Patch awaiting review at http://openocd.zylin.com/247 . Next time, please
push it directly to gerrit yourself. Read HACKING for instructions.
Thanks!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
I just want to add that there is a tcl hook that gets called when gdb
connects. Depending on how you use openocd/gdb, that one can be more
convenient for doing a reset init than with monitor commands from within
gdb.
As has been said already, openocd (and gdb) should do as little as possible
to
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey does this code is related anyhow to arm_adi_v5 or this is totally
alternative solution?
Yes, it *uses* arm_adi_v5.
/Andreas
___
Openocd-development mailing list
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I have some problems with pointers and need some support plz ;-)
I'm not sure I understand what the problem is, but I can give some general
hints.
int swd_bus_read_ack(swd_ctx_t *swdctx, swd_operation_t
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Andreas :-)
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
This won't even compile. You pass a pointer-to-int, but swd_bus_read_ack
expects a pointer-to-pointer-to-char
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:56 AM, ger...@openocd.zylin.com wrote:
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to
Gerrit, which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/134
-- gerrit
commit
Sorry for bringing this old thread up (no pun intended).
This code got a few minutes of my attention after I browsed through the
clang static analysis report someone posted recently. rtos.c was one of the
first in the list, and while the bug report probably was a false positive, I
noticed some
Hi!
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Evan Hunter ehun...@broadcom.com wrote:
You are right – Looking at it again, the “qP” code looks like I got halfway
through implementing it, then found that I should be using qThreadExtraInfo
instead.
Please feel free to remove it. The only reason I
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:23 PM, freddie_chopin freddie_cho...@op.plwrote:
W dniu 2011-10-19 14:14:11 użytkownik Akos Vandra axo...@gmail.com
napisał:
#lpcfixchecksum takes only binary files, so
#make a binary file from the elf, and fix the checksum.
arm-eabi-objcopy -O binary $FILE
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Simon Barner bar...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear list,
I have already posted the attached script some weeks ago.
It enables the PLL of the STM32F107 and thus configures
the MCU to run at 72 MHz which allows for higher JTAG speeds.
Since this should be useful for
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Transfer rate: 3 KB/sec, 13848 bytes/write.
USB roundtrips?
Ḯ'll have a look with usbmon soon.
U+0618 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Akos Vandra axo...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Is it just me, or the default reply address is the sender
himself, and not the list?
The list server doesn't set Reply-To to the list address, for some very good
reason which I have forgotten now. Easiest fix is to set
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Simon Barner bar...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear list,
I finally found some time to rebase my patches and to split
them into smaller pieces (as suggested by Ųyvind Harboe
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Luca BRUNO lu...@debian.org wrote:
Luca Bruno scrisse:
This patch fix udev rules to work with any listed tty-based adaptor.
Speaking of udev, another related patch is currently sitting in the
bug tracker at
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/openocd/ticket/39
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Simon Barner bar...@gmx.de wrote:
On 16.08.2011 01:25, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
mailto:s
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org wrote:
I cant upload an image into internal SRAM (AT91SAM9).
it can really write only 20 bytes.
load_image into internal flash area works fine.
But why it doesn't fail if it writes the other regions?
It crashes only
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:07:44 +0200
Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
It obviously hangs during init, which could mean just about anything.
It's
impossible to tell without a debug log (-d3).
I
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Karl Kurbjun kkurb...@gmail.com wrote:
This additional output was helpful when debugging a FTDI device with a
broken
EEPROM. I was expecting to connect to a cable with a particular
description,
but the device was not found. This error message would
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
Moin,
Has anyone got a Atmel SAM3N (N, not U) working with OpenOCD?
SAM3U works with OpenOCD 0.5.0, but not with SAM3N.
The device is properly detected, but when accessing the flash, OpenOCD
hangs indefinitely.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
That log doesn't show that OpenOCD hangs after accessing flash. The
Flash
bank access DONE part is wrong, the flash bank has only
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.comwrote:
I find gerrit intriguing as a way of managing patches.
