[osol-discuss] Re: Re: WPC54G version2 and NDIS Wrapper Toolkit

We pay attention to the codes that are not GPL licensed. Thanks, Mikore This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Audio File Support

Ken: The Gstreamer framework is well supported on Solaris 8->10 and Solaris Express so the question really goes into the plugins. Not sure what you mean by "well supported". Although the GStreamer framework does exist on Solaris 10, it is GStreamer 0.8 and not 0.10. Note that the Fluendo p

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Audio File Support

John: Sorry, I didn't mean to cause any confusion. There is no difference in Fluendo's support of Solaris x86 versus Sparc. I think I only mentioned Sparc because we had to provide Fluendo with a Sparc machine to be able to build their NDA plugins. They didn't need a Solaris x86 machine since

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Audio File Support

> You mentioned only "Sparc platform" in your notes, > does this mean that in the contract negotiation , > i86pc (x86) Solaris platform might be left out, this > I believe it needs to be included across the > different architectures if possable. I hope it can be > included! First entry, I meant to

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Audio File Support

You mentioned only "Sparc platform" in your notes, does this mean that in the contract negotiation , i86pc (x86) Solaris platform might be left out, this I believe it needs to be included across the different architectures if possable. I hope it can be included! This message posted from open

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: joining Sun

On 04/04/07, Jason J. W. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Its a question of preference. Solaris is a far superior OS in the kernel etc. Userland it just isn't. Nexenta is a really nice bridge between the two. Frankly, if you need to get hot around the collar about this issue its alright. I t

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: joining Sun

Hi there, Its a question of preference. Solaris is a far superior OS in the kernel etc. Userland it just isn't. Nexenta is a really nice bridge between the two. Frankly, if you need to get hot around the collar about this issue its alright. Best Regards, Jason On 4/2/07, a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [osol-discuss] joining Sun

Hi Alan, Seriously, many people have talked about this in the past, and there are some solutions today such as pkg-get which blastwave uses, and apt was ported with Nexenta...but I don't think it would matter as long as people got their packages and were able to have a network enabled install. I

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE Build 61 available

Derek Cicero wrote: Please find the links to SXCE Build 61 at . Helloo CPU Caps! A big congrats to everyone who works on CPU-Caps and especially Alexander Kolbasov, *Andrei Dorofeev, and **Jonathan Chew*. Awesome job all! All we're mi

Re: [osol-discuss] After an abruptly power off, system is not booting in Multi-User mode

Hugo Hernandez wrote: >Hello folks, >We have a medium cluster of about 600 slots running Solaris 10 6/06 X86 and we >experienced a power failure causing most (all) of the nodes went into a error >due to the abruptly power off. After booting them did not boot in Multi-User >mode but asking to

[osol-discuss] SXCE Build 61 available

Please find the links to SXCE Build 61 at . - Derek -- Derek Cicero Program Manager Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] Release Taxonomy Primer

Alan DuBoff wrote: In a sense we do have a version today...it's the date on which the sources are pulled...:-/ This laze-fair attitude bothers me a bit - it seems as if we have lost touch with some guiding principles (if we ever had a common set to begin with...) To that end, I wanted to say

Re: [osol-discuss] ON C-Team or how to make the process more open

Alan DuBoff wrote: On Tuesday 03 April 2007 11:09 am, John Plocher wrote: But that's nothing more than some arbitrary mojo to say, "today this is v5.11". At some point we (OS.o, not Sun) will wish to produce a named milestone release so that it can go on and try something new. Up till now, th

[osol-discuss] After an abruptly power off, system is not booting in Multi-User mode

Hello folks, We have a medium cluster of about 600 slots running Solaris 10 6/06 X86 and we experienced a power failure causing most (all) of the nodes went into a error due to the abruptly power off. After booting them did not boot in Multi-User mode but asking to boot in failsafe mode. Her

Re: [osol-discuss] ON C-Team or how to make the process more open

Alan DuBoff writes: > On Wednesday 04 April 2007 05:18 am, James Carlson wrote: > > When the first major release binding project integrates, we've got a > > problem. Those who still want to create minor releases will > > essentially be unable to do so. At best, they'll be able to fork the > > sou

Re: [osol-discuss] ON C-Team or how to make the process more open

On Wednesday 04 April 2007 05:18 am, James Carlson wrote: > When the first major release binding project integrates, we've got a > problem. Those who still want to create minor releases will > essentially be unable to do so. At best, they'll be able to fork the > source at that point, and just "h

Re: [osol-discuss] Project proposal : busybox-ksh93

Thanks, Shivakumar. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to get you set up. Eric On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, gns wrote: Project proposal : busybox-ksh93 Busybox on OpenSolaris is about providing a busybox equivalent for OpenSolaris. This will help in making possible small sized distros and dist

