> Society<http://www.bcs.org.uk/>
> Health IT blog <http://www.wolandscat.net/>
> *
> *
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-techni
Erik Sundvall wrote:
> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem.v1.adls
> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis.v1.adls
> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis_sweden.v1.adls
> openEHR-EHR-LINK.indication.v1.adls
>
> Should not the identifiers instead be:
>
> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem.v1.adls
> openEHR-
Hi!
Thanks again for quick and informative replies.
Obviously was not paying enough attention when the discussion of the
identifier change was taking place some time ago. I had started
composing a long reply of how query implementation would get more
complex unless the RM was changed at the same
lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101028/df5b0414/attachment.html>
nd it
is a terrible way to do research. I have not encountered it in any other
IT area, though.
- thomas*
*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101028/bf666923/attachment.html>
Shouldn't archetype identifiers and file names be separated?
2010/10/28 Peter Gummer :
> Erik Sundvall wrote:
>
>> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem.v1.adls
>> ? openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis.v1.adls
>> ? ? ?openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis_sweden.v1.adls
>> openEHR-EHR-LINK.indication.v1.adls
>>
yntax and semantics requirements changed in
>>> ADL/AOM 1.5?
*
*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101028/466330a1/attachment.html>
The draft spec for 1.5 knowledge identifiers can be accessed via
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/Development+and+Governance+of+Knowledge+Artefacts
The '-' based specialisation syntax is proposed to be dropped, as it
became very unweildy once you srart to consider how to handle
namespaces
ion about this on the
> mailing list about a year ago.
>
> - Peter Gummer
>
*
*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101028/f426b584/attachment.html>
Hi!
A question regarding naming/identifiers.
According to
http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/am/archetype_semantics.pdf
parts of the grammar for identifiers is...
archetype_id: qualified_rm_entity ?.? domain_concept ?.? version_id
qualified_rm_entity: rm_originator ?-? rm_name
org/attachments/20101028/c882585a/attachment.asc>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101028/55e2d532/attachment.asc>
nehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101028/ee2dabde/attachment.html>
hime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101028/889ee119/attachment.html>
> In all other industries, the quality of standards is
> measured initially against public safety and then
> against criteria of effectiveness and economic qualities.
it seems you mean, by market testing. If not, do you have an example?
> In all other industries that i know of, standards are
> cr
nEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
--
Ocean Informatics *Thomas Beale
Chief Technology Officer, Ocean Informatics
<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/>*
Chair Architectural Review Board, /open/EHR Foundation
<http:/
16 matches
Mail list logo
