Re: [Oorexx-devel] Where are we at?

2008-06-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
applyAction MEB=6 action=6 bool_output=003E5922 deref=1 applyAction return !=0 So, the read_write bit seems to be set, but I don't see where. -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place

[Oorexx-devel] Playing with the stream library in Rick's sandbox

2008-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
bufferSize; char *buffer = getDefaultBuffer(bufferSize); getDefaultBuffer() returns a pointer with the value of: 0x20200a0d So it looks like the bufferAddress member of StreamInfo has gotten overwritten. I still get baffled trying to figure those out, so that's where I quit. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Playing with the stream library in Rick's sandbox

2008-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
of these problems twice. Okay, I'll look at the unix version. -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The new stream library

2008-06-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The doc text and the syntax diagram say that the default shared mode for open is: SHARED. But the code actually does the open as not shared

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The new stream library

2008-06-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My guess is this is giving an error, but because of the other problem you've seen, you're not getting the error message. Try setting a breakpoint at RexxActivity::raiseException(). If indeed an error is getting raised,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The new stream library

2008-06-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My guess is this is giving an error, but because of the other problem you've seen, you're not getting the error message. Okay, that's good. I'm

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The new stream library

2008-06-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ooTest.frm Error 49 running C:\work.ooRexx\ooRexxUnit\3.x\framework\OOREXXUNIT.CLS line 1308: Interpretation error Thanks. -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The new stream library

2008-06-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
the difference in the before and after lines were. -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Getting the test framework to run: parse source

2008-06-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Show version and quit -V, --verbose=NUMSet verbosity to NUM C:\work.ooRexx\3.x\interpreter.rick\Win32Dbg I've been neglecting a few things, that I need to get back to. Probably a few days until I can get to actually running any tests. -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:42 AM

[Oorexx-devel] sandbox: SysFileTree()

2008-06-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
The other problem is that no message is printed, it just ends silently. -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http

[Oorexx-devel] poppedStackFrame is null

2008-06-25 Thread Mark Miesfeld
, but instead of that syntax error being raised, the routine not found error is raised. Even though in reality the routine was found. -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Debugging the test suite

2008-06-25 Thread Mark Miesfeld
to demonstrate the problem? Rick On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:10 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The test suite appears to be starting upor at least, the progress indicator runs for a while before it issues

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Some individual tests now passing in the Sandbox

2008-06-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
This command line pegs the CPU and hangs: E:\work.ooRexx\3.x\interpreter.rick\Win32Dbg.\rexx \work.ooRexx\ooRexxUnit\3.x\testOORexx.rex -R ooRexx\base\runtime.objects -U runtime.objects only has the environmentEntries.testGroup -- Mark Miesfeld On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Rick McGuire

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Some individual tests now passing in the Sandbox

2008-06-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
:\work.ooRexx\3.x\interpreter.rick\Win32Dbg.\rexx \work.ooRexx\ooRexxUnit\3.x\testOORexx.rex -R ooRexx\bas e\class -f Properties It is ooRexx/base/class/Properties.testGroup -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Some individual tests now passing in the Sandbox

2008-06-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
/trapping the notready condition. Yeah, I need to work on some other stuff now too. I'll see where we are at this evening. -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell

[Oorexx-devel] The BEEP.testGroup

2008-06-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
: BEEP.testGroup File: E:\work.ooRexx\ooRexxUnit\3.x\ooRexx\base\bif\BEEP.testGroup Event: [SYNTAX 93.903] raised unexpectedly. Missing argument in method; argument 2 is required Program: Line:103 103 *-* retc = beep(38, ) -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Solaris and Linux issues.

