Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
...ssen-indentation-of-pseudo_client_ig.patch | 69 ---
...mplify-pseudo_client_ignore_path_chr.patch | 50 --
meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_git.bb| 4 +-
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 122 deletions(-)
delete mode
On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 12:34 +, Luca Bocassi wrote:
> From: Luca Boccassi
>
> Update systemd to v247.1.
> Add rule for new oomd dbus conf and for new pam.d
> conf directory in /usr/lib.
> Drop selinux-hook-handling-to-enumerate-nexthop.patch,
> merged upstream.
> Backport
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM Alan Perry wrote:
>
> Add a package for libopcodes, since, like libbfd, it is needed by
> perf. Without separate packages for these libraries, all of the
> binutil tools get added as well.
>
libopcodes is not an API that binutils publish for wider consumption,
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 11:09 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/16/2020 6:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc
> > > @@ -46,10 +46,11 @@ do_install () {
> > > # The .so files in iproute2-tc are modules, not traditional
> > > libraries
> > >
On 16.12.20 17:56, Sinan Kaya wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
---
meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.3p1.bb | 30 +-
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.3p1.bb
b/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.3p1.bb
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 16:45 +, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Move the ip tool into its own package. Useful for size constrained
> systems that only want the ip tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
> ---
> .../iproute2/iproute2.inc | 47 ++-
> 1 file changed, 45
On 12/16/2020 12:24 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> Is your preference to keep ip or have individual packages for the
>> remaining ?
> I have a very strong preference for only splitting the things we need
> to split.
Sounds good, I'll rework.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 12:09 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/16/2020 12:00 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > I accept there is a case for splitting out ip, the patch now splits
> > out
> > every binary though? That isn't what the commit message says...
>
> I thought of going all the way to split
Move the ip tool into its own package. Useful for size constrained
systems that only want the ip tool.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
---
meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 12/16/2020 6:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc
>> @@ -46,10 +46,11 @@ do_install () {
>> # The .so files in iproute2-tc are modules, not traditional
>> libraries
>> INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-tc = "dev-so"
>>
>> -PACKAGES =+ "\
>>
Allow to include whether we want sudo, visudo, sudoreplay
or cvtsudoers tools.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
---
meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.3p1.bb | 30 +-
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.3p1.bb
On 12/16/2020 12:00 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> I accept there is a case for splitting out ip, the patch now splits out
> every binary though? That isn't what the commit message says...
I thought of going all the way to split everything since I'm here.
Is your preference to keep ip or have
Package just sudo binary into its own package for size concerned
targets.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
---
meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.3p1.bb | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.3p1.bb
On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 12:34 +, Luca Bocassi wrote:
> From: Luca Boccassi
>
> Update systemd to v247.1.
> Add rule for new oomd dbus conf and for new pam.d
> conf directory in /usr/lib.
> Drop selinux-hook-handling-to-enumerate-nexthop.patch,
> merged upstream.
> Backport
On 12/16/20 10:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM Alan Perry wrote:
Add a package for libopcodes, since, like libbfd, it is needed by
perf. Without separate packages for these libraries, all of the
binutil tools get added as well.
libopcodes is not an API that binutils
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:57 AM Alan Perry wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/16/20 10:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM Alan Perry wrote:
> >> Add a package for libopcodes, since, like libbfd, it is needed by
> >> perf. Without separate packages for these libraries, all of the
> >>
Move the ip tool into its own package. Useful for size constrained
systems that only want the ip tool.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
---
.../iproute2/iproute2.inc | 47 ++-
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 12/16/2020 12:01 PM, Konrad Weihmann wrote:
>> +PACKAGES += "${SUDO_PACKAGES}"
>
> I think needs to be PACKAGE_BEFORE_PN = "${SUDO_PACKAGES}"
> otherwise everything will end up in ${PN} as the list is appended here
OK, I guess this is what I didn't know. This is unusual keyword that I
have
This also effectively reverts commit b6d30c21b0:
bitbake.conf: Extend PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS to ${COREBASE}/meta
The contents of ${COREBASE}/meta were ignored as pyc files could be
generated for the contents of the lib subdirectory if python modules
were imported within a pseudo context. However
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 18:07 +, Richard Purdie via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> a reproducibility issue in oe-selftest:
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/1651
> (which did happen last time as well on centos but I don't think was
> reported on the list,
On 12/16/2020 11:09 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> +PACKAGES += "${IPROUTE2_PACKAGES}"
>>> +PROVIDES += "${IPROUTE2_PACKAGES}"
>> This doesn't look correct. Why do we need to add all the individual
>> package splits to PROVIDES?
>>
> I want to add iproute2-ip into my IMAGE_INSTALL and not take the rest
On 12/16/20 11:00 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:57 AM Alan Perry wrote:
On 12/16/20 10:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM Alan Perry wrote:
Add a package for libopcodes, since, like libbfd, it is needed by
perf. Without separate packages for these
Move the ps and sysctl tools into its own package. Useful for
size constrained systems that only want the ps and/or sysctl tools.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
---
meta/recipes-extended/procps/procps_3.3.16.bb | 25 +++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git
Move the ps and sysctl tools into its own package. Useful for
size constrained systems that only want the ps and/or sysctl tools.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
---
meta/recipes-extended/procps/procps_3.3.16.bb | 25 +++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git
Include an upstream patch for 0.4.4 which fixes a test framework error
that occurs on host systems with symlinked /tmp directories (like OE).
