Re: armv6hf build failing with multiple definition of `JNI_OnLoad'

port of GTK 3 to FX 8, which was pushed to > 8u-dev about 3 weeks ago. > > > Similar changes to those made in buildSrc/linux.gradle will likely be > needed in buildSrc/armv6hf.gradle. > > -- Kevin > > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212147 > >

armv6hf build failing with multiple definition of `JNI_OnLoad'

Hi all, Despite all the cool new build stuff being done with OpenJFX I still get a few queries about my nightly chriswhocodes.com OpenJFX8 builds for ARM from the Pi community. Someone recently noticed that my builds broke on Oct 26 2018. I've posted a gist of the failure log here https://gist.

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

Congratulations to all involved in this! Looking forward to seeing JavaFX grow now it's outside of the JDK. -Chris On Tue, September 18, 2018 14:08, Johan Vos wrote: > Adding to what Kevin already said (huge thanks to Kevin and Oracle for > all they did), I want to thank everyone on this list fo

Re: More community participation in JavaFX

Hi Kevin, I'm more than happy to keep the community JavaFX build server at chriswhocodes.com running and host JDK 8/9/10/n + FX builds there. At the moment it's mostly used by the Raspberry Pi community to grab JavaFX overlays for JDK8 on ARM. I can also build and host OSX and Windows builds the

Re: Building OpenJFX.

Hi Phil, Would it be possible to update the Windows build instructions? Getting VS10 and SDKs from 2010 to work on a Windows 10 build machine isn't much fun. Thanks, Chris On Tue, December 19, 2017 20:11, Phil Race wrote: > In the "innovation" email thread it was suggested that one obstacle t

Re: Innovation again (was Re: Text classes)

Hi John, Here's my $0.02 on JavaFX as someone who's used it for over 4 years in the JITWatch project (https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jitwatch) and also for fun with my DemoFX benchmarks (https://github.com/chriswhocodes/DemoFX). On the whole I think the API is very good. Event handling, layout,

Re: Error on build

VS 2010 and VS 2013, which should >> work as long as you don't build media or webkit (they aren't built by >> default). >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187366 >> >> >> >> >> Chris Newland

Re: Error on build

Hi, I'm also trying to build OpenJFX on Windows 10 so I can add a Windows build to my community OpenJFX build server at https://chriswhocodes.com and am hitting the same problems as you. Setting WINSDK_DIR on the command line using 'set' or 'export' doesn't work and neither does setting via the W

Re: Review: Remove Lens code (finally)

Thanks for the heads-up David. I've checked my chriswhocodes.com web server logs and around 90 unique IPs per week are still downloading the ARM OpenJFX overlay builds so before this patch is merged I'll take a snapshot of the last working ARM build and keep that available. Kind regards, Chris

Re: Is a Desktop Experience on ARM with X11 Possible?

Hi Scott, I run windowed JavaFX desktop apps on the Raspberry Pi 3 (Latest Raspbian + PIXEL desktop without experimental driver) using the GTK platform and software pipeline with an OpenJFX build from my server at https://chriswhocodes.com/ Just download an ARM nightly: wget https://chriswhocode

Re: Planning for JavaFX.next

Hi Jonathan, +1 to that list for me. In my experience JavaFX performs well for the "low-level" (Canvas + GraphicsContext) stuff with one exception - the PixelWriter APIs appear do a lot of array duplication and copying under the hood which I believe can be optimised. I'll investigate further and

New JavaFX performance benchmark (DemoFX part III)

Hi all, Hope not too off-topic but I've just released the 3rd version of my JavaFX performance benchmark "DemoFX". This time it exercises the PixelWriter (of Canvas and WriteableImage), the spectral analyser (thanks for adding this!), and some 3D as well as drawing on the Canvas. It does use Med

Re: OSX+Radeon crash VideoDataBuffer.convert YCbCr_422 -> BGRA_PRE

afx.media module. Further, > this methods will go away very soon as part of the ongoing encapsulation > of all impl_ methods. > > Can you file an RFE for a public API to do this? We can consider it for > a future version of JavaFX. > > -- Kevin > > > > Chris Newland wrote:

OSX+Radeon crash VideoDataBuffer.convert YCbCr_422 -> BGRA_PRE

Hi, This is really just an FYI as I'm doing funky stuff with multiple MediaPlayers and using the deprecated impl_getLatestFrame() method to grab frames. I can grab frames fine with a single MediaPlayer instance but when I use multiple MediaPlayer objects each with an AnimationTimer calling this c

default X86EGL.includeSwing = true for headless Linux?

