadically connected to the internet and the
upgrade check rarely is successful

B) Some users ignore/defer the upgrade notifications until a later
time, in some cases months later
Some features not supported in AOO 3.4.x especially, the report builder 
not developed any more,

and Base users meet problems with reports containing charts.
For this reason they after upgrade to AOO 3.4.x downgrade back az least 
one computer in companies

to OOo 3.3 for report creating, and not care about update warning.
And waiting for solution, and we can not provide them real solution,
It is from forum posts (LibO no solutions for them, because their report 
builder has different bugs,

which prevent from daily work.)
Zoltan


C) Some user run OpenOffice rarely, sometimes at an interval of several months

D) Someone, some web site, some organization, etc., is still
distributing OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 to users, and after they install
they get the AOO upgrade notification.

If D), this is somewhat a concern, since users running OOo 3.3.0 are
exposed to several security flaws.


-Rob





[Bugzilla ADMINS] Remove the MySQL Connector/OOo from bugzilla

2012-09-09 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,

As part of the moving of MySQL native sdbc driver from AOO to 
AOO-extras: http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/aoo-my-sdbc/
I reviewed all bugs relating to native driver, closed as wontfix here, 
all unconfirmed or confirmed bugs with related to native driver.


During the review process I removed the MySQL Connector/OOo label and 
set as none, if the bug was connected to other part of AOO Base, and not 
connected the MySQL native driver.


Created new issues on AOO-extras which I found as not solved: See issues 
from 2 to 6: 
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/aoo-my-sdbc/issues/list


Now I finished this work,  MySQL Connector/OOo needs to make 
unselectable when you submiting a new bug.


Please do it.

Thanks,
Zoltan


Re: [EXT] MySQL SDBC Connector

2012-09-07 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi Ariael,

Hi Li Feng Wang,

I tested on win7 32bit with localhost no problems for me with this 
connector.

Can connect create and use queries, forms, etc.
I connected to Mysql 5.1 and 5.5 servers.

2012.09.07. 5:09 keltezéssel, Ariel Constenla-Haile írta:

Hi Li Feng Wang,

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:26:57AM +0800, Li Feng Wang wrote:

I test it on Windows XP 32bits, just connect to local MySQL directly.  It
have no crash.

thanks for testing it :)


But it list all databases, not only my specified database name. I don't
know whether it is a existing issue.

I couldn't find an issue number, but it's reproducible with Oracle's
build from http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/mysql_connector
I'm not find it, may be it is not there, but you can search for MySQL 
native driver development information and known bugs on wiki:

http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native/Overview
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native/Beta/Known_Issues
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native/Known_Problems


It's strange that the extension is not listed on bugzilla when you
select Product: extensions. The extension is listed on MySQL site
http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/ so maybe bugs where reported
there... I'll have to investigate.
Bugzilla you can search for mysql connector issues in advanced search 
select  database connection in product field,

then you can select  MySQL Connector/OOo  in component field.
Regards,
Zoltan



Regards




Re: [EXT] MySQL SDBC Connector

2012-09-07 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi Jürgen, Ariel,
2012.09.07. 10:51 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta:

On 9/7/12 9:40 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

Hi Reizinger,

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:20:43AM +0200, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:

But it list all databases, not only my specified database name.
I don't know whether it is a existing issue.

I couldn't find an issue number, but it's reproducible with Oracle's
build from
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/mysql_connector

I'm not find it, may be it is not there, but you can search for MySQL
native driver development information and known bugs on wiki:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native/Overview
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native/Beta/Known_Issues
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native/Known_Problems

I had found this only one issue, it seemed too little ;)
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Database/Drivers/MySQL_Native/1.0/Known_Issues


It's strange that the extension is not listed on bugzilla when you
select Product: extensions. The extension is listed on MySQL site
http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/ so maybe bugs where
reported there... I'll have to investigate.

Bugzilla you can search for mysql connector issues in advanced
search select  database connection

database access was the field name.


in product field, then you can
select  MySQL Connector/OOo  in component field.

There are 31:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamednamedcmd=mysqlconn-ooo
I will upload the source code in Apache Extras - or plain Google Code
(the extension cannot be built here at AOO because it must build and
ship the MySQL Connector/C and Connector/C++, both GPL); Google Code has
a bug report feature, so I may add the reproducible bugs there.

I agree that makes probably most sense

I'm not sure what to do with those bugs in AOO bugzilla, because, in the
case that I'll fix some bugs (and I'm not sure about it, I do this in my
spare time, so I invest time in coding as far as it's fun), in that
case I don't plan to commit code in AOO source tree under
trunk/main/mysqlc: after IP clearance with revision 1201714 the code
only works with MySQL system libraries, so that it can be considered
dead code, and archived.

we can keep the issues in bugzilla for reference at the moment but
probably it make sense to mark them won't be fixed with an appropriate
comment that the code is not maintained here at Apache and point to the
new location. And of course close them.
I will do the bugs move to Google code work, when Ariel created the new 
place for it, and I will close bugs in bugzilla.

Zoltan



Juergen






Re: Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

2012-08-24 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.08.21. 18:40 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

As we perform the final preparations to release Apache OpenOffice
3.4.1 it is a good time to look ahead to the future.  A big
opportunity is OpenOffice 4.0.  That once seemed so very far away, but
2013 is getting closer every day.   Will it be a large collection of
small ideas?  Will it have a major overarching theme?  Or will it just
be whatever random stuff we happen to have on a given date when we
release 4.0?   The answer, of course, depends on what we, as project
members/volunteers decide to do.   It is a good time now, as a
background activity, to poll the community and wider ecosystem on
ideas for Apache OpenOffice 4.0.

To participate, go to this page on Google Moderator, where you can
help us gather and rate ideas:
https://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=2011d5

A few project members have already seeded this with some initial
ideas. Of course, you are encouraged to add your own ideas, as well as
rate the ideas of others.   Try not to censor yourself from thinking
outside-of-the-box.  We need big ideas as well as incremental ones.

We don't have a close date on this brainstorming activity, but it is
good to get your ideas in early, so there is an opportunity for others
to rate and comment on it.

Regards,

-Rob

In old days around 2008-2009 we made similar brainstorming on OOo Base 
features, and we put all ideas into wiki page:

http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Base/Features/Pool
It is a wild ideas list not prioritized most of them valid for present 
state of Base.

Regards,
Zoltan




Re: Something wrong on SF download statistics

2012-08-20 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.08.20. 15:45 keltezéssel, Dave Brondsema írta:

Hi, SourceForge engineer here.  The platform stats within each country only
began in June.  So that's why  they don't add up to the total.  The total
is correct.

Thanks for the clarification
Zoltan


I'll see if we can clarify that somehow on the page.

-Dave

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.huwrote:


Hi all,

I looked around of SF download site, to write Hungarian download
statistics in a blog post.

I checked the AOO 3.4.0 data from here:

http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**
files/stats/map?dates=2012-05-**08+to+2012-08-19http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map?dates=2012-05-08+to+2012-08-19

Hungary in the 28th place. If I sum up all platform download numbers, I
get 44786, the Total is 57,235.

The difference is 12 499.

Maybe some bug in creation of this statistics?

Regards,
Zoltan










Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

2012-08-19 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.08.19. 17:52 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
willingness/readiness to govern ourselves.  If this vote passes then
we continue by drafting a charter, submitting it for IPMC endorsement,
and then to the ASF Board for final approval.   Details can be found
in the Guide to Successful Graduation.

Everyone in the community is encouraged to vote.  Votes from PPMC
members and Mentors are binding.  This vote will run 72-hours.


[ ] +1  Apache OpenOffice community is ready to graduate from the
Apache Incubator.
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1  Apache OpenOffice community is not ready to graduate from the
Apache Incubator because...


Regards,

-Rob

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-community-vote


+1  Apache OpenOffice community is ready to graduate from the Apache Incubator.

Zoltan



Something wrong on SF download statistics

2012-08-19 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi all,

I looked around of SF download site, to write Hungarian download 
statistics in a blog post.


I checked the AOO 3.4.0 data from here:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map?dates=2012-05-08+to+2012-08-19

Hungary in the 28th place. If I sum up all platform download numbers, I 
get 44786, the Total is 57,235.


The difference is 12 499.

Maybe some bug in creation of this statistics?

Regards,
Zoltan





Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating), RC2

2012-08-18 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.08.15. 14:02 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta:

Hi all,

this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating). This will be our first bug fix release
after the AOO 3.4 from May 8th. A further milestone to show that we
deliver good and stable software with focus on quality. It will again
help to continue the success of OpenOffice.org and will gain confidence
in OpenOffice.

This time I did not prepare a separate page to highlighting the release
candidate. We had developer snapshot since several weeks and the latest
one based on revision 1372282 is intended to become released if the
voting succeeds. That means and to make it clear you vote here on the
final release based on this snapshot build.


This release is intended to be a bug fix release and to introduce some
further languages:
(1) 71 issues are fixed and a detailed list can be watched under
http://s.apache.org/Huv.
(2) 5 further languages are now officially supported: British English,
Khmer, Slovenian, Slovak, and Finnish.

For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Release+Notes.


The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary
releases for 20 languages) and further information how to verify and
review Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) can be found on the
following wiki page:

hhttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOO3.4.1


Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
(incubating).

The vote starts now and will be open until:

Saturday, 18 August: 2012-08-18 2:00pm UTC+2.

After the vote of the PPMC the vote will start on
gene...@incubtor.apache.org mailing and will be open for further 72 hours.
But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like
to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project
members.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
[ ]  0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...



+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
Zoltan




Re: [TRANSLATION][3.4.1]: update Pootle server to include new string for a new warning box

2012-07-03 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.07.03. 15:25 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta:

Hi,

based on the discussion relating Windows 8 readiness etc. we have
identified 5 critical issues. And we have already started to work on
these issues and my plan is to have them all ready for a 3.4.1 that we
can decide at any time later if we want to move forward with the W8
support when we have everything in place in time.

For solving one of these issues we have to introduce a new warning box
which means that we have to translate a new string for 3.4.1.

I have updated the Pootle server already with the new string (17 words
only) and I would like to ask our translators to focus on this new
string as soon as possible (ideally this week).

Most important are the languages that we want release:

en-US ar cs de en-GB es fi fr gl hu it ja km nl ru sl pt-BR zh-CN zh-TW

and potentially sk where I have to update Pootle with the latest
available updates from Michal Hriň

The new string is in desktop - source - app.po

See for example for French

desktop.src#STR_BOOTSTRAP_ERR_MULTISESSION.string.text

https://translate.apache.org/fr/OOo_34/translate.html?unitstates=fuzzy,untranslated

de will be covered by myself ;-) because there is currently a problem
that I don't understand and that I have to solve.

To simplify the update I would prefer if the string get translated on
the Pootle server.

Please send me a short note when an updated or better a translation of
the string is available. I will take care of the integration.

If anybody have problems doing it on Pootle please let me know.


Juergen



The HU translation is ready.
Zoltan




Re: AOO testing status update as of 2012/06/26

2012-06-26 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.06.26. 16:49 keltezéssel, Ji Yan írta:

HI all,

After AOO 3.4 release, we, QE, volunteer didn't send out weekly report
to brief our activity, to make sure we are on the same page, I'll update
you with our main activity and achievement:
1. Built up VCLAuto framework which has been deliver to trunk stream,
anyone with Java experience is able to write test script under this
framework.
2. 252 defect opened by people from IBM Symphony team which the defect
doesn't exist in Symphony.
3. Confirmed 174 UNCONFIRMED issues in bugzilla.
4. Verified  184 RESOLVED issues in bugzilla
5. Work out AOO 3.4.1 test plan and put it on wiki page
6. Start AOO 3.4.1 fixed defect verification
7. AOO 3.4.1 general usage testing is ongoing.
One question, how do you test AOO modules which is not in Symphony e.g 
the Draw and Base?

Zoltan


I'll keep you post with AOO 3.4.1 and AOO 3.5 testing status in next week.





Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?

2012-06-25 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.06.25. 8:40 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta:

2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu:

Hi,
I tried to follow the wiki description:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto

I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build.
No success with running test under windows 7.
Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page.

I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some
picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me
the screenshot of the problem.
I cleared eclipse workspace, when I  import your new code from thw 
bugreport: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998
The testoo not created,  see screenshot: 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48546468@N00/7438663856/in/photostream/lightbox/

Zoltan




I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the
results to text file?

Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later.

Thanks,
Zoltan








Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?

2012-06-25 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.06.25. 10:29 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta:

Oops! I forgot to change project name (testscript-testoo, I think
testscript is too confusing). It doesn't matter.  According to your
screenshot, there is no problem. At next step,
you need download junit.jar, put it into
testscript/output/lib/junit.jar,  and then refresh project.

PS, I uploaded the new code. Corrected the project name. You can try
the new one.