Can I have a show of hands of contributors for/against/don't care/don't
know?
Haven't heard of it until now, but sure, a tool like that could be useful.
What
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Simon Barner bar...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear list,
I finally found some time to rebase my patches and to split
them into smaller pieces (as suggested by Ųyvind Harboe).
Please refer to the commit messages for the purpose
of the individual patches.
I would
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.orgwrote:
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
I cant upload an image into internal SRAM (AT91SAM9).
it can really write only 20 bytes.
load_image into internal flash area works fine.
But why it doesn't fail if it writes the
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Matt Reimer mrei...@sdgsystems.com wrote:
The code in xscale_receive() that tries to skip invalid reads (i.e.
reads that don't have the DBG_SR[0] 'valid' bit set) seems to be
wrong, as it only looks at the first word's valid flag rather than
each word's own
It's merged. Thanks!
/Andreas
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Martin Schmölzer
martin.schmoel...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:25 -0400, Eric Wetzel wrote:
I don't think I have a way to verify the changes I made to
src/flash/ocl/at91sam7x (from the second patch) or the changes I would
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Eric Wetzel thewet...@gmail.com wrote:
On the discussion of style, I mentioned that the Linux coding standard
doesn't really like typedefs. Here is an article from Greg K-H that
partially addresses the subject:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5780?page=0,2
Did we decide whether patches should be posted to the list, in addition to
the pull request, to ease reviews? Personally I much rather check the
patches via a web interface, if one is available for the repo. On the other
hand, having the patches in the list archive could be good (if they're not
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Simon Barner bar...@gmx.de wrote:
On 16.08.2011 01:25, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
mailto:s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 09/08/2011 22:15, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Any
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Evan Hunter e...@ozhiker.com wrote:
Hi All,
** **
I've noticed that if my processor gets reset whilst debugging a program,
GDB knows nothing about it. I would have thought GDB should stop, in a
similar way as hitting a breakpoint.
** **
Is
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Sam Jansen sam.jan...@starleaf.com wrote:
**
Hello,
In attempting to use openocd with an Amontec JTAG key to program a Xilinx
FPGA, I encountered a series of issues I though others might be interested
in. I don't have sensible proposed solutions for any of
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Sam Jansen sam.jan...@starleaf.com wrote:
**
On 26/08/11 19:18, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Sam Jansen sam.jan...@starleaf.comwrote:
At this stage I got the libftdi driver giving the same error message as
the libftd2xx driver
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
On 19:35 Tue 09 Aug , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
tested in buildroot
any comments?
Spelling error:
+ LDFLAGS=$LFFLAGS $LIBUSB_LDFLAGS
I'm pretty sure I've seen some hard
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Jie Zhang jzhang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
+if test -f $srcdir/guess-rev.sh ; then
Great, but you should probably check if it's executable instead of just a
regular file
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Jie Zhang jzhang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
On 15 August 2011 14:22, Eric Wetzel thewet...@gmail.com wrote:
if test $cross_compiling = no; then
# guess-rev.sh only exists in the
Thank you all for the encouraging comments!
I've been an OpenOCD user and followed the project several years now and
watched it getting better and better. I'm excited to join the maintainer
crew, taking a closer part in that positive progress.
I'll start by getting acquainted with the procedures
The following changes since commit 194e3c5bc5e0fbb7d41cfcbe913c4264782cdd5b:
Rodrigo L. Rosa (1):
fix tapenabler return code
are available in the git repository at:
http://repo.or.cz/r/openocd/andreasf.git rlink
Andreas Fritiofson (7):
rlink: fix indentation errors
rlink
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
On 09/08/2011 22:15, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Any objections?
I would like to give this a test-run tomorrow.
One observation - other targets that do not yet support the new functions
will output a LOG_ERROR to the
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.comwrote:
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than
a v0.5.0-rc2-.
Is that intentional?
I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0- goes out
of the door.
I have no
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
Release tags are annotated, but not rc tags
Oh, but they are, or am I completely oblivious of git tags (quite possible)?
