l-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf
Of *Josh Stompro
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:58 AM
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
*Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Catalog holds status display - Hold
queue and potential copies
Hello Scott, we do resource share. One of our systems is 3x
<mailto:ddis...@scenicregional.org>
>
> www.scenicregional.org
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*Open-ils-general
> [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Josh Stompro
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:58 AM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion G
Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Catalog holds status display - Hold queue and
potential copies
Hello Scott, we do resource share. One of our systems is 3x larger than the
other, so the smaller system uses age hold protection on their new items to
keep them home for a while. Otherwise w
pen-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org>>;
ME list serv
<evergr...@lists.mobiusconsortium.org<mailto:evergr...@lists.mobiusconsortium.org>>
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Catalog holds status display - Hold queue and
potential copies
I a
ral@list.georgialibraries.org>
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Catalog holds status display - Hold queue and
potential copies
Scott,
It's not that you can't have a hybrid, but that FIFO sites will end up getting
their holds prioritized over proximity-based sites if there is resource sharing
between the
es.org] On Behalf Of
scott.tho...@sparkpa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 7:31 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Catalog holds status display - Hold queue and
potential copies
Another interesting issue was raised in this discussion. Our consortium is all
pro
es.org] *On Behalf Of *Diane Disbro
> *Sent:* Monday, November 27, 2017 8:30 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-general@list.
> georgialibraries.org>; ME list serv <evergr...@lists.mobiusconsortium.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Catalog holds status
st.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Diane Disbro
> *Sent:* Monday, November 27, 2017 8:30 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-general@list.
> georgialibraries.org>; ME list serv <evergr...@lists.mobiusconsortium.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Catalog h
.mobiusconsortium.org>
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Catalog holds status display - Hold queue and
potential copies
I am very interested to hear if someone has done something with this other than
try to explain to disgruntled patrons why they see in their online account that
they are next
I am very interested to hear if someone has done something with this other
than try to explain to disgruntled patrons why they see in their online
account that they are next in the queue for an item but they wait weeks or
months to get it.
Thank you, Josh, for asking.
Diane Disbro
Circulation
Hello, Those of you that use age hold protection and non FIFO best hold
selection sort order, what have you done with the status column of holds in
your catalog. We just noticed that it is showing the FIFO queue position for
holds, along with all potential copies. This gives users bad info
11 matches
Mail list logo
