I don't see any feature of sshd that provides for limiting the number
of sessions. I suspect it wouldn't be all that difficult to add such a feature.
There is a feature to limit the number of sessions that have not yet
completed the authentication phase, but I don't know how much that would
help y
> > Nah. If you look at the headers and even the
> bottom of
> > the post, the spam is injected through
> > opensolaris.org's forum software:
>
> They still need to go through an email verification
> process, so any spam
> that makes it onto a list is either the result of
> moderator mistake or
Frank Van Der Linden announced [1] that the Hg/SVN repository access on
opensolaris.org had now moved out of beta, having fixed the main issues to come
out of the beta testing. Frank believed it now paved the way for fully open
development for the project.
1.http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/o
> No system to date is without sacrifice in some way
> for Solaris. I'd like
> to hear a lot more of how we can make Solaris be
> itself. I mean this in
> regards to pkgsrc wanting things in /usr/pkg,
> belenix wanting /usr/foss,
> and even Solaris using /usr/sfw...or duplication of
> libs runn
Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
Very probably. People who are in the
unfortunate position
of using Windoze but are subscribed to
the mailing list
could well have their computers acting as a spam
bot without their
knowledge. :-(
It's more likely that people subscribe and then
> The caveats are that Vendors like RedHat often have
> a significant
> number of patches included with their builds. I
> maintained packages
> for a set of RHEL system for a few years, trust me,
> it is not as easy
> as it sounds to "customise" and rebuild packages.
Significant number of patches
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
Alien is a package translator last check, while apt4rpm is just a port
of apt-get, etc. for RPM-based systems.
Yes, alien isn't a transport at all.
apt-get has super cow powers, Alien does not, or something like that ;)
Well, it's funny because it w
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
Well, Red Hat has been good at finding loopholes in the past which make it
difficult for people. Removing all the configure and Makefiles make it
quite hard to just rebuild, they used to do that with their RHES product.
That I never encountered, but las
On 16/04/07, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
> The only relatively easy part was setting up the repository with apt4rpm.
>
> Everything else was a rather painful experience for me.
I've never messed with the rpm formats at all, but apt4rpm sounds s
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
The caveats are that Vendors like RedHat often have a significant
number of patches included with their builds. I maintained packages
for a set of RHEL system for a few years, trust me, it is not as easy
as it sounds to "customise" and rebuild packages.
On 16/04/07, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
> Huh? What caveats may I ask? Whether apt+deb or
> yum+rpm, both handle this in a most trivial manner.
Well, Red Hat has been good at finding loopholes in the past which make it
difficul
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
Huh? What caveats may I ask? Whether apt+deb or
yum+rpm, both handle this in a most trivial manner.
Well, Red Hat has been good at finding loopholes in the past which make it
difficult for people. Removing all the configure and Makefiles
On 16/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That isn't to say that there can't be some 3rd party
> easy way of doing
> this, such as "ports for Solaris" -- but I wouldn't
> expect it to be
> part of the base OS. On an RHEL system, you can of
> course download the
> srpms
> That isn't to say that there can't be some 3rd party
> easy way of doing
> this, such as "ports for Solaris" -- but I wouldn't
> expect it to be
> part of the base OS. On an RHEL system, you can of
> course download the
> srpms, alter the spec file, and rebuild the packages
> and then deploy
> a
Rich Teer wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, John Weekley wrote:
Exactly. Sometimes, Blastwaves' packages have more dependencies than I care to
shake a stick at. Here's the problem: Blastwave maintainers tailor the
package dependencies to *their* requirements. Not mine. This not meant to
disparage
> For example knowing that libreadline is under the GPL
> rather than the
> LGPL or CDDL would be good information, particularly
> since libtecla is
> available as an alternative set of functionality.
One idea some of us have thrown around is to provide a command to provide this
information giv
meetcm, Submit a BUG-ID/RFE on your Solaris install, include the
/usr/X11/bin/scanpci -v ,the prtconf -pv outputs and the X logs from /var/log
directory.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discu
Have you applies the latest patch cluster There were quite a few patches that
deal with Storage, MPXIO and kernel patches from http://SunSolve.sun.com or a
better idea upgrade to Solaris 10 1107 version if you can?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Bart Smaalders writes:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > Bart Smaalders wrote:
> >> Packages should represent a minimization boundary; e.g. they
> >> are either installed or not installed depending on the
> >> proposed use of the system.
