On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
The fact that it never
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 12, 2012 6:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
...
As a minor update, the only observation we received so far (besides a
substantial number of +1 votes, no abstentions or -1) was that almost all
the proposed PMC members do not belong to other Apache
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 13, 2012 11:00 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
?..
It never occurred to me that any of them would have necessarily been
interested.
The fact that it never occurred to anyone participating in the definition
of the PMC membership is, in my opinion, a
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 13, 2012 11:00 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
?..
It never occurred to me that any of them would have necessarily been
interested.
The fact that it never occurred to
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
The fact that it never occurred to anyone participating in the definition
of the PMC membership is, in my opinion, a major failing of process which
was designed to identify people with sufficient merit.
Now that you mentioned it,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
The fact that it never occurred to anyone participating in the definition
of the PMC membership is, in my opinion, a major failing of process which
Yes, it's easily resolved, Dave already indicated the three ways it might
be resolved. Like I said its more of a lesson to be learned than a reason
to delay. Awareness of the issue is enough for now.
Ross
Sent from mobile, forgive terseness and errors
On Oct 14, 2012 5:55 PM, Dave Fisher
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
The fact that it never
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 14, 2012 9:18 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Also, there are some administrative steps that we'll need to take care
of over the weekend, assuming the IPMC vote passes:
1) Sending a [VOTE][RESULTS] post to the IPMC list
2) Sending the proposed
- Original Message -
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
...
As a minor update, the only observation we received so far (besides a
substantial number of +1 votes, no abstentions or -1) was that almost all
the proposed PMC members do not belong to other Apache projects; our
On Oct 13, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
...
As a minor update, the only observation we received so far (besides a
substantial number of +1 votes, no abstentions or -1) was that almost all
the proposed PMC
On 13/10/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
1) Sending a [VOTE][RESULTS] post to the IPMC list
2) Sending the proposed resolution to the board list
The 72 hours just expired and I've taken care of both steps. So
everything to be done
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
...
As a minor update, the only observation we received so far (besides a
substantial number of +1 votes, no abstentions or -1) was that almost all
the
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
...
As a minor update, the only observation we received so far (besides a
substantial number of +1 votes, no abstentions or -1) was that almost
On 12/10/2012 15:52, Rob Weir wrote:
2) Sending the proposed resolution to the board list per these
instructions:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#top-level-board-proposal
This probably needs to happen on Saturday, shortly after the 72-hour
PMC vote ends, if we are to get on
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Issac Goldstand is...@volo-net.com wrote:
On 12/10/2012 15:52, Rob Weir wrote:
2) Sending the proposed resolution to the board list per these
instructions: http://incubator.apache.org/**guides/graduation.html#top-*
Rob Weir wrote:
Also, there are some administrative steps that we'll need to take care
of over the weekend, assuming the IPMC vote passes:
1) Sending a [VOTE][RESULTS] post to the IPMC list
2) Sending the proposed resolution to the board list per these
instructions:
On Oct 12, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Issac Goldstand is...@volo-net.com wrote:
On 12/10/2012 15:52, Rob Weir wrote:
2) Sending the proposed resolution to the board list per these
instructions:
On Oct 12, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Also, there are some administrative steps that we'll need to take care
of over the weekend, assuming the IPMC vote passes:
1) Sending a [VOTE][RESULTS] post to the IPMC list
2) Sending the proposed resolution to the board
20 matches
Mail list logo
