> So, I've done this now, but I still get the same error:
Doh! Scratch that! I needed to re-start the OpenAFS server for it to
realize the "patrition" was there.
--
Tim Gustafson
t...@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354
Baskin Engineering, Room 313A
___
OpenA
> You may need to 'touch /vicepa/AlwaysAttach' to force it to use arbitrary
> directories
So, I've done this now, but I still get the same error:
root@server: touch /vicepa/AlwaysAttach
root@server: vos create server /vicepa root.afs -localauth
vos : partition /vicepa does not exist on the server
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:56:19PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Tim Gustafson wrote:
I just sent off a (believed to be final) patch to get 1.6.1 in the freebsd
ports collection this morning; it should hit the ports tree within
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:56:19PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Tim Gustafson wrote:
>
> >>I just sent off a (believed to be final) patch to get 1.6.1 in the freebsd
> >>ports collection this morning; it should hit the ports tree within a day
> >>or
> >>two.
> >>That sharb
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 09:26:18 -0700
Tim Gustafson wrote:
> The documentation I read was that it was acceptable to use folders,
> rather than mountpoints, for OpenAFS.
This is perfectly okay; many sites do this all the time. While there may
be minor issues for performance or organization depending
> Less performant, harder to reason about space usage when something else can
> be using the space, potentially harder to recover from filesystem corruption
> (although you are likely pretty hosed in that case whether it's dedicated or
> not).
I can set it up as a separate ZFS file system and rese
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> > But is it a partition (that is, a local mountpoint)? You may need to
> 'touch
> > /vicepa/AlwaysAttach' to force it to use arbitrary directories; this is a
> > bad idea in general.
>
> Why is your suggestion a "bad idea in general"? Is i
> But is it a partition (that is, a local mountpoint)? You may need to 'touch
> /vicepa/AlwaysAttach' to force it to use arbitrary directories; this is a
> bad idea in general.
The documentation I read was that it was acceptable to use folders,
rather than mountpoints, for OpenAFS.
Specifically:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> > I just sent off a (believed to be final) patch to get 1.6.1 in the
> freebsd
> > ports collection this morning; it should hit the ports tree within a day
> or
> > two.
>
> Thanks! This has hit the ports treen and I got quite a bit further
> I just sent off a (believed to be final) patch to get 1.6.1 in the freebsd
> ports collection this morning; it should hit the ports tree within a day or
> two.
Thanks! This has hit the ports treen and I got quite a bit further.
OpenAFS is running, but now when I go to create a file system, I ge
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Tim Gustafson wrote:
I just sent off a (believed to be final) patch to get 1.6.1 in the freebsd
ports collection this morning; it should hit the ports tree within a day or
two.
That sharball will not work for recent versions of freebsd, as it does not
include the OS support
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
* The FreeBSD platform, having ZFS, is IMNSHO an excellent choice for a
file server.
How far ahead is the client code on FreeBSD?
It works under light load, but I am pretty sure there are su
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Setting Up OpenAFS on FreeBSD Date: Wed, Jun 27,
2012 at 01:28:11PM -0400 Quoting Brandon Allbery (allber...@gmail.com):
> > Are your comments about "light load" related to ZFS or OpenAFS?
> OpenAFS client, specifically, as I read it (and as I u
> I just sent off a (believed to be final) patch to get 1.6.1 in the freebsd
> ports collection this morning; it should hit the ports tree within a day or
> two.
> That sharball will not work for recent versions of freebsd, as it does not
> include the OS support for 8.3, 8-stable, 9-stable, or 10-
> Last time I looked at it (not very recently, admittedly; not much grounds to
> set up fbsd servers of late) it panic() a couple minutes after being
> started. As for the current state, I know only what was said earlier in
> this thread; corner cases could well cover either panic() or corruption.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:46:24 -0700
Tim Gustafson wrote:
Is there anything in PtLog?
Lots of this:
ptserver: pt 11 (267275)pt 11 (267275)pt 11 (267275)pt 11 (267275)pt
11 (2pt11 (267275) Can't rebuild database because not running NoAuth
Can you ru
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> >> * The FreeBSD platform, having ZFS, is IMNSHO an excellent choice for a
> >> file server.