2008-06-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
a release source you can expect to see very few warnings. -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net

[Oorexx-devel] A little help with rxqueue

2008-06-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
In the doc rxqueue is listed as a builtin. But there is no rxqueue in BuiltinFunctions.cpp. I think, things in CoreClasses.orx get added to rexx.img, but I'm not sure how the routine rxqueue in CoreClasses.orx would get tied into the interpreter. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Development set-up

2008-06-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
/oorexx/interpreter-3.x/releases/3.2.0/trunk https://oorexx.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/oorexx/interpreter-3.x/trunk Let me know if you have any trouble with the mechanics of using any of the tools on Windows. Rick is the better source for how to port the code of course. -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] ooDialog, public routines and new APIs

2008-06-29 Thread Mark Miesfeld
you also said you felt you had to be backwards compatible. How did you resolve this, or did you? -- Mark Miesfeld - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexxUnit Writing a test case

2008-07-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
++. Contribute test cases to the ooRexx project and I guarantee I will push to make you a committer. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexxUnit Writing a test case

2008-07-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
how to add some test case to a test group already written. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A suggestion for improving the unit tests for handling syntax errors.

2008-07-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
the second will raise the syntax error within the ooRexxUnit.cls file. I think, have to look at that code again. If it does, we would loose some of the info on where the real error was. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Where are we at with running unit tests?

2008-07-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark, I'm curious...is the clipboard timing problem a new problem on trunk, or did it occur on 3.2.0 also? I'll explain why I'm asking once I have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Where are we at with running unit tests?

2008-07-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
have to look at the code again, but I believe the time listed for file search is I/O bound. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need a quick tutorial on debugging on Linux

2008-07-05 Thread Mark Miesfeld
in the time to get it working. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Since David was so cool to get the rpm build working, I thought I'd give it a quick try. After a RPM install, on a very simple program, just: say hello world It runs but no output is produced. Is that a symptom of not finding the image? -- Mark Miesfeld On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Rick

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
version of the interpreter on your local system. We can also help you set up and use any additional things you need. Like SVN, the platform SDK, etc. Maybe you can even capture all the information and get it in the Wiki. Something that looks beyond my personal capabilities. grin -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Mark said I can use 'Microsoft's free compiler. (The Express edition.)' Is this 'The Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is link to get Visual C++ 2005: http://www.microsoft.com/express/2005/download/default.aspx# on that page you have to look closely at the different selections, they kind of blend together. Be sure you select C

[Oorexx-devel] interpreter-AttachThread(context) continued

2008-07-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
and my test program for that if you wanted to make a temporary change to ooDialog to take a look at it that way. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting

Re: [Oorexx-devel] interpreter-AttachThread(context) continued

2008-07-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
an AttachThread() with a corresponding DetachThread()? -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy

Re: [Oorexx-devel] interpreter-AttachThread(context) continued

2008-07-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
from the method. That's very exciting. Really, this is the biggest advancement in ooRexx since it has become an open source project. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Moritz, Are you doing a build in between these different sizes? There was a problem on Windows with the build order where sometimes some things got left out. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Moritz Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, oorexx 4 works for me as well, I can

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Temporarily rename your ooRexx directory: C:\homeren ooRexx ooRexx-temp Then rename the directory back when you want to use the 3.2.0 version of ooRexx. You only need to do the rename when you actually start the build. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
to build 4.0, but will bear the rxApi service in mind when I come to it. Actually, I think you are building 4.0. grin The version just recently got upped. But it still lives in the 3-x directory. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. You need to either get killer.exe or edit the batch file to use taskkill. You can get killer from SourceForge. Download: ooRexx-build-utils-1.0.0-windows.zip and unzip it somewhere. Take killer.exe and put it somewhere in your path. The rest of the stuff you can throw away if you want. -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
had to go through this. You need to download the build-utils package. It has both killer.exe and stouch.exe in it. Put them in your path and then the touchheaders.bat file will work. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hard to believe that I could misunderstand what you meant by 'ONCE' - got it now. Unfortunately, I only seem to have the source for stouch

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
set up so that it is not picking up the Platform SDK. As soon as you get back to this, e-mail me and we will straighten it out. -- Mark Miesfeld - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
be the call to the SDK setEnv.cmd. Since Shlwapi.h is in the SDK include files, but it is not found during your compile, the most likely cause is that setEnv.cmd did not run. Check the spelling and make sure you have the path correct. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-15 Thread Mark Miesfeld
SRC_DRV=D: D:\set SRC_DIR=\orxSVN\interpreter-3.x\trunk\ D:\set NO_BUILD_LOG=1 Then cd into your ooRexx build directory and run makeorx. It should build. If it doesn't, we'll figure out why offline. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Anybody else having problems committing code?

