The OpenSolaris on Power name makes the point. Let's
call it that.
I believe you can forget it. Polaris is way too cool of a name, it's already
established, and it's a spin of words on Solaris. Perfect.
You could officially call it what ever you like, but I seriously doubt anyone
will ever
Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great idea, although I'm not convinced of the name. At the moment there's
only one distro on Power, but what if that were to change? OpenSolaris
on Power is, IMHO, a bit too generic--imagine what would've happened if
Joerg Schilling decided to call his
Gino Ruopolo wrote:
I've integrated the fix for CR 6451513, the HP
DL585/DL380 etc. boot hang
into Solaris Nevada b46; I'll backport it into an
S10
patch/update as soon
as possible. In the meantime, it should show up
soon
in Solaris Express.
Thanks all for the help,
Dana
Dear friend,
I am a bigger Nike Shoes seller in Beijing.i have LV bag and dior bag
too. I could sell the shoes to you at a lower price.The low price will
improve you competition in your district
and steady development of our company.We hope to keep long stable cooperation
with you.
My
Simon Phipps writes:
On Aug 21, 2006, at 00:30, John Weekley wrote:
Time for an oss-legal list with a pack of Sun lawyers willing to
provide
an official opinion for matters like these?
Best off keeping it here; I asked the Sun lawyers last week and they
say they legally can only
The OpenSolaris on Power name makes the point. Let's
call it that.
I believe you can forget it. Polaris is way too cool of a name, it's
already established, and it's a spin of words on Solaris. Perfect.
You could officially call it what ever you like, but I seriously doubt
anyone will
We are unable to investigate more ... hangs happens after
about 4 hours. Nothing on the logs, nothing on the console.
Hangs happens with server idle or busy.
Any suggest?
S10U1 is running fine on those machines ..
I have had EXACTLY had the same issue - and believe it or not, fixed it
we are experiencing the same here.
did you find a solution?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
James C. McPherson wrote:
Suraj Singh wrote:
Hi all,
I have just downloaded the source files for fcinfo (from
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/nwsc/src/sun_nws/fcinfo/).
My question is how do i compile fcinfo.c.
I would need step-by-step procedure to do this.
Suraj,
please make sure
Thanks James,
One more query, how do I download all the consolidation in one go.
I tried ftp to this site, but it doesn't support ftg I guess.
-Suraj
-Original Message-
From: James C. McPherson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 14:24
To: Suraj Singh
Cc:
Thanks - I've done that. I had initially rewritten shadow with just a
clone of one of the lines for one of the other users in the shadow
file, namely:
root:NP:6445::
Which didn't work. My old shadow file had the following for root:
rot:v.kMMas3.. :6445::
Where the .
Andrew Pattison wrote:
Thanks - I've done that. I had initially rewritten shadow with just a
clone of one of the lines for one of the other users in the shadow
file, namely:
root:NP:6445::
Which didn't work. My old shadow file had the following for root:
rot:v.kMMas3.. :6445::
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006, Andrew Pattison wrote:
Thanks - I've done that. I had initially rewritten shadow with just a
clone of one of the lines for one of the other users in the shadow file,
namely:
root:NP:6445::
Which didn't work. My old shadow file had the following for root:
Not
Andrew Pattison writes:
Which didn't work. My old shadow file had the following for root:br
br
rot:v.kMMas3.. :6445::br
Literally? With rot instead of root and with the stray space in
the hashed password field and all the extra colons?
--
James Carlson, KISS Network
For the record I'm also see the same problem with a DL385 with Solaris 10 06/06
installed and this is after wrestling with the hang on boot problem reported
elsewhere.
What makes this situation really annoying is that I've successfully installed
Solaris 10 on various DL's before but this is
We are unable to investigate more ... hangs happens
after about 4 hours. Nothing on the logs, nothing on
the console. Hangs happens with server idle or busy.
What kind of console device are you using? PS/2 keyboard; USB; serial port?
Is the X11 server running?
Did you try to boot with kmdb
We are unable to investigate more ... hangs
happens
after about 4 hours. Nothing on the logs, nothing
on
the console. Hangs happens with server idle or
busy.
What kind of console device are you using? PS/2
keyboard; USB; serial port?
We are using ssh access and also remote console
Gary,On 8/18/06, Gary Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose the creation of a project to direct thedevelopment of the software associated with the operationof the opensolaris.org website.That's a +1 from me too, but one clarification:
Which bits of opensolaris.org are and aren't
Jörg == Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jörg if you look at what Sun does, you will find that Sun is
Jörg distributing binaries from GPL sources under the OpenSolaris
Jörg Binary License.
