Gerard Freriks schreef:
> Bert,
>
> What is the definition of 'closed system'?
Excuse me, I meant "closed source", typo.
Thomas discussed the Ocean system, which is (as he said himself) closed
source, which is (in my opinion) a commercial proprietary system.
There is nothing wrong with that, but,
t;
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081106/5ea9a19e/attachment.html>
William E Hammond wrote:
> Thanks. I agree that things are moving ahead. I wish we could remove some
> of the animosity (maybe I am reading it worng) towards HL7 (not from you),
> and close the gap between the two efforts.
>
> best Regards.
>
>
*Ed,
I think think the biggest problem with resp
There is no HL7. It is an organization with many members. Most people who
believe that HL7 is just message-centric are outside people, plus, I admit,
some are in HL7. In my opinion, the CDA, and certainly level 3, are
templates/archetypes in compositiopn. I further believe that the CDA will
ado
Gerard Freriks schreef:
> Perhaps you have not noticed
>
> The question was about Open Source and not about commercial
> proprietary ehr systems
Sorry Gerard, there were more closed systems discussed under this topic.
>
> Gf
>
> Sent from my iPhone
Very small keyboard?
Bert
.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081106/a466cd7c/attachment.html>
HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081106/2c2873d7/attachment.html>
Thanks Eric. I'll take a look when I get a chance (soon I hope) and give
you my comments.
Ed
"Eric Browne"
"For openEHR
Thomas Beale schreef:
> I also don't think that the metric means much, but for the record, there
> are 4 million patients in an openEHR server (v0.95) in Australia, some
> thousands (ultimate design vlume 1,000,000 EHRs) in the Netherlands, and
> probably some thousands in Brazil - that I know d
achment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081106/eb54ca2f/attachment.html>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081106/a68a29bb/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OceanC_small.png
Type: image/png
Size
There is another, simpler reason: open systems rather than open source
code is a far higher priority for clinical and secondary use users.
- thomas beale
Bruce Wilder wrote:
> Ignacio,
>
> I cannot provide you with any numbers, but have a few
> comments as to why open source systems are not wi
William E Hammond wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I am very impressed with these statistics. I was not aware of the
> penetration of openEHR into that volume of use. Congratulations for a hugh
> success. Can you help me identify the actual systems that are in use in
> Australia, Netherlands and Brazil. I
I also don't think that the metric means much, but for the record, there
are 4 million patients in an openEHR server (v0.95) in Australia, some
thousands (ultimate design vlume 1,000,000 EHRs) in the Netherlands, and
probably some thousands in Brazil - that I know directly about. None of
these
Thanks for sharing those sentiments. Where there is hope there is a chance
of success.
Ed
"Dr Carola Hullin
Lucay Cossio"
Which syntax is used in the parse specifications in the time_specification
Package? (For example Data Types Information Model Rev 2.1.0 in section
8.2.2.1)
I have seen that Backus?Naur form (BNF) is used in some other places in
the specification. However, the parse specifications in the
Time_speci
Olof,
In http://svn.openehr.org/ref_impl_java/BRANCHES/trunk-zm-merge/ you
will find the XSDs that describe the OET format. These XSDs were based
on a draft version of the Template specification and may not be up to
date with the current version of the specification, but it is a start
point.
Thanks for your reply. Clinical templates seems like an interesting project.
Considering my project, I've been working for several years in a project
where we have developed
tools that let clinicans define their clinical models/templates
themselves. These templates are then read by software that
Thanks. I agree that things are moving ahead. I wish we could remove some
of the animosity (maybe I am reading it worng) towards HL7 (not from you),
and close the gap between the two efforts.
best Regards.
Ed
Thomas,
I am very impressed with these statistics. I was not aware of the
penetration of openEHR into that volume of use. Congratulations for a hugh
success. Can you help me identify the actual systems that are in use in
Australia, Netherlands and Brazil. I am specifically interested in the EH
Hi Adam,
Can you provide details of the offending archetype?
Looking at the AOM, the originalAuthor is a required attribute and this is
reflected in the Resource.xsd. However apart from the list being non-empty,
I see no other invariant to that states that the value of the originalAuthor
item can
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081106/f89539a7/attachment.html>
was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081106/3d40379c/attachment.html>
review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient please contact info at freemedsoftware.com and delete all
copies.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081106/38a8f61b/attachment.html>
Ignacio,
I cannot provide you with any numbers, but have a few
comments as to why open source systems are not widely
deployed:
1) Physicians, and probably many institutions, don't
really understand the concept of open source code, and
the potential advantages, which include cost savings,
protecti
Hello all,
The un-official, Draft 8 of the upcoming American Medical Informatics
Association Open Source Working Group white paper to be voted on
November 9th can be found http://ignaciovaldes.com/amia. It will be
voted on for ratification on November 9th-11th or so. Action is needed
on your part
26 matches
Mail list logo
