Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 107, Issue 2

See if this helps you... [ovs-discuss] How to get 2 vms on 2 different physical hosts to communicate using openvswitch https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2011-September/025619.html On Jan 17, 2018 10:18 AM, wrote: > Send openflow-discuss mailing list submissions to > o

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow

Hello, In the openflow flow-mod, flow rules are installed in the switches for a flow, after that subsequent packets for that flow need not to go through the controller. They are forwarded from the switch. In contrast, packet-out messages, the controller does not install any rule in the switch for

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 87, Issue 1

2016 3:13 AM > To: André Mantas > Cc: Justin Pettit; openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu; Stas Kozlov > Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 87, Issue 1 > > A barrier is only 8 bytes in each direction. An acknowledgment could only, at > most, save 8 byte

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 87, Issue 1

A barrier is only 8 bytes in each direction. An acknowledgment could only, at most, save 8 bytes in one direction, which is hardly worth changing the basic OpenFlow header format. On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 12:46:26AM +, André Mantas wrote: > Thanks for all your answers, I was not sure where to

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 87, Issue 1

Thanks for all your answers, I was not sure where to ask this. The reason I ask this is because: a) I think it would be an useful feature that, I think. wouldn't "hurt anyone". b) I found this (old) conversation ( https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2009-December/000547.html)

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 87, Issue 1

The basic answer to Andre's question is that no, there are no plans. The right place to bring up a proposal for such a feature is the ONF Open Datapath working group. On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 06:45:27AM +0300, Stas Kozlov wrote: > That's right, but Andre does not want use Barrier. From my point of

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 87, Issue 1

That's right, but Andre does not want use Barrier. From my point of view the barrier messages are suitable in most cases, but I have a feeling that one more cycle for control plane might be a burden for weak cpu. -- Stas On 2 Jan 2016 10:25 am, "Justin Pettit" wrote: > That's true, but to know t

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 87, Issue 1

Hi This duty should be done by controller. In case a flow can not be modified or added a switch response with error message. In case message was delivered tcp.ack will be generated according tcp flow. Controller may handle both events. Faithfully yours Stas > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow for host

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 06:24:10PM +0300, Amer wrote: > I would like to ask you, is there an openflow for end user. > I want the openflow controller communicate directly to the end user machine > and modifies its flow-table. > I want the end user pc pretend as an OF switch and sends the packet-in

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow switch

work, try "*mininet*" instead of installing open vswitch as mininet will have ovs and you can also create topologies in a single VM. > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 02:20:05 -0700 > From: Murphy McCauley > To: Dalia Adheed > Cc: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow switch

This all depends on how you install Open vSwitch. Are you building your own OVS? Unless you have a specific reason to do so, it's probably a better idea these days to install it using packages from your OS distribution... in which case, the kernel module should already be installed, and no ins

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 77, Issue 6

Hi, I've few simple question, I think it is extension to OpenFlow, what are your ideas? 1. What is the Use case of Group Table? 2. Apart from PacketIN/PacketOUT, Is there any way to send/receive custom information to the Controller? best regards VIswanath _

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 77, Issue 7

> > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:05:09 +0530 > From: Arpan Palit > To: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 77, Issue > 6 > Message-ID: > j...@mail.gmail.

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 77, Issue 6

Hello, I am not sure why it is not working correctly,but please check whether S1 and S2 is acting as a openflow switch. Add some controller with it, and connect those controller with C0. It would probably work. On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:56 PM, wrote: > Send openflow-discuss mailing list sub

Re: [openflow-discuss] [openflow-dev] Simulation of delay-sensitive algorithms in OF environment

[catching up on post-vacation e-mail] YMMV, but a number of experiments have been successfully run on Mininet - check out http://reproducingnetworkresearch.wordpress.com I'm obviously a fan of container-based emulation, but you might also look at simulators like ns-3 and testbeds like Emulab.

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Question

If you want your switch to support full functionality, you have to consider all the fileds of the header. Otherwise and for experiments, you can support only a subset of the header fields. You have to be careful in raising an error, or omitting extra field when controller request adding or modi

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 73, Issue 9

Hi Folks: could someone tell me if anyone has tried to integrate OVS with OF-DPA ? If so, could you please share the procedure ? On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:31 AM, < openflow-discuss-requ...@lists.stanford.edu> wrote: > Send openflow-discuss mailing list submissions to > openflow-discuss

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 73, Issue 3

We have made a tutorial to make RouterBoard 750GL Openflow enabled. What this tutorial contain: -Installation procedure of OpenWRT on RouterBoard GL750 -Installation procedure of Openflow v1.0 on RouterBoard GL750 -Installation of NOX/POX/Floodlight Controller -Testing of OpenFlow enabled Network

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables

em.anderso...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 3:55 PM To: Zoltán Lajos Kis; openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables   thanks Zoltan,   Would you please point me to the exact Table Feature instruction/field that can request an openflow switc

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:32:02PM +, Emma Anderson wrote: > are openflow tables odefined in the switch only by user > configuration, or there is an instruction by the controller which > can request switch to create a new table? For the switches I know about, the tables are statically defined.

