[opencog-dev] Broken master

Hi, according to http://61.92.69.39:8080/job/ci-atomspace-master/222/console I've broken the master. Unfortunately I haven't been able to reproduce it, even with uncommenting `SET(DB_IS_CONFIGURED 1)` in `tests/persist/sql/odbc/CMakeLists.txt` to make sure I compile it. Any idea? Nil --

Re: [opencog-dev] Broken master

I can't reproduce it wither, but the error message is clear: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘opencog::NodePtr {aka std::shared_ptr}’ to ‘opencog::AtomPtr& {aka std::shared_ptr&}’ It this automatically for us, but not for jenkins .. a different compiler, maybe? Or a different version of

[opencog-dev] Re: ImplicationLink?

No, actually, I worked around that. The only reason that PutLinkUTest currently passes is because PutLink fails to treat ScopeLinks correctly. When that gets fixed, the unit test will fail ... the issue remains the same. --linas On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Nil Geisweiller

Re: [opencog-dev] About Attention Values and Truth Values

> > Hey Roman, > Thanks for the reply :-) I am not sure what exactly you want to use the AttentionValues for With attention values, i thought i could do the following: I have 24x7 tweets coming. So i thought, I can send them to NLP pipeline and get Atoms. Let's say most of the people tweet

Re: [opencog-dev] About Attention Values and Truth Values

Hey, Short explanation first: STI: This value indicates how relevant this atom is to the currently running process/context LTI: This value indicates how relevant this atom might be in future processes/context (Atoms with low LTI have no future use and get delete if the AS gets to big) VLTI:

Re: [opencog-dev] About Attention Values and Truth Values

Hey vishnu, what you are suggesting does sound doable. In your case, you would just want to stimulate atoms every time they have been parsed by the NLP pipeline. Something like this might already exist not sure ask misgana. More generally there would be many Mind-Agents that are running in

[opencog-dev] Re: ImplicationLink?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Nil Geisweiller wrote: > > > On 10/12/2016 06:55 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote: > >> Well, yes, but Nil,, look at the core issue: the variable X in the >> Implication link is bound, but the unit test is pretending that its >> free. My

Re: [opencog-dev] Re: ImplicationLink?

Wait ... we can have nested ScopeLinks, so that a variable embedded in two ScopeLInks can be bound by the outer one or the inner one... no? On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Nil Geisweiller

[opencog-dev] Re: ImplicationLink?

Well, yes, but Nil,, look at the core issue: the variable X in the Implication link is bound, but the unit test is pretending that its free. My question is: are you *sure* you really want the implicationLink to inherit from Scope Link (and thus, always bind it's variables)? --linas On Wed, Oct

Re: [opencog-dev] Re: ImplicationLink?

Potentially Atomspace could host other sorts of variables But, since ImplicationLink is a PLN (or other formal logic) thing, it makes sense to have the variables involved with implicationLink bound somewhere, since that is how formal logic works, right? Potentially this quantification could

[opencog-dev] Contributing to OpenCog

Hi there, I recently completed my open source project that I started in Summer 2016. The project involved documenting a core feature of Linux XIA, specifically the Longest-Prefix-Matching principal where I helped experiment/verify all relevant constructs - including installing virtual

Re: [opencog-dev] Re: ImplicationLink?

On 10/13/2016 02:38 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote: Wait ... we can have nested ScopeLinks, so that a variable embedded in two ScopeLInks can be bound by the outer one or the inner one... no? Yes, no problem, if a variable is scoped by both then the inner one will cover the outer one. Anyway, I