RE: Development based on xml-schemas

you better. -- Kind regards, Eng. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez http://cabolabs.com Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:37:31 -0200 Subject: Development based on xml-schemas From: gabriel.m...@figlabs.com To: openehr-implementers@lists.openehr.org Hi everyone, I'm a researcher of medical systems for ultrasound

Re: Blood pressure archetype, XML projection problem

Hi Otto, C_STRING is not a data type, is a constraint over a string. Not sure what fails in your case, what schema are you using? On Apr 20, 2017 1:21 PM, "Otto Medin" wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I've just started experimenting with openEHR, and here's a newbie

RE: Versioning implementations

is case is an update to the Change control spec that describes a variant or guideline for using the model to implement linear versioning, while allowing for later addition of branched versioning when/if needed. - thomas On 18/08/2017 12:49, Pablo Pazos wrote: >From Thomas comments, it is clear

Re: Versioning implementations

locking system (like databases have) is, I think, good enough. That is how > classic EHR builders handle concurrency. > > Bert > > > On 21-06-17 03:04, Pablo Pazos wrote: > > Hi all, > > I had this questions in mind for a long time: did someone implemented the >

EHRServer v0.9.5 was released!

oudehrserver.com/learn?lang=en Out open test server was updated to the latest version, try it out! https://ehrserver-cabolabs2.rhcloud.com Questions, comments, suggestions, etc. are always welcome! Kind regards, Pablo. -- Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez Cel:(00598) 99 043 145 Skype: cabola

Re: A little community coordination

Hi all, received more answers and shared them in the openEHR wiki. Very interesting projects there and I can see a lot of room for collaboration! On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I just published the received respons

Info request about openEHR implementations for a presentation

be useful. All the info I have is on the openEHR website but it doesn't have insights like challenges, benefits and lessons learned from those implementations. Thanks, Pablo. -- Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez e: pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com p: +598 99 043 145 skype: cabolabs <http://cabolabs.com/>

Re: Versioning implementations

Hi Bert, excellent questions! On Aug 21, 2017 5:55 AM, "Thomas Beale" <thomas.be...@openehr.org> wrote: On 21/08/2017 09:09, Bert Verhees wrote: > On 21-08-17 02:51, Pablo Pazos wrote: > >> @Bert Persistent records are a well know pattern in ehrs and it's >&

Re: Mandatory elements in archetypes, and user interfaces

d for Archetypes > Nasjonal IKT HF, Norway > > Tel. +47 40203298 <+47%20402%2003%20298> > > Web: http://arketyper.no / Twitter: @arketyper_no > <https://twitter.com/arketyper_no> > > > > ___ > openEHR-impl

Re: Info request about openEHR implementations for a presentation

It's a pity we don't have much info about openEHR implementations in Latin America :( On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm giving a talk about openEHR next month in Argentina and the > organization asked me to menti

How do you identify OPTs in your implementation?

structure but are defined for different languages (mine is a multi-language implementation). Would love to hear what format are you using for template IDs. Thanks! -- Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez e: pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com p: +598 99 043 145 skype: cabolabs <http://cabolabs.com/> http://www.cabola

Re: Announcing Archie version 0.4

Thanks Pieter, I'm sure we will use it when adl 2 time arrive for us, we are still on 1.4. On Feb 3, 2018 9:04 AM, "Pieter Bos" wrote: Or a Java app with rest api and a JavaScript frontend. Let the java application take care of parsing, validating, flattening, operational

Re: Is partial datetime pattern (yyyy-mm-ddTHH:??:??) equivalent to "any allowed"?

*Chairos Time* is modelled via Archetypes using the Data Types but > augmented with attributes taken from the proper ontologies. > > > Gerard Freriks > +31 620347088 > gf...@luna.nl > > Kattensingel 20 > 2801 CA Gouda > the Netherlands > > On 19 Mar 2

Is partial datetime pattern (yyyy-mm-ddTHH:??:??) equivalent to "any allowed"?

on both (on all cases timezone information can be added, if it is not present, UTC is default) Considering this, it seems both are equivalent. So why allow both? IMO this generates a point where implementers can have different interpretations and implement both constraints in a different way (any

Re: query writing question 2

hould include parser+engine and the parser is the simple part. Until we have that all implementations will have differences when querying the same database. On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:23 PM Pablo Pazos wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 07:10 David Moner wrote: > >> >> >&g

Re: query writing question 2

Hi Seref, see below :) On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:19 AM Seref Arikan < serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com> wrote: > Hi Pablo, see inline please > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:29 PM Pablo Pazos > wrote: > >> Recently we discussed other problematic cases, like having cr

Re: query writing question 2

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 07:10 David Moner wrote: > > > El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 11:52, Seref Arikan (< > serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com>) escribió: > >> >> Obligatory moaning for the millionth time: All of this confusion stems >> from lack of a formal model defining AQL semantics. I used

Re: query writing question 2

> - > > > ___ > openEHR-implementers mailing list > openEHR-implementers@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implementers_

Re: How to write Github commit messages to connect to openEHR Jira issues

all-page > > - thomas > > > > ___ > openEHR-implementers mailing list > openEHR-implementers@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implementers_lists.openehr.org > -- *Ing. Pablo Pazos Gut