Thanks,

Now I can run test cases, but only with java 1.7 versions, under Windows 7.

On wiki page you created screenshot, with java 1.6 settings, on 
preferences.


When I start with 1.6.30 the test terminated:
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: testcase/SayHelloToOO : 
Unsupported major.minor version 51.0

at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.java:631)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:615)
at 
java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:141)

at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:283)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:58)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.loadClass(RemoteTestRunner.java:693)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.loadClasses(RemoteTestRunner.java:429)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:452)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)


Zoltan


2012/6/25 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu:

2012.06.25. 8:40 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta:


2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu:

Hi,
I tried to follow the wiki description:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto

I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build.
No success with running test under windows 7.
Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page.

I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some
picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me
the screenshot of the problem.

I cleared eclipse workspace, when I  import your new code from thw
bugreport: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998
The testoo not created,  see screenshot:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48546468@N00/7438663856/in/photostream/lightbox/
Zoltan



I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the
results to text file?

Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later.

Thanks,
Zoltan













[VCLAuto] How to run under windows?

2012-06-23 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,
I tried to follow the wiki description: 
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto


I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build.
No success with running test under windows 7.
Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page.

I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the 
results to text file?


Thanks,
Zoltan


Re: [VCLAuto] Problems with build.xml

2012-06-21 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.06.21. 7:49 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta:

Hi Raphael Bircher,
Did you run the testing successfully? I wanna get some feedback to improve it.

I tried to run tests, but I can not start it.
The build run OK.
When I try to configure the Junit for 
testscript/src/testcase/SayHelloToOO.java,  I can add VM arguments, but 
the test class is empty and I can not add any value to it.
When I add to class test, I get error messeage:  Can not find test 
class 'test' in project 'AOO_test'.

I tried to search on test class, the Test selection dialogbox is empty,

Zoltan


2012/6/20 Raphael Bircher rbirc...@apache.org:

Hi Du

Am 20.06.12 11:49, schrieb Du Jing:

when you run build.xml via ant(select ant 2),please don't select test in
configuration check box,only select the prepare.dependencies.Hope can
help you~


Yes, it helps, thanks!

Greetings Raphael








Re: [DISCUSS]Next steps for automated testing

2012-06-16 Thread Reizinger Zoltán
2012.06.15. 8:31 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta:
 Hi all,
 As mentioned before, I was working on a Java library to perform gui
 testing. Actually it has been implemented on Symphony source code. It
 involves 3 modules:
 1. 
 https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/test
 It contains all testing scripts. Some JUnit testcases have been
 written in the package testcase. Smoke testing is re-implemented
 based on the lib. We also developed some performance testing script,
 but not include in svn.
 2. 
 https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testcommon
 It contains the low-level implementation to do GUI testing.
 3. 
 https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testgui
 It contains the common utilities used by uno api testing and GUI testing.
 I also wrote one wiki page to introduce it.
 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto

I'm not a coder, but I run the old VCLtool in past, used for translation
testing, by creating screenshots from each dialog.
This will be possible with new tool?

I try to setup this test configuration on my win7.
I can set up and build test enviroment, and could build it, but can not
run the example test.
Needs some more help on JUnit configuration. Which test class I can use?
Regards,
Zoltan


 I propose to do the following tasks next.
 1. Migrate the library to our AOO trunk. I has successfully used it to
 test AOO 3.4 with some patch.
 symphony/trunk/main/testcommon-ooo/trunk/main/testcommon
 symphony/trunk/main/testgui-ooo/trunk/main/testgui
 symphony/trunk/main/test-ooo/trunk/main/test   or
 ooo/trunk/main/testoo  (Avoid to conflict with the test module that
 already exists in AOO)
 2. Setup several testing machines to do build verification testing on
 daily build. Post the result on somewhere(e.g. wiki, or maillist) .
 The testing platforms includes:
 Windows XP
 Windows 7 32b/64b
 Mac os x
 Redhat
 Suse
 Ubuntu
 ...? (pls suggest)
 3. Continue to clean up the UNO API testing. I tried to run it and
 found there are too many failures and some errors. I think API testing
 is very valuable.It is essential to revive it.

 Welcome to comment.





Re: Horrible update

2012-06-14 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi Michael,

It is known bug.
Workaround:
Open form in edit mode, switch in View menu, between Print an Webview, 
save form, close form.

When you open next time, the form will be correct.
Zoltan

2012.06.13. 14:16 keltezéssel, Michael Adamowicz írta:

Hi,

I have used OpenOffice for a number of years and loved it.  I have
recommended it to everybody that I know.

However, the 3.4.0 update to OpenOffice is terrible.  It has ruined the
settings on the forms that I have made using prior versions of OpenOffice.

It seems to operate poorly overall.  Please undo the update.

I'm using Windows 7 on a Toshiba Satellite.  There are no other problems
with the computer or the operating system.  OpenOffice was working
perfectly before the update. The fault seems to be solely with the new
update.

So, again, please, please, please provide either a way to undo the update
or a fix for the mess it makes.

Thanks,

Michael W. Adamowicz, LICSW, LLC

http://RIpsychotherapy.com
http://RIpsychotherapy.com/blog

250 Wampanoag Trail, Suite 303
East Providence, RI 02915

Office: (401) 264-0004

The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender, shred any hard copies made and
delete the material from any computer or storage device.






Re: fonts

2012-06-06 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi Frankie,
2012.06.06. 8:21 keltezéssel, frankie lee írta:

Hello i want to add my native language fonts into my openoffice, from the
uni instructions i need to add to font file though i cannot find a font
file in openoffice.
from the openoffice help i dont seem to have spadmin, searched through all
program files, or i dont understand can you help
OpenOffice uses fonts installed in operation system, you can add with 
your OS tools.

Or on linux you can find in /opt/openoffice.org3/program/spadmin
Zoltan


frankie lee
0413602686
waterfr...@gmail.com






Re: What to do with the Czech homepage?

2012-06-03 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.06.03. 17:23 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:56 AM, drewd...@baseanswers.com  wrote:

On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 09:19 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Pavel Janíkpa...@janik.cz  wrote:

Not from myside. I would delete them as well.

But why not ask our Czech committer. ;-)

@Pavel: Could you sheet some light on the cz webpage? What do you think?

Delete them, yes.
--

OK.  I've updated the page, added the new 3.4 links, updated the
branding and cleaned up similar issue.  A review is welcome, to make
sure I did not introduce any language errors.

Thanks.


Hi Rob

Looks good.

One question though on this site (page now I suppose, not a site) there
is a right side menu, same is on many of the other language pages. A
left over I think from the old CMS system, not just embedded in the
html.

I checked another 8 pages with this and they all just go to 404 error
page, shouldn't we (and I'll go do it today if so) just remove these?


Remove, or if you know the new location of a particular link, update it.

I also updated the Japanese and Hungarian pages to point to the AOO
3.4.

Thaks Rob.
Zoltan

I noticed an immediate jump up in downloads of the Japanese AOO
3.4 when I did this.


-Rob


//drew





Re: [EXT]Discontinued Base extensions

2012-05-29 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.05.29. 15:23 keltezéssel, Roberto Galoppini írta:

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Reizinger Zoltánzreizin...@hdsnet.hu  wrote:

The code   the two extensions no more developed by us, due to license
incompatibilities.

The Oracle report builder, and the MySQL connector.
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/reportdesign
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/mysql_connector

To inform AOO 3.4 users about this situation, I added a comment to report
builder,
and want to add to MySQL, but the commenting not possible.

How can I put some words to this extensions page?

My understanding is that for some extensions comments have been
disabled for spam.
Should we enable comments for this extensions for good or just
temporarily? By the wat, what about the other extensions with disabled
comments?

About how to manage this issue in a pro-active way, we could write
something like:


On MySQL connector page:
Add some words before yours:

The extensions might work with Apache OpenOffice 3.4, but development 
stopped.
The known, not fixed bugs on Mac, on Linux 64 bit versions, make it 
unusable on these platforms.

Use ODBC or JDBC connectors to MySQL databases.

The source code for this extension was transferred to the Apache
OpenOffice project in 2011. If you are interested in volunteering to
develop this extension, please contact the Apache OpenOffice mailing
list: ooo-dev at incubator.apache.org

Thoughts?


Zoltan

Roberto


Zoltan





[EXT]Discontinued Base extensions

2012-05-27 Thread Reizinger Zoltán
The code   the two extensions no more developed by us, due to license 
incompatibilities.


The Oracle report builder, and the MySQL connector.
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/reportdesign
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/mysql_connector

To inform AOO 3.4 users about this situation, I added a comment to 
report builder,

and want to add to MySQL, but the commenting not possible.

How can I put some words to this extensions page?
Zoltan



Re: Error in about aoo

2012-05-26 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.05.26. 13:24 keltezéssel, Albino Biasutti Neto írta:

Hi.

I was looking in menu Help  About OOo a error in line tree after
Copyright, print screen [1].

[..] %OOO_VENDO [..]

It is a translation error.
Probably a missing space before  OOO_VENDO in translation text.
Zoltan



Just for me ?
Could is translation.

I have update the AOO 3.4 release.

1 - http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=oa0hvcs=6

Albino





Re: Need confirmation on PDF export

2012-05-24 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.05.24. 17:28 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta:

Zoltán,

Indeed on windows 7 it install with a setup dialog for the PDF export.

the cheksum for mi install is ok ,

have to find  a other XP machine  who's is working correct on 3.3 and 
redo the install to find out if it was may already wrong on mi 3.3 ?


any idea how i can repair this thing manualy, i supose, to change or 
deleteting some xcu (configuartion) files ?

Ferdinand,
User profile rename could help you:
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=74t=12426
Zoltan


Greetz

Fernand

2012.05.22. 16:14 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta:

Zoltán,

I am using US Englisch,

at home i have a frech install on windows 7 i check there also

how do i  check the install set integrity ?

http://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html#howto

Zoltan


Thanks

Fernand

Hi Fernand,
2012.05.22. 11:18 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta:
After installing 3.4 based on a 3.3 On Windows XP there is no 
difference between Export to PDF directly and the export with 
PDF-settings. For both menu items there is no PDF-settings menu.
When using the Export menu item, there is only 1 choise: PDF (same 
as for PDF export directly)
Do i file a  issue ? or do i have to look else where to correct 
this Menu items ?
In my AOO 3.4 under win7, this is works, as earlier, the 
FileExport to PDF opens settings dilaog.
I installed such way, first unistalled OOo 3.3 than installed, AOO 
3.4, and not deleted user profile.


Which language version you installed, and you checked the install 
set integrity?

Zoltan



Greetz

Fernand











Re: Need confirmation on PDF export

2012-05-22 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi Fernand,
2012.05.22. 11:18 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta:
After installing 3.4 based on a 3.3 On Windows XP there is no 
difference between Export to PDF directly and the export with 
PDF-settings. For both menu items there is no PDF-settings menu.
When using the Export menu item, there is only 1 choise: PDF (same as 
for PDF export directly)
Do i file a  issue ? or do i have to look else where to correct this 
Menu items ?
In my AOO 3.4 under win7, this is works, as earlier, the FileExport to 
PDF opens settings dilaog.
I installed such way, first unistalled OOo 3.3 than installed, AOO 3.4, 
and not deleted user profile.


Which language version you installed, and you checked the install set 
integrity?

Zoltan



Greetz

Fernand





Re: Need confirmation on PDF export

2012-05-22 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.05.22. 16:14 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta:

Zoltán,

I am using US Englisch,

at home i have a frech install on windows 7 i check there also

how do i  check the install set integrity ?

http://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html#howto

Zoltan


Thanks

Fernand

Hi Fernand,
2012.05.22. 11:18 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta:
After installing 3.4 based on a 3.3 On Windows XP there is no 
difference between Export to PDF directly and the export with 
PDF-settings. For both menu items there is no PDF-settings menu.
When using the Export menu item, there is only 1 choise: PDF (same 
as for PDF export directly)
Do i file a  issue ? or do i have to look else where to correct this 
Menu items ?
In my AOO 3.4 under win7, this is works, as earlier, the FileExport 
to PDF opens settings dilaog.
I installed such way, first unistalled OOo 3.3 than installed, AOO 
3.4, and not deleted user profile.


Which language version you installed, and you checked the install set 
integrity?

Zoltan



Greetz

Fernand








Re: svn commit: r1336368 - /incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext

2012-05-12 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.05.11. 22:17 keltezéssel, Dave Fisher írta:

On May 9, 2012, at 10:42 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:


2012.05.09. 23:02 keltezéssel, Dave Fisher írta:

On May 9, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:


I'm not programmer and try to change Hungarian site.
What is the BOM?

In this environment hard to me to do any useful work changing the Hungarian 
site to useful format.
I will stop doing it.

