Mike Christie wrote:
On 08/03/2009 04:13 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/31/2009 09:53 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hmm. I must admit I'm slightly at a loss here.
I do have this function:
Did you try my second patch queue-some-io-during-tmfs2.patch
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:12 PM, nick nicholasfredd...@gmail.com
mailto:nicholasfredd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to knw if i can present same volume to two hosts?
I am using Stonefly Voyager as SAN and the host would be Xen.
Thanks in Advance
Nick
For correct TMF handling we should keep track of outstanding
TTTs; some targets will drop the connections if outstanding
TTTs are not honoured.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de
---
drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c |7 +++
drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c |2 +-
Hi Mike,
as you might've seen, I finally found the problem for the MSA dropping
the connection. It seems that it's follows this section from the RFC:
For the LOGICAL UNIT RESET function, the target MUST behave as
dictated by the Logical Unit Reset function in [SAM2].
where SAM2 says:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Mike Christiemicha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/31/2009 04:03 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
tcp_sendpages/tcp_sendmsg can wait sndtmo seconds
if a connection goes bad. This then delays session
recovery, because that code
This is a the second proposal of an extended and cleaned up generic kernel FIFO
implementation.
Changes since V0.1:
add kfifo_init()
kfifo_put() and kfifo_get() restored to the original behavior (but without
locking)
introduce new kfifo_put_rec() and kfifo_put_rec() for FIFO record
/*
* A generic kernel FIFO implementation.
*
* Copyright (C) 2009 Stefani Seibold/Munich/Germany stef...@seibold.net
* Copyright (C) 2004 Stelian Pop stel...@popies.net
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public
/*
* A generic kernel FIFO implementation.
*
* Copyright (C) 2009 Stefani Seibold/Munich/Germany stef...@seibold.net
* Copyright (C) 2004 Stelian Pop stel...@popies.net
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public
Thanks for your answer!
Yes, by using #iscsiadm -m iface -I ethN, N=1...6 we can have 6
iSCSI sessions.
But now there is the question HOWTO assign an initiator name for EACH
session?
For one iSCSI session it can be found in the /etc/iscsi/
initiatorname.iscsi File:
Folks,
I really fear this one is a FAQ somewhere, but I can't find the answer
to it.
My problem is that discovering new targets overwrites any custom
settings that have been applied to targets that already exist on a given
portal.
Here is the sequence of events I'd like to do:
1) Create an
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hi Mike,
as you might've seen, I finally found the problem for the MSA dropping
the connection. It seems that it's follows this section from the RFC:
For the LOGICAL UNIT RESET function, the target MUST behave as
dictated by the Logical Unit Reset function in
Ty! Boyack wrote:
Folks,
I really fear this one is a FAQ somewhere, but I can't find the answer
to it.
My problem is that discovering new targets overwrites any custom
settings that have been applied to targets that already exist on a given
portal.
Here is the sequence of events
Erez Zilber wrote:
I'm running with open-iscsi.git HEAD + the check suspend bit patch +
the wake xmit on error patch. If I disconnect the cable on the
initiator side (even while not running IO), I see that after sending
the signal, the iscsi_q_XX thread reaches 100% cpu. I ran it over
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Mike Christiemicha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
Erez Zilber wrote:
I'm running with open-iscsi.git HEAD + the check suspend bit patch +
the wake xmit on error patch. If I disconnect the cable on the
initiator side (even while not running IO), I see that after
I don't know if there's a way to set unique initiator names for each NIC. A
quick scan of the config file didn't show anything. I *believe* iscsid has
the initiator name so it's a global parameter.
Why do you want unique names for each initiator? What do you think it
will gain you?
-don
On
15 matches
Mail list logo
