On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Ulrich
Windl wrote:
>
> On 22 Jul 2009 at 17:09, Erez Zilber wrote:
>
>> restart)
>> stop
>> + if [ $RETVAL -ne 0 ]; then
>> + echo "Stopping iSCSI initiator service
>> failed, not
If 'iscsiadm -m node --logoutall=all' fails when stopping
the open-iscsi service, we shouldn't kill iscsid.
This solves the following race:
1. A logout from a node is initiated by the user.
2. Before the logout completes, the user runs /etc/init.d/iscsi stop.
The 'stop' method logs out from all
Mike Christie wrote:
> On 07/22/2009 12:00 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> No, wrong. The check in queuecommand is by no means relevant
>>> to the actual window.
>>> We're checking the target window at the time queuecommand is run,
>>> but we're _generating_ the CmdSN only much later after we've
>>>
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 07/22/2009 12:00 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
No, wrong. The check in queuecommand is by no means relevant
to the actual window.
We're checking the target window at the time queuecommand is run,
but we're _generating_ the CmdSN on
Mike Christie wrote:
> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>> On 07/22/2009 12:00 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> No, wrong. The check in queuecommand is by no means relevant
> to the actual window.
> We're checking the target window at the time queuecommand is run,
> but we
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/22/2009 12:00 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>> No, wrong. The check in queuecommand is by no means relevant
>> to the actual window.
>> We're checking the target window at the time que
Mike Christie wrote:
> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[ .. ]
>> Fsck. You are correct.
>>
>
> But you still might be hitting a problem where the target does not like
> data-outs when it closed the window. Maybe they interpreted the RFC
> differently. You should ask the HP target guys for more info.
>
On 07/23/2009 12:24 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> But you still might be hitting a problem where the target does not like
> data-outs when it closed the window. Maybe they interpreted the RFC
> differently. You should ask the HP target guys for more info.
>
> Also your patch might be working be
Mike Christie wrote:
> Sorry for the really late response on this.
>
> On 06/25/2009 08:25 AM, Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
>>
>> Li, I have attached the diff against git master, please go through it. I
>> have merged the contents of uip directory and nic related files into one
>> common libuip. So now o
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> I think I can replicate this problem now too. It was by accident. I am
>> using a EQL target remotely (I am in the middle of the US and the target
>> is on the west coast so there is a good deal of space between us and the
>> connection is slow) and I am seeing the proble
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> [ .. ]
>>> Fsck. You are correct.
>>>
>> But you still might be hitting a problem where the target does not like
>> data-outs when it closed the window. Maybe they interpreted the RFC
>> differently. You should ask the HP
On 07/23/2009 07:01 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> I think I can replicate this problem now too. It was by accident. I am
>>> using a EQL target remotely (I am in the middle of the US and the target
>>> is on the west coast so there is a good deal of space between us and the
Mike Christie wrote:
> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> [ .. ]
Fsck. You are correct.
>>> But you still might be hitting a problem where the target does not like
>>> data-outs when it closed the window. Maybe they interpreted the RFC
>>> diff
Mike Christie wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> Mike Christie wrote:
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> [ .. ]
> Fsck. You are correct.
>
But you still might be hitting a problem where the target does not like
data-outs when it closed the window. Maybe the
14 matches
Mail list logo