2008-07-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Forbidden (https://o orexx.svn.sourceforge.net) -- Mark Miesfeld On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, to answer my own question, this looks like a system wide problem. There's a discussion thread about this already on the sourceforge discussion forums. Rick

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Anybody else having problems committing code?

2008-07-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
always hope. grin -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two

[Oorexx-devel] svn e-mail notifications may not be working

2008-07-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
revision 2717. Warning: post-commit hook failed (exit code 255) with no output. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin

Re: [Oorexx-devel] svn e-mail notifications may not be working

2008-07-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
object rather than two. Hey, that's great. I guess I need to look more closely at what is available. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine doesn't build Windows interpreter

2008-07-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
should be a log. Could you take a look at it? Thanks. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great

[Oorexx-devel] Should discuss compiler version for Windows build

2008-07-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. Problems with the C run time libraries. To tell the truth, I'm not real knowledgeable in that area. It seems to me, we should have problems, but the couple of quick tests I've done over the last year didn't show any problems. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Should discuss compiler version for Windows build

2008-07-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
everything, unless I run into something unexpected. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand

[Oorexx-devel] 64-bit compile with Visual C++ Express edition

2008-07-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
in the MSDN Library: Visual C++ How to: Configure Visual C++ Projects to Target 64-Bit Platforms The .NET Framework SDK is also free, so it looks as though anyone willing do some free downloads and installs will be able to build a local version of the interpreter to work on the code. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New ooRexx Website

2008-07-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Yeah, it looks good David. -- Mark Miesfeld On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM, David Ashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All - FYI, I have been working on a new RexxLA and ooRexx web site. The new RexxLA website still has some work to be done but the new ooRexx web site is ready for testing. You

[Oorexx-devel] The build machine

2008-07-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
++ 6.0. So that is not the problem. Can we get that fixed? Or, is it just not working because David is migrating to the new site he posted yesterday? -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The build machine

2008-07-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
that the Ubuntu VM may just be hung. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The build machine

2008-07-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
docs. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The build machine

2008-07-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:19 AM, David Ashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, there are two problems with the Windows build. 1. The build cannot locate some of the docs so it aborts the build. makeorx for Windows has

Re: [Oorexx-devel] The build machine

2008-07-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
the DOC_LOCATION environment variable. Okay, I'll look at it. It seems to work fine in my local working copy. I'll try to see what the problem is. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I'm going to be off the net the next couple of days.

2008-07-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
interpreter. I'll try to not find too many things until you are back. grin Have fun. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Changes between 3.2.0 and the current SVN interpreter-3.x

2008-07-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
are still sorting through things not working as intended due to the large amount of code changes. Mostly simple thinks like typos or copy / paste errors. It could be that this is a bug we haven't caught yet. I didn't think that existing libraries would need to be recompiled. -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] Arg validation in the native API

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
areas in the interpreter that I am hazy on, I thought I'd run it by you. -- Mark Miesfeld. - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK

Re: [Oorexx-devel] It's my build, but...