Signed-off-by: Alex Stewart
---
...e-OS-negotiate-relative-package-dirs.patch | 43 +++
.../opkg/{opkg_0.4.3.bb => opkg_0.4.4.bb} |
Adopting Alejandro del Castillo's original upgrade patch.
Patch V2:
* Added a .patch from the 0.4.4 upstream which should resolve the ptest
framework error which Alex Kanavin observed in his OE-core tests. I've
verified this change on a local build of the OE-core minimal QEMU image.
Alex
On 12/16/2020 6:19 PM, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
>>
>> -PACKAGES =+ "\
>> +IPROUTE2_PACKAGES =+ "\
>> ${PN}-devlink \
>> ${PN}-genl \
>> ${PN}-ifstat \
>> +${PN}-ip \
>> ${PN}-lnstat \
>> ${PN}-nstat \
>> ${PN}-rtacct \
>> @@ -58,12 +59,16 @@ PACKAGES =+ "\
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sinan Kaya
> Sent: den 17 december 2020 01:31
> To: Peter Kjellerstedt ; openembedded-
> c...@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v4] iproute2: split ip to
> individual package
>
> On 12/16/2020 6:19 PM, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
>
Move the mii-tool into its own package. Useful for size constrained
systems that only want the mii-tool only.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
---
.../net-tools/net-tools_1.60-20181103.bb | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
This backports a fix from glibc's master branch, which solves a
regression in 2.32 with adjtime() where it would seg fault if being
called with delta == NULL on 32 bit machines.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt
---
...-adjtime-with-NULL-argument-BZ-26833.patch | 110 ++
On 12/16/2020 8:20 PM, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
>> I do something very similar in my bbappend now. On the other hand, we
>> have an upstream first principle in the company. I would rather try to
>> find an upstream friendly solution that works for everybody without
>> breaking existing users
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org c...@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Sinan Kaya
> Sent: den 16 december 2020 18:50
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Sinan Kaya
> Subject: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v4] iproute2: split ip to
From: Teoh Jay Shen
-Improve this test case to fulfill the requirements of replacing the
click_terminal_icon_on_X_desktop manual test case from oeqa/manual/bsp-hw :
1) verify that the terminal window is working without problem
2) verify that there's only 1 terminal window is launched
3) reduce
From: Luca Boccassi
Add the ability to have the kernel, dtb and ramdisk individually signed
by setting FIT_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL = "1". This could be useful if you are
intending to verify signatures before using kexec for example.
Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
From: Paul Eggleton
Add a UBOOT_MKIMAGE_SIGN_ARGS variable to enable passing additional
options to uboot-mkimage when it is run the second time to perform
signing.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Paul Eggleton
Add a new test to verify signing FIT images. Also includes testing for
the newly introduced FIT_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL, UBOOT_MKIMAGE,
UBOOT_MKIMAGE_SIGN, and UBOOT_MKIMAGE_SIGN_ARGS variables.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta-selftest/classes/test-mkimage-wrapper.bbclass |
From: Paul Eggleton
Add a FIT_DESC variable to make it possible to change how the
description is set in the FIT image.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Some minor extensions to the kernel-fitimage class, mostly for signing,
with associated oe-selftest tests.
(Separate docs patch is queued and will follow once these changes are
pass review).
The following changes since commit 6012fffa99b600956ea1076d60e050d0737b4c4f:
systemd: Fix
From: Easwar Hariharan
fitimage_emit_section_config() has a number of arguments, add named
variables to make the function a bit more readable.
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 53
1
From: Paul Eggleton
Add a UBOOT_MKIMAGE and UBOOT_MKIMAGE_SIGN variables to allow specifying
an alternative uboot-mkimage executable (or wrapper script/function).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
From: Paul Eggleton
I'm about to add an additional test, and on the assumption that we might
also add more in future it seems reasonable to have the tests in their own
module.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py | 84 +++
From: Paul Eggleton
Add verification of FIT_DESC to the existing test for kernel-fitimage.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py
Please merge these changes in gatesgarth.
Thanks,
Anuj
The following changes since commit d11ab9cb77bf91f939035417b757773a5d80242c:
build-appliance-image: Update to gatesgarth head revision (2020-12-07
16:25:27 +)
are available in the Git repository at:
The following changes since commit e216b2223cbe8c459348262f98b3cfbe79d12023:
go: update to 1.14.12 (2020-12-03 07:35:27 -1000)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib stable/dunfell-next
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 23:09, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> > Maybe? Depends on the matching in anchored. If it does by accident
> > then explicitly matching would be better. What machine has a triple
> > like that for testing?
>
> Most arm machines I think? :)
Only old ones, which are dead to me.
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 02:41 +, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Move the ip tool into its own package. Useful for size constrained
> systems that only want the ip tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
> ---
> meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc | 10 --
> 1 file changed, 8
Thanks for all the work over the years, it's been much appreciated!
Cheers,
Ross
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 19:07, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I haven't lately had time to do OE work, or maybe the lack of time is
> more rooted in lack of motivation since I don't objectively have a very
>
47 matches
Mail list logo
