RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

om] Skickat: den 9 april 2016 09:38 Till: For openEHR technical discussions Ämne: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR Hi Silje, As far as I can see the specification process is fully documented at http://openehr.org/programs/specification/ but it is a technical specification and therefore highly det

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

sible to learn how the processes work > without being shown. J > > > > Regards, > *Silje* > > > > *Fra:* openEHR-technical [mailto: > openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] *På vegne av* Ian McNicoll > *Sendt:* 5. april 2016 23:04 > *Til:* For openEHR te

RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

. april 2016 23:04 Til: For openEHR technical discussions Emne: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR Just to add. I sense that there is a real difficulty for those involved in the reviews in understanding anything other than traditional ISO/CEN type standards/specification processes. Do we have an

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

Just to add. I sense that there is a real difficulty for those involved in the reviews in understanding anything other than traditional ISO/CEN type standards/specification processes. Do we have an opportunity to show them how an archetype review process works, or to show how the specifications re

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

Hi Silje, Thomas and Erik have answered substantial aspects related to specification review. *2. A.18: “Is relevant documentation of the development and approval process of the specification archived and identified?”* The Clinical content review process and governance structures is documen

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

I forgot, w.r.t. to versioning of archetypes, this is the specification that applies. On 04/04/2016 15:51, Erik Sundvall wrote: Adding some thoughts below. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Beale

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

Adding some thoughts below. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Beale wrote: > > 4. A.26: “Does the maintenance organisation for the technical > specification or standard have sufficient finances and resources to be sure > of freedom from short- to medium-term threats?” > > · Unabl

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

On 04/04/2016 14:07, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote: Hi, The project has now done a preliminary CAMSS assessment of openEHR. It’s identified some issues that I would like some input on: 1.A.16: “Are the technical specification or standards reviewed using a formal review process with all rele

RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

e web pages. Anyone? ☺ Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Bakke, Silje Ljosland Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:52 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR Thanks again Ian!

RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

[mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Ian McNicoll Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 10:41 AM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR I have added some links. many of the questions seem inappropriate, not applicable, or virtually

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

J > > > > Regards, > *Silje* > > > > *From:* openEHR-technical [mailto: > openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian McNicoll > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:37 AM > *To:* For openEHR technical discussions > > *Subject:*

RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Ian McNicoll Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:37 AM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR My first go now at CAMSS wiki page<https://openehr.atlassian.net/w

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

> *Sent:* Monday, January 04, 2016 4:08 PM > *To:* openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org > *Subject:* Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR > > > > > I have set up a CAMSS wiki page > <https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/stds/CAMSS+Assessment+of+openEHR>, > Silje if you can co

RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

nical@lists.openehr.org Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR I have set up a CAMSS wiki page<https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/stds/CAMSS+Assessment+of+openEHR>, Silje if you can copy the relevant CAMSS boilerplate in (assessment table etc) and make it look vaguely presentable

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

R-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Beale *Sent:* Monday, January 4, 2016 2:57 PM *To:* openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org *Subject:* Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR Hi Silje, I had a look at the website - it doesn't seem as if anyone is u

RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

PM To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR Hi Silje, I had a look at the website - it doesn't seem as if anyone is using CAMSS much, if we believe this page, which contains CAMSS assessments<https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/og_page/camss

Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

Hi Silje, I had a look at the website - it doesn't seem as if anyone is using CAMSS much, if we believe this page, which contains CAMSS assessments , none of which are health related. On this page