Hmm, that doesn't sound right to me. I believe that the correct notice
is at
Mike Kupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jörg == Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jörg if you look at what Sun does, you will find that Sun is
Jörg distributing binaries from GPL sources under the OpenSolaris
Jörg Binary License.
Hmm, that doesn't sound right to me. I believe that
Is it possible to enter kmdb when the machine hangs,
by typing F1-A?
unfortunately no. machine is totally frozen.
Hmm, maybe it's possible to get a panic dump from the hanging machine
using the deadman feature?
See:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mike Kupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jörg == Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jörg if you look at what Sun does, you will find that Sun is
Jörg distributing binaries from GPL sources under the OpenSolaris
Jörg Binary License.
Hmm, that doesn't sound right to
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
Ah, I see. The table has a License column, and it says OBL for all
the binaries. That's a bug. Even the binary-only tarball (which by
definition shouldn't have any GPL code) has a couple files that are
covered by third-party licenses.
Thanks for
stevel == Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
stevel That's wrong, that should probably say OBL,Others. I'll
stevel update that... thanks.
Okay, great. I won't file a bug, then. :-)
mike
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check this:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
it is obvious from the list that the files from the lower half are
completely
under the OBL.
That's wrong, that should probably say OBL,Others. I'll update
that...
On Monday 21 August 2006 11:35 am, Alan DuBoff wrote:
When: Tuesday*, July 25th, 2006
cut/paste typo, should be Thurs. August 24, 2006.
--
Alan DuBoff - Sun Microsystems
Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi,all:
I installed a sol 10 box (T2000) and tried to migrate our propritary
programe on non-global zones to seperate applications. But when installing
the package,I met a problem, in the installation package, there was some
dispadmin -c RT -s ../filesname commands can't excute. After checking
Joerg Schilling wrote On 08/21/06 12:40,:
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check this:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
it is obvious from the list that the files from the lower half are completely
under the OBL.
That's wrong, that should probably say OBL,Others.
Is it possible to enter kmdb when the machine
hangs,
by typing F1-A?
unfortunately no. machine is totally frozen.
Hmm, maybe it's possible to get a panic dump from the
hanging machine
using the deadman feature?
See:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/esaxe?entry=debugging
NexentaOS (elatte-unstable) contains now OpenSolaris build #46 (08/18/2006).
Run Nexenta Update Manager = Install Updates
Or, alternatively:
$ sudo apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade
Build #46 changelog is available at:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b46/on-changelog-b46.sparse.txt
I refuse to learn vi on the basis that I don't see why there needs
to be a learning curve associated with editing text files in text
mode. Nano or pico will do nicely thank you.
Andrew.
And you have a perfectly valid point.
The process of using vi to edit files in UNIX is just
Andrew Pattison writes:
body bgcolor=#ff text=#00
OK, now you're just being silly. Did I insult you by dissing the mighty
vi? ;-)br
No, of course not. You'll see Emacs in my mail headers. :-/
As it's unclear _what_ might be wrong, but that something small is
likely the cause, it
As an FYI, all future SXCR releases (I just posted build 46) will
feature 6 CDs.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/on/
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Derek Cicero wrote:
As an FYI, all future SXCR releases (I just posted build 46) will feature 6
CDs.
Blimey. It won't be long before distributing Solaris on Blu-ray
Disc will need to be seriously considered! :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
I think this is a great idea; seconded.
- Sam
On Aug 20, 2006, at 11:06 PM, Spencer Shepler wrote:
I propose a new Open Solaris project to be called NFSv4.1 pNFS.
With the forward momentum in the IETF NFSv4 working group around
NFSv4.1 and pNFS specifically, it seems appropriate to start
Looks to be based on build 44 and its still a slim trim 5 CDs !
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=8PartDetailId=Sol-Express_Sub-SP_x86-G-FTransactionId=try
I have always wondered if there is any difference to the SXCR and SX releases
at all. Even in the least degree.
On 8/21/06, Derek Cicero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an FYI, all future SXCR releases (I just posted build 46) will
feature 6 CDs.
what was added? are all the cds mandatory?
nacho
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On 8/21/06, Derek Cicero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an FYI, all future SXCR releases (I just posted build 46) will
feature 6 CDs.
what was added? are all the cds mandatory?