$ git checkout v0.4.0-rc2~2
$ git describe
v0.4.0-rc1-193-g747a607
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote:
Andreas Fritiofson scrisse:
make dist should use git2cl to genereate ChangeLog from git
history, populating the placeholder file in released tarball.
Still not working for srcdir != builddir
make[1]: Entering
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Jean, please provide full featured RC package (generated by
make distcheck, containing configure scripts) to test it on FreeBSD,
as for now bootstrap fails, so the status is no-go.
Best regards,
Tomek
Yes, we
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Mahr, Stefan stefan.m...@sphairon.comwrote:
Hi Drasko.
Drasko DRASKOVIC (1):
mips32 : Fixed memory byte access
Your patch fixes the broken byte access, but not the big endian host issue.
Since both problems are tied together, I would prefer a more
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello! :-) Trying to bootstrap on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE fails with the
0.5.0-rc2 as given at:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
delete mode 100644 tcl/target/stm32.cfg
delete mode 100644 tcl/target/stm32f2xxx.cfg
For compatibility with existing user scripts, it would be best to keep these
files during the 0.5.x period. Just make them print a
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
On 29 July 2011 14:54, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
delete mode 100644 tcl/target/stm32.cfg
delete mode
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
On 29 July 2011 15:43, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
That one won't help for all scripts out there that are currently sourcing
target/stm32.cfg.
/Andreas
Good point - how about
http
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Steve Franks bahamasfra...@gmail.comwrote:
Every year or so I try openocd, and still no joy. Actually, seems the
script and config stuff has all finally matured/stabilized, so I'll
assume I can make it work w/o too much pain, after I fix this hang:
I have a
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Steve Franks bahamasfra...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
0.4.0 is rather old, you may be seeing a bug that has already been fixed.
Grab the latest version from the repo and give
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Peter Horn peter.h...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Am 19.07.2011 22:43, schrieb Peter Horn:
Last time I've used OpenOCD with RLink stepping was awfully slow,
about 3 seconds or more per step. This was some weeks ago and on
Windows / Mingw. On Linux, stepping is
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Peter Horn peter.h...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Patches 1/7 to 4/7 work ok, the problem is caused by patch 5/7
On Windows using the embedded RLink, OpenOCD:
Open On-Chip Debugger 0.5.0-dev-snapshot (2011-07-21-07:10)
Licensed under GNU GPL v2
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Freddie Chopin freddie_cho...@op.plwrote:
On 2011-07-21 23:02, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
However I can't explain Freddie's reproduced failures. Maybe post the
hex files (matching, slightly different and very different) and I can
see if I can take a closer
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Peter Horn peter.h...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Am 22.07.2011 13:36, schrieb Andreas Fritiofson:
I don't see how this error could be caused by my patches. If I'm not
mistaken, none of them have run at this point. It fails during init, and
that code is unchanged
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Matthew Lai cyberf...@wecheer.com wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to embed a FT2232D based programmer into my board with a STM32
(Cortex-M3 MCU).
I want the programmer to be compatible with jtagkey, so I looked at
schematics of compaible designs.
I noticed that
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Magnus S. mankk...@yahoo.se wrote:
Freddie Chopin freddie_chopin@... writes:
I can partially confirm...
Tested with 0.5.0-rc1
Comparing with right image works fine:
Comparing with almost right image (compilation date inside has
changed)
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
On 17 July 2011 10:18, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote:
make dist should use git2cl to genereate ChangeLog from git history,
populating the placeholder file in released tarball.
Still not working for srcdir !=
This patch set fixes some general problems in the RLink interface driver.
Most importantly it fixes a performance bug that have been causing decreased
throughput.
