Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

I have multiple objections to this being included as is: 1) Wrong license 2) No ooRexx copyright statement 3) We don't put change logs in commentary. Source control is what manages change logs. 4) We don't identify specific authors in any of our source files. Once contributed, it is community

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

ooRexx only accepts Common Public License v1.0 You are providing your rgf_util2.rex under ASF 2.0 On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 7:14 PM Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hi Erich, > > On 22.03.2020 11:56, Erich Steinböck wrote: > > I agree with Gil. Let's stay with our current coding/tagging style and >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

- > > have classnames, literals and the like marked up with the methodname tag > in title elements to see its effect on the TOC formatting? > Is it o.k. to use the methodname tag for marking up keywords, subkeywords > and directives? - I totally disagree with intentional mis-tagging. - - Only tag

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Dear Rony, I have collected the 12003 doc build from Jenkins and put it in my dropbox , where you can collect them. Rexxpg is r12001 still. It is quite easy to get them from Jenkins, just log in to Jenkins, select the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Gosh, Gil.  Don't say _that_.  These days you're better off saying, "My hemorrhoids are flaring up and I can't sit at the computer" than let people speculate that you've come down with SARS-CoV2 ... :-X On 3/24/2020 10:57 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote: FYI - my "silence" on this thread is not due

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

FYI - my "silence" on this thread is not due to lack of interest or having no comment but rather to being a bit "under the weather" at the moment. As soon as I am able, I will offer my thoughts. Gil On 3/24/2020 9:18 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Forgot to check in my changes that have led

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Dear Rony, The build of documentation on Jenkins has not run since the 20th, the revision for rexxpg is 11998. I am rebuilding the documentation now, in an hour I can see if it built ok. (The Win slave had rebooted without reconnecting, this happens every now & then. MS.)

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Forgot to check in my changes that have led to yesterday's rendering of the rexxpg book, checked in with r12003. ---rony On 23.03.2020 19:09, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > > Hi Gil, > > On 20.03.2020 19:07, Gil Barmwater wrote: >> I finally have had an opportunity to look into this issue. I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Hi Erich, On 22.03.2020 11:56, Erich Steinböck wrote: > I agree with Gil.  Let's stay with our current coding/tagging style and the > typographic conventions. I concur as well, see my follow-up to Gil's mail. > Also, rgf_util2.rex is unacceptable for inclusion in our svn.  Please fix the >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Hi Gil, On 20.03.2020 19:07, Gil Barmwater wrote: > I finally have had an opportunity to look into this issue. I downloaded your > version of rexxpg and > opened it next to the one that comes with the ooRexx build which is > "pre-split" so it has none of > the changes that you have made. One

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Rony, I agree with Gil. Let's stay with our current coding/tagging style and the typographic conventions. Also, rgf_util2.rex is unacceptable for inclusion in our svn. Please fix the copyright or remove it from the svn, and please also do so for any other of your current or future commits.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Hi Rony, I finally have had an opportunity to look into this issue. I downloaded your version of rexxpg and opened it next to the one that comes with the ooRexx build which is "pre-split" so it has none of the changes that you have made. One thing I noticed was that you have added tags

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

On 20.03.2020 14:23, René Jansen wrote: > just want to correct one terminology issue: a monotype font is a font from a > specific foundry, a monospaced (or non-proportional) font is what you mean. Ah, yes, thank you René, also: . ---rony

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

just want to correct one terminology issue: a monotype font is a font from a specific foundry, a monospaced (or non-proportional) font is what you mean. > On 20 Mar 2020, at 14:15, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > > On 19.03.2020 14:31, Gil Barmwater wrote: >> >> Having spent some time looking at

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

On 19.03.2020 14:31, Gil Barmwater wrote: > > Having spent some time looking at the documentation while developing the > system to build the > books, I found that we actually have a set of conventions on how things are > displayed. This is > part of every document, under the title "Typographic

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Documentation: using less bold font for some elements ?

Having spent some time looking at the documentation while developing the system to build the books, I found that we actually have a set of conventions on how things are displayed. This is part of every document, under the title "Typographic Conventions", right near the beginning of the book.