Hi Paul!
Yes, this is part of the openEHR specification LINK class
(https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/docs/common.html#_link_class),
and it needs to be handled by the application. I know DIPS has started using
this in some functional areas like their hospital care plan
E, UCL
On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 10:43, Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-clinical
mailto:openehr-clinical@lists.openehr.org>>
wrote:
Hi everyone,
It seems like Dileep’s original questions have been largely answered by other
members of the community, thank you!
There’s been some added
Hi everyone,
It seems like Dileep’s original questions have been largely answered by other
members of the community, thank you!
There’s been some added discussion about the effects of changing archetypes on
implementations and implementers. Heather wrote an email about this four years
ago
Sorry, I wasn’t clear enough: This is openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.gender, not
openEHR-DEMOGRAPHIC-CLUSTER.gender.
Regards,
Silje
From: Diego Boscá
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 10:27 AM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Cc: Bakke, Silje Ljosland
Subject: Re: Class of archetype 'Gender'
The only
Hi everyone,
On revisiting the archetype CLUSTER.gender, we've discussed changing the class
of the archetype to EVALUATION. The reasoning behind this is that the original
use cases we thought would be relevant for this archetype, such as nesting it
within a lab result or an interpreter
a las 7:59, Bakke, Silje Ljosland
(mailto:silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no>>)
escribió:
Hi everyone, happy new year!
We’ve just hit a question about modelling choices, how to represent
percentages. We have a data type DV_PROPORTION, which can be used to represent
any proportion su
Hi everyone, happy new year!
We've just hit a question about modelling choices, how to represent
percentages. We have a data type DV_PROPORTION, which can be used to represent
any proportion such as a fraction or a percentage, and we have the DV_QUANTITY
data type which can have % as the unit.
Hi everyone,
Sorry for the crossposting, but I thought this would concern everyone.
I believe the openEHR wiki is an important documentation tool that has probably
been a bit neglected(?). The default Confluence theme isn't super pretty, and
the site is difficult to navigate, in my opinion
Hi all,
As you can see from the attached email, the deadline for submissions is
extended to November 25th.
Mvh.
Silje
From: openEHR-clinical On Behalf
Of Dr. Carol Hullin
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 3:50 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: Re: MEDINFO 2019, Lyon, France.
I
maybe there are less transitions between other states, and those can be in the
archetype. This would remove a little friction at development time.
It would be nice to know how other modelers do this and how other implementers
deal with non defined transitions in ACTION archetypes.
Best,
Pablo
Hi everyone,
I’ve seen a tendency lately that topics that at least to me seem to be of a
technical nature are posted to the clinical list. These topics often generate a
lot of discussion, which drowns out much of the discussion about the clinical
aspects of openEHR. I realise that a lot of
Hi Pablo!
I’ll try to answer your question about how clinical modellers solve this
problem. Have a look at the ACTION.medication archetype
(http://openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.123). This archetype has 11
separate steps for the ACTIVE state. In each medication management context, one
Hi everyone,
We've been struggling for a while to define and delineate a concept about the
activities an individual does during their day - do they do paid work, unpaid
work, are they a student, are they unemployed and seeking work, unemployed and
not seeking work, retired, carer, are they a
Hi Angela,
I understand the issue with not being able to install applications on your
computer; we have the same kinds of restrictions at my workplace. If you would
point me to your current model in some kind of generic format, I could have a
look at it for you.
Kind regards,
Silje Ljosland
%2093%2043%2029%2010>
From: openEHR-implementers
[mailto:openehr-implementers-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Bakke,
Silje Ljosland
Sent: fredag 10. november 2017 11:48
To:
openehr-implement...@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openehr-implement...@lists.openehr.org>;
For openEHR clinic
Another crosspost between the Clinical and the Implementers lists.
In versioning archetypes, we've defaulted to SemVer's three version levels
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH. When discussing with DIPS what should be considered MINOR or
MAJOR changes, we've come to the preliminary conclusion that many more
Crossposting this between the clinical and implementers lists, since it belongs
in both:
In some archetypes, one or more elements are set as mandatory (typically
occurrences 1..1 or 1..*), because the rest of the concept makes no sense
without this particular element recorded. Examples are
Hi all!