> >>
> >> Solaris has areas where packages are too fine-grained,
>
On 16/04/07, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Thomas Rampelberg wrote:
> Now, onto packaging (and this is gonna sound a lot like emerge on gentoo, I
> like it!), I'd like to see something that by default has generic binaries
> that are compiled in the normal manner. Howe
Now, onto packaging (and this is gonna sound a lot like emerge on
gentoo, I like it!), I'd like to see something that by default has
generic binaries that are compiled in the normal manner. However,
there are times that I'd like to select specific "features" of the
binaries. In gentoo these a
Petteri Tammiaho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> And thanks, I'll crawl to the nearest corner and stay there a while after
> this feeling
> very much ashamed. Should have slept first and had another look. It was the
> typo. And
> I managed to screw up the exlude somehow a week ago. Now after renaming the
> f
>
> Double-checl your spelling on the filename; I believe
> you wanted to type:
>
> /boot/acpi/tables/DSDT_INTELR_AWRDACPI.dat
>
> unless this is a typo in the message and not on your
> system :-) I have
> successfully replaced ACPI tables a number of times
> without problem.
>
> You can preve
Petteri Tammiaho wrote:
[...]
> Motherboard is an Abit AB9 Pro with Intel E6300 Core 2 Duo CPU
>
> The problem starts after the tzmon has been loaded:
> Apr 16 21:20:14 sauron genunix: [ID 936769 kern.notice] pcie_pci5 is /[EMAIL
> PROTECTED],0/pci8086,[EMAIL PROTECTED],5
> Apr 16 21:20:14 saur
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Lenin wrote:
I have been trying to use pfil/IPfilter to intercept packets in solaris but
couldn't do so successfully. I am basically trying to develop something like a
NAT-PT to intercept ip v4 packets and translate them to v6 and reinject them to
the network and vice ver
Since all these services are derivatives of ssh, then ideally I'd like to limit
ssh, and I have a workaround for ssh. I can limit ssh sessions by limiting the
number of ptys in /etc/system. Am I missing some way to limit ssh as a whole?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Thomas Rampelberg wrote:
I think you make a valid point about about tracking Debian unstable, or from
my experience with Gentoo, just going along with the latest portage tree and
evolving the system. Having a set package version to a set OS version is very
comforting in the
Hi,
I have a pretty fresh Solaris Express Community Edition installation that works
for the most part just fine but still have a couple of issues left to solve.
The most visible and annoying problem is constant ACPI errors coming to
messages. They are coming soo often, that it pretty much rende
Well then again... Had a power outage today...
And 'zpool import' no longer works.
System continuously panics on import now...
Bummer!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Bart Smaalders wrote:
Packages should represent a minimization boundary; e.g. they
are either installed or not installed depending on the
proposed use of the system.
Solaris has areas where packages are too fine-grained,
it also has areas where the packages are much too l
Bart Smaalders wrote:
Packages should represent a minimization boundary; e.g. they
are either installed or not installed depending on the
proposed use of the system.
Solaris has areas where packages are too fine-grained,
it also has areas where the packages are much too large
to be useful in thi
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 4/11/07, John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or, looking at it the other way, packages map to the
output of an independent, distributed development
team. They are the ultimate "consolidation"
boundary - everything within a package is delivered
together as a unit and
* Nils Nieuwejaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-15 20:45]:
> Unfortunately, the volume of spam that ended up in the moderators' queue
> was so unmanageable that we eventually had to start rejecting all
> submissions from non-subscribers sight-unseen. That's a lousy way to have
> to run a mailing li
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, John Weekley wrote:
> Exactly. Sometimes, Blastwaves' packages have more dependencies than I care to
> shake a stick at. Here's the problem: Blastwave maintainers tailor the
> package dependencies to *their* requirements. Not mine. This not meant to
> disparage their work,
Dennis Clarke wrote:
also .. what is the purpose of this ?
I'd find these recipes very useful. Often, a binary package comes
close, but doesn't entirely fit the needs of an organization.