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables

Yes it can ask; and if the switch can’t do so it will reply with an error. From: Emma Anderson [mailto:em.anderso...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 4:28 PM To: Zoltán Lajos Kis; openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables The last paragraph

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables

em.anderso...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 3:55 PM To: Zoltán Lajos Kis; openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables   thanks Zoltan,   Would you please point me to the exact Table Feature instruction/field that can request an openflow switc

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables

:55 PM To: Zoltán Lajos Kis; openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables thanks Zoltan, Would you please point me to the exact Table Feature instruction/field that can request an openflow switch to add a specific table to the pipeline? On Tuesday, 7 October

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables

thanks Zoltan, Would you please point me to the exact Table Feature instruction/field that can request an openflow switch to add a specific table to the pipeline? On Tuesday, 7 October 2014, 16:55, Zoltán Lajos Kis wrote: #yiv4387626187 #yiv4387626187 -- _filtered #yiv4387626187 {

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow tables

Hello, In OpenFlow 1.3 and later the Table Features message is bidirectional. The controller can use this message to request a new pipeline (set of new tables) from the switch. Also, there is ongoing work in ONF on Table Type Patterns (TTPs) [1]. These are predefined pipelines that the controll

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow: SwitchFeatures and PortStatus messages

SwitchFeatures -> One per established OpenFlow channel. So unless you force reconnections, you should expect six. PortStatus -> One per port status change. Unless you mess with the ports, you should expect zero. PacketIn -> Depends on the installed flows in switches and the traffic matrix. Best,

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 67, Issue 8

HI Lixu I got these configurations from someone, These were working for him he has tested them. And I don't really know much about this stuff thats why i'm asking for help here. Are you saying that the queues are the problem? Are my configurations correct? On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:01 AM, < open

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 66, Issue 6

Re:Question about section 4.7 View OpenFlow Messages for Pingin the open flow tutorial. I have a problam with this pat in the tutorial, from some reason the only kind of messages i see in the wireshark are "

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet

Good afternoon every one, I was trying to implement a very simple controller using C++ to talk to the openflow switches. I open one socket to listen for incoming connections, then the switch connects to the controller and I get the corresponding socket with the IP and PORT number (54416), then

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet

d.edu [mailto:openflow-discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Eduard Gibert Renart Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 7:39 PM To: Andrew Ferguson Cc: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet Still doesn't work now the message doesn't even appear in the sc

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet

Monday, January 27, 2014 7:39 PM > To: Andrew Ferguson > Cc: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet > > Still doesn’t work now the message doesn’t even appear in the screen when I > use wireshark, but if I change the size of the char bu

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet

Still doesn’t work now the message doesn’t even appear in the screen when I use wireshark, but if I change the size of the char buffer from 10 to 100 then I get Unknown Type 59 or 122 (15231B or 3261B) Ver Warning ! Any ideas ? Respectfully, Eduard Gibert Renart On ene 27, 2014, at 12:37 PM,

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet

On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:33 PM, Eduard Gibert Renart wrote: > Yes my architecture is little-endian. So I need to convert the length and > the xid like this ? > > struct ofp_header header; > header.version = OFP_VERSION; > header.type = OFPT_HELLO; > header.length = htons(8); >

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet

On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Eduard Gibert Renart wrote: > Good morning every one, > > I was trying to create a very simple SDN controller and I’m having > difficulties creating an SDN packet using sockets in C. I create a regular > TCP/IP packet using the C library to create sockets and then

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow packet

Yes my architecture is little-endian. So I need to convert the length and the xid like this ? struct ofp_header header; header.version = OFP_VERSION; header.type = OFPT_HELLO; header.length = htons(8); header.xid = htonl(13); Respectfully, Eduard On ene 27, 2014, at 12:28 P