Speed test on a STM32 Primer (STM32F103 platform with built in RLink) with the
following openocd.cfg
---
source [find
Indentation was inconsistent and some lines not indented at all. Quickfix
using Eclipse's auto-indentation.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/jtag/drivers/rlink.c | 726 +++---
1 files changed, 363 insertions(+), 363
Remove unnecessary block scopes to reduce indentation level.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/jtag/drivers/rlink.c | 203 +++---
1 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/jtag/drivers
dtc_queue.reply_index was wrongly being increased during out scans, causing
the queue to be sent before the out buffer was full. This patch increases
raw upload speed by 50% or so.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/jtag/drivers/rlink.c | 16
After the reply_index handling is fixed, there's no need to special case
the out scan.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/jtag/drivers/rlink.c | 28 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/jtag/drivers
After correcting the reply size counter, it should be safe to rely on it
for the number of bytes expected in the USB read, instead of reading the
endpoint maximum. This doesn't make things go any faster but it's nicer and
removes the local buffer.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof
__FILE__ and __LINE__ are already printed using the log macros.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/jtag/drivers/rlink.c | 15 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/jtag/drivers/rlink.c b/src/jtag/drivers/rlink.c
Add a helper function for running the queue if it would overflow otherwise.
Use it to simplify the queue fill level checks and optimize in a few cases
that would previously run the queue prematurely.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/jtag/drivers/rlink.c
This patch set enables targets to implement asynchronous algorithms that
can be run in the background while OpenOCD performs other tasks. It also
implements async algorithm support for ARMv7-M and enables it for the
Cortex-M3 target. The final two patches rewrites the stm32x flash driver
to use an
the algorithm is flashing the current.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/target/target.c | 75 ++
src/target/target.h | 22 +
src/target/target_type.h |2 +
3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 0
Split armv7m_run_algorithm into two pieces and use them to reimplement it.
The arch_info parameter is used to keep context between the two calls, so
both calls must refer to the same armv7m_algorithm struct. Ugly but works
for a proof-of-concept.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/target/cortex_m3.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/target/cortex_m3.c b/src/target/cortex_m3.c
index 98a775c..a2f8b78 100644
--- a/src/target/cortex_m3.c
+++ b/src/target/cortex_m3
Access the different flash banks' registers using a bank specific register
base and a register specific offset. This is equivalent but feels more
natural.
Some accesses were discovered that maybe should not be hard coded to bank0
registers. Add a note about that.
Signed-off-by: Andreas
accesses (really inefficient) and algorithm uploads caused the flash
programming to be latency bound in many cases. Now it should scale better
with increased throughput.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
contrib/loaders/flash/stm32x.S | 71 --
src/flash
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
On 18 July 2011 11:13, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
This patch set fixes some general problems in the RLink interface driver.
Most importantly it fixes a performance bug that have been
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Andreas!
Do you know what is the difference between JTAG (on Stm32Primer) and
SWD (on Stm32Primer2) RLink interface? Would they run on existing
driver? Do you have some kind of manual or technical specification?
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Jean-Claude Repetto jcr...@mxm.eu wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 16:25, Andreas Fritiofson a écrit :
Yes it's best to put these on hold for 0.5.0. It needs some testing on
the standalone RLink or other variants, I currently only have access to
STM32 Primers. Also more
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.comwrote:
What puzzles me is that there is no warning on x86, even if I the
-Wcast-align option
is there
-Wcast-align
Warn whenever a pointer is cast such that the required alignment
of the target is increased.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC drasko.drasko...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am just wandering, would :
t32 = *(uint32_t*)((void *)buffer[i]);
quite the compiler ;)
Yes probably, but it would still crash on an architecture that doesn't
support unaligned accesses.
/Andreas
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Mahr, Stefan stefan.m...@sphairon.comwrote:
are you sure about this ?
It seems to me that buffer[i] is directly filled by target, and I see
no reason that it is in the host endianess...
Hi Drasko,
Yes I'm sure. I tested it on my big endian host
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Mahr, Stefan stefan.m...@sphairon.comwrote:
Where are those functions defined and how do they know what the target
endianness is?
They doesn't know the target endianness, but host endianness.
It sounds a little strange to do the swapping at this low level.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Mahr, Stefan stefan.m...@sphairon.comwrote:
Where are those functions defined and how do they know what the target
endianness is?
They doesn't know the target endianness, but host endianness.