An Easter Egg copy of StarOffice 8 plus a full flight simulator ?
anyone old enough to recall easter eggs besides me
On 8/21/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks to be based on build 44 and its still a slim trim 5 CDs !
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=8PartDetailId=Sol-Express_Sub-SP_x86-G-FTransactionId=try
I have always wondered if there is any difference to the SXCR
On 8/21/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks to be based on build 44 and its still a slim trim 5 CDs !
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=8PartDetailId=Sol-Express_Sub-SP_x86-G-FTransactionId=try
I have always wondered if there is any difference to the SXCR
Level of testing is a difference as well. SX has had more testing so it
isn't as bleeding edge as SXCR.
James Dickens wrote:
On 8/21/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks to be based on build 44 and its still a slim trim 5 CDs !
Dennis Clarke wrote:
The SXCR snv_46 release has 6 CD images.
The SX snv_44 release is 5 plus a Languages CD.
did someone stuff the Languages CD into SXCR as CD number 6 ?
I know that the size of ISO #6 is all wrong for that but
inquiring minds that install other Locales want to know.
I
Dennis Clarke wrote:
The SXCR snv_46 release has 6 CD images.
The SX snv_44 release is 5 plus a Languages CD.
did someone stuff the Languages CD into SXCR as CD number 6 ?
I know that the size of ISO #6 is all wrong for that but
inquiring minds that install other Locales want to know.
Seems
Matt Williamson wrote:
are all the cds mandatory?
yes
We're really not doing ourselves any favours encouraging those people in less
bandwidth privileged countries to join our community. 6 CDs is a pretty huge
commitment - I hope we're going to provide something like
shipit.opensolaris.org,
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
$99 gets you
into a forum that'll potentially give you a higher level of interaction
with engineering than straight Open Solaris.
Probably much lower actually - I know many engineers who participate in
OpenSolaris - I don't remember how to get to the SX paid site and
On 8/21/06, Matt Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 8/21/06, Derek Cicero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an FYI, all future SXCR releases (I just posted build 46) will
feature 6 CDs.
what was added?
Looks like a lot of source code packages were added to cause
It's http://developers.sun.com/services/expertassistance/. Note that
this is for Solaris 10, not OpenSolaris. There's also a special going
on right now where it's free until October 31, 2006.
Another big difference is that with SDN, you're guaranteed an answer,
and an accurate one at that.
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
dont you guys think it's getting a little too big?
imho it is
is there a way to include staroffice and the sources in separate cds
to lighten the burden?
great idea! would you mind filing an rfe against consolidation/install?
But that's not the previously referenced support site for the Solaris Express
commercial edition, which we still advertise as $99/year.See the bottom
half of http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/solaris-express/get.jsp for that,
which is what we were discussing.
-Alan Coopersmith-
On 8/21/06, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Williamson wrote:
are all the cds mandatory?
yes
We're really not doing ourselves any favours encouraging those people in less
bandwidth privileged countries to join our community. 6 CDs is a pretty huge
commitment - I hope we're going
Ah. They are two different things. Sorry, I was confused.
The site I referred to is *developer* support. It's new. Developer
support covers the How do I do thing? questions.
The support you're referring to is break/fix, which is more the thing
doesn't work. Fix it.
Either way, paying
Matt Williamson wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
dont you guys think it's getting a little too big?
imho it is
is there a way to include staroffice and the sources in separate cds
to lighten the burden?
great idea! would you mind filing an rfe against consolidation/install?
This
Ah. They are two different things. Sorry, I was confused.
The site I referred to is *developer* support. It's new. Developer
support covers the How do I do thing? questions.
The support you're referring to is break/fix, which is more the thing
doesn't work. Fix it.
Either way, paying
Bill Rushmore wrote:
This might be a kind of crazy idea and I am not sure if it is even
possible. But couldn't a public flash http server be setup? So all
that would be needed would be an initial install CD. Then during then
install the necessary packages can be downloaded from the public
I am looking for an iso image of Elatte Alpha 5 for x86-64 (AMD) platform.
Anyone have a link they can post for me to follow?
Would love to give it a try.
Hope to hear from someone soon,
Russ
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/Download
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue 22 Aug 2006 at 03:59AM, Oxy Hazard wrote:
If I can't set scheduler parameters under non-global zone, that limit force
me to modify the code. Is there any small skill to allow non-global zone
setting the schedule parameters? Under my system infrastructure, all
applications under one
57 matches
Mail list logo