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow tutorial

In the given link they provided the passwd also. *Important: For this VM image, the user name is 'openflow' with password 'openflow'.* On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Donald Masse wrote: > Hello, > My name is Donald Masse, I’m writing now my Master thesis in SDN > Networking and Openflow protoc

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow and embedded systems

I guess this message was intended to be sent to Alex and to the list. Regards. Fabio. Enviado via iPad > Em 21/12/2013, às 16:43, srujan escreveu: > > What particular access point are u planing for, depends on the use case. You > can use raspberry or openwrt compatible router, depending on the

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow and embedded systems

Hi, we have an image of OpenFlow 1.0 running over Mikrotik router. If you intend to have more than an AP, mikrotik router with OpenFlow enabled can be usefull. See http://200.133.238.124/grew/OF_Mikrotik.html. Regards. Fabio. Enviado via iPad > Em 20/12/2013, às 16:26, Alison Chan escreveu: >

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow and embedded systems

Hi Alex, In his recent email to this, Andrew Ferguson provided some links about OpenFlow on embedded devices, namely openwrt, soekris, and pc-engines. https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2013-December/005087.html Cheers, Alison On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Alex Reyes wro

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow Switch on TP-Link multiple connection problem

On Dec 8, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Jon Stan wrote: > The following is the error message: > > 11:03:42.592 INFO [n.f.c.i.OFChannelHandler:New I/O server worker #2-4] New > switch connection from /192.168.100.1:60059 > ... > 11:03:42.636 WARN [n.f.c.i.C.s.notification:main] Switch > 00:00:00:23:20:98:4

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow 1.3 compatible controller

Hi > We have used POX and floodlight controllers, but none of them were > successful with openflow 1.3 version.. Since you feel comfortable with python, you can also try Ryu. http://osrg.github.io/ryu/ regards Lucas Brasilino MSc Student @ Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) twitter: @luca

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow 1.3 compatible controller

Hi Alexander, Thanks alot for the information.. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Alexander Shalimov wrote: > Hi Windhya, > > CPqD also has NOX 1.3 controller (https://github.com/CPqD/nox13oflib). > Just try https://github.com/CPqD/ofsoftswitch13/wiki/OpenFlow-1.3-Tutorial. > > > С уважением,

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow 1.3 compatible controller

Hi Windhya, CPqD also has NOX 1.3 controller (https://github.com/CPqD/nox13oflib). Just try https://github.com/CPqD/ofsoftswitch13/wiki/OpenFlow-1.3-Tutorial. ? ?, | Sincerely, ?. | Alexander. On 11/19/2013 03:33 PM, Windhya Rankothge wrote: Hi all, We have the SDN netw

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow on patchless click

Hi Salman, You could try to follow the git instructions to get the source downloaded. http://www.read.cs.ucla.edu/click/git It would probably work. You might not have the file there. BR, Namal On 24.9.2013 15:09, Salman Khalid wrote: hello , I am a newbie to openflow and my research project r

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Switch Management Tool

Ok, there may be some misinterpretations of what I wanted to say. When I see a Central controller, I see an entity. I don't see a single or a group of machines, I see a concept. For me a central control system is still central, even if behind it, there are hundreds of machines executing instruction

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Switch Management Tool

hi Carlos, On Oct 21, 2013, at 8:34 AM, Carlos Ferreira wrote: > I don't really understand why would anyone want multiple controllers, when > there could be only one controller and over it, multiple apps implementing > different services. Its a much more simple layered approach. multiple contr

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Switch Management Tool

Why not having the same controller, controlling all the switches? What is the problem? Remember that central control is a concept. Its implementation can follow diverse paths, going from 1 server only to an app running in a cloud. I don't really understand why would anyone want multiple controller

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Switch Management Tool

On 10/18/13 7:30 AM, Rui Figueira wrote: Hi Brian. The controller is really a good option to manage the switches, but I'm intending to have something that is more independent of it, because a switch can have multiple controllers, right? In addition, we can have a controller responsible for some o

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Switch Management Tool

Hi Brian. The controller is really a good option to manage the switches, but I'm intending to have something that is more independent of it, because a switch can have multiple controllers, right? In addition, we can have a controller responsible for some of the network switches and a other controll

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Switch Management Tool

Hi Srujan. I need a free solution, I´ve already looked hyperglance, it´s fantastic but it´s out of our affordability. Is tail-gate a tool? Can you indicate any site about it? Thank you again. Rui Figueira 2013/10/17 srujan > Hi rui, for monitoring i came across hyperglance , for managinf tail