I agree with Heather, making even just a subset of the generic archetypes
context specific will lead to governance horrorfest, both on the CKM level and
for each application/vendor. I imagine it also could make querying for specific
clinical concepts across different clinical contexts
I agree and disagree. ☺
An EHR needs to be able to cope with all kinds of data, “questionnaire” or not.
However I’m not so sure a modelling pattern that works for everything that
could be labelled a “questionnaire” is achievable, or even useful.
Modelling patterns are sometimes extremely
I think this is a case of putting too much weight into the names of the
archetype classes.
Basically:
· OBSERVATIONs are used when you need a point in time event (or series
of them) or an interval event with or without a math function, ie want the same
thing done over and over again
Hi everyone,
We've got an archetype proposal for Z scores
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_score).
The way we understand these, they're statistical calculations for specific
values such as height or weight, based on a population average, similar to
percentiles. We're not sure how to
Thanks for your replies everyone!
Can the Any data type be constrained to DV_ORDINAL and populated with values in
template or at run time?
Regards,
Silje
From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Hi everyone,
We're working on requirements for labs results, and have bumped into a
potential problem. Some results are textual/non-quantitative in nature, for
example "positive/negative", "+/++/+++", "negative/borderline/positive". These
results also need a kind of "normal range" for the
Hi Pekka!
VAS is a quantification of the severity of a symptom, which could be pain or
other symptoms. When the international Symptom/Sign archetype was reviewed and
published, the element “Severity rating” was included to cater for VAS or other
severity scales. For now, there are no plans to
Is interval of proportions a legal data type? If so, which is the correct
syntax?
ELEMENT[at0004] occurrences matches {0..1} matches { -- Proportion of
normal daily intake
value matches {
DV_PROPORTION matches {*}
DV_INTERVAL matches {
upper matches {
Hi Gerard,
I don’t have time to look through the use cases right now, but I thought I
should give a general outline to how we handle negation in openEHR archetypes.
Basically, there isn’t a single way that works for all use cases, but we’ve
worked out a few patterns that seem to work:
·
Hi everyone,
A recent requirement is to be able to record that a specific
observation/test/score was not performed and why. The case example is the
Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), which is part of the WHO Multiaxial
classification of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. In
Hi everyone,
Based on requirements from the Norwegian National Summary Care Record
(Norwegian: "Kjernejournal"), and Heather's email about therapeutic precautions
(https://omowizard.wordpress.com/2014/07/16/therapeutic-precautions-are-the-new-black/),
we've made an archetype to represent the
Hi again,
I see from the list lots of people didn't get to read the actual article. I for
some reason got a full text download for free, but I can see several of you
didn't. Perhaps some sort of time limited offer after publication? I don't
think it's easy to judge the article from the
Hi everyone!
As some of you may have noticed, a paper called "Evaluating Model-Driven
Development for large-scale EHRs through the openEHR approach"
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505616300247) was
recently published by a PhD student at the University of Tromsø. The
When implementing an openEHR based system for a large hospital, there will be
hundreds if not thousands of document types. Examples of these are admission
notes for different departments and specialties, outpatient notes, nursing
documentation, check lists, discharge summaries, etc ad
The same requirement has just popped up here. If nobody else has one, I’m sure
we can make one cooperatively.
Regards,
Silje
From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Ian McNicoll
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 8:11 PM
To: For openEHR clinical
For now, the other_details attribute within TRANSLATION_DETAILS should do the
trick. The main issue is to keep the different translators separated, which
this seems to do:
other_details =
[secondary_translators] = Ian McNicoll, freshEHR, UK, Sebastian
Garde, Ocean Informatics, DE
The
, they can be put in ADL 2, and the ADL Workbench and
other tools can fairly easily upgrade the existing archetypes into new
structures.
- thomas
On 17/03/2015 10:32, Sebastian Garde wrote:
On 17.03.2015 11:25, Thomas Beale wrote:
On 17/03/2015 10:17, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
For now
Hi everyone,
The openEHR CKM contains quite a few archetypes of the class DEMOGRAPHIC-*,
apparently all authored by a Brazilian team in 2009. These are not editable
using the Archetype Editor. How would one go about editing these archetypes? Is
editing ADL in a text editor the only way at the
Do you really need a separate CKM instance to be able to share archetypes,
though?
