Mike Christie wrote:
> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :) I do
> not think a changelog will help either since it is the first version of a
> RFC patch.
Mike, signature is needed and helpful, I assume you sign all the patches
you send to James, isn't it... ch
Mike Christie wrote:
> On 09/01/2009 09:53 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 09/01/2009 03:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> Mike Christie wrote:
Or, I am ccing you because some time ago Erez was working on support
for older RHEL and SLES kernels for OFED. It looks like the patch
below would
Fix compilation warnings and modify the Makefiles to treat
warnings as errors.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zilber
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Erez Zilber wrote:
> Fix compilation warnings and modify the Makefiles to treat
> warnings as errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erez Zilber
>
2 comments about this patch:
1. I'm not familiar enough with the fwparam_ibft code, so I didn't add
the -Werror flag to the Makef
On 09/03/2009 07:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :) I do
>> not think a changelog will help either since it is the first version of a
>> RFC patch.
> Mike, signature is needed and helpful, I assume you sign a
On 09/02/2009 11:36 AM, ofero wrote:
> We are running RHEL 5U3. What do you means when you say that the open-
> iscsi.org version does not have full support for bnx2i ? And is the
If the bnx2i driver you are using hooks into the iscsi kernel class and
libiscsi then iscsiadm can display session i
On 09/03/2009 11:21 AM, Erez Zilber wrote:
> Fix compilation warnings and modify the Makefiles to treat
> warnings as errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erez Zilber
>
Thanks.
I get this compilation error on fedora 10. We used to get a warning about it
not being initialized and upstream we did this
On 09/03/2009 11:37 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 09/03/2009 07:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :) I do
>>> not think a changelog will help either since it is the first version of a
>>> RFC patch.
>> Mike,
On 09/03/2009 12:17 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 09/03/2009 11:37 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 09/03/2009 07:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> Mike Christie wrote:
A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :) I
do not think a changelog will help either since it i
On 02/07/2009 12:32 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
> This patch is from Fedora. The problem is that some distros are starting
> iscsid in anticipation that iscsi might be needed, and it turns out it
> might never be :( So this patch has the iscsi tools start iscsid only
> when they first need it for log
10 matches
Mail list logo