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Switch Management Tool

Ideally, you would just use your controller to monitor and manage your switches. If you want a separate command line utility, you can try dpctl. - Brian On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Rui Figueira < ruialexandrefigue...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone. I´m new at SDN world and I´m looking up

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28

lf Of Shuva Jyoti Kar >>Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:01 AM >>To: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >>Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue >>28 >> >>Hi, >> >>Could someone explaain how the Topolgy is discovered using

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28

@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28 In a case where controller is physically directly connected to S1, but it controlls both S1 and S2 C1 I S1 --- S2 for the openflow topology discovery, does controller send LLDP packets to both switches which are

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28

;-Original Message- > >From: openflow-discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu [mailto:openflow- > >discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Shuva Jyoti Kar > >Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:01 AM > >To: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > >Subject: Re: [o

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28

To: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue >28 > >Hi, > >Could someone explaain how the Topolgy is discovered using LLDP? > >Shuva > >-Original Message- >From: openflow-discuss-boun..

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28

27, 2013 10:01 AM >To: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28 > >Hi, > >Could someone explaain how the Topolgy is discovered using LLDP? > >Shuva > >-Original Message- >From: openflow-d

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28

environment, i would like to know, how controllers discover each other ? Does this handles by openflow it self ? Highly appreciate your thoughts.. Best Regards, Windhya Rankothge. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.stanford.ed

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow controller discovery

Hi, As i understand, there are no distributed controllers, you can connect to one or more controllers. Some controllers support active/standby model but as i understand there is no distributed controller support in openflow controllers. There may be SDN controllers which supports distributed contr

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Tutorial VM Problem

Hi Ali, You can install 2.0 from source (option #2) or using apt-get (option #3). http://mininet.org/download/ Option #3 might be easier, but I would recommend Option #2 because you will get Mininet 2.1 which contains many fixes and enhancements, and it will be easier to update in the future. B

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Tutorial VM Problem

Thanks for the guidance. I am all setup now. Regards, Bukai On Sep 13, 2013 3:13 PM, "Jose Pedro Oliveira" wrote: > On 2013/09/13 07:54 AM, Ali Hasan Bukai wrote: > >> >> I had my doubts regarding that, thanks. >> >> Since this is the system I am stuck with, could you please guide me to a >> tut

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Tutorial VM Problem

On 2013/09/13 07:54 AM, Ali Hasan Bukai wrote: I had my doubts regarding that, thanks. Since this is the system I am stuck with, could you please guide me to a tutorial that could help me out in installing the Mininet 2.0 version on my Ubuntu 12.04. The manual setup is described in the fo

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Tutorial VM Problem

I had my doubts regarding that, thanks. Since this is the system I am stuck with, could you please guide me to a tutorial that could help me out in installing the Mininet 2.0 version on my Ubuntu 12.04. Regards, Ali Bukai On Sep 12, 2013 4:32 AM, "Jose Pedro Oliveira" wrote: > > On 2013/09/11 2

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Tutorial VM Problem

You might check out these entries from the FAQ (faq.mininet.org): Regarding switching to the right linux virtual console: https://github.com/mininet/mininet/wiki/FAQ#wiki-blank-screen Regarding virtualbox errors on windows: https://github.com/mininet/mininet/wiki/FAQ#wiki-virtualbox-error Good

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Tutorial VM Problem

On 2013/09/11 22:46 PM, Ali Hasan Bukai wrote: Hello, I am a Masters student at NU-FAST, Karachi, Pakistan. I have been trying to run the OpenFlow Tutorial for Mininet 2.0 for over a week now. I am stuck on the startup, and have googled around but have not been able to find a solution. Th

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 58, Issue 10

Hi Sudeep, Sorry if I didn't understand exactly what you meant. If you have a mixed environment of both OF switches and traditional switches as in your example you're trying to create loops between OpenFlow island (cluster) and traditional switches. Currently I'm using Floodlight and this is n

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 58, Issue 10

Thanks Luca. Is this implementation takes care of interop with traditional switch MSTP? As my main concern was loop formation with traditional switch. For example: consider a triangle topology with one OF switch and two traditional switch or two OF switch and one traditional switch. Here OF switch

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow wireshark dissector not recognized

missing. > > Thank you, > > Heming > > From: Diana Marosin [marosin.di...@gmail.com] > Sent: April 30, 2012 18:22 > To: Heming Wen > Cc: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu; rwh...@i-a-i.com > Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Ope

Re: [openflow-discuss] (OpenFlow Extensible Match)

You would create a new OXM field (or fields) and then add support for the new field to your switches and controller. On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 02:17:18PM -0400, Seyed Hossein Mortazavi wrote: > Is this using the OXM fields? or should I also modify OF? > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Ben Pfaf

Re: [openflow-discuss] (OpenFlow Extensible Match)

You could add an extension to do that but there is no standardized support for such matching. On Jul 8, 2013 11:02 AM, "Seyed Hossein Mortazavi" wrote: > Hi, > > I know this would require controller and switch support but using OF v1.3, > can I create OF_Matches based on application layer packet

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.3 Rate Limiting logic in ofsoftswitch13

Hi, The software switch implements a token bucket to perform rate limiting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Token_bucket Basically it add tokens to the meter band at every second and consumes a determined number of them when a packet arrives. To limit by packets per second, 1000 tokens are consumed b

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.3 Rate Limiting Anomaly

Hi, Any chance you are experiencing the effect of the "burst tolerance" associated with the meters? I believe that when you switch to the new meter, your traffic quickly consumes the burst tokens - causing the peak - and once the tokens are depleted, the meter starts working. It would be great

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.3 Rate Limiting Anomaly

Thanks for sharing your experience! -Christian On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Philippos Isaia wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking of my idea that "There is a small time interval every time > you change the limit. In that time interval, the switch/router disables the > previous limit and enables

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.3 Rate Limiting Anomaly

Hi, I was thinking of my idea that "There is a small time interval every time you change the limit. In that time interval, the switch/router disables the previous limit and enables the new limit. (i.e. flow table entry/modification) But as soon as the previous limit is disabled, the switch/ro

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow-discuss IRC channel

I haven't seen any followup on this besides Nick's message, but I expect it would make sense to keep the existing #openflow channel on freenode and just document that it exists somehow so that people can find it (I added a link on the openflow.org wiki at least.) Either I wasn't aware of the #o

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest

FYI: http://www.sdncentral.com/interviews/onf-openflow-driver-competition-dan-pitt/2013/06/ Ibrahim Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:42:14 -0700 From: dan.tala...@bigswitch.com To: ederleaofernan...@gmail.com CC: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow-discuss IRC channel

On Jun 6, 2013 8:03 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote: > There is, or at least was, an #openflow channel in active use on > freenode. Did it disappear? Why create a new channel? It still exists with light but steady traffic. -- Nick ___ openflow-discuss mailing

Re: [openflow-discuss] Openflow-discuss IRC channel

On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 06:05:01PM -0700, Ali Al-Shabibi wrote: > We (Open Networking Laboratory) are announcing an IRC channel where > OpenFlowers like you can meet up and help each other out. The channel > can be found at: > > IRC Server : irc.freenode.net > Channel : #openflow-discuss There is

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Eder Leão Fernandes < ederleaofernan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have the same view from Ben. But I believe that the contest is also > asking for something like the OpenFlow Connection manager on Indigo Agent. > (plus the unmarshaling/marshaling libraries, which are g

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest

I have the same view from Ben. But I believe that the contest is also asking for something like the OpenFlow Connection manager on Indigo Agent. (plus the unmarshaling/marshaling libraries, which are generated by LOXI on Indigo). On 20 May 2013 14:18, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:30 PM, ibrahim menem wrote: > Anybody can explain what is exactly a "driver" and how it should integrate > into the controller and the switch at the same time, I read the announcement > in detail but still not getting it! My interpretation is that a driver is an OpenFlow

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest

Thanks, but those links don't seem to provide any more information than the links in David's original message. Sent from my iPhone On May 17, 2013, at 11:33 PM, Akram Hakiri wrote: > HI Bob, > Here is a couple of links that may clarify the concept of OF driver. > https://www.opennetworking.or

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest

: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest HI Bob, Here is a couple of links that may clarify the concept of OF driver. https://www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/misc/openflow-driver-competi

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest

HI Bob, Here is a couple of links that may clarify the concept of OF driver. https://www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/misc/openflow-driver-competition-terms-conditions.pdf https://www.opennetworking.org/competition Le 17/05/2013 20:51, Bob Lantz a écrit : What precisely is an O

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Driver Contest

What precisely is an OpenFlow driver? Is it something like openflowj or libopenflow which sends and receives OpenFlow messages? Is it an API/protocol abstraction layer like OpenDaylight's SAL which might provide a new protocol or API to work with multiple versions of OpenFlow as well as proprie

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow AP with PC Engine

Hi, I personally would be suggest using Openwrt for the PC Engine, unless someone else had tried. I am currently trying to figure out why the image is not available. The easiest way is to install Linux on the PC Engine and put in hostpad and openvswitch. This should not be any harder to dealing

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow AP with PC Engine

Dear Abobakr, You can try this link: http://www.openflow.org/wk/index.php/Pantou_:_OpenFlow_1.0_for_OpenWRTI didn't tried but studied a little that the generic image can be implemented over PC engine.You may be using ALIX boards for it?All the best. Best Regards,Shan ZaidiNetworking Laboratory,

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow enabled switch

OpenFlow Tutorial is the de facto entrance level documentation tailored for you. On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Ayah Abu-Tair wrote: > Hello,, > > I read a paper about how to consolidate a switch using openflow > > I mean the functions a

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 54, Issue 36

Hi How to post a new thread? > From: openflow-discuss-requ...@lists.stanford.edu > Subject: openflow-discuss Digest, Vol 54, Issue 36 > To: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:22:14 -0700 > > Send openflow-discuss mailing list submissions to > openflow-discuss@li

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Wiki Spammed?

Thanks Volkan.. this is a community wiki so feel free to sign up for an account and rollback anything that you see that has been vandalized (I fixed this particular page). I agree that the site should change, a fair amount of the content is out of date, and I would expect this to be sorted out

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow 1.3 for openwrt

Hi >> By the way, I'll take some time and will try to generate an image to >> my tl-wr741nd. > > that would be really helpful, we only have TL-WR1043ND in the lab. Just for update, I've managed last week to generate a TL-WR741ND and x86 image (after a little patch) of ofsoftswitch 1.3. The x86

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow tutorial: multiple switches part requires controller changes with POX?

Thanks for your answers, everything seems clear to me now. 2013/4/14 Murphy McCauley : > I also think you're right and it'd be nice to make a note about this. I'd do > it, but am backlogged for the next few days. It's a wiki; I think you can do > it yourself. :) Oh right, I missed the "create

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow tutorial: multiple switches part requires controller changes with POX?

On Apr 14, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Bertrand Bonnefoy-Claudet wrote: > I've been through the tutorial up to the multiple switches part > (http://www.openflow.org/wk/index.php/OpenFlow_Tutorial#Support_Multiple_Switches) > and I don't understand what is meant by the following sentence: > >Now, modify

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow tutorial: multiple switches part requires controller changes with POX?

Hi Bertrand, below is my understanding, a beginner myself so trying to figure it out as well. Perhaps it is more obvious if you use a linear topology involve multiple switches. For example: mininet@mininet-vm:~$ sudo mn --topo linear,3 --mac --switch ovsk --controller remote mininet> net c0 s

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Stress-tests

On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:59 AM, Amadine Florence wrote: > Hello! > I have to make several stress-testing OpenFlow controller to quantify its > robustness and performance. > > I must designe stress tests to implement, with the aim of measuring the > response time at different load levels and to de

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow Stress-tests

Check out Oflops: http://www.openflow.org/wk/index.php/Oflops Zoltan From: openflow-discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu [mailto:openflow-discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Amadine Florence Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:00 AM To: openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu Subject: [open

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow 1.3 for openwrt

Lucas, > By the way, I'll take some time and will try to generate an image to > my tl-wr741nd. that would be really helpful, we only have TL-WR1043ND in the lab. Thanks, Christian > regards > Lucas Brasilino > MSc Student @ UFPE -- Christian ___ o

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow 1.3 for openwrt

Hi > Hi Lucas, > > There are more two options. > You can try Ryu and Trema(under development). > https://github.com/osrg/ryu Thanks for both of you. I'll try it. By the way, I'll take some time and will try to generate an image to my tl-wr741nd. regards Lucas Brasilino MSc Student @ UFPE _

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow 1.3 for openwrt

rs. > >>> Only simulations with virtual switches do not bring up real-world > >>> problems, such as those that occur with control-plane desruptions. > >>> Features present in version 1.3, such as LSP and IPv6 support will be > >>> very welcome. > >

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow 1.3 for openwrt

simulations with virtual switches do not bring up real-world >>> problems, such as those that occur with control-plane desruptions. >>> Features present in version 1.3, such as LSP and IPv6 support will be >>> very welcome. >>> >>> Thank you, >>

Re: [openflow-discuss] openflow 1.3 for openwrt

that occur with control-plane desruptions. >> Features present in version 1.3, such as LSP and IPv6 support will be >> very welcome. >> >> Thank you, >> Márcio >> >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:34 AM, >> wrote: >> >> Message: 3 >>

  1   2   3   >