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
stop rxapi cd 3.1.2 directory .\rxapi -u -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize

[Oorexx-devel] Default Numeric Digits in the 21st century

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
) Error 93 running C:\work.ooRexx\other\feature.requests\update.progressBar\oodpbar.rex line 104: Incorrect c all to method Error 93.928: D2X value must be a valid whole number; found 4278190080 -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Arg validation in the native API

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
of external functions in the DLL. The design of the new API is looking pretty good the more I dig into it. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Arg validation in the native API

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
know to free it. So, in this case creating a new string object is the best thing to do? -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications

Re: [Oorexx-devel] API testing

2008-07-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event

[Oorexx-devel] Revisit native API typed value args

2008-07-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
as a bad arg. But, of course it is not a bad value for uint32_t. I was going to post my fix here, (which works but may not be the best fix,) for you to review. But, it seems easier to just review the code. So I just committed it with the caveat that you should change it if need be. -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Revisit native API typed value args

2008-07-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
the way it does and I didn't know what ramifications changing it would have. On the other hand, I was pretty sure that using unsigned64Value() would not break anything. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Linux debugging (again)

2008-07-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've fixed both the concurrenty issues and the rexxhide crash. Yes, I just saw those. Thanks. I like the fix to the standard I/O handles. That looks much cleaner. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Native API methods with no return value?

2008-07-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
like that when I asked the question. But, I think returning NULLOBJECT would be enough of a signal that the method is not intended to return anything. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Thinking about reorganizing the code tree

2008-07-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
that in extensions seems move reasonable to me. (We could just acknowledge amongst ourselves that it is an exception.) -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Thinking about reorganizing the code tree

2008-07-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
a utilities subdirectory is good. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize

[Oorexx-devel] Native API and FindClass

2008-07-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
lookup, there is only 1 class in its slot, which is CHECKBOX. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Native API and FindClass

2008-07-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
purposes, moving the .RECT class into the ooDialog package is sufficient. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A potential improvement to the native APIs.

2008-07-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
That was quick. I went out to mow the lawn, came back and its done. grin -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, this is in. Pretty easy to add, actually. Rick On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

[Oorexx-devel] Creating String objects in external functions

2008-08-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
I'm not clear on this, thought I should get some confirmation. With context-NewStringFromAsciiz() I've been assuming the interperter makes a copy of the string, so it is okay to use local storage RexxMethod1(..) { char buffer[64]; ... return context-NewStringFromAsciiz(buffer); }

[Oorexx-devel] Native API UnsignedInt64ToObject() on 32-bit Windows

2008-08-03 Thread Mark Miesfeld
it is not correct, is there any way to achieve what I would like? -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Native API UnsignedInt64ToObject() on 32-bit Windows

2008-08-03 Thread Mark Miesfeld
= new (Numerics::DIGITS64) RexxNumberString (Numerics::DIGITS64); +newNumber-formatUnsignedInt64(integer); /* format the number */ return newNumber; } -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Launching rxapi in a process.

2008-08-03 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. It seems like you could just put that in temporarily to debug your problem, then take it out. -- Mark Miesfeld It's starting to sound like it might be easiest to just byte the bullet and implement a logging subsystem. Rick On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Bug in 4.0.0 ooDialog?

2008-08-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
to open bugs as you find them so we can be sure and not lose sight of them go ahead. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications

[Oorexx-devel] Bugs 2037626; OODialog 4.0.0 not populating attributes

2008-08-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
at a lose here. The only thing I can think of is that now that we have the RexxMethodContext and the RexxThreadContext that has somehow changed the behavior so that the variable is not in the proper scope. Any hints are appreciated. grin -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Bugs 2037626; OODialog 4.0.0 not populating attributes

2008-08-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
, but then lost sight of it. Thanks. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Anybody have any experience with the STL collection classes?

2008-08-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick, I'm on my way home, I'll look at this later. I did manage to use a little STL in the WinShell code, but of course I am very weak on C++. I remember I struggled. You might want to just glance at it to see if it gives you a hint. I only use the map class. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Aug 4

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RexxGTK Status

2008-08-07 Thread Mark Miesfeld
, you'll need to run the 4.0.0 interpreter to use the GTK code. Not that that should discourage you, I just wanted to make sure you understood that. David or I will build a Linux version and put it where you can get it. I'm planning on building a Windows version of the DLL over the weekend. -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Some building problems in my sandbox version

2008-08-08 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick, I glanced at the change you made to the make file when you did it, and I think you made the wrong change. I know what the problem is, give me a few minutes to figure out the correct flags. -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark, I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Some building problems in my sandbox version