I'd like to understand how that bad character was added. You weren't the only 
one with the same problem and you won't be the last.

What do you use to edit the mdtext files?

I used win7 notepad first(it was coded as ASCII, which is wrong if I need to 
use accented characters, but I not was aware to this).
In second case in Notepad ++ when I converted from ASCII coding to UTF-8, and I 
think it was correctly coded, possibly I needs to be aware to another settings, 
which I don't know.

It no longer matters, Joe has modified the Apache CMS to accept a BOM at the 
beginning of these files.

Regards,
Dave

Thanks for your effort.
Zoltan



Zoltan

But how can I proceed to do it?

I've fixed these two files for you. It looks good at www.openoffice.org/hu/. 
You can proceed.

Regards,
Dave


Thanks,
Zoltan

2012.05.09. 21:49 keltezéssel, Dave Fisher írta:

Same problem here - what are you using to cause BOM?



On May 9, 2012, at 12:42 PM, r4z...@apache.org wrote:


Author: r4zoli
Date: Wed May  9 19:42:28 2012
New Revision: 1336368

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1336368view=rev
Log: (empty)

Modified:
incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext

Modified: incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext?rev=1336368r1=1336367r2=1336368view=diff
==
--- incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext (original)
+++ incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext Wed May  9 19:42:28 
2012
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-home:  home
-search:keresés
+home:   home
+search:keresés
name:   Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
-tagline:   (incubating) | Nyílt és ingyenes irodai programcsomag
+tagline:   (incubating) | Nyílt és ingyenes irodai programcsomag
logo:   AOO_logos/OOo_Website_v2_copy.png
domain: www.openoffice.org
divid:  bannera
announce:   Megjelent az Apache OpenOffice 3.4
announceurl:/hu/aoo34.html
-announcetip:   Olvassa el a bejelentést
+announcetip:   Olvassa el a bejelentést
\ No newline at end of file








Re: svn commit: r1336368 - /incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext

2012-05-09 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

I'm not programmer and try to change Hungarian site.
What is the BOM?

In this environment hard to me to do any useful work changing the 
Hungarian site to useful format.

I will stop doing it.

But how can I proceed to do it?

Thanks,
Zoltan

2012.05.09. 21:49 keltezéssel, Dave Fisher írta:

Same problem here - what are you using to cause BOM?



On May 9, 2012, at 12:42 PM, r4z...@apache.org wrote:


Author: r4zoli
Date: Wed May  9 19:42:28 2012
New Revision: 1336368

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1336368view=rev
Log: (empty)

Modified:
incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext

Modified: incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext?rev=1336368r1=1336367r2=1336368view=diff
==
--- incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext (original)
+++ incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext Wed May  9 19:42:28 
2012
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-home:  home
-search:keresés
+home:   home
+search:keresés
name:   Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
-tagline:   (incubating) | Nyílt és ingyenes irodai programcsomag
+tagline:   (incubating) | Nyílt és ingyenes irodai programcsomag
logo:   AOO_logos/OOo_Website_v2_copy.png
domain: www.openoffice.org
divid:  bannera
announce:   Megjelent az Apache OpenOffice 3.4
announceurl:/hu/aoo34.html
-announcetip:   Olvassa el a bejelentést
+announcetip:   Olvassa el a bejelentést
\ No newline at end of file








Re: svn commit: r1336368 - /incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext

2012-05-09 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.05.09. 23:02 keltezéssel, Dave Fisher írta:

On May 9, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:


I'm not programmer and try to change Hungarian site.
What is the BOM?

In this environment hard to me to do any useful work changing the Hungarian 
site to useful format.
I will stop doing it.

I'd like to understand how that bad character was added. You weren't the only 
one with the same problem and you won't be the last.

What do you use to edit the mdtext files?
I used win7 notepad first(it was coded as ASCII, which is wrong if I 
need to use accented characters, but I not was aware to this).
In second case in Notepad ++ when I converted from ASCII coding to 
UTF-8, and I think it was correctly coded, possibly I needs to be aware 
to another settings, which I don't know.

Zoltan



But how can I proceed to do it?

I've fixed these two files for you. It looks good at www.openoffice.org/hu/. 
You can proceed.

Regards,
Dave


Thanks,
Zoltan

2012.05.09. 21:49 keltezéssel, Dave Fisher írta:

Same problem here - what are you using to cause BOM?



On May 9, 2012, at 12:42 PM, r4z...@apache.org wrote:


Author: r4zoli
Date: Wed May  9 19:42:28 2012
New Revision: 1336368

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1336368view=rev
Log: (empty)

Modified:
incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext

Modified: incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext?rev=1336368r1=1336367r2=1336368view=diff
==
--- incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext (original)
+++ incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/hu/brand.mdtext Wed May  9 19:42:28 
2012
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-home:  home
-search:keresés
+home:   home
+search:keresés
name:   Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
-tagline:   (incubating) | Nyílt és ingyenes irodai programcsomag
+tagline:   (incubating) | Nyílt és ingyenes irodai programcsomag
logo:   AOO_logos/OOo_Website_v2_copy.png
domain: www.openoffice.org
divid:  bannera
announce:   Megjelent az Apache OpenOffice 3.4
announceurl:/hu/aoo34.html
-announcetip:   Olvassa el a bejelentést
+announcetip:   Olvassa el a bejelentést
\ No newline at end of file








Re: [URGENT] Broken download link

2012-05-08 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.05.08. 16:09 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta:

On 5/8/12 3:54 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:

The download binaries link from
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ is broken


I don't see the problem, it works for me. Can somebody else confirm 
the problem ...


But the transfered link to http://www.openoffice.org/download/ sugest 
OOo 3.3, you can only download 3.4 from Get more patforms link.

Zoltan

Juergen





Re: Volunteers needed: To update NL download pages later this week

2012-04-30 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi Rob,

2012.04.30 21:41 időpontban Rob Weir ezt írta:

The following tasks are on the wiki and need owners:


Manually update the downloads from the Arabic NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Czech NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the German NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Spanish NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the French NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Hungarian NL homepage

I volunteer for Hungarian page, modified wiki

Manually update the downloads from the Galacian NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Italian NL homepage and
subpages (pescetti)
Manually update the downloads from the Japanese NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Dutch NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Brazilian NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Russian NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Simplified Chinese NL homepage
Manually update the downloads from the Traditional Chinese NL 
homepage



https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Distribution+Tasks

Only one of them has an owner (Thanks, Andrea!)

What needs to be done?

We need someone to review these NL pages and identify what needs to 
be

changed to support the AOO 3..4 release.

Changes to consider:

1) Branding changes (OpenOffice.org - Apache OpenOffice)

2) Updates to download location,  for the 3.4 releases instead of the
3.3 release

3) References to the old LGPL license need to be changed to Apache
2.0 License

4) References to old NLC email addresses, marketing leads, etc., need
to be replaced by the new Apache email lists.

5) Other similar changes.

You don't need to do a complete rewrite of the pages.  But we should
refresh the page with information on the AOO 3.4 release.

Timeline looks like this:

-- Wednesday May 2nd -- Vote ends on approving the 3.4 release

-- Thursday-Friday -- Update the mirrors with the release, test the
new download websites.

-- Over the weekend, additional website updates and testing

-- Monday or Tuesday, if everything is working well, then we make
public announcement


So ideally we would have the NL website updates done at the end of
this week.   However, we should not make them be live on the
production server until after the mirrors are populated.  Maybe
easiest way to coordinate is to submit patches for the changes into
BZ?

Any other ideas?

My problem with the downloaded files from svn, which one needs to be 
changed?
My problem is that the old Hungarian OOo site contains files which 
was manually customized, the content and layout not match to the English 
site.
How can I proceed, I download En site from svn and translate it, and 
upload to Hungarian part of svn?

How can I check my work, I'm an only Hungarian in PPMC?
Zoltan


Any volunteers?

-Rob




Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-23 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.04.21. 2:58 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta:

Hi all,

this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache 
OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release 
for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of 
OpenOffice.org.



This release candidate provides the following important key changes 
compared to former OpenOffice releases:
(1) Code clean up to remove all copyleft components and external 
dependencies
(2) Reworked or introduced LICENSE and NOTICE file to reflect and 
document the used licenses of the code itself as well as of external 
3rd party libraries

(3) MD5, SHA1, SHA512 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts

For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under 
https://cwiki.apache.org/OOOUSERS/aoo-34-release-notes.html.


The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary 
releases for 16 languages) and further information how to verify and 
review Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) can be found on the 
following wiki page:


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+%28incubating%29+Release+Candidate 




Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 
(incubating).


The vote starts now and will be open until:

   UTC midnight Wednesday, 25 April: 2012-04-25 24:00 UTC.

After the vote of the PPMC the vote will start on 
gene...@incubtor.apache.org mailing and will be open for further 72 
hours.
But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would 
like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our 
project members.


   [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
   [ ]  0 Don't care
   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...



+1 (PPMC)

Zoltan


[Bugzilla] AOO 3.4RC version in bugzilla

2012-04-17 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Please create AOO 3.4RC in bugzilla versions field.
Thanks,
Zoltan


Re: [WWW] Translating branding and navigation

2012-04-12 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,
Please make hu next.
Thanks,
Zoltan

2012.04.11 17:47 időpontban Dave Fisher ezt írta:

Hi -

es, de, nl, fi, pt-br, ru, and ja are now setup for committers to
make translations to brand.mdtext and topnav.mdtext.

I still have the question about Chinese / zh split regarding
traditional / simplified (Taiwan / Mainland)

Next languages? cs, hu? Please respond for the next NL set.

brand.mdtext
===
home:   home
search: search
name:   Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
tagline:(incubating) | The Free and Open Productivity Suite
logo:   AOO_logos/OOo_Website_v2_copy.png
domain: www.openoffice.org
divid:  bannera

topnav.mdtext

divid:  topnava

- [Product][m0]
- [Download][m1]
- [Support][m2]
- [Extend][m3]
- [Develop][m4]
- [Focus Areas][m5]
- [Native Language][m6]


[m0]: /product/index.html
 Apache OpenOffice product description
[m1]: /download/index.html
 Download OpenOffice.org
[m2]: /support/index.html
 Find Support for OpenOffice.org
[m3]: /extensions/index.html
 Extensions and Templates for OpenOffice
[m4]: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/get-involved.html
 Get involved in Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
[m5]: /projects/accepted.html
 Apache OpenOffice development focus areas
[m6]: /projects/native-lang.html
 Apache OpenOffice in your Native Language

Regards,
Dave

On Apr 7, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:


Hi Andrea,

On Apr 7, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:


On 05/04/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:

Here is what you would do to effect all of the FR site at once for
translated branding and navigation buttons:


Thanks for the detailed instructions, that should definitely be put 
on

the wiki. I tried to apply them to the IT site:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1310806
Everything seems OK, but I can't see the changes at
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/it/ or
http://www.openoffice.org/it/


I think that there was a hiccup with the CMS. Joe asked that you 
trigger your build again.


I went ahead and added the files for French. I also made a change to 
a comment in ooo-site/trunk/lib/view.pm. This is a trick that will 
cause the staging build to do a full build causing all of the IT and 
FR sites to be changed to the new SSI.






(1) Create trunk/templates/fr/ssi.mdtext from templates/ssi.mdtext
... Change /brand.mdtext to /fr/brand.html Change /topnav.mdtext 
to

/fr/topnav.mdtext


I did this, just replacing fr - it.


(2) Copy /trunk/content/brand.mdtext from content/brand.mdtext


Here I actually copied content/brand.mdtext to 
content/it/brand.mdtext

(which is probably what you meant) and edited accordingly.


(3) Copy /trunk/content/topnav.mdtext from content/topnav.mdtext


Same as (2).

Commit all three changes at once and the whole of the FR part of 
the

site takes these changes at once. O(1) operation.


I committed, the build was triggered and succeeded but I don't see 
the

changes.


The trick with lib/view.pm may be required.




If you would like I'll create the mdtext files and then you can
translate.


This would probably be helpful to all native-lang projects, since 
even those not familiar with SVN could simply submit the translated 
version of their mdtext files.


Yes, but I want to wait until we do a couple and make sure all the 
proper details are covered.


We may be adding a news.mdtext and index.mdtext for the main index 
page, but that will be a separate thread of work.


And it is not a reason to wait. I'll look into doing it for many NLs 
this week.


Here is a list of the next NLs to setup:

es, de, nl, fi, pt-br, ru, ja

This scheme only goes a single directory level deep. Is a single 
translation viable for both zh_cn and zh_tw? If not then the two sites 
will need to be separated. I want to be careful how that is done.


Regards,
Dave



Regards,
Andrea.