[osol-discuss] Re: [discuss] PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem

Thanks, William. Your proposal has been seconded. I'll contact you offline to get you set up. Eric On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Guan Zhi (William) wrote: PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem I would like to propose a "CPK cryptosystem" project to implement CPK (Combined Public Key) algorithm on OpenSola

[osol-discuss] ZFS boot: a new heads-up

It has been pointed out to me that if you have set up a zfs boot configuration using the old-style prototype code (where you had to have a ufs boot slice), and you BFU that system with a version of the Solaris archives that contain the new zfsboot support, your system will panic. So until we figu

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem

On Apr 4, 2007, at 1:47 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: james hughes wrote: Hope I can help. [...] Yes, but I would add that the conversion of ssh to use the CPK algorithm using the solaris crypto framework is also interesting. So... Would this not be 2 projects? 1) adding the token as an en

Re: [osol-discuss] ON C-Team or how to make the process more open

* John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-03 11:09]: > James Carlson wrote: > >You've got me. I've pointed out the seeming inconsistency before on > >other threads, but John Plocher seems to think that it's not a > >problem. > > Uhmmm... > > I believe it is Stephen Hahn who is driving this "OS

[osol-discuss] Proxy ssh avec connecteur ldap

Bonsoir, Avez-vous une aidée use l'existence d'un produit proxy ssh avec en option un connecteur ldap en version open source !! Merci de votre aide Sabsa1412 opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-dis

Re: [osol-discuss] xpg/bin/tr unexpect output on Sparc?

Oops, I thought that message was from SUN. that's why I was supprised at the first place. It looks like it's not from SUN. Thanks James for clarifying. James Carlson wrote: Steven Xie writes: Is this mean We should use Solaris original utilities under /usr/bin instead of posix ones under

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: blastwave package handling [was Re:Re:joiningSun]

For 3rd party software, I'd say that you're on your own to determine what you need to do in order to support your customers. If your customers do not want to see new features in patches, then make sure you don't deliver them that way. If they do, then arrange to make it happen. My customers c

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem

The aim of the project is to build a cryptosystem with a USB token to save the keys. But current USB tokens on market do not support ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography), which is needed in our project. So we buy a USB token hardware and write our own firmware. But the firmware is (maybe) not compati

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Heads-up: ZFS Boot support for the x86 platform bld 62

thank you very much! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-mktg] Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris tracks during CommunityOne day at JavaOne

I'm not sure if I'm laughing or not. I think I might be There is a demo station at the event and if you would like to work at it (Young has already volunteered), I'll put you down and you can get in that way. Sara Jim Grisanzio wrote: When I try to register I get the following message:

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris tracks during CommunityOne day at JavaOne

When I try to register I get the following message: 'sorry, but CommunityOne is not open to Sun employees' Jim Sara Dornsife wrote: That was a mouthful. The CommunityOne event held on Monday May 7th is free and open to anyone who would like to attend. Below is the email invitation to sign

Re: [osol-discuss] Audio File Support

> > > > Case in point, https://shop.fluendo.com/ > who sell currently support for > > WMA/WMV/Mp3 playback for Solaris x86/SPARC - and from what I > understand, > > the compresssion side of the equation will be arriving soon. > > > > Not o

Re: pcscd (Was Re: [osol-discuss] Re: PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem)

Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We have been testing pcscd from various different builds for years, on > >> USB attached readers and the Sun Ray internal readers and never once > >> have I heard of an alignment problem. Maybe it is because we aren't > >> using the functions in

Re: [osol-discuss] ON C-Team or how to make the process more open

Alan DuBoff writes: > On Tuesday 03 April 2007 10:18 am, James Carlson wrote: > > My guess is that we'll eventually need community-level decisions on > > when major releases are needed and will have to deal with the gate > > issues at that time. > > Why so? When the first major release binding pr

Re: pcscd (Was Re: [osol-discuss] Re: PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote: > Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As long as Sun does not provide pcscd, I cannot log a bug. > > > > I'm talking about the BOOL problem with pscslite.h you mentioned. > > > > Not the later thing you brought up about alignment problems.

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem

james hughes wrote: Hope I can help. On Apr 3, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Zhi Guan wrote: The aim of the project is to build a cryptosystem with a USB token to save the keys. But current USB tokens on market do not support ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography), which is needed in o

Re: pcscd (Was Re: [osol-discuss] Re: PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem)

Joerg Schilling wrote: Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As long as Sun does not provide pcscd, I cannot log a bug. I'm talking about the BOOL problem with pscslite.h you mentioned. Not the later thing you brought up about alignment problems. We have been testing pcscd from various