Hi, Currently Monocle builds are configured (in buildSrc/x86egl.gradle) with X86EGL.includeSwing = false This results in build.gradle excluding javafx/embed/swing packages if (!targetProperties.includeSwing) { exclude("javafx/embed/swing") } Which means that you can't easily (to my knowled

Re: Huge JavaFX performance drop in Debian Jessie

Hi Kevin, The JavaFX performance when forcing the sw pipeline is still much slower with Jessie than Wheezy so I'm hoping there is something I can do at the OS level to get back to previous sw performance. Will let you know if I find it! Cheers, Chris Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Dec 2015, at

Re: Huge JavaFX performance drop in Debian Jessie

15 08:00, Chien Yang wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > JavaFX may run on Intel GMA 3150, but it is not a supported GPU. There > is a high likelihood that the drop in performance is caused by the switch > from sw pipe (Debian Wheezy) to es2 pipe (Debian Jessie). GMA 3150 is an > underpowered GP

Huge JavaFX performance drop in Debian Jessie

Upgraded my netbook (Intel GMA3150 onboard graphics) from Debian Wheezy to Debian Jessie and JavaFX performance has suffered a huge drop :( Possibly not JavaFX related but native apps (firefox etc) all seem to perform the same and glxgears runs full sync framerate and 350fps unsynced. JavaFX stag

Re: JavaFX on Raspberry Pi

Hi Scott, If you don't mind the bleeding edge I publish OpenJFX nightlies here for x86 (Linux and OSX) and ARM (Pi etc) http://108.61.191.178/ They just unzip over your existing JDK/JRE. Cheers, Chris Sent from my iPhone > On 6 Dec 2015, at 02:29, Scott Palmer wrote: > > I seem to recall t

Re: OpenJFX / JDK 9 questions

Thanks Kevin, Phil. I find it encouraging that there is a plan to include jfx as part of the jdk forest as that will lead to a smoother build process. Hopefully there will still be a mechanism to add OpenJFX to other JDKs (Zulu etc.) in a post-Jigsaw world. I filed a bug just as a reminder: Revi

OpenJFX / JDK 9 questions

Hi, Please could someone briefly explain the changes to OpenJFX under JDK9 / modularisation / jigsaw? I've been trying to answer some questions about this in the London Java Community (JUG) and have added 8u40 stable binaries to my OpenJFX build server as that was requested: http://108.61.191.178

JavaFX amd64 linking against glibc 2.14?

Hi, I've been testing against JDK 8u60b13 from https://jdk8.java.net/download.html and it looks like libglass.so in the Linux 64-bit (amd64) download is now linking against glibc 2.14 JDK 8u45 linked against glibc 2.4 This breaks on Debian (Wheezy) which only provides 2.13-38+deb7u8 Dependency

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

test the fix on their OSX system. Thanks a lot Jim and team for looking into this! Cheers, Chris On Thu, April 16, 2015 09:39, Chris Newland wrote: > Hi Jim, > > > Thanks for looking into this. > > > The patch definitely improves es2 performance on Debian Linux amd64 fro

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-40533 > > > If others could apply the indicated patch to an OpenJFX build and > provide feedback on any improvements (or bugs!) that they see, that would > help. In the meantime, we have a lot of testing to do to verify the > correctness of the ch

Private APIs not usable in Java 9?

I just asked about this on the adoption-disc...@openjdk.java.net list and the answer from Martijn Verburg is: --- Hi Chris, I think the strong advice for those using private APIs is to run the jdeps tool to see where they are using APIs that will go away / be moved. I'd then get them to post that

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

.8) I get 60fps for es2 and 44fps for sw. Are you >> running a newer version of MacOS? >> >> ...jim >> >> >> On 3/31/15 3:40 PM, Chris Newland wrote: >> >>> Hi Hervé, >>> >>> >>> That's a valid question :) >>

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

ps: 19 >>> fps: 25 >>> >>> >>> java -Dprism.order=sw -cp target/classes/ >>> com.chrisnewland.demofx.standalone.Sierpinski fps: 1 >>> fps: 54 >>> fps: 60 >>> fps: 60 >>> fps: 60 >>> fps: 60 >>> fps: 60 >

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

0:13, Jim Graham wrote: > On my retina MBP (10.8) I get 60fps for es2 and 44fps for sw. Are you > running a newer version of MacOS? > > ...jim > > > On 3/31/15 3:40 PM, Chris Newland wrote: > >> Hi Hervé, >> >> >> That's a valid question :) &

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

there is a performance problem here? (or at least a need for documentation so as to set expectations for gc.fillPolygon). Best regards, Chris On Tue, March 31, 2015 22:00, Hervé Girod wrote: > Why don't you use Nodes rather than Canvas ? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > >> O

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

rectangle and render it more directly. If we > added that support then I'd expect the SW pipeline to perform the set of > drawLine calls faster than drawPolygon as well... > > ...jim > > > On 3/28/15 3:22 AM, Chris Newland wrote: > >> Hi Robert, >> >&g