In the Norwegian CKM, we?ve been quite liberal in handing out (public or
private) incubators w/ editor rights to anyone (in Norway; non-profit or
commercial) who wants one. We had an initial lapse where we
Hi,
At the Norwegian CKM http://arketyper.no, we've been doing quite extensive
translation of international (English language) archetypes into Norwegian.
During this process, we're finding more and more translation isn't a one-person
job, but usually there's a primary translator and one or
speakers want to do. Does anyone know the
deadline? Is it Monday as with the papers? Has anyone else submitted?
I have prepared a background paper on openEHR which I will submit this weekend.
Cheers, Sam
From: Bakke, Silje Ljosland
Sent: ?Wednesday?, ?17? ?December? ?2014 ?9?:?48? ?PM
No, there?s been no activity as far as I?ve seen.
Is anyone else attending planning to present as part of a tutorial/workshop
regarding clinical modelling? As far as I can see from the wiki page
I?ve just checked, the deadline for papers is Monday December 22 as you wrote,
but for workshops, panels, tutorials and demos it?s January 15 as I wrote in my
previous email. I?m considering submitting my talk as a regular paper by
Monday, and then see what we can get done by January 15
, Silje Ljosland:
Hi everyone,
During a recent review of the Body weight archetype in the Norwegian CKM
(http://arketyper.no/ckm/#showArchetype_1078.36.25), the following comment was
submitted for the ?Use? element :
The text needs better specification of how the reference model is to be used
Hi everyone,
During a recent review of the Body weight archetype in the Norwegian CKM
(http://arketyper.no/ckm/#showArchetype_1078.36.25), the following comment was
submitted for the Use element :
The text needs better specification of how the reference model is to be used
to record estimates.
, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
Thanks Thomas and Seref!
I think the main point for this report is your statement on what openEHR is in
relation to CIMI. I don?t know why they?ve brought CIMI into this at all
really, since neither DIPS nor the National ICT governance is relating our work
to CIMI
, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
Hi everyone,
Recently Gartner released a survey of EHR suppliers in the Norwegian
markethttp://www.regjeringen.no/pages/38845466/gartner_survey_ehr_suppliers_systems_norwegian_market.pdf,
as commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services
Dear openEHR clinical community,
To facilitate cross border contact between openEHR communities as well as
distribute costs, National ICT Norway would like to invite the international
community to a two day course on openEHR and practical archetype/template
modelling taking place in late
I'm having trouble saving a particular archetype from Archetype Editor. Other
archetypes are apparently saved without issue. I'm getting the following error
message. The archetype is attached to this email. I'd be extremely happy if
anyone could tell me why this happens and how to fix it... :)
I think you might have an old version of this archetype. In the openEHR.org CKM
this limitation was fixed by Ian McNicoll in March 2013. I believe the 0..1
occurrences constraint originally was an error.
Kind regards,
Silje Ljosland Bakke
Coordinator, National Editorial Board for Archetypes,
Looking forward to seeing you again, and hopefully meeting lots of new people!
:)
--
Silje
Kind regards,
Silje Ljosland Bakke
E-health Adviser
+47 40203298
Haukeland University Hospital
RD dept, E-health section
www.helse-bergen.nohttp://www.helse-bergen.no/
From: openEHR-clinical
I hope you succeed! I was planning on going to Medinfo if this workshop was
accepted. :)
Kind regards,
Silje Ljosland Bakke
E-health adviser
40203298
Haukeland University Hospital
www.helse-bergen.nohttp://www.helse-bergen.no/
Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at
Hi,
At our previous archetype workgroup meeting we chanced upon an archetype
(openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.goal.v1) in which the cardinality of a cluster
(Target) was different than most of the others we'd seen. We were unsure what
cardinality is used for in this context, and we couldn't find any
Hi!
We're slowly getting into translating a small set of archetypes into Norwegian,
and we're a bit confused about some properties from the archetypes Body fluid
or substance and Bodily output. Bodily output is described as Recording of
findings and measurement (or estimation) of bodily output
51 matches
Mail list logo