2008-08-08 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick, Just a note, you'll probably realize this anyway. If you make the change to the C flags, then you need to do completely rebuild everything so that all the *.obj files link with the same library. -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick

[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [Oorexx-svn] SF.net SVN: oorexx:[2888] main/trunk/kernel/streamLibrary/StreamNative.cpp

2008-08-08 Thread Mark Miesfeld
and it seems correct to me. -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision: 2888 http://oorexx.svn.sourceforge.net/oorexx/?rev=2888view=rev Author: miesfeld Date: 2008-08-08 18:11:17 + (Fri, 08 Aug 2008) Log Message: --- find fix

[Oorexx-devel] Question on context-raiseException in 4.0 native APIs

2008-08-08 Thread Mark Miesfeld
the original conversion of OLEObject and coded all the RaiseExceptions like the first example, I got to wondering if maybe you intended the first to work? I think not, but wanted to check with you on it. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RexxMethodContext versus RexxThreadContext

2008-08-09 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick, thanks. There were some things I didn't understand. I had forgotten about the calls to Rexx2Variant and Variant2Rexx from outside of orexxole.c. -- Mark Miesfeld On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, it wasn't really an efficiency argument

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems with build (again)

2008-08-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This warnings are fine. Mark is working on cleaning up those issues in his prototype version, I believe. Those are only a problem for a 64-bit version. Rick On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems with build (again)

2008-08-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
(). Because of this, code that is correct for both 32-bit and 64-bit will generate these warnings during a 32-bit compile. It looks like there are a few warning for rxwinsys.cpp that need the code fixed. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems with build (again)

2008-08-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
to run this by you at some point Rick, see what you thought. For now I've sort of just got used to the warnings. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems with build (again)

2008-08-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
to add a comment at the point of the ones we can't make go away indicating those are acceptable. Yes, that is my feeling also. I'll add the comments to the code. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Uninits for oleObject not being called

2008-08-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems as though the uninit() method is not being called for any of the oleObject objects. I've been looking at it, but haven't made any progress. In RexxMemory::runUninits(): if (uninitTable-value(iterTable

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Uninits for oleObject not being called

2008-08-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
); printf(zombiObj=%p value==TheTrueObject\n, zombieObj); The init() for ojbect lines are from the init() method of oleObject. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Restructuring windows install files.

2008-08-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Yeah sure. Probably tonight. -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark, You seem to know the most about the windows install stuff. I created a platform/windows/install directory. Could you take a stab at moving all of the files used

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need an opinion on timezones and DateTime

2008-08-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
-calculate what it was. -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A proposal for loosening the rules for private methods.

2008-08-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. This seems to make sense to me. Although David may have some other, better, reasons for not making the change. grin -- Mark Miesfeld - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A proposal for loosening the rules for private methods.

2008-08-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The rebuttals that I thought of are: 1.) Changing the behavior of PRIVATE runs the risk, maybe slight, of breaking someones existing programs

[Oorexx-devel] Native APIs and raising exceptions

2008-08-15 Thread Mark Miesfeld
exception } ... return ResultObj } So, in that raise some exception block, should I set ResultObj to something other than null. Or is it okay to just return NULLOBJECT since an exception is raised? else { // raise some exception ResultObj = context-Nil(); } ... -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Native APIs and raising exceptions

2008-08-15 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Okay, thanks. I saw those methods CheckCondition(), etc., but hadn't thought through when to use them yet. That's helpful. -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, returning NULLOBJECT when you've raised an exception is just fine

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [Oorexx-svn] SF.net SVN: oorexx:[2987] main/trunk/api/platform/windows/rexxplatformdefs. h

2008-08-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
? I'm not sure that is semantically correct. On Windows only, (because it is in a Windows only header,) the macro forces a constant number to be signed and 64 bits in size. I think that is what the macro is intended to do. We'll see if Rick has a more clever way to deal with it. grin -- Mark

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >