Re: armv6hf build failing with multiple definition of `JNI_OnLoad'

2018-11-14 Thread Chris Newland
of GTK 3 to FX 8, which was pushed to > 8u-dev about 3 weeks ago. > > > Similar changes to those made in buildSrc/linux.gradle will likely be > needed in buildSrc/armv6hf.gradle. > > -- Kevin > > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212147 > > >

armv6hf build failing with multiple definition of `JNI_OnLoad'

2018-11-14 Thread Chris Newland
Hi all, Despite all the cool new build stuff being done with OpenJFX I still get a few queries about my nightly chriswhocodes.com OpenJFX8 builds for ARM from the Pi community. Someone recently noticed that my builds broke on Oct 26 2018. I've posted a gist of the failure log here

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

2018-09-18 Thread Chris Newland
Congratulations to all involved in this! Looking forward to seeing JavaFX grow now it's outside of the JDK. -Chris On Tue, September 18, 2018 14:08, Johan Vos wrote: > Adding to what Kevin already said (huge thanks to Kevin and Oracle for > all they did), I want to thank everyone on this list

Re: More community participation in JavaFX

2018-02-02 Thread Chris Newland
Hi Kevin, I'm more than happy to keep the community JavaFX build server at chriswhocodes.com running and host JDK 8/9/10/n + FX builds there. At the moment it's mostly used by the Raspberry Pi community to grab JavaFX overlays for JDK8 on ARM. I can also build and host OSX and Windows builds

Re: Building OpenJFX.

2017-12-19 Thread Chris Newland
Hi Phil, Would it be possible to update the Windows build instructions? Getting VS10 and SDKs from 2010 to work on a Windows 10 build machine isn't much fun. Thanks, Chris On Tue, December 19, 2017 20:11, Phil Race wrote: > In the "innovation" email thread it was suggested that one obstacle

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

2017-12-14 Thread Chris Newland
Hi John, Here's my $0.02 on JavaFX as someone who's used it for over 4 years in the JITWatch project (https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jitwatch) and also for fun with my DemoFX benchmarks (https://github.com/chriswhocodes/DemoFX). On the whole I think the API is very good. Event handling, layout,

Re: Error on build

2017-10-04 Thread Chris Newland
uild with VS 2010 and VS 2013, which should >> work as long as you don't build media or webkit (they aren't built by >> default). >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187366 >> >> >> >> >> Chris N

Re: Error on build

2017-10-03 Thread Chris Newland
Hi, I'm also trying to build OpenJFX on Windows 10 so I can add a Windows build to my community OpenJFX build server at https://chriswhocodes.com and am hitting the same problems as you. Setting WINSDK_DIR on the command line using 'set' or 'export' doesn't work and neither does setting via the

Re: Review: Remove Lens code (finally)

2017-04-19 Thread Chris Newland
Thanks for the heads-up David. I've checked my chriswhocodes.com web server logs and around 90 unique IPs per week are still downloading the ARM OpenJFX overlay builds so before this patch is merged I'll take a snapshot of the last working ARM build and keep that available. Kind regards, Chris

Re: Is a Desktop Experience on ARM with X11 Possible?

2017-02-12 Thread Chris Newland
Hi Scott, I run windowed JavaFX desktop apps on the Raspberry Pi 3 (Latest Raspbian + PIXEL desktop without experimental driver) using the GTK platform and software pipeline with an OpenJFX build from my server at https://chriswhocodes.com/ Just download an ARM nightly: wget

Re: Planning for JavaFX.next

2016-12-07 Thread Chris Newland
Hi Jonathan, +1 to that list for me. In my experience JavaFX performs well for the "low-level" (Canvas + GraphicsContext) stuff with one exception - the PixelWriter APIs appear do a lot of array duplication and copying under the hood which I believe can be optimised. I'll investigate further and

New JavaFX performance benchmark (DemoFX part III)

2016-11-10 Thread Chris Newland
Hi all, Hope not too off-topic but I've just released the 3rd version of my JavaFX performance benchmark "DemoFX". This time it exercises the PixelWriter (of Canvas and WriteableImage), the spectral analyser (thanks for adding this!), and some 3D as well as drawing on the Canvas. It does use

Re: OSX+Radeon crash VideoDataBuffer.convert YCbCr_422 -> BGRA_PRE

2016-05-25 Thread Chris Newland
module. Further, > this methods will go away very soon as part of the ongoing encapsulation > of all impl_ methods. > > Can you file an RFE for a public API to do this? We can consider it for > a future version of JavaFX. > > -- Kevin > > > > Chris Newland wrote: > >

OSX+Radeon crash VideoDataBuffer.convert YCbCr_422 -> BGRA_PRE

2016-05-25 Thread Chris Newland
Hi, This is really just an FYI as I'm doing funky stuff with multiple MediaPlayers and using the deprecated impl_getLatestFrame() method to grab frames. I can grab frames fine with a single MediaPlayer instance but when I use multiple MediaPlayer objects each with an AnimationTimer calling this

default X86EGL.includeSwing = true for headless Linux?

2016-04-27 Thread Chris Newland
Hi, Currently Monocle builds are configured (in buildSrc/x86egl.gradle) with X86EGL.includeSwing = false This results in build.gradle excluding javafx/embed/swing packages if (!targetProperties.includeSwing) { exclude("javafx/embed/swing") } Which means that you can't easily (to my

Re: Huge JavaFX performance drop in Debian Jessie

2015-12-22 Thread Chris Newland
Hi Kevin, The JavaFX performance when forcing the sw pipeline is still much slower with Jessie than Wheezy so I'm hoping there is something I can do at the OS level to get back to previous sw performance. Will let you know if I find it! Cheers, Chris Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Dec 2015,

Re: Huge JavaFX performance drop in Debian Jessie

2015-12-22 Thread Chris Newland
:00, Chien Yang wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > JavaFX may run on Intel GMA 3150, but it is not a supported GPU. There > is a high likelihood that the drop in performance is caused by the switch > from sw pipe (Debian Wheezy) to es2 pipe (Debian Jessie). GMA 3150 is an > underpowered GPU for

Huge JavaFX performance drop in Debian Jessie

2015-12-21 Thread Chris Newland
Upgraded my netbook (Intel GMA3150 onboard graphics) from Debian Wheezy to Debian Jessie and JavaFX performance has suffered a huge drop :( Possibly not JavaFX related but native apps (firefox etc) all seem to perform the same and glxgears runs full sync framerate and 350fps unsynced. JavaFX

Re: JavaFX on Raspberry Pi

2015-12-06 Thread Chris Newland
Hi Scott, If you don't mind the bleeding edge I publish OpenJFX nightlies here for x86 (Linux and OSX) and ARM (Pi etc) http://108.61.191.178/ They just unzip over your existing JDK/JRE. Cheers, Chris Sent from my iPhone > On 6 Dec 2015, at 02:29, Scott Palmer wrote: >

Re: OpenJFX / JDK 9 questions

2015-08-20 Thread Chris Newland
Thanks Kevin, Phil. I find it encouraging that there is a plan to include jfx as part of the jdk forest as that will lead to a smoother build process. Hopefully there will still be a mechanism to add OpenJFX to other JDKs (Zulu etc.) in a post-Jigsaw world. I filed a bug just as a reminder:

OpenJFX / JDK 9 questions

2015-08-18 Thread Chris Newland
Hi, Please could someone briefly explain the changes to OpenJFX under JDK9 / modularisation / jigsaw? I've been trying to answer some questions about this in the London Java Community (JUG) and have added 8u40 stable binaries to my OpenJFX build server as that was requested:

JavaFX amd64 linking against glibc 2.14?

2015-04-30 Thread Chris Newland
Hi, I've been testing against JDK 8u60b13 from https://jdk8.java.net/download.html and it looks like libglass.so in the Linux 64-bit (amd64) download is now linking against glibc 2.14 JDK 8u45 linked against glibc 2.4 This breaks on Debian (Wheezy) which only provides 2.13-38+deb7u8 Dependency

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-04-16 Thread Chris Newland
the indicated patch to an OpenJFX build and provide feedback on any improvements (or bugs!) that they see, that would help. In the meantime, we have a lot of testing to do to verify the correctness of the changes... ...jim On 4/8/15 9:25 AM, Chris Newland wrote: Hi Jim, I'll post

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-04-16 Thread Chris Newland
the fix on their OSX system. Thanks a lot Jim and team for looking into this! Cheers, Chris On Thu, April 16, 2015 09:39, Chris Newland wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for looking into this. The patch definitely improves es2 performance on Debian Linux amd64 from around 33fps to around 53fps

Private APIs not usable in Java 9?

2015-04-09 Thread Chris Newland
I just asked about this on the adoption-disc...@openjdk.java.net list and the answer from Martijn Verburg is: --- Hi Chris, I think the strong advice for those using private APIs is to run the jdeps tool to see where they are using APIs that will go away / be moved. I'd then get them to post

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-04-08 Thread Chris Newland
:40 PM, Chris Newland wrote: Hi Hervé, That's a valid question :) Probably because a) All my non-UI graphics experience is with immediate-mode / raster systems b) I'm interested in using JavaFX for particle effects / demoscene / gaming so assumed (perhaps wrongly?) that scenegraph

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-04-08 Thread Chris Newland
which GPU is being used if you run it with -Dprism.verbose=true... ...jim On 4/2/15 4:13 PM, Jim Graham wrote: On my retina MBP (10.8) I get 60fps for es2 and 44fps for sw. Are you running a newer version of MacOS? ...jim On 3/31/15 3:40 PM, Chris Newland wrote: Hi Hervé, That's

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-04-04 Thread Chris Newland
. Are you running a newer version of MacOS? ...jim On 3/31/15 3:40 PM, Chris Newland wrote: Hi Hervé, That's a valid question :) Probably because a) All my non-UI graphics experience is with immediate-mode / raster systems b) I'm interested in using JavaFX for particle effects

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-03-31 Thread Chris Newland
... ...jim On 3/28/15 3:22 AM, Chris Newland wrote: Hi Robert, I've not filed a Jira yet as I was hoping to find time to investigate thoroughly but when I saw your question I thought I'd better add my findings. I believe the issue is in the ES2Pipeline as if I run with -Dprism.order=sw

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-03-31 Thread Chris Newland
there is a performance problem here? (or at least a need for documentation so as to set expectations for gc.fillPolygon). Best regards, Chris On Tue, March 31, 2015 22:00, Hervé Girod wrote: Why don't you use Nodes rather than Canvas ? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 31, 2015, at 22:31, Chris Newland cnewl

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-03-28 Thread Chris Newland
performance that can be tracked? I will file an issue with a simple test case and hope for the best. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Chris Newland cnewl...@chrisnewland.com wrote: Possibly related: I can reproduce a massive (90%) performance drop on OSX between drawing a wireframe

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

2015-03-27 Thread Chris Newland
Possibly related: I can reproduce a massive (90%) performance drop on OSX between drawing a wireframe polygon on a Canvas using a series of gc.strokeLine(double x1, double y1, double x2, double y2) commands versus using a single gc.strokePolygon(double[] xPoints, double[] yPoints, int count)

Re: libjfxmedia.so on armv6hf?

2015-03-17 Thread Chris Newland
, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Not sure what missing stuff you are referring to. All of the JavaFX sources for embedded are in the rt repo on openjfx. -- Kevin Chris Newland wrote: Hi Kevin, Is there any chance Oracle can release all the missing ARM32 stuff and let the community have a go

Re: libjfxmedia.so on armv6hf?

2015-03-16 Thread Chris Newland
further. -- Kevin Chris Newland wrote: In reference to http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=81t=97367p=720267#p7 20267 When cross-compiling to armv6hf on an x86-64 Linux system using: gradle clean openZip -PCOMPILE_TARGETS=armv6hf Some of the binaries are compiled

libjfxmedia.so on armv6hf?

2015-03-16 Thread Chris Newland
In reference to http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=81t=97367p=720267#p720267 When cross-compiling to armv6hf on an x86-64 Linux system using: gradle clean openZip -PCOMPILE_TARGETS=armv6hf Some of the binaries are compiled as x86-64: file

Re: Build farm for OpenJFX (on ARM)

2015-03-15 Thread Chris Newland
Group's CloudBees but for now this helps IoT ARM JDKs to get OpenJFX support. Cheers, Chris On Wed, March 11, 2015 16:36, David Hill wrote: On 3/9/15, 5:00 AM, Chris Newland wrote: Hi all, A quick update on this: There are a small number of wrinkles before we get OpenJFX building

Re: Build farm for OpenJFX (on ARM)

2015-03-09 Thread Chris Newland
-the-Tower meetup? Cheers, Chris On Mon, March 9, 2015 09:41, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi Chris, Just to add to this, have you got an account to edit the wiki at adoptopenjdk.java.net? We should add a link to this build from there. Cheers, Martijn On 9 March 2015 at 09:00, Chris Newland cnewl

Re: Build farm for OpenJFX (on ARM)

2015-03-09 Thread Chris Newland
Hi all, A quick update on this: There are a small number of wrinkles before we get OpenJFX building on the Adoption group's CloudBees system so I've put together a Debian-based VPS server that is producing nightly OpenJFX builds for Linux amd64 and armv6hf. It updates from

Re: DemoFX - JavaFX examples / benchmarking framework

2015-03-09 Thread Chris Newland
)? --Benjamin On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Chris Newland cnewl...@chrisnewland.com wrote: Hi all, I've put together a little framework called DemoFX and a few demoscene graphical effects for measuring JavaFX performance: https://github.com/chriswhocodes/DemoFX Here's a YouTube

Build farm for OpenJFX (on ARM)

2015-02-05 Thread Chris Newland
Hi Johan, all, Following the announcement that JDK builds for ARM will no longer include JavaFX I started talking with the OpenJDK Adoption group (https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Main) about the possibility of using their CloudBees CI system to produce OpenJFX binaries (for all

Quick look at JavaFX methods above the HotSpot inlining threshold

2014-11-03 Thread Chris Newland
Hi all, As part of the JITWatch[1] project I've written a tool called JarScan which counts the bytecode size of methods in a jar and logs those methods which are above HotSpot's 325 byte size threshold for inlining methods it determines are hot. In jfxrt.jar from Oracle's JDK 1.8.0_25 on Linux

Re: OT: Netbeans ported to JFX?

2014-07-10 Thread Chris Newland
Apologies for the self-promotion but I've built a pretty complex open source project using JavaFX and found it to be a very usable technology. Light years ahead of Swing and more powerful than SWT; much easier layout (VBox/HBox), builder pattern, styling (CSS etc.) and deployment (part of JRE).