[Pootle server] Server not responding

2012-04-01 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi all,

I try to finish Help (Hungarian) translation, when I log in into the 
server it seems working.
But when I submit a translation, in most cases I need to wait for the 
server response more than a minute or the page hang at all.

When log into again seems normal until I not submit a new translation.

Regards,
Zoltan


Re: [TRANSLATION]: collecting status

2012-03-22 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.03.22. 18:36 keltezéssel, Risto Jääskeläinen írta:

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann [orwittm...@googlemail.com] kirjoitti:

Hi Risto,

On 21.03.2012 23:12, Risto Jääskeläinen wrote:
 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann [orwittm...@googlemail.com] kirjoitti:
 Hi,

 I have setup a wiki page in order to provide/collect the status of 
the

 translation of specific languages [1].

 I also linked this wiki page from our AOO 3.4 Release Plan cwiki 
page [2].


 Does it makes sense to have such a wiki page?
 If yes, please provide further data/information.

 Please provide further data/information.

 Initially I put in the following data from my memory:
 -- As far as I know the strings for the user interface for Portuguese
 (Brazilian) are complete (currently not reflected on the Pootle 
server, but in

 the svn repository) - I do not the status for the help for Portuguese
 (Brazilian).
 -- Zoltan stated in a post that the user interface strings for 
Hungarian are
 also complete, but I do not know, if some of this work is lost due 
to the fact

 that the Pootle server was not up to date.
 -- I have see work on Finnish - issue 119066. It looks like that 
not all
 survived the Pootle server update. I have reopened the issue in 
order to

 indicate that a review is needed. Thanks.

 [1] 
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_for_AOO_3.4_-_Status
 [2] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Release+Plan



 Thanks in advance, Oliver.

 Hello!
 I just check some new missing Finnish translation lines in Pootle 
(chart2 /
 source / controller / dialogs.po) and it seems to me normal 
situation: those
 missing translations are for new lines of version 3.4 and there is 
not yet
 Finnish translations for them. And overall amount for new lines is 
quite normal
 for new version I think. So there are no need anything else than 
translation work.


 I am going to send my CLA to Apache. I think I can translate some 
lines as

 nobody or offline?


Thanks for the feedback.

I hope you did not look into the Pootle server projects Apache 
OpenOffice (Incubating) or Apache OpenOffice (INcubating) Help 
Files. These projects shall not be used.


At least the translation of the help for Finnish which is found in 
issue 119066 is not available in project Apache OpenOffice 3.4.x 
Help Files.



Thx again, Oliver.

Now there is line for 3.4 help file too on page 
https://translate.apache.org/fi/

I can confirm that all Finnish text are missing. This is not normal.

Regards
Risto

The Hungarian Help files in same state: empty. Earlier state was 98% 
done, in incubating help files.
The UI stings I finished for Apache OpenOfficce 3.4.x, excluding 
basic/source/app.po which is a VCLTestool po file.

Regards,
Zoltan


[Pootle][Translation] Why needs to translate VCLTesttool strings?

2012-03-21 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,
My second question to translation:
The po file /basic/source/app.po contains strings to VCLTesttools. Why 
it needs to be translated?
IIRC we decided not to use VCLTesttool in QA work, because we not want 
to use it, and no one want to learn BASIC.

Regards,
Zoltan


[Pootle] Finished HU language UI translation

2012-03-18 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,
I just fished missing tranlslation of UI strings, in pootle.
Please use this for next developers release of HU langpack.
I keep working on help files.
Regards,
Zoltan



Templates site link from OOo

2012-03-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,
The SourceForge help was big when they migrated the templates site.
The full redirction from templates.services.openoffice.org to new place 
will be happen?
When I click on More templates in OOo 3.3/AOO 3.4m1 template 
manager window, the links bring me to the address:
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/?cid=923508 and get error 
message: This space is managed by SourceForge.net. You have attempted 
to access a URL that either never existed or is no longer active. Please 
check the source of your link and/or contact the maintainer of the link 
to have them update their records.

This can be solved?
Thanks,
Zoltan


Re: [RELEASE]: release platforms, products and languages

2012-02-28 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.02.28. 11:13 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta:

Hi all,

I just wanted to clarify what we want or plan to release.

Platforms
=
I plan to release Windows, Linux, MacOS

FreeBSD is handled separately directly form the BSD guys

Solaris, I am unclear about the current status. I saw the developer 
snapshots but haven't test it on my own because I have no Solaris 
machine nor a VM right now. but I noticed that the build are prepared 
with --disable-mozilla which will disable some important features. 
If we want release it we should build with the pre-built mozilla libs 
and should test it.


Products

For the developer snapshots we built an English and a multilingual 
version + various language packs.


For our first final release I would like to provide at least full 
install set for the languages that we have already supported for the 
dev snapshots and potentially more language packs for other languages 
on demand and we have check the translations


Languages
=
en-US de fr es it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl

More languages packs when we have verified the translations and when 
we have volunteers who are interested to test these languages. Means 
we need volunteers from the local communities who are able to test 
these languages. When we see enough support we can also provide full 
install sets. We have to figure that out over time. I am not sure 
right now.
If I know correctly the OOo 3.4Beta all UI strings was translated in 
Hungarian version, when I tested it not found any problems.
Needs to be checked in HU version of AOO 3.4 or in langpack, that the 
changes not caused any UI problems.
I try to organise the HU langpack testing, but most HU OOo project went 
to the LibO.

I can test on win and linux platform.
Please build HU langpack, too.
Zoltan



Re: Apache OpenOffice Extensions Website restored at SourceForge

2012-02-26 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.02.26. 12:24 keltezéssel, RGB ES írta:

2012/2/26 RGB ESrgb.m...@gmail.com:

The new site is working very well: logged in, download some
extensions, no problem at all! Many thanks for the work!

Just a general question: is it possible to redirect the old address to
the new one? As someone noticed on the forums(1), the old address is
build-in on OOo so anyone trying to get more extensions online or
even download more dictionaries from OOo UI will not be able to
understand what's going on.

BTW, the new address is advertised on the ES, EN, IT and (thanks to
Floris V) Dutch forums.

Of course this happend on HU forum, too:
http://user.services.openoffice.org/hu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12t=1157
Zoltan


(1) http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?p=222419#p222419

A forum member filled a bug report about this problem:

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118976





Re: Plan to deliver the GUI test Java library on the next release

2012-02-22 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,
I'm interested in this tool, but I'm not a programmer, I can describe me 
as power user, and I did some QA on database part of OOo.

This tool can be used by non programmers?
I used the VCL tool in past, with the predefined tests, never created 
new tests.
The new tool difficulty level will be same as the VCL test tool and, I 
can use it without deep java programming knowledge.

I can use Eclipse or Netbeans on basic level.
Thanks,
Zoltan

2012.02.22. 10:11 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta:

Hi,
As mentioned before, I plan to replace VCL TestTool with a Java
library for GUI testing.  I wrote a wiki page to describe it a little
bit. I want to know how the community think about it, so I can adjust
its design early.
Thanks!




[Bugzilla]Add AOO 3.4 to bugzilla version

2012-02-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,

As a new versions started to build from source, needs to add Bugzilla 
Version field the AOO 3.4 + version number or whatever  you think 
about fit to the this place.
The versions which you now can select all OOo older and developer 
versions. The latest is OOo 3.4Beta which I use, but it is not good 
label for AOO versions, because it is two different thing.


In past when new version was built, the new DEV version added to 
bugzilla versions, to ease find a bug in builds source, if you find only 
in specific version or from specific version.

Regards,
Zoltan




Re: Configure error on FreeBSD with report builder extension

2012-02-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

The report builder extension needs for Base users.
Which way we can keep it running?
Zoltan
2012.02.05. 19:09 keltezéssel, Pedro Giffuni írta:

Hi Maho;

Yes, the report builder extension and the wordperfect
filter are mostly dead for AOO.

Pedro.

--- Dom 5/2/12, Maho NAKATAm...@apache.org  ha scritto:
...

Now I seem to understand... looks
like licensing change;
related jar files might not compatible with Apache license.
thanks
  Nakata Maho

From: Maho NAKATAm...@apache.org
Subject: Configure error on FreeBSD with report builder
extension
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:15:36 +0900 (JST)


Hi Pedro

I'm playing configure options. when i activate
--enable-report-builder
,
configure fails like following.

checking which jfreereport libs to use (for Report

Builder extension)... external

checking for /usr/share/java/sac.jar... no
configure: error: sac.jar not found.

Could you please help me a bit?

thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG:

http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt




Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice

2012-01-13 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:

Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:


Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352


IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new
bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.

Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the
issue status.

I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.


Regards


Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue 
118352).

So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.

Regards,
Olaf



Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/
Regards,
Zoltan


Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice

2012-01-13 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:

Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:

2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:

Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:


Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352


IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the 
new

bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.

Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and 
change the

issue status.

I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as
fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.


Regards


Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
118352).
So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.

Regards,
Olaf



Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/
Regards,
Zoltan



It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but 
the Wizard doesn't work.


Regards,
Olaf


It shows a debug messeage:

Debug Output
---
Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her?
From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx 
at Line 79

Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)

Click no, then second debug error:
---
Debug Output
---
Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents!
From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at 
Line 1444

Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)

Click No, the wizard starts.

May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version 
of AOO.


Regards,
Zoltan






Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice

2012-01-13 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.01.13. 17:21 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:

Am 13.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:

2012.01.13. 17:06 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:

Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:

2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:

Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán:

2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta:

Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:


Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status?
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352


IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test 
the

new
bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges.

Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In 
OpenOffice.org
times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as 
fixed.

Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and
change the
issue status.

I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve
this as
fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed.


Regards


Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7.
Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue
118352).
So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported.

Regards,
Olaf



Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. :
http://people.apache.org/~orw/
Regards,
Zoltan



It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but
the Wizard doesn't work.

Regards,
Olaf


It shows a debug messeage:

Debug Output
---
Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her?
From File 
c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx

at Line 79
Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)

Click no, then second debug error:
---
Debug Output
---
Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents!
From File 
c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at

Line 1444
Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)

Click No, the wizard starts.

May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug 
version

of AOO.

Regards,
Zoltan







I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the
selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one.

Regards,
Olaf


May be we use different OS, I run under Windows 7.
Regards,
Zoltan



I'm using this Office 
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe 
on WinXP - SP3.


Regards,
Olaf

I'm using 
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe


Regards,
Zoltan


Re: Problems with SVG in Writer

2012-01-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Ariel 2012. 01.0 1 1226179. builded version.

I now tested with some svg file from wikipedia, on Win7:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Svg_text_flowregion_test.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Japanese_text_test.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Korean_text_test.svg


It has unstable behavior when inserted one into first document works 
correctly, but all gone when I saved the file, and empty frames shows 
errors.

Closing and reopening file, the svg pictures on their place.

In second case in new document, inserted one without problem, when 
inserted second it shows up, but first gone, same happens with third 
picture.
Saving document not change the status, reopening document solve the 
problems.


In Third case, the inserting went correctly, but I scrolled the page 
down and up the pictures gone.


May be it is a text only problem other svg files from:
http://croczilla.com/bits_and_pieces/svg/samples

not cause such problem.

This is my results.
Regards,
Zoltan




2012.01.05. 14:59 keltezéssel, Regina Henschel írta:

Hi,

I have severe problems with svg-graphics in Writer. Is it not ready to 
be used in Writer?

I use build from Ariel from 2011-12-24 on WinXP.

Kind regards
Regina





Re: Problems with SVG in Writer

2012-01-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2012.01.05. 17:06 keltezéssel, Armin Le Grand írta:

Hi Ariel and Regina,

please write a bug report and set to me.

On 05.01.2012 16:22, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:

Ariel 2012. 01.0 1 1226179. builded version.

I now tested with some svg file from wikipedia, on Win7:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Svg_text_flowregion_test.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Japanese_text_test.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Korean_text_test.svg


It has unstable behavior when inserted one into first document works
correctly, but all gone when I saved the file, and empty frames shows
errors.
Closing and reopening file, the svg pictures on their place.


Only in Writer, or also on Draw/Impress?


I tested only in Writer, until now, when I tested in Draw and Impress.
The problems exist in Writer only, the Draw, and Impress works correctly.




In second case in new document, inserted one without problem, when
inserted second it shows up, but first gone, same happens with third
picture.
Saving document not change the status, reopening document solve the
problems.

In Third case, the inserting went correctly, but I scrolled the page
down and up the pictures gone.

May be it is a text only problem other svg files from:
http://croczilla.com/bits_and_pieces/svg/samples


This means text in Svg? Or Writer, too?

Not, I tested Writer with only these  svg pictures files from this site:
http://croczilla.com/bits_and_pieces/svg/samples/circles1/circles1.svg
http://croczilla.com/bits_and_pieces/svg/samples/quadbezier1/quadbezier1.svg
http://croczilla.com/bits_and_pieces/svg/samples/circles1/circles1.svg

Now checked the bugzilla and 
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118338 describes similar 
problem, and the attached svg file cause same problem.


