Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-21 Thread Shrey
Hi, After a little more experimenting, I think this iscsi-targets fault. I agree this does not have any relevance to the open-iscsi code, nevertheless, I though it would nice to post here as well to keep this post updated. Do apologize if that is against the principles of this mailing-list. > I

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-20 Thread Shreyansh
Hi Mike and List, Thanks for the reply. On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Shrey wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> Thanks for you reply. Please find my reply inline. >> >> On May 19, 11:04 pm, Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Shrey wrote: Dear

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-20 Thread Mike Christie
Shrey wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for you reply. Please find my reply inline. > > On May 19, 11:04 pm, Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Shrey wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> I started using/studying open-iscsi recently. I was wondering if there >>> is any hard-coded limit to number of targe

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-19 Thread Shrey
Hi Mike, Thanks for you reply. Please find my reply inline. On May 19, 11:04 pm, Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shrey wrote: > > Dear All, > > > I started using/studying open-iscsi recently. I was wondering if there > > is any hard-coded limit to number of targets devices that can >

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-19 Thread Mike Christie
Shrey wrote: > Dear All, > > I started using/studying open-iscsi recently. I was wondering if there > is any hard-coded limit to number of targets devices that can > discovered per iSCSI target? Is there any hard-coded limit on the > number of LUNs supported per target device (assuming that someh

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-19 Thread Shrey
Hi Konrad and list, Thanks for the reply. Please see my comments inline. On May 19, 7:13 pm, Konrad Rzeszutek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:53:07AM -0700, Shrey wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > Further update on this topic: > > > > Thanks once again :) - If I manage to find/a

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-19 Thread Mike Christie
Shrey wrote: > Hi all, > > Further update on this topic: > >> Thanks once again :) - If I manage to find/assert it, I will surely >> post back. > > I tried to do an experiment to confirm the maximum number of available > targets and LUNs with an initiator. I did: > > On the target machine: > 1

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:53:07AM -0700, Shrey wrote: > > Hi all, > > Further update on this topic: > > > > > Thanks once again :) - If I manage to find/assert it, I will surely > > post back. > > I tried to do an experiment to confirm the maximum number of available > targets and LUNs with a

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-19 Thread Shrey
Ok, I got something to ponder from one of the old discussions : http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi/browse_thread/thread/cc57ad9b5f571b31 (I wonder why I did not find it earlier - might be acted a little lazily!!) On May 19, 6:53 pm, Shrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Further u

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-19 Thread Shrey
Hi all, Further update on this topic: > > Thanks once again :) - If I manage to find/assert it, I will surely > post back. I tried to do an experiment to confirm the maximum number of available targets and LUNs with an initiator. I did: On the target machine: 1. I created softlinks for a devic

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-15 Thread Shrey
On May 15, 3:36 pm, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2008, Shrey wrote: > > On May 15, 12:39 pm, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Shrey wrote: > > > > I started using/studying open-iscsi recently. I was wondering if there > > > >

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-15 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Shrey wrote: > On May 15, 12:39 pm, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Shrey wrote: > > > I started using/studying open-iscsi recently. I was wondering if there > > > is any hard-coded limit to number of targets devices that can > > > discove

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-15 Thread Shrey
Hi, On May 15, 12:39 pm, Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Shrey wrote: > > I started using/studying open-iscsi recently. I was wondering if there > > is any hard-coded limit to number of targets devices that can > > discovered per iSCSI target? Is there any hard-

Re: Maximum LUN support

2008-05-15 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Shrey wrote: > I started using/studying open-iscsi recently. I was wondering if there > is any hard-coded limit to number of targets devices that can > discovered per iSCSI target? Is there any hard-coded limit on the > number of LUNs supported per target device (assuming tha

Maximum LUN support

2008-05-14 Thread Shrey
Dear All, I started using/studying open-iscsi recently. I was wondering if there is any hard-coded limit to number of targets devices that can discovered per iSCSI target? Is there any hard-coded limit on the number of LUNs supported per target device (assuming that somehow HBA on iscsi target do