Re: [Stgt-devel] [ofa-general] [ANNOUNCE] open iSCSI over iSER target RPM is available

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:38:11 -0500 Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Erez > > Erez Zilber wrote: > > stgt (SCSI target) is an open-source framework for storage target > > drivers. It supports iSCSI over iSER among other storage target drivers. > > > > Voltaire added a git tree for stg

Re: [Stgt-devel] Update (Re: open iSCSI over iSER target RPM ...)

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:05:03 -0500 Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Update: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/big/local.file bs=256k > count=10 > 10+0 records in > 10+0 records out > 2621440 bytes (26 GB) copied, 58.7484 seconds, 446 MB/s > > Better. I reb

Re: [Stgt-devel] Update (Re: open iSCSI over iSER target RPM ...)

From: Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Stgt-devel] Update (Re: open iSCSI over iSER target RPM ...) Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:05:03 -0500 > Update: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/big/local.file bs=256k > count=10 > 10+0 records in > 10+0 records out > 26214

Re: Limiting the number of ISCSI-Sessions per target

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:32:41 +0200 "Dr. Volker Jaenisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Mike! > > Thank you for the fast reply. > > Mike Christie schrieb: > > I am not sure if this is what you are looking for but you can control > > which sessions get made. > If I get you right your solut

Re: Crash tgtd and tgtadm with more than 112 volumes.

On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:23:30 +0100 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Konrad Rzeszutek schrieb: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:52:41PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > >> I wrote a script to create lots of iscsi volumes on loop devices. > >> > >> Seems to run fine up to 111, and then tgtd crashes and tgtadm

Re: iSCSI initiator implementation question

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:12:49 +0200 Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > Hi all, > > Joachim Worringen wrote: > > On Jun 18, 11:19 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >> On 06/18/2009 10:56 AM, Joachim Worringen wrote: > >> > >>> Greetings, > >>> I tried to use Open-iSCSI with a non-tcp socket type and failed > >

Re: iSCSI initiator implementation question

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Joachim Worringen wrote: > > > > On Jun 18, 12:37 pm, FUJITA Tomonori > wrote: > > Yeah, I guess that all niche high performance interconnect technology > > (such as Dolphin, Myrinet, etc) for HPC support RDMA. They could

Re: iSCSI initiator implementation question

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Joachim Worringen wrote: > > On Jun 18, 1:14 pm, FUJITA Tomonori > wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:53:47 -0700 (PDT) > > Joachim Worringen wrote: > > > I just wonder why iscsi_tcp.c calls tcp-functions directly for

Re: iSCSI initiator implementation question

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:33:42 +0200 Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:14 PM, FUJITA > Tomonori wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:53:47 -0700 (PDT) > > Joachim Worringen wrote: > >> On Jun 18, 12:37 pm, FUJITA Tomonori > >> wrote:

Re: What gives with the spam.

On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:46:23 -0500 Mike Christie wrote: > > On 06/24/2009 12:31 PM, Alvin Starr wrote: > > > > There seems to be a lot of spam coming through the open-iscsi mail list. > > > > Any chance of getting something done about this? > > > > Right now only members can post and if a non

Re: What gives with the spam.

On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:40:36 -0500 Mike Christie wrote: > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:46:23 -0500 > > Mike Christie wrote: > > > >> On 06/24/2009 12:31 PM, Alvin Starr wrote: > >>> There seems to be a lot of

Re: [PATCH 2/2] RFC: The be2iscsi driver support for bsg

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:37:07 +0530 Jayamohan Kallickal wrote: > This patch contains the necessary changes to support > the bsg interface > > Signed-off-by: Jayamohan Kallickal > --- > drivers/scsi/be2iscsi/be_cmds.h | 137 --- > drivers/scsi/be2iscsi/be_iscsi.c |3 +

Re: [PATCH 2/2] RFC: The be2iscsi driver support for bsg

On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:02:52 -0500 Mike Christie wrote: > On 03/18/2010 08:58 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > > - You invent your hardware specific data structure for the simplest > >operation such as setting IP address. > > I think this is what Jay is not tryi

Re: [PATCH 2/2] RFC: The be2iscsi driver support for bsg

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:56:30 -0400 James Smart wrote: > > I still want to know why vendors can't do this via the existing > > netlink interface. open-iscsi uses the netlink interface for some pdu > > so I guess that having a different channel for management might be a > > good idea. > > Separate

Re: [PATCH 2/2] RFC: The be2iscsi driver support for bsg

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:16:31 -0400 James Smart wrote: > > About the implementation, I think that it's better to have the common > > library code rather than just copying the fs bsg code into iscsi. > > Note: I tried to library-ize the transport implementation on the first pass > of > the RFC.