I will add above examples which cause problems, to the bug 118338, and 
set to you.


Zoltan



not cause such problem.

This is my results.
Regards,
Zoltan




2012.01.05. 14:59 keltezéssel, Regina Henschel írta:

Hi,

I have severe problems with svg-graphics in Writer. Is it not ready to
be used in Writer?
I use build from Ariel from 2011-12-24 on WinXP.

Kind regards
Regina






Sincerely,
Armin
--
ALG






Re: Problems with SVG in Writer

2012-01-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

I was wrong, the issue is different, problems only with text:
Now checked the bugzilla and 
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118338 describes similar 
problem, and the attached svg file cause same problem. 
The text problem not in AOO 3.4 it shows all text correctly, but in OOo 
3.4Beta where rectangles shows instead of text.

Sorry.
Zoltan



Re: Buildbot

2011-12-10 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.12.09. 9:53 keltezéssel, Raphael Bircher írta:

Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:

Hi,

I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for 
three days in the row.  That is really good news, both because the 
Linux buildbot is running and that the last builds where successful.


Great work.

I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to?  I can 
see messages in the build logs 
(http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about 
several uploads but I can not see their targets.

They are here -- http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/

Greetings Raphael

I found only 64 bit version, any plan to build x86 32bit version?
I can only test 32bit version in virtualbox/ubuntu 32bit, or opensuse 
32bit (rpm based).

Thanks,
Zoltan







Re: [DISCUSS]: how can i change saved search queries in BZ

2011-12-01 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.12.01. 14:25 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta:

Hi,

i have several saved search queries which i would like to adapt to my 
Apache email address that i use in BZ now. But i can't figure out how 
to do that. I can edit and change it but i don't find a save or submit 
changes button.


And ideas how it works? I assume that i am simply blind or to stupid ;-)

I figured out:
Click your saved search,  go down,  below the last bug, a line with 
options, edit your search with clicking on Edit Search, modify  query, 
click on Search button (down),  the new list creates, and after the 
bug list on same lower line, is the Remember search button is shows 
up. Before clicking on it you can change the edited saved search name or 
create new one. Or leave it without change, then the saved search will 
be updated.


Zoltan


Juergen





Re: Put test case to wiki

2011-11-28 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.11.28. 9:23 keltezéssel, xia zhao írta:

2011/11/28 Raphael Bircherr.birc...@gmx.ch


Hi

Am 28.11.11 08:51, schrieb Yan Ji:

Currently, there is no test management tool available for AOO. So we have

nowhere to put test case. For AOO 3.4 release, can we put test case to
wiki? and which folder should we put them into? Anyone can help?


Maybe you put it under Build-QA-Plan

I don't think this foloder is fit for test cases. My understanding the

testing defined Build-QA-Plan is at smoke test level. Suggest create fnew
sub older under Release-QA-Plan and place related cases there.

We lost test cases stored centrally, anybody has a backup of them?
Or locally stored versions somewhere in OOo site?


My question is if specific cases are needed at current time? Or only some
cases for general usage are enough, can you explain more detail about the
test cases?

I found the test case, and test case template on old OOo wiki page.
I don't know how useful this.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_case_specification
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_case_specification_template
It can be a starting point, may be not in HTML, if we put it into cwiki.
Zoltan





Greetings Raphael

--
My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/





Re: Extensions and Templates [was: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice]

2011-11-18 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.11.18. 17:19 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net  wrote:

On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:


On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:40:25AM -0800, Dave Fisher wrote:

If this statement is rewritten for Binary releases to allow informed
installation of a Language Pack whatever it's host, license and
copyright might be - as long as on installation choices were clearly
visible and the user explicitly opts in or out.

This same IP framework could be used for Extensions and Templates - an
area in total limbo with no volunteers active.

http://extensions.services.openoffice.org is down again (5:30 UTC).
Is this a problem with the host or a problem of lack of maintenance by
OOo side?
IIRC both http://extensions.services.openoffice.org and
http://templates.services.openoffice.org are hosted by the Oregon State
University Open Source Labs, and have been working bad all year long.

I've discussed this with OSUOSL sysadmin.

The servers are overloaded. So much so that the Nagios alerts were constant. 
They turned them off. Every so often varnish acts up and the machines lock.

When this happens I have been the only one who emails supp...@osuosl.org - they 
are almost always responsive during business hours in their time zone - US 
Pacific.

Both servers are customized Drupal stacks at different versions. There were 
people from Oracle working on upgrades. No one has volunteered to administrate 
these from the project.

Since these servers host extensions and templates with all types of licenses 
they are not candidates for migration into the ASF.

What should we do?


We could move to an entirely different model.  Don't host extensions
at all.  With SourceForge, github, Google Code, etc., there is really
no good reason why we need to have a single entity host all of the
extensions.  It would be enough for us to have a browseable
catalog/registry of the extensions: name, description, category,
sreenshot, license and a URL to download.

It would not be hard to scrape the existing extension side to form
this kind of category.
This steps if it done, left out the existing users who accustomed to 
find extensions in these sites.
You needs to contact all template and extensions creators to host their 
stuff in other sites.
What will happen with Oracle created, provided templates, extensions 
(report builder, wiki publisher, ), all under SGA?

Zoltan


The license issue goes away, since there is no problem with having the
extension info hosted by Apache in a catalog of extensions.

Load is not longer an issue, since the catalog can be very cheap --
static HTML if we want, generated from XML.

I'd be willing to help with such an approach.


-Rob


Regards,
Dave



Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina






Re: [VOTE] Trademark and Brand

2011-11-10 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

a) Apache OpenOffice.org

Zoltan


2011.11.10. 4:47 keltezéssel, Donald Harbison írta:

As promised, here's the ballot. Choose one, cast your vote.  If none of
them get more than 50% of the binding votes, we will start a ballot for the
top two contenders.

a) Apache OpenOffice.org
b) Apache OpenOffice
c) Apache Open Office
d) Apache Office

The ballot is open for a full 7 day week closing 12:00 p.m. EST ( UTC - 5 )
on Wednesday, November 16, 2011.





Re: Report Builder extension (was Re: [proposal] development for the first AOO release)

2011-11-10 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi Pedro,

The report builder extension has 49 open bugs:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed;namedcmd=SRB_open;list_id=2823

Lot of bugs reported by me, I was the volunteer QA on this feature.
Some of them needs to be repaired, and some features available in 
pentaho reporting, not implemented it in, for example subreports, and 
new chart features from OOo.

If I know correctly the original developer will not continue working on it.
If some developer continue the development, I will do QA on it.

Regards,
Zoltan

2011.11.10. 16:22 keltezéssel, Pedro Giffuni írta:

Hi Ariel;

I honestly have no idea how this works: can we turn this
into an uno extension, and make it available in the
extensions site?

We can keep the sources, and maybe even some SVN history,
in Apache-extras but once it builds I don't think we have
to do a lot of maintenance.

Pedro.

--- On Thu, 11/10/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:


the reportbuilder won't be built nor released by AOOo, but
anyone can
take the sources and build it (for example, it would be
useful to take
the sources and make a Netbeans project out of it).
This extension is not really extension in the real sense of
the term
(extending OOo without touching any line of source code),
it depends on
the core functionality introduced in the reportdesign
module.
AOOo is not removing reportdesign nor reportbuilder.

The main issue is not the source code (on the software
grant from
Oracle, so no issue at all), nor the 3rd parties libraries
(the code
that relies on them can be built as an extension by anyone
who wants),
but the lack of man power with the knowledge to maintain
and further
develop it.

Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina





Re: Problem when showing a dialog of a deployed extension

2011-11-08 Thread Reizinger Zoltán
Another problem,  when I open OOo main window, without any document, and 
click on Oo2GDocs menu item, OOo crash with runtime error.


Zoltan

2011.11.08. 13:40 keltezéssel, Reizinger Zoltán írta:

2011.11.07. 23:42 keltezéssel, Gerardo Gómez írta:

Hello Ariel.

the underlying issue is in LoginPanel.fillCredentials():

this.getUserNameTextField().
setText(creditionals.getUserName());
creditionals.getUserName() returns null. You should check if this is 
a bug

or the expected behaviour (no OOo API bug in either case).


I'm agree with you, it is more a fillCredentials() problem, it would be
better to construct the credentionals.userName as an empty string 
instead

of a null one. But because it was (at least), an enhancement, i was only
replicating the effect.

I've Uploaded in my GitHub account, the .oxt (the extension itself), so
everybody who wants, could test it. As far as i've tested, it seems 
that in

linux and windows the extension works great.
I added your extension 0.0.1 version, downloaded today, tested under 
win7, to OOo 3.3 and OOo 3.4Beta(oracle), and AOOo 3.4.

Java versions selected: 1.6.0_27 (and same with java 1.6.0_18):
I get same error from all versions, I copied here as I get from debug 
version of AOOo 3.4 messages.


When clicked on configure button:
---
Debug Output
---
Error: UnoWrapper::SetWindowInterface: there already *is* a 
WindowInterface for this window!
From File y:/apache/trunk/main/toolkit/source/helper/unowrapper.cxx at 
Line 186

Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
---
Igen   Nem   Mégse
---
Second:
---
Debug Output
---
Error: VCLXToolkit::createWindow: did #133706# resurge?
From File y:/apache/trunk/main/toolkit/source/awt/vclxtoolkit.cxx at 
Line 1138

Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
---
Igen   Nem   Mégse
---
Third:
---
Debug Output
---
Error: [jni_uno bridge error] Java calling UNO method setText: 
[map_to_uno():string] null-ref given!

java stack trace:
at com.sun.star.bridges.jni_uno.JNI_proxy.dispatch_call(Native 
Method)


at com.sun.star.bridges.jni_uno.JNI_proxy.invoke(JNI_proxy.java:175)

at $Proxy33.setText(Unknown Source)

at util.OoTextField.setText(OoTextField.java:50)

at 
org.openoffice.gdocs.ui.dialogs.ConfigDialog.init(ConfigDialog.java:157)


at org.openoffice.gdocs.UNOGDocs$1.run(UNOGDocs.java:104)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)


From File Y:/apache/trunk/main/bridges/source/jni_uno/jni_java2uno.cxx 
at Line 633

Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
---
Igen   Nem   Mégse
---


When I clicked on Export to Google docs:
---
Debug Output
---
Error: [jni_uno bridge error] Java calling UNO method setText: 
[map_to_uno():string] null-ref given!

java stack trace:
at com.sun.star.bridges.jni_uno.JNI_proxy.dispatch_call(Native 
Method)


at com.sun.star.bridges.jni_uno.JNI_proxy.invoke(JNI_proxy.java:175)

at $Proxy33.setText(Unknown Source)

at util.OoTextField.setText(OoTextField.java:50)

at 
org.openoffice.gdocs.ui.LoginPanel.fillCredentials(LoginPanel.java:179)


at 
org.openoffice.gdocs.ui.LoginPanel.readCreditionals(LoginPanel.java:202)


at org.openoffice.gdocs.ui.LoginPanel.setSystem(LoginPanel.java:212)

at 
org.openoffice.gdocs.ui.dialogs.UploadDialog.init(UploadDialog.java:181)


at org.openoffice.gdocs.UNOGDocs$2.run(UNOGDocs.java:231)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)


From File Y:/apache/trunk/main/bridges/source/jni_uno/jni_java2uno.cxx 
at Line 633

Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump)
---
Igen   Nem   Mégse
---

I hope this help you.

Zoltan




On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
ariel.constenla.ha...@gmail.com  wrote:


Hello Gerardo,

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:25:40PM -0600, Gerardo Gómez wrote:
I have addressed my problem with the null ref, it was due to 
assigning to

xText.setText, a null string, i only added an if:

public void setText(String text){
 if (text != null)
 this.xTextComponent.setText(text);
}

another option:

public void setText( String text ) {
this.xTextComponent.setText( text == null ?  : text );
}

an empty string will clear the text field (a null string will crash
OOo). May be clearing the text field is the desired effect when you get
a null string reference.


I'm not really happy with this solution, but it seams to work good, so
until i don't find any other solution i will keep it this way.

the underlying issue is in LoginPanel.fillCredentials():

this.getUserNameTextField().setText(creditionals.getUserName());

creditionals.getUserName() returns

Re: [Request] create ooo-disc...@incubator.apache.org mailing list

2011-11-08 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.11.08. 21:48 keltezéssel, eric b írta:

Hi,

Looking at the archives (see [1]), the flow of mails we receive every 
day, on ooo-dev mailing list is really big, and not always 
development relevant. And more than 1500 mails every month, is maybe 
too much (of me it is). Of course, I'm the first to think, some topics 
are important, interesting and must be debated, but we reached some 
limit, and must, say ... improve the situation.