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

ac > OSX > a second-class citizen as far as dev resources are concerned? > > Tobi and Chris, have you filed Jira Issues on Mac graphics performance > that can be tracked? > > I will file an issue with a simple test case and hope for the best. > > > > > > On

Re: Canvas performance on Mac OS

Possibly related: I can reproduce a massive (90%) performance drop on OSX between drawing a wireframe polygon on a Canvas using a series of gc.strokeLine(double x1, double y1, double x2, double y2) commands versus using a single gc.strokePolygon(double[] xPoints, double[] yPoints, int count) comma

Re: libjfxmedia.so on armv6hf?

s On Tue, March 17, 2015 14:46, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > Not sure what missing stuff you are referring to. All of the JavaFX > sources for embedded are in the rt repo on openjfx. > > -- Kevin > > > > Chris Newland wrote: > >> Hi Kevin, >> >> >> Is

Re: libjfxmedia.so on armv6hf?

rget. > David can response further. > > > -- Kevin > > > > Chris Newland wrote: > >> In reference to >> http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=81&t=97367&p=720267#p7 >> 20267 >> >> >> When cross-compiling to armv6hf

libjfxmedia.so on armv6hf?

In reference to http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=81&t=97367&p=720267#p720267 When cross-compiling to armv6hf on an x86-64 Linux system using: gradle clean openZip -PCOMPILE_TARGETS=armv6hf Some of the binaries are compiled as x86-64: file build/armv6hf-sdk/rt/lib/arm/libjfxmedi

Re: Build farm for OpenJFX (on ARM)

Group's CloudBees but for now this helps IoT ARM JDKs to get OpenJFX support. Cheers, Chris On Wed, March 11, 2015 16:36, David Hill wrote: > On 3/9/15, 5:00 AM, Chris Newland wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> >> A quick update on this: >> >> >&g

Re: Build farm for OpenJFX (on ARM)

FX demoscene hacking tutorial at the next Hack-the-Tower meetup? Cheers, Chris On Mon, March 9, 2015 09:41, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > Just to add to this, have you got an account to edit the wiki at > adoptopenjdk.java.net? We should add a link to this build from t

Re: DemoFX - JavaFX examples / benchmarking framework

t; and Shapes (in a Scene graph)? > > > --Benjamin > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Chris Newland > wrote: > > >> Hi all, >> >> >> I've put together a little framework called DemoFX and a few >> "demoscene"

Re: Build farm for OpenJFX (on ARM)

Hi all, A quick update on this: There are a small number of wrinkles before we get OpenJFX building on the Adoption group's CloudBees system so I've put together a Debian-based VPS server that is producing nightly OpenJFX builds for Linux amd64 and armv6hf. It updates from http://hg.openjdk.java

DemoFX - JavaFX examples / benchmarking framework

Hi all, I've put together a little framework called DemoFX and a few "demoscene" graphical effects for measuring JavaFX performance: https://github.com/chriswhocodes/DemoFX Here's a YouTube video of some of the effects I've developed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1rihYA8c2M (watch in HD if

Build farm for OpenJFX (on ARM)

Hi Johan, all, Following the announcement that JDK builds for ARM will no longer include JavaFX I started talking with the OpenJDK Adoption group (https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Main) about the possibility of using their CloudBees CI system to produce OpenJFX binaries (for all oper

Re: JavaFX embedded (graphics example / performance test)

Hi Felix, This looks like a really interesting project. I'm starting to investigate JavaFX performance from a JIT compilation viewpoint to make sure there are no areas in the codebase that are defeating the HotSpot JIT compilers. I've written a couple of Canvas-based "demoscene" style animations

Window decoration bug on Yosemite?

Hi, I think there might be a bug with the window decoration on OSX Yosemite whenever the StageStyle is set to UTILITY: initStyle(StageStyle.UTILITY); The red close icon appears twice. Once on the left as expected but again in the right most position where the green maximise icon should be. Scre

Re: Quick look at JavaFX methods above the HotSpot inlining threshold

to indicate > megabytes, g or G to indicate gigabytes. By default, the maximum bytecode > size is set to 35 bytes: > > -XX:MaxInlineSize=35 > > > > It would be interesting to see how adjusting some of those parameters > affects performance. Does JITWatch have tools for measuring that sor

Quick look at JavaFX methods above the HotSpot inlining threshold

Hi all, As part of the JITWatch[1] project I've written a tool called JarScan which counts the bytecode size of methods in a jar and logs those methods which are above HotSpot's 325 byte size threshold for inlining methods it determines are "hot". In jfxrt.jar from Oracle's JDK 1.8.0_25 on Linux

Re: OT: Netbeans ported to JFX?

Apologies for the self-promotion but I've built a pretty complex open source project using JavaFX and found it to be a very usable technology. Light years ahead of Swing and more powerful than SWT; much easier layout (VBox/HBox), builder pattern, styling (CSS etc.) and deployment (part of JRE). T