By using these recipes, I'd able to more easily build packages that fit
my needs.
well we can currently
Murali Chellamuthu wrote:
We checked for higher versions of Solaris like build 60 which needs more than 768 mb ram
Only for the full Developer Express graphical install. If you choose the
non-Developer Express / non-graphical install, it requires much less RAM
(256 Mb I believe).
Express Int
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, sujay wrote:
Greetings,
We have ported parted :)
Nice!
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
The scripter in any case is still stupid imho to spam
mailing lists/forums here because no one is going look
and the only achievement is the irritating of
list/forum members.
Most of the ones I've seen come in through the forums seem to
be more intent on boost
--- Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gns wrote:
> > Many mailing lists these days require entering of
> a verification code or characters displayed on the
> page while subscribing. This ensures the
> subscription is done by a *human* and not a bot.
>
> "CAPTCHA" schemes, in which th
On 4/16/07, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I wan to installa a solaris 9 and a xp.
I thint that I have to begin to install the xp and then de solaris 9, but
...how I must create the partitions? 2 primary? one NTFS and the other linux
ex3 or swap?
Thanks a lot and sorry for my english.
Hi,
I wan to installa a solaris 9 and a xp.
I thint that I have to begin to install the xp and then de solaris 9, but
...how I must create the partitions? 2 primary? one NTFS and the other linux
ex3 or swap?
Thanks a lot and sorry for my english.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Dear Solaris Installation Team ,
Here is a list of system configuration that we have at our M.Tech Lab
We are in the process of installation. We tried various installation build
starting from
Solaris 10 update 2 to latest solaris 11 build 60.The installation starts in
blue screen
and gets compl
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:29 +0700, Doug Scott wrote:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:30 +0530, Manish Chakravarty wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Doug,
> >>
> >> I have SXDE. Does that mean the build env is already set up on my box?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > You definitely don't need the CBE t
Mark Phalan wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:30 +0530, Manish Chakravarty wrote:
Hi Doug,
I have SXDE. Does that mean the build env is already set up on my box?
You definitely don't need the CBE to build vim 7. IIRC it simply built
out of the box with no problems. Just download it and
Manish Chakravarty wrote:
Hi Doug,
I have SXDE. Does that mean the build env is already set up on my box?
Unfortunately no. You will have to download and install the JDS CBE from
the JDS download area.
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/jds/downloads/cbe/
Once you has the CBE installed you can ch
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:30 +0530, Manish Chakravarty wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I have SXDE. Does that mean the build env is already set up on my box?
>
You definitely don't need the CBE to build vim 7. IIRC it simply built
out of the box with no problems. Just download it and try the usual
configur
Hi Vikrant,
I am not sure about your exact requirements, but you could try running
$prstat -p
to see the the RSS/size of the process.
If you want to look at system memory consumption, you could try running
vmstat or sar
Thanks
Suraj
Vikrant Kumar Choudhary wrote:
Hi ,
I have a program whic
Hi Doug,
I have SXDE. Does that mean the build env is already set up on my box?
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I wanted to use GVIM 7.0 with GTK.
>> I use SXDE and I note that gvim 6.3 is present in
>> /opt/SUNWspro/contrib/vim/
>>
>> But:
>>
>> 1) It's version 6.3
>> 2) It is compiled with xlibs, not with GTK
> Hi All,
>
> I wanted to use GVIM 7.0 with GTK.
> I use SXDE and I note that gvim 6.3 is present in
> /opt/SUNWspro/contrib/vim/
>
> But:
>
> 1) It's version 6.3
> 2) It is compiled with xlibs, not with GTK , making
> it look very ugly.
>
> Has anyone compiled GVIM 7.0 with GTK on SXDE/SXCE ?
Ok, thank you very much!
I have read the book Writing Device Drivers, but there is no more detailed
information about my problem.
I will post on storage-discuss for more detailed answer. ^_^
Yang Mingshan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> This is great news!
> Thank you. Ported GNU Parted should speed up porting
> of various
> Linux-only installers to OpenSolaris-based distros.
> I'm thinking about
> NexentaOS, where we could benefit from libparted and
> make full port of
> Debian installer.. If anyone interested to start this
> e
Hi All,
I wanted to use GVIM 7.0 with GTK.
I use SXDE and I note that gvim 6.3 