thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 24.03.2024 15:48, Rick McGuire wrote:
if .context~executable~isa(.Method) then say .context~executable~scope
Wow, thank you very much for this pointer!
(I was not aware of the Method class
, not
ooRexx.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Greetings Rony,
No, I do not have the necessary skills to take on the task. The task seemed
pretty important, and thus it stuck in my mind.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Michael,
AFAIK nothing has happened
suggested by ChatGPT in case anyone else
wants to adapt it to rexxapi communications.
Rick
End Forwarded Message
Did that suggested code prototype ever make it into the ooRexx RexxAPI
communications code base?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http
Greetings Walter,
WalterPachl wrote:
What is the '=' good for?
Emphasized position move back to the beginning? That was how Mike and Chip
dreamed it up... so I captured it, and have used the pattern repeatedly.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http
unking up data and not storing
it in a stem.
Chip... I appreciate your mentoring.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourcef
ny times since then and always I
leave behind:
/* Optimizing thanks to MFC & MrParse */
in the code just before the parse call.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lis
oth belong in the category "Great once accomplished!"
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
erim build.
In that case, given the availability of .rexxinfo~revision will always be supported, I
would be fine with removing the precise version from "rexx -v".
I appreciate you explaining.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.
panies this distribution or at
https://www.oorexx.org/license.html
I prefer the version which states:
*Open Object Rexx Version 5.1.0 r12616*
Build date: Jan 6 2023
The 5.1.0 is the "major version" and the "r12616" is the most precise version
identification.
ly formatted version number.
ah. :-)
Even a version for my trusty 16.04 machine, which is now out of LTS support, but I still get some use out of. That is the machine I have ooRexx v4.2 on, and Rony's kind custom assistance got
BSF4ooRexx running on.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lue
...Enter 'exit' to end.
.output~LineOut('Hello, World! Coming from ooRexx v5.0 GA Release!')
Hello, World! Coming from ooRexx v5.0 GA Release!
... rexxtry.rex on LINUX
exit 0
mdlueck@jaakob:~$
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com
number.
Downloading and trying out the version for 22.04 next...
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/
v5 then? Excellent if that is the case.
+1 to release.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
m thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
The O.P.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Oorexx-devel] Strange behaviour RxMath RxCalcSqrt function
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 12:12:19 +0200
From: Ruurd Idenburg
Reply-To: Open Object Rexx Developer Ma
better design would be to start many ooRexx PIDs and have each one be
single threaded, let the OS manage the PIDs/threads, to achieve Rexx parallel
processing, correct?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasyste
to specifically target which command processor they need
the ooRexx program to target
2) Allows ooRexx to target multiple command processors
3) One less configuration to maintain in the host computer's configurations
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com
;part of speech" I termed
with accompanying example sentence:
"The Dangling Participle" Ex: "The man rolled down the barn roof and fell into a
pile of."
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
__
oRexx code actually exists, I would not think a call to
System.gc() would so tamper with the memory that it would distort the root of the problem, or also hopefully not make the problem be masked / disappear altogether.
Just thoughts...
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Sy
feature request, or are there even more hurdles to pass in order to contribute
the function code?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--- Begin Message ---
I allow.
-Simon Husin in Nashville, Tennessee
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 7:53 PM Michael
.. so I am unable
to immediately retest the sample program.
Attaching from the original thread...
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--- Begin Message ---
Running the attached script "rxmath.rex" will yield a weird result on
my Lin
changes to best optimize for ooRexx.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Harmander Singh wrote:
Terry,
One issue which came up in this context a long while back was that at some stage in the development of v5.0, the classic Rexx file input statements
ooRexx is capable of doing "bad
things"?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
MHz single core and 128MB or 256MB RAM! ;-)
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
aintain in the ooRexx language. Is it
causing you some sort of technical issues?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Greetings René,
René Jansen wrote:
I am sure you mean 1984. And then there was still only EXECIO.
Excellent correlation! Indeed EXECIO was the mainframe I/O alternative I could
not recall the name of.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com
Do we have a third WRITE mode - non-APPEND, non-REPLACE - that needs to be
documented?
What characteristics would the third WRITE mode have? Ignore "non"
capabilities... those show what it lacks. What is left as a capability to yet support?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lue
l the time behind the scenes, not retaining them for repeat calls. Thus using
the proper ORexx classes avoided the overhead.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oo
not
see the same error as running on ooRexx 5. Did that issue ever get correctly
resolved?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange behaviour RxMath RxCalcSqrt function
Date: Mon
: Michael Lueck
To: Simon Husin
Greetings Simon,
Long time since our last chat indeed!
Simon Husin wrote:
Yes, go ahead.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 7:47 PM Michael Lueck mailto:mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com>> wrote:
Please see:
[feature-requests:#687]
https://sourceforge.net/p/
-)
Yes, I agree with your critique / dilemma. ooRexx needs to not assume
everything is a string.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge
Greetings Rony,
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Should we still support 32-bit Linux at all?