As a compromise, what about to create ooo-disc...@incubator.apache.org  ?

You think, you can separate the mails you not interested in?
I think it is an attempt which will not give positive result to you.
The subscribers can submit any topic on this list which he/she seems to 
be related to the development, and another subscriber think it is fit 
into other list, and what will happens, nothing.

The mails can be ignored, which is out of your interest.

What a topics discussed here, you propose to discuss on 
ooo-discuss@i.a.o list?
Please add more details, as new potential subscriber. Why I will think, 
it worth to subscribe to this new list?
As consequence this list traffic will be less? Or we creating an useless 
empty list.


Regards,
Zoltan



Thanks in advance for any suggestion / opinion :-)


Regards,
Eric Bachard

[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/





Re: Addressbook replacement: CardDAV

2011-11-06 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.11.03. 9:02 keltezéssel, Mathias Bauer írta:

On 01.11.2011 20:45, Pedro Giffuni wrote:

Hi;

I was looking at the IP_Clearance Wiki, and the known problem of
replacing Mozilla.

I have noticed that for many things Gecko is being replaced with
Apple's Webkit some further investigation shows that Apple
Released their Calendar and Contacts server under AL2:


We don't use Gecko anywhere in OOo.
I think it is not correct, the gecko is added during OOo 3.4 
development, used in Base for Seamonkey addressbook connection.
It worth keeping it some way, if it is not possible as built-in, than 
keep it as extensian.


See: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=107809
Zoltan
Besides that, Webkit is much more evil than Mozilla because on Windows 
it requires proprietary libraries from Apple (or using suboptimal 
cairo based libraries).


Regards,
Mathias





Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal

2011-10-18 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

+1
2011.10.18. 18:27 keltezéssel, Dennis E. Hamilton írta:

In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the
acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org
Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling.  The Proposal text is at the
October 12 version of wiki page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project.

The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from
now.

A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the
proposal.

[  ] +1 approve
[  ]  0 abstain
[  ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons:


GUIDELINES

ANYONE MAY VOTE.  BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by
any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message).  When the
same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the
ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual.  Votes made
anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted.

DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD.  This thread is for the votes
themselves, including explanations for -1 votes.  Any other discussion related
to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be
on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS].


  - Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability,http://nfoWorks.org/
dennis.hamil...@acm.org  gsm: +1-206-779-9430  @orcmid






Re: Good-Day site is gone...

2011-10-17 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.10.17. 13:49 keltezéssel, Marcus (OOo) írta:

Am 10/17/2011 01:23 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de  
wrote:



Am 10/17/2011 02:53 AM, schrieb Maho NAKATA:

  I'm looking for ftp site so that I can upload my taball for QA 
purpose.

(and for my builds, too).
The Good-day ftp server is gone in August 2011, so I cannot upload my
builds
as well.



I'm very sorry to hear that because it was always a reliable host. 
And now

even www.good-day.net is not reachable. What happened here?



I think Good-day was a Japanese organization/company that provided free
hosting to Maho. Good Day Inc. in Umeda Osaka. 
http://www.good-day.co.jp/


I know. We had a good collaboration about mirroring at Sun/Oracle 
times. I'm a bit frightened about the was. ;-)


Marcus


I now checked, the qa-ftp site is working to me:  
ftp://qa-upload.services.openoffice.org/

Zoltan





  Note: I have been uploading source tar ball for each milestones, and
uploading MacOSX PPC and Intel packages for all languages for 
almost every
milestones over 6 years. To do that, Good-day ftp site was very 
important

and useful.



As Ross said your http://people.apache.org; acccount could be an
intermediate place to host builds on a temporary basis. Otherwise we 
have to

find somewhere else a bit space for build hosting.

Marcus






Re: ODF and HTML 5

2011-10-03 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.10.03. 12:39 keltezéssel, Ian Lynch írta:

On 3 October 2011 10:40, RGB ESrgb.m...@gmail.com  wrote:

2011/10/3 Ian Lynchianrly...@gmail.com


A logical technical need could be
to develop ODF rendering and editing in web browsers.


Something like WebODF?
http://www.webodf.org/
They even have an app on android market to display ODF documents on smart
phones (I never used it: my cell phone is only useful for phone calls...)

Yes I have it on my phone, but I don't use desk based files for
information very much mainly direct in web pages. WebODF is a good
start. Just seemed that If ODF was an official part of HTML 5 it would
get increasingly wide support and so would help strategically with
marketing.  OASIS should be the focus but the more support from a wide
range of organisations, the more likely it is to happen.

No that way.
If I know correctly the ODF among others, uses HTML, XML and other 
standards, see normative references in ODF 1.2:  
http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/cos01/OpenDocument-v1.2-cos01-part1.html#__RefHeading__1414984_253892949
It uses the latest issued version HTML 4.0,  if the HTML 5 is out, the 
HTML 5 version can be used in ODF, when the OASIS TC creates new ODF 
version, or reviews 1.2.

That means no such possibility in marketing.
Zoltan




Forums not reachable

2011-09-28 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi all,
The forums not reachable, at least to me,  on address 
http://user.services.openoffice.org

Somebody knows why?
Thanks,
Zoltan


[DISCUSS] Bug reporting, handling rules

2011-09-08 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi all,

Start again, the my earlier try was alienated.

As a first builds starts, and OOo Bugzilla migrated to Apache, needs to 
think about how we will use it.


On OOo QA site can be found three page which says about issues/bug 
issuing rules which the OOo project followed, and Bugzilla was 
customized accordingly:

http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/bug_writing_guidelines.html
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/basic_rules.html

This time the bugzilla migrated, could stick to these rules, which 
worked in most cases.


We want to change it?

It is a time to start to think about.

Regards,
Zoltan


Re: Need a volunteer for the Bugzilla templates

2011-09-07 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.09.07. 18:10 keltezéssel, Pedro F. Giffuni írta:

Great! Thanks to Matt!!

One thing I didn't mention and that may be interesting
for international users is that the new bugzilla can
be customized for other languages.

The internationalization of bugzilla can be counterproductive.
Until now only English bug reports allowed or solved, excluding in some 
cases German, because most of the the developers can deal with.
The translation of bugzilla UI will pretend that you can submit bug in 
your language, that  could create a big mess.

Or translated bugs not counts, and why consume space on non real bugs.

Thanks,
Zoltan


cheers,

Pedro.

--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Matt Richards  wrote:


I'm willing to give this a healthy
try, if nobody else beats me to it.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:


(This just required a new subject header)

Hi;

As you know the bugzilla database is working already

(very

well to be honest) but the UI interface changes were

not

brought in due to the extremely outdated version

(3.2.10)

the old site was running.

Apparently it is not a difficult task and it would

make

our users feel more comfortable to get most of the

previous

look and feel.

Mark Thomas, from infrastructure@ has analysed the

files

provided by Oracle here:
http://openoffice.org/downloads/www/mw/ooo_bz_template.tar.bz2
and has offered the pointers for anyone wanting to

take

the job (I am attaching his post).

If someone would like this task please let the list

know

so that we don't have a lot of people creating JIRA

issues.

After notifying the list do create a JIRA issue:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA

cheers,

Pedro.

ps. I found this link that may be helpful to see what
we are talking about:
http://linux.die.net/Bugzilla-Guide/cust-templates.html




--
--Matt





Re: Can not visit the Chinese Community Forum!

2011-09-06 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi,

You warns us about a migration test forum: 
http://ooo-forums.apache.org/zh/forum/
Where I get same error: Language file ./language/zh_cs/common.php 
couldn't be opened.

The migration test not finished,

The http://user.services.openoffice.org/zh/forum/ working correctly? I 
can reach it.


Regards,
Zoltan


2011.09.06. 10:37 keltezéssel, 陈京东 írta:

Hi Terry and all,

I have got to know we are migrating OOo forum to the Apache 
Infrastructure, and have accomplished several Community Forums, 
including the Japanese, but when I want to access to the Chinese 
Community Forum, an error appears, like this: Language file 
./language/zh_cs/common.php couldn't be opened. I think, maybe we have 
not finished its migration yet. So, could you tell me when we will 
migrate the Chinese Community Forum successfully? and what can we do 
for this work? Could you give us suggestions? Thank you in advance!


Best Regards
JingDong Chen

--
MSN:   blue_che...@hotmail.com
Email: chenjingd...@redoffice.com






Re: [RT] Create a second incubator podling - the ooo forums

2011-09-06 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.09.06. 12:03 keltezéssel, Christian Grobmeier írta:

Hello,

there are much emotions on the ooo forum at the moment and my feeling
says if we continue this path of discussion, we'll have some problems.

Now I had an idea: what if we would make up another incubator podling
- the ooo forums - with an own PPMC.
In fact Rob already expressed something like that and introduced the
idea to run the forums outside apache. But this can happen different.
What if we run the forums outside of the standard ooo project but as a
project on its own.

I mean, the forums have some technic - the phpBB boards.
They have active admins (I call PPMC) and active mentors (committers).

I think making ooo-forums another podling is way easier than
integrating it into ooo-dev.

Thoughts?

It can be a good solution.
Zoltan


Christian





Re: What is needed for Support Forums to be fully integrated into the Apache OpenOffice.org project

2011-09-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.09.04. 22:36 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

I'm putting aside for sake of this note the alternate approach,
suggested by some, of allowing the support Forums to operate
independently outside of Apache.  I'm merely talking about what would
make the forums into a well-integrated part of the project, in terms
of decision making, accountability, branding, etc.  I'm not talking
about technical integration, since that appears to be the easier
topic., and one that Apache Infra and Terry are already working on.

If the Forums are to be well-integrated into the project, I think we need:

== PPMC Oversite and Approval of Forum Policies ==

Remember, the Forum volunteers -- 75 of them -- are not all committers
or PPMC members.  Very few of them are.  Very few of of them are
following this ooo-dev list.  Obviously we should give great deference
to the real-world experience of current Forum volunteers, but we also
need to ensure that the Forum works well with project and Apache
policies as well.

1) The Terms of Use and other policy documents used by the Forum
should be reviewed and approved by the PPMC, and for the former, also
by Apache legal.

+1


2) We need to develop a privacy policy for the Forums, also to be
reviewed by the PPMC and Apache legal

-1
It can be a part of TOU, no needs separate document.


3) Changes to Forum policies, TOU and privacy policy would require a
proposal on ooo-dev, and discussion and consensus reached there.  It
is possible that preliminary public discussions could occur in other
places first, such as on the Forums themselves.  But the project's
official discussions and decisions are made on ooo-dev.In other
words, if it didn't happen on the project's main list (ooo-dev), it
didn't happen.

-1
What you mean under Forum policies in plain English?



4) We need the Forum website to conform to Apache branding
requirements, including the podling-specific requirements

+1


==Approval of Forum roles==

My understanding is that forums have essentially three roles:

a) Users
b) Moderators, who delete, edit and move all posts, ban users, etc.
c) Admins who can also create new forums and assign moderator rights

Volunteers not listed, who contribute in posts with their special knowledge.

5) Users require no special treatment.  They are like subscribers to a
users list.

6) Being listed as an admin or moderator on a public-facing Apache
website suggests endorsement by the project, and aside from any
enhanced Forum capabilities enhances your ability to keep order on the
Forums.  In other words, it is the star that makes the sheriff, not
the gun.  But this endorsement, to be meaningful, should be made
authentic.   So Admins and Moderators should be approved by the PPMC.
This kind of routine approval is given all the time for those who want
to be list moderators.  I see no reason why we cannot, initially at
least, simply receive a list of current volunteers to ooo-private and
approve them all.

-1
Simple users became volunteers when he/she gives many useful comments to 
users not worth anything on this list.
You and all commiters on this list will approve Hungarian moderators 
without knowing how they works?
You will learn Hungarian and all twelve forum languages? Some 
moderators, and most volunteers even not reading English.

How the PPMC will endorse them?



7) Future grants of admin/moderator rights would require a proposal to
ooo-dev seeking lazy consensus.  Such a proposal could originate from
a forum volunteer or could originate from anyone on ooo-dev. This is
no different than someone asking to be a moderator for a mailing list.

-1
Same as above, language barrier.

8) Any project committer, on request, will be made a forum admin or
moderator.

+1
But needs to work as a moderator and admin on forum, if they require 
such role.

  This is how it works with every other project resource --
mailing lists, source code, website, etc.   Committers have rights to
pretty much everything on the project.  We trust our committers. We
don't segregate the project into exclusive zones of ownership.

-1
It is a misunderstanding of closed forums.


==Transparency==

9) We need all private forum discussions to be echoed to a log or
mailing list where PPMC and Apache Members can view them.

If you join as mod. or admin you can see it.

  One way of
doing this is to echo posts to ooo-private.  Another way is to
periodically commit logs to the PPMC's private directory.  There may
be other ways as well.

-1
The private list will be spammed unnecessarily, by forums posts.

10) The use of private forums must be used for only discussions of
specific moderation cases.  It must not be used for discussion of
routine board operations.

+1


==Integration into the larger AOOo community==

Although the forum volunteers appear to have been previously isolated,
not involved in larger project discussions and decision making, this
is not optimal for providing support, and it is not optimal for the
project 

Re: What is needed for Support Forums to be fully integrated into the Apache OpenOffice.org project

2011-09-05 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.09.05. 20:35 keltezéssel, davidills...@gmail.com írta:

On 5 Sep 2011, at 19:00, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
snip

==Approval of Forum roles==

My understanding is that forums have essentially three roles:

a) Users
b) Moderators, who delete, edit and move all posts, ban users, etc.
c) Admins who can also create new forums and assign moderator rights

Volunteers not listed, who contribute in posts with their special knowledge.

5) Users require no special treatment.  They are like subscribers to a
users list.

6) Being listed as an admin or moderator on a public-facing Apache
website suggests endorsement by the project, and aside from any
enhanced Forum capabilities enhances your ability to keep order on the
Forums.  In other words, it is the star that makes the sheriff, not
the gun.  But this endorsement, to be meaningful, should be made
authentic.   So Admins and Moderators should be approved by the PPMC.
This kind of routine approval is given all the time for those who want
to be list moderators.  I see no reason why we cannot, initially at
least, simply receive a list of current volunteers to ooo-private and
approve them all.

-1
Simple users became volunteers when he/she gives many useful comments to users 
not worth anything on this list.
You and all commiters on this list will approve Hungarian moderators without 
knowing how they works?
You will learn Hungarian and all twelve forum languages? Some moderators, and 
most volunteers even not reading English.
How the PPMC will endorse them?


7) Future grants of admin/moderator rights would require a proposal to
ooo-dev seeking lazy consensus.  Such a proposal could originate from
a forum volunteer or could originate from anyone on ooo-dev. This is
no different than someone asking to be a moderator for a mailing list.

-1
Same as above, language barrier.

My experience elsewhere at Apache is that PMCs are pretty open and trusting. If 
there's a recommendation for further involve a valued contributor requiring 
lazy concensus, I'd expect them to all go through, unless there's someone 
proposed who's known to be problematic. The important thing is really 
procedural... the fact that the PMC approves someone makes it clear that the 
PMC has responsibility for keeping the forums healthy.


8) Any project committer, on request, will be made a forum admin or
moderator.

+1
But needs to work as a moderator and admin on forum, if they require such role.

While that's certainly desirable, if PMC members need this kind of access to 
provide oversight, then they need to be able to get access regardless. This 
seems less likely to be required if there's separate archival as suggested 
below.


  This is how it works with every other project resource --
mailing lists, source code, website, etc.   Committers have rights to
pretty much everything on the project.  We trust our committers. We
don't segregate the project into exclusive zones of ownership.

-1
It is a misunderstanding of closed forums.

Perhaps you could elaborate on this?
The  exclusive zone of ownership is too ambiguous to me in this case, 
may be my English is not good enough to understand it.
The closed forums (not seen by ordinary users) used for discussing all 
forums common things about of management, updates etc., other for 
storing spam posts for limited time, but if committer has 
admin/moderator access could see the content.





==Transparency==

9) We need all private forum discussions to be echoed to a log or
mailing list where PPMC and Apache Members can view them.

If you join as mod. or admin you can see it.

If the forums are running on ASF infrastructure delegated to the PMC, the PMC 
and ASF membership need a mechanism to provide oversight. This is commonly done 
via mailing lists, and so repeating that pattern would simplify this task for 
many.


  One way of
doing this is to echo posts to ooo-private.  Another way is to
periodically commit logs to the PPMC's private directory.  There may
be other ways as well.

-1
The private list will be spammed unnecessarily, by forums posts.

Yeah, i'd suggest a separate archival list


10) The use of private forums must be used for only discussions of
specific moderation cases.  It must not be used for discussion of
routine board operations.

+1






Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers

2011-09-04 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi Rob,

As a Hu forum admin and not a native English speaker lot of time raised 
the forum question from beginning.
I dissatisfied with your ignorant behavior to forums, you not want to 
make any steps to understand our questions.


Not registered into forums, and not see into the discussions.

Why you think the volunteers and admins will join to this list, if you 
not makes any steps into the other directions?


Regards,
Zoltan



The forums works differently what Apache works, and you can understand

2011.09.04. 16:15 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Terry Ellisonte...@ellisons.org.uk  wrote:

A few days ago, I made the statement below and received a generally robust
and unapologetic response.  I don't want to rehash this again, but this
tipped the balance for me and I decided to finish off my work with Apache
and hand over.  What has somewhat surprised me and this is the issue that I
want to flag up the the PPMC in this note, is the volume and tone of the
general responses that I received when I let the forums know of my decision
to hand over and stand down.


I don't see anything recent from you on the forums.  Can you send a
link to your note and the responses?  It is much better to get first
hand information, I think, then to have it filtered through someone
else.


In essence my concerns and fears seem to be shared by most of the NL admins,
moderators and volunteers that staff the forums and do over 90% of the work
to respond to end users.  Until this last week my views were probably at the
more positive end of the spectrum.  If this happens then we aren't going to
be left with any functioning forums, so I am starting to consider quite
seriously why I am continuing to do this work at all.


I would encourage the NL admins to be as vocal as you are, and to
raise their issues directly on ooo-dev.   It will be very hard for
them to acclimate to Apache, and for us to understand their concerns,
if they do not participate directly on the project's primary
discussion list.  I'm grateful, of course, for any attempts to collect
and consolidate feedback and bring it to this list, but that is an
inadequate substitute for an authentic two-way conversion.

The following pieces of advice you've offered us are all good topics
for discussion.  What can we do to get the admins to come over and
discuss these items?  Note that discussing these points a private
forum would go against the need for overall transparency.  So the
admins need to meet us half-way here.

-Rob


Please consider taking active steps:

   * To realise that these people spend all of their pro-bono time
 working in the forum model and generally hate using email for
 anything other than 1-1 communication.  We need to have a mutually
 efficient way of working together.
   * To understand that the forums are a well oiled machine that are
 administered tightly and efficiently and have been for years.
  Please understand how the system works and what its strengths and
 weakness are, before demanding changes.
   * Please don't demand, but provide rational explanations for the
 need to change and use sensible change management to change
 working policies and practices.
   * Reach out and consider how to work with people for whom English is
 a second language, who find it hard work to read a simple and well
 formatted document or post and who just cannot follow complex
 email threads that are a dozen levels deep and get completely
 mangled by some respondents:
 o Keep thread simple and maintain thread discipline
 o Try to give direct answers to direct questions
 o All participants configure their email clients to use
   text/plain; format=flowed encoding, as text/plain only
   can completely mangle nesting of reply content.

Of course the PPMC doesn't have to do any of this, but also please accept my
parting advice that if you don't then you are effectively and knowingly
killing the forums off.  At some point these people will have decide whether
to stay and tough it out; to leave one-by-one; or to take this service
elsewhere.

Regards Terry Ellison


On 01/09/11 23:02, Terry Ellison wrote:

Quite honestly -- and I can only speak personally -- at the moment I feel
that I am caught between a rock and a hard place.  My work is time consuming
and the skills are different to the mainstream C++ trained OOo developer,
but they are also different to a pure sysAdmin.  In some ways you need to be
an expert in *both* these worlds and to be able to integrate this expertise.
  I am not talking about enthusiastic newbie volunteers; I am talking about
hacks who have done this so many times that it's routine.  Again this only
my personal experience, but I feel that Apache is unwelcoming to newcomers
and this seems to be an endemic culture, albeit strongly advocated by a few
individuals.  

Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers

2011-09-04 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.09.04. 16:42 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Reizinger Zoltánzreizin...@hdsnet.hu  wrote:
snip


Why you think the volunteers and admins will join to this list, if you not
makes any steps into the other directions?


I'm assuming the volunteers and admins want positive results.  The
decision-making in the project occurs on this list -- ooo-dev -- by
participants making and discussing proposals.So I think that
volunteers and admins should join and participate in this list so they
can engage in an open, two-way conversation on how the project,
including the support forums, are run.
If I know correctly they interested in supporting users, and whether 
forum will survive the Oracle- Apache transition and no more.
If they interested in AOOo development and other project things, will 
join to this list, or join to podling project as I did.

Most of them reading this list through mail reader, or subscribed here.
May be they see no reason to joining this type of discussion.


Remember, I am just one person, with my own ppinion.  I have only one
vote.  I don't make the decisions myself.  But if an admin or other
forum volunteer is not participating on the ooo-dev list at all, then
their opinions will likely be unheard and their vote uncounted.  That
is why you should encourage them to participate on the ooo-dev list.

-Rob


Zoltan


Re: Legacy OOo list post stats

2011-09-03 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.09.03. 18:40 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

To help prioritize the list migration efforts, I've collected numbers
from the legacy OOo lists.  Looking at 2011 posts, year to date, these
are the average posts/day for the most-used lists.

I've arbitrarily cut-off the lost at lists having more than one post
every other day.  There are 332 lists overall that I could find, most
of them getting little to no traffic.   To put these numbers in
perspective note that our ooo-dev list averages 59 posts per day. So
we know what that traffic feels like.   If we add up all of the top
100 OOo lists, excluding the Bugzilla notifications, they add up to 62
posts/day average.

So I think this argues strongly for list consolidation.  Direct all
user-related lists to ooo-users and project-related lists to ooo-dev.

List Posts/day
org.openoffice.allbugs  54.8
org.openoffice.users9.0
org.openoffice.de.users 7.9
org.openoffice.de.dev   4.1
org.openoffice.fr.users 3.6
org.openoffice.it.utenti3.2
org.openoffice.dev  3.2
org.openoffice.user-faq.authors 2.9
org.openoffice.discuss  2.5
org.openoffice.l10n.dev 1.6
org.openoffice.dba.needsconfirm 1.3


This dba.needsconfirm list can be excluded, it is used in bugzilla when 
issue/bug was submitted and no developer assigned to bug, mostly a 
waiting list for database bugs. All unconfirmed database bug came here 
first, after that reviewed by QA and assigned to devs. This method was 
selected because only one QA person and two developer worked on database 
part (from Sun/Oracle), and it is helped them prioritize works.
The us...@dba.oo.o can be merged to general users list and d...@deba.oo.o 
to ooo-dev, both has low number of traffic one-two per week.


Zoltan

org.openoffice.es.discuss_es1.2
org.openoffice.marketing.dev1.2
org.openoffice.api.dev  1.1
org.openoffice.ja.discuss   1.0
org.openoffice.releases 0.9
org.openoffice.allcvs   0.9
org.openoffice.qa.dev   0.9
org.openoffice.es.dev   0.9
org.openoffice.fi.users 0.9
org.openoffice.distribution.dev 0.8
org.openoffice.cws-announce 0.8
org.openoffice.br-pt.usuarios   0.7
org.openoffice.nl.gebruikers0.7
org.openoffice.es.users 0.7
org.openoffice.it.localizzazione0.7
org.openoffice.distribution.cdrom   0.6





Re: Extensions and templates site down

2011-08-14 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.08.14. 15:07 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:26 AM, drewd...@baseanswers.com  wrote:

The site (particularly templates) seems hinky, bad, and has for a over a
day now, once again.


Do we know what the underlying issue is?  Is it load related?

I don't know, may be not enough resources to do administration.

At the end of July when similar down happens, I submitted a support 
question to supp...@osuosl.org e-mail.

After few days the pages were up.

And get answer:
Should be back online. This is a persistent issue that we do not have 
the time nor resources to resolve long term. I'm waiting to hear where 
this site will end up (hopefully with the ASF). For now I have to just 
mend it along.


Zoltan

Do we have any stats on the most-downloaded extensions? Would it be 
worth treating them specially, getting them into a mirroring 
infrastructure, for example? Or is this something that could be moved to 
apache-extras.org ?

On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 17:37 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:

snip

  We will have to
  find an
  alternative repository

snip

We Need to fix the current one

- the fact that LibreOffice will open yet another repository (as
mentioned there are already other locations on the net hosting OO.o/Libo
compatible extensions) is IMO great, the current site however has the
largest collection of files and one would be foolish to just close it.

What would be _really_ nice is someone hack an extension that lets the
user change default repos, and for bonus points, search ala InkScape and
OpenClipart...but I wander OT there.

my very late .02

//drew






Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was re:OpenOffice.org branding)

2011-08-02 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.08.02. 14:03 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jean Hollis Weberjeanwe...@gmail.com  wrote:

On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 21:24 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:

I'd look at it like this:  The documentation that is needed for our
users to be successful with our product, from end users, to admins, to
application developers, that documentation is product documentation.
If having it deleted or defaced, without us noticing it, would cause
our users some harm, then it is product documentation.  If the right
to copy, modify and redistribute the documentation is essentially to
successful creating and hosting a new port or translation, or even a
commercial derivative or an open source fork, of the project, then it
is product documentation.