> >>
> >> How far ahead is the client code on FreeBSD?
>
> > It works under light load, but I am pretty sure there are subtle
> lingering
> > issue
> Can you run 1.6.1 instead? The instructions on
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/afs-server mention
> http://web.mit.edu/freebsd/openafs/openafs.shar, which appears to be
> 1.6.1. This problem should go away with 1.6.1.
>
> There are other solutions to this, but 1.6.0 has major known issues, so
> I think
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:46:24 -0700
Tim Gustafson wrote:
> > Is there anything in PtLog?
>
> Lots of this:
>
> ptserver: pt 11 (267275)pt 11 (267275)pt 11 (267275)pt 11 (267275)pt
> 11 (2pt11 (267275) Can't rebuild database because not running NoAuth
Can you run 1.6.1 instead? The instructions
>> * The FreeBSD platform, having ZFS, is IMNSHO an excellent choice for a
>> file server.
>>
>> How far ahead is the client code on FreeBSD?
> It works under light load, but I am pretty sure there are subtle lingering
> issues, and it should not be considered production-ready. Only memory cache
> He would be using 1.6.0, I expect -- that's been in the ports tree since its
> release, and I haven't gotten 1.6.1 pushed yet.
I'm apparently running:
openafs-1.6.0.20110814_3
--
Tim Gustafson
t...@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354
Baskin Engineering, Room 313A
__
> Can you read from the database ('pts examine system:anyuser')?
root@host: pts examine system:anyuser
libprot: unable to build security class (getting token)
libprot: Could not get afs tokens, running unauthenticated
pts: User or group doesn't exist so couldn't look up id for system:anyuser
> I
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Måns Nilsson wrote:
Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: Setting Up OpenAFS on FreeBSD Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at
04:47:10PM -0500 Quoting Andrew Deason (adea...@sinenomine.net):
I'm not sure if I've ever seen someone actually encounter that error
before. Keep in mind
Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: Setting Up OpenAFS on FreeBSD Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at
04:47:10PM -0500 Quoting Andrew Deason (adea...@sinenomine.net):
> I'm not sure if I've ever seen someone actually encounter that error
> before. Keep in mind it may be possible you are encounterin
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Andrew Deason wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:29:04 -0700
>> Tim Gustafson wrote:
>>
>>> I was able to get past this problem by using FreeBSD's Kerberos
>>> server. I was previously trying to integrate with our MIT
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:34:03 -0400 (EDT)
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
should be in a /var/lib-like location.
I am told that you will need to use pt_util to initialize a protection
database as part of setting up a server.
This should not be necessary. Bef
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:34:03 -0400 (EDT)
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > should be in a /var/lib-like location.
>
> I am told that you will need to use pt_util to initialize a protection
> database as part of setting up a server.
This should not be necessary. Before 1.6, you had to either create the
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:29:04 -0700
Tim Gustafson wrote:
I was able to get past this problem by using FreeBSD's Kerberos
server. I was previously trying to integrate with our MIT Kerberos
server, but that seems to be problematic.
To be clear, that p
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:29:04 -0700
Tim Gustafson wrote:
> I was able to get past this problem by using FreeBSD's Kerberos
> server. I was previously trying to integrate with our MIT Kerberos
> server, but that seems to be problematic.
To be clear, that previous error should not be caused by any
> Bos cannot find tickets from your KeyFile with which to authenticate (or
> possibly another error, but I think that's it). Can you run 'asetkey
> list' and see if you appear to have any keys in your KeyFile? Do NOT
> send the output of 'asetkey list' to the mailing list, but just say if
> it list
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:07:29 -0700
Tim Gustafson wrote:
> I'm trying to follow this tutorial on how to set up OpenAFS on FreeBSD:
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/afs-server
To whomever wrote this document (Ben?): it seems to reference both
Transarc and non-transarc paths. Should it just be using no
31 matches
Mail list logo