Ubuntu dropped 32-bit at LTS version 16.04. That is only supported through next
April, I believe.
Drop 32-bit +1 vote here.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http
served.
This program and the accompanying materials are made available under
the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 which accompanies this
distribution or at
http://www.oorexx.org/license.html
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.
Greetings ooRexx'ers,
Erich Steinböck wrote:
We cannot support XP any more.
XP R.I.P.
Much appreciated the ooRexx support for so long. So be it.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx
ignore it?
Would it be something a regression test case could be developed to test for /
validate does not come back?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel
Greetings ooRexx'ers,
Jon Wolfers wrote:
I have found this a nuisance in the past, sometimes revealing passwords to
users on net use commands. Glad to see it go!
I second the vote to abolish the title bar showing the commands.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http
enizing any of my ooRexx
code.
Thus asking if it is a requirement I have somehow missed that "Programs utilizing /
touching BSF4ooRexx MUST be tokenized."
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
__
out a starting value is not compatible with
the over keyword?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
rpm lacked it.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
, between command line ren and move, one is able to overwrite
existing target files (I believe move), whereas the other (ren) is not.
Since we (ooRexx'ers) are not in the business of making things operate the same
across platforms, I vote to leave it as-is.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck
Greetings Rick,
Rick McGuire wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:23 AM Michael Lueck mailto:mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com>> wrote:
I added some of the RexxUtil functions. So please let me know how I may
assist in contributing test cases for those functions.
Take a look at what functi
Greetings Team,
Michael Lueck wrote:
On to make install finally... maybe during lunch (shortly).
(uiserver):u40009095:~/build/oorexxbuild/release$ make install
[ 3%] Built target class_files
[ 10%] Built target rexxapi
[ 82%] Built target rexx
[ 83%] Built target hostemu
[ 83%] Built target
= FINDstream~qualify
drop FINDstream
This does simplification of . .. and so on that may appear in the
FINDfilenamequery passed into the method.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx
Greetings Team,
Rick McGuire wrote:
This change is in now.
Checked out revision 11724.
[100%] Built target rexxinstance
Phew!!!
On to make install finally... maybe during lunch (shortly).
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com
Greetings Team,
All right. Please let me know when I can do another svn pull to pick up that
accommodation.
Meanwhile I have contacted 1&1 support seeking the specified library package.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Rick McGuire w
done) so I can specify
where I would like the tmp files created.
1&1 advises against writing to the common / shared /tmp directory, and for good
reason!
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oo
Michael Lueck wrote:
Brilliant suggestion! That does work. I am building now. Used CMake suntax:
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RELEASE
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/homepages/35/d157794216/htdocs/build/oorexxbuild/release/opt/oorexx
../../ooRexx-5.0.0/oorexx-code-0
Oops, copy/paste issue
thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
s to me like the error is in stacking up multiple /kunden/ directories in
the path. There should only be one:
(uiserver):u40009095:~/build/oorexxbuild/release$ pwd
/kunden/homepages/35/d157794216/htdocs/build/oorexxbuild/release
Suggestions / assistance please.
I am thankful
for shared web hosting, I full
pathed the prefix value.
#ooRexx 4.2 syntax
./configure --disable-static
--prefix=/kunden/homepages/35/d157794216/htdocs/opt/oorexx
Noted, after getting cmake syntax established, I will perform a make and make install.
"Getting close."
I am thankful,
getting more objects than actually exist... some would be picked up multiple times.
Rick, perhaps hide it in your 'Z' option idea? And have 'Z' option supported
cross platform... just only actually does something on Linux?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http
ecursively for a given path.
RFE #482 is a request to make the ooRexx use of SysFileTree consistent across Windows and *nix. +1 request for burring platform shim code down in C/C++ land so the ooRexx API behaves consistently
across platforms.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Sy
for?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
n
8.11
uname -a
Linux infong531 3.16.0-ui18276.29-uiabi1-infong-amd64 #1 SMP Debian
3.16.59-1~ui80+1 (2018-10-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
So, based on real Debian, not Ubuntu.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasyste
on Linux there is a wider gap in functionality.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
pull?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
e separate files for the 18.04 and 10.04.1 release all in the one
folder.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge
am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
on a scheme which works in as many scenarios as possible.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
impossible. Such as deployments in DMZ
environments.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
control, I will
do a pull and try building on shared Linux web hosting with only non-root user
perms available.
Please just let me know you think this code is ready.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com
directory?
Yes yes, I am aware that the socket still gets opened in the context of the entire machine, so only one user could run ooRexx at a time. I do not think desiring to run ooRexx on Shared Web Hosting
servers is common, sadly... not concerned about that risk.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
x DLL call to ooRexx"
https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/687/
How may I assist to get this completed?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
will begin building and testing Ubuntu packages.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites
that connect?
Also, what are the chances of getting:
"Add GetCRC32 Rexx DLL call to ooRexx"
https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/687/
grafted into ooRexx v5 source? How may I assist to get this completed?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Sy
ept the Rexx API source code into
ooRexx v5, I would very much appreciate.