Leaving aside for the moment all the other user-doc type items on the
wiki, and looking specifically at the existing current set of user
guides (which are in ODT/PDF format, but made available for download
from the existing OOo wiki), I'm unclear how they will fit into this.
They are not currently under the Apache license, and we would never be
able to track down all the contributors to get them to agree to the
license and/or sign the iCLA. So are we talking only about future
updates to these docs? And if so, do you mean that every future
contributor to these guides during their production must sign the iCLA?
Or just that only someone with suitable access rights (committer?) can
put them on the wiki (in ODT/PDF format)? Or something else?


I'd like us to treat documentation like we do code.  Not necessarily
the same tools, but the same care for provenance, accountability and
quality, namely:

1) We welcome patches and contributions from anyone, but these
must be first reviewed and approved by a project committer before they
become part of the documentation set.  Any such contributions must be
made under Apache 2.0 license.

2) Only project committers have direct write access to the
documentation.  This requires that they first sign the iCLA.

3) All contributions, whether from the public or from committers and
tracked/logged, so we can accurately determine who made a given
change.  So no anonymous or pseudonymous patches.  A user id that we
can trace to a real email address is fine.

With code this works by non-committer contributors sending patches
(diffs) to the mailing list, where they are merged in and reviewed by
a committer, and then checked into the repository.  With
documentation, using a wiki , we would need a different mechanism for
achieving this.  Luckily there are MediaWiki extensions to enable
this.

Rob,
I think you lives outside of this world. You will not find a lot of 
contributors which needs to work with this idea.

This will stop causal documentation contributors to enhance wiki page.
When I started working with wiki documentation, first I checked that the 
written down text is working in OOo, and if I find something corrected 
the text.

I did this when I found some time to work on wiki.
If the causal user meet barriers like every post wait for moderating for 
committers they will lost their interest very soon.
May be you will have good managed and fully license compliant 
documentation, but fully out of date.

Zoltan

I'd like to preserve the immediate nature of editing on the wiki.
That is its strength.  But we need to find away to also get this under
project oversight as well.  I think we can do both, without too much
annoyance to contributors.


--Jean










Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was re:OpenOffice.org branding)

2011-08-02 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.08.02. 15:47 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Reizinger Zoltánzreizin...@hdsnet.hu  wrote:

2011.08.02. 14:03 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jean Hollis Weberjeanwe...@gmail.com
  wrote:

On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 21:24 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:

I'd look at it like this:  The documentation that is needed for our
users to be successful with our product, from end users, to admins, to
application developers, that documentation is product documentation.
If having it deleted or defaced, without us noticing it, would cause
our users some harm, then it is product documentation.  If the right
to copy, modify and redistribute the documentation is essentially to
successful creating and hosting a new port or translation, or even a
commercial derivative or an open source fork, of the project, then it
is product documentation.

Leaving aside for the moment all the other user-doc type items on the
wiki, and looking specifically at the existing current set of user
guides (which are in ODT/PDF format, but made available for download
from the existing OOo wiki), I'm unclear how they will fit into this.
They are not currently under the Apache license, and we would never be
able to track down all the contributors to get them to agree to the
license and/or sign the iCLA. So are we talking only about future
updates to these docs? And if so, do you mean that every future
contributor to these guides during their production must sign the iCLA?
Or just that only someone with suitable access rights (committer?) can
put them on the wiki (in ODT/PDF format)? Or something else?


I'd like us to treat documentation like we do code.  Not necessarily
the same tools, but the same care for provenance, accountability and
quality, namely:

1) We welcome patches and contributions from anyone, but these
must be first reviewed and approved by a project committer before they
become part of the documentation set.  Any such contributions must be
made under Apache 2.0 license.

2) Only project committers have direct write access to the
documentation.  This requires that they first sign the iCLA.

3) All contributions, whether from the public or from committers and
tracked/logged, so we can accurately determine who made a given
change.  So no anonymous or pseudonymous patches.  A user id that we
can trace to a real email address is fine.

With code this works by non-committer contributors sending patches
(diffs) to the mailing list, where they are merged in and reviewed by
a committer, and then checked into the repository.  With
documentation, using a wiki , we would need a different mechanism for
achieving this.  Luckily there are MediaWiki extensions to enable
this.

Rob,
I think you lives outside of this world. You will not find a lot of
contributors which needs to work with this idea.

I'm seeing it working exactly as it does now, with the difference that
the changes made by non-committers are not immediately visible on the
page until reviewed and approved by a committer.


This will stop causal documentation contributors to enhance wiki page.

So you think that someone will refuse to contribute unless their
change is made available immediately?  Have you tried this?  Can you
back up your assertion that no one will contribute?

Take a look at the wiki logs right now:

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChangesfrom=20110702130619days=30limit=500

What do you see?  Many new zombie accounts.  People updating their
User pages (not documentation) and a few real documentation changes,
most of which are made by Jean, who is already an Apache OpenOffice
committer.

So although I've seen claims that there are 35,000 user accounts, even
15,000 real accounts, I'm not seeing a huge volume of changes.

Fighting with spammers is a continuous work.
No changes so much because OOo 3.4 was not out on time, and the no new 
features happens, it is an side effect of Oracle stopping work on OOo.


See my rare contribution to wiki:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributionslimit=500target=R4zoli
Check it, the changes I've made during my contribution, worth for 
committer checks, who has not knowledge in Hungarian or OOo Base?

Worth for waiting for approvals?

Your idea to bring all user content under AL 2.0 will not help the users 
of OOo, it will hurt them, that is what my experience on tho OOo is saying.


I see no further effort on this topic, your idea may be wrong.
I not want to spend more time on this.
I not see so much support on your side, only you forcing this idea.
Time will tell that it will be useful or not.

Zoltan

When I started working with wiki documentation, first I checked that the
written down text is working in OOo, and if I find something corrected the
text.
I did this when I found some time to work on wiki.
If the causal user meet barriers like every post wait for moderating for
committers they will lost their interest 

OOo Conferences presentations

2011-07-13 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi All,
I want to rise one question not raised in this list.
OOo community held 10th OOo Conference in Budapest last year.
The conference materials with 9th Italian conference materials stored in 
http://www.ooocon.org/ site.

What is the status of this site, it is in transfer list if hosted by Oracle.

The older OOo conference materials not reachable in the net, stored 
somewhere inside Oracle?

It is worth looking around not to lost the useful content of it.
May be some presentation outdated, but can be useful one found.
Regards,
Zoltan






Re: Extensions and templates site down

2011-07-12 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.07.11. 15:41 keltezéssel, TJ Frazier írta:

On 7/11/2011 07:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
The two sites works sporadically, needs four five web page refresh 
to load:

http://templates.services.openoffice.org/
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
To help OOo present users, needs to stabilize sites work.
Somebody knows what the cause of this problem.


Yes, I posted some more details in this message a few weeks ago:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201106.mbox/browser 


and I don't have further updates available.

Note that those sites are not part of the Oracle infrastructure.

Regards,
   Andrea.


Hi, all,

Andrea Pescetti's helpful message is easier to find here:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201106.mbox/%3c1308391724.2986.34.camel@localhost.localdomain%3e 



since it is titled, Re: Bugzilla or JIRA? ... etc.

Oregon State University Open Source Lab hosts the extensions site, and 
some Apache-related things as well. Just for fun, I tried looking up 
OSUOSL's service ticket #18367, but their website was impenetrable to 
my relatively feeble search attempts.


As a systems programmer (retired), I used to read a lot of tickets, 
and it was my job to solve them. I find this protracted trouble 
curious, to say the least. :-/
It seems to me it is an abandoned site, nobody care for it, it hurt all 
OOo effort if we not find a solution to restart, the users ask every day 
on forum which way they could find specific extensions, and we can not 
help them. It is sad thing.

Zoltan


Re: Some more strange files in the OOo code

2011-06-30 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.06.29. 23:05 keltezéssel, Pedro F. Giffuni írta:

snip

Note that some of them are also outdated. More
outdated tarballs independent of the license) and
the version *I* recommend are listed here:
snip

hsqldb  1.8.1

snip

This will cause incompatibility with other OOo/LibO versions which is use 
hsqldb 1.8.0.10.
The incompatibility caused by built in OOo warning of newer version of hsqldb, 
this means the odb file database tables will be unreadable/manageable in older 
version of OOo.
If you want to update hsqldb use cws hsqldb19 which contain hsqldb 2.x.x 
version, causing different type of incompatibility and not reversible.

Zoltan




Re: Getting to our first build

2011-06-29 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.06.29. 12:23 keltezéssel, Michael Stahl írta:

On 29.06.2011 11:58, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 04:26, Mathias Bauermathias_ba...@gmx.net  
wrote:

On 29.06.2011 00:07, Greg Stein wrote:


On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:31, Rob Weirapa...@robweir.comwrote:


Let me summarize what I'm hearing the initial steps then are.

1)  We take the OOo source code with tag OOO340_m1 from
hg.services.openoffice.org, including the full history, and convert
that into a SVN repository, e.g.,:   hg convert --dest-type svn
hgreponame svnreponame


Who does this?  Is this something that can be done remotely, or do we
need an Oracle admin to do this for us?


We would do this. We have all the access that we need (open source, 
yay!)


I've started on a script to create this (local) Hg repository. See
tools/dev/single-hg.sh for my first bits. I'm trying it out now, but
it is probably going to take a while to run :-P  (I also have no idea
about CWSs)


Did you clone the repo at

http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO340?

This is the one we should use.


As you can see from the script, it is designed around DEV300.

I thought we wanted the latest development branch?


actually no CWS was integrated on the development DEV300 after the 
release OOO340 was branched off, while on OOO340 release relevant 
CWSes were integrated.

so OOO340 contains the latest and greatest stuff.

Pulling the CWS should be faster: create a local clone of your 
existing repo
for each cws and pull from the CWS repro at hg.services.ooo. This 
will pull

only the change sets not in your local repo and create a second head
revision in it. This revision could be moved over to svn or you 
could create

a patch from it against whatever version that is on the hg repo.


Ah! That's and awesome improvement. Thanks. I'll incorporate that into
the scripting.

I don't think we want patches. I continue to believe we want a single
Hg repository with everything, and we convert that to Subversion,
and then load it into svn.apache.org.


if it is possible to convert HG heads to SVN branches, that would be 
the way to go.


i still think it makes sense to go a step further and actually merge 
all finished CWSes into OOO340 using HG first, because that is by far 
the easiest way and doesn't have any technical pitfalls.


This will not good in database part of OOo, the cws hsqldb19 finished 
and waits for dev300 integration toward OOo 3.5.
it is contain hsqldb 2.x.x database engine which is incompatible 
(convert all data into new version whic is not reversable) to presently 
used 1.8.0.10 version. Then the new version file opens in older version 
of OOo, but not usable, warning came up to use newer version of OOo.

If you merge it it will cause mess.
The using merging cws hsqldb needs to discussed in project in later 
time. It is cause incompatibilities, but the hsqldb 2.x.x has more 
features which is good for database users.

Zoltan


Re: Contributors versus Committers versus PMC members - AND USERS

2011-06-25 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

2011.06.24. 23:44 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:

Does anyone see a difference other than the obvious difference of
technology, between the OOo user list and the forums?  Are they being
used for different kinds of things?  Or are they just different ways
of doing the same things?


The user downloaded OOo from OOo site can be aware of OOo mailing lists 
if met some problems - users with some knowledge.
If user get OOo without his knowledge, some admin installed on computer, 
this happens in small companies or public administration,
This user - average Joe, has knowledge in other software, when met 
specific problems, in most cases use some search engine to find answer, 
then the forum could came first.
The second type of user prefer forums, and the first type possibly 
mailing lists.


My practice on user forums and Base user and developer mailing list have 
differences, in the forums core developers never posts, questions 
answered by volunteers or other users.
(It takes time to crawl through all posts, the developers time worth 
more than spend reading questions, easily answerable ones.)
In users mailing lists, half answers came from core developers, if they 
think, the problem is real. Easily answerable questions answered by 
volunteers.
In developer mailing list users mostly ISVs or power users use, when met 
specific problems, in specific database drivers, or with programming 
OOo, and answered usually by developers.


Zoltan



Introduction

2011-06-17 Thread Reizinger Zoltán

Hi All,

My name is Zoltán Reizinger (r4zoli on OOo) and I have been involved in
OpenOffice.org Base QA project from last year.
I participated in Base documentation development and in wiki.
I was the founder co-admin for Hungarian OOo user forum, and volunteer 
on En forum.


Regards,
Zoltan