You can't convert between target and host endianness if you don't
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC drasko.drasko...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked briefly at the memory read functions in mips32_dmaacc.c and
mips32_pracc.c and it looks like the type usage
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.comwrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Mahr, Stefan stefan.m...@sphairon.com
wrote:
mips32_pracc_read_mem casts uint32 to void, so we need to cast it
back to uint32. I found no suitable macro in actual sources.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
On 1 July 2011 00:41, Andrew Leech coronasen...@gmail.com wrote:
One other point, do you know whether you can get openocd to add it's own
program directory to the search path for the source [find ...] lines?
It'd
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Rodrigo Rosa rodrigorosa...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
This is disturbing. Why switch to global variables?
+static uint32_t data_read_dummy;
static int jtag_data_write(struct target *
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Domien Nowicki domien.nowi...@gmail.comwrote:
**
1. The USB Blaster clone does not use the original FT245 chip, and so it
tries to emulate its behavior.
As it turns out, the API call FT_GetLatencyTimer is not properly emulated
by the clone, and this makes
Great, but does it really work? There has been discussions about this on
this list in the past. I think the conclusion was that there's no way to
robustly know GDB's intentions based on the remote commands. When you do a
source-level step in GDB, it may send a step command to OpenOCD. Then we can
Resending, Cc to the list got lost somewhere...
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Peter Horn peter.h...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Hi Andreas
Am 18.06.2011 17:32, schrieb Andreas Fritiofson:
Great, but does
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
I take it is just a bugfix?
Yes - it changes:
retval = allow_transports(CMD_CTX, jtag_interface-transports ? :
jtag_only);
into:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.comwrote:
Definitely! I'm holding off on this patch in favor of a patch that
deletes
cruft instead of decorating it :-)
I have a soft spot for patches that delete code that nobody
understands
IF the function is
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Nit, the construct below is a little bit fancy. I'd prefer splitting
it over multiple lines to make it more accessible to the
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
- for (int i = 0; 1; i++)
+ for (int i = 0; ft2232_vid[i] || ft2232_pid[i]; i++)
What's the point? This condition can never become false, or the function
would have returned in the previous iteration.
/Andreas
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
+ retval = ft2232_initone(ft2232_vid[i], ft2232_pid[i], more,
try_more);
This is a good start, but what's with the function name?? How about
ft2232_init_{device,interface,ftdilib,hardware,handle,whatever}
This together with patch 5/5 is equivalent to my patch, only with gotos.
Both patches are perfectly fine with me, although I prefer getting rid of
the forward declaration as well.
/Andreas
___
Openocd-development mailing list
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
+ retval = ft2232_initone(ft2232_vid[i], ft2232_pid[i],
more,
try_more);
This is a good start, but what's with the function name??
Short. And one from one device
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Laurent! :-)
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Laurent Gauch laurent.ga...@amontec.com
wrote:
But before to close the handle we should still be able :
-1- to tristate signal High-Z via all the out enable signals
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Andreas :-)
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
I have created simple quit() that sets all port pins high and as input
(mpsse command 0x80 0x82) but that did
Hi all!
The recent activity surrounding the ft2232 driver makes it obvious that
there are lots of bugfixes and structural improvements that need to be done.
Unfortunately, trying to understand the code or even just browsing around in
it is complicated by the fact that its cluttered with functions
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
Setting the FTDI pins to Hi-Z is not necessarily the same as setting the
pins in the JTAG connector to Hi-Z. There is arbitrary
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm, from what I understand LAYOUT is only used for initialization of
specific device based on FT*232 device, maybe other minor stuff, all
work is done in fact by queue_flush() and it is common for all devices
as it
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest to drop this patch and merge a simpler fix for the problem
adressed by this patch. Only a few lines of code would need to change.
Attached is such a patch. The benefit over Tomek's patch
anywhere. Maybe
the entire function is flawed, or is the data really supposed to be
discarded?
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
---
src/jtag/drivers/ft2232.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/jtag/drivers/ft2232.c b
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