Just the one API... Linux and Windows source code for it was provided on the
ooRexx ticket.
Please advise.
Also, very excellent news that BSF4ooRexx gets along with ooRexx v5 so well.
Bravo teams!!! :-)
I am thankful,
, are all BSF4ooRexx functionalities working properly with the current
state of ooRexx v5? No longer areas of regression compared to the functionality
available to BSF4ooRexx on ooRexx 4.2?
Otherwise I think I am good. ooRexx v5 has built so far on a couple of recent
LTS editions of Ubuntu! :-)
I am thankfu
committed something. Makes sense.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http
like it was on v4.2. How is that
bit calculated? Days since a certain point in time, perhaps?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community
v5?
Shall I upload these first two packages somewhere?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech
18.04 build/test VM's.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http
Greetings ooRexx'ers,
Michael Lueck wrote:
Are we actually attempting test cases which consume 656M of RAM?
I increased VM RAM by 1GB and the execution finished. Results:
ooTest Framework - Automated Test of the ooRexx Interpreter
Interpreter:REXX-ooRexx_5.0.0(MT)_64-bit 6.05 18
test cases which consume 656M of RAM?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org
,
and guessed incorrectly:
mdlueck@testxd1604x64:~/Documents/test50$ svn co
https://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0/test/branches/5.0.0/trunk .
svn: E17: URL
'https://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0/test/branches/5.0.0/trunk' doesn't
exist
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data
will fire up the test Xubuntu 16.04 X64 VM, install the package, and see what
the regression test suite thinks of this package.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out
again expecting different
results?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org
thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
shortened the output.
You see I showed a bare make, and then started copy/paste of actual results.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community
: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/rexxapi.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/rexxapi.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:149: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
mdlueck@buildxd1604x64:~/Documents/oorexxbuild/release$
Suggestions?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http
For my build/test machines I have VM's running on my desktop machine. I do not
leave all of them always running. Thus, not possible to automate nightly builds.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com
resolutions, so
that packages might be contributed to SourceForge officially?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one
xx 4.2 on Xubuntu 14.04
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 21:08:44 -0400
From: Michael Lueck <mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com>
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List <oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Greetings ooRexx'ers,
I just went through the steps on a clean VM to build an ooRexx 4.2 package
Message
Subject: Fwd: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Steps to build ooRexx 4.2 on Xubuntu 14.04
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:23:46 -0400
From: Michael Lueck <mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com>
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List <oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Greetings again Erich,
I do n
business logic.
Thus, I am actively looking for a place to build another ooRexx powered Application Server. Leveraging the full Java stack already available reduces development time / expense building extensive C/C++
code from scratch.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http
.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
John Timmons wrote:
Michael,
I get what you are saying but "dynamically unstable at high
volume" isn't even funny anymore. Just from the conversation, I tease out the gist
tha
ented, one of the pros was "no direct memory
access". No?
So is in fact BSF4ooRexx able to directly edit the JVM's memory directly and
bypass the JVM to do so?
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.
recently.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
.
Also, I do not have a current Windows build environment... and my Linux build
environment is still questionable.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out
2017 21:52:48 -0400
From: Michael Lueck <mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com>
Reply-To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
<oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List <oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Greetings Erich,
Erich Steinböck wrote:
I went through brain surgery and got brain wiped.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech
to automatically load
functions in it.
I cannot seem to find the correct keywords to locate what I am recalling.
The solution involved I believe a Rexx loadable DLL as well as perhaps a
configuration file to assist with function mapping in the native Windows DLL.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
lain the different run-time duration for multiple
runs of your same program, sorry.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's mo
situation and it is a hard problem
to solve with out some level of compaction.
Oh that all programming languages were as powerful an intuitive as ooRexx, eh!?
;-)
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatas
Message: Check for root must succeed
Here it seems that Rexx has no working shell available
Can you try rexx -e " 'id -u' " and tell us the result?
mdlueck@testxd1604x64:~/Documents/test42$ rexx -e " 'id -u' "
1000
mdlueck@testxd1604x64:~/Do
.
This program and the accompanying materials are made available under
the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 which accompanies this
distribution or at
http://www.oorexx.org/license.html
Michael Lueck wrote:
Interpreter: REXX-ooRexx_4.2.0(MT)_64-bit 6.04 25 May 2017
Addressing Mode: 64
ooRexxUnit
(testResult, verbose)
546 *-* test~execute(testResult, verbose)
115 *-* suite~execute(testResult)
79 *-* retCode = 'worker.rex'(arguments)
[error] [20170602 11:02:29.991319]
svn:r3371 Change date: 2008-09-21 00:
,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
of the Common Public License v1.0 which accompanies this
distribution or at
http://www.oorexx.org/license.html
mdlueck@testxd1604:~/Desktop$
Xubuntu 16.04 x86 coming up next.
I am thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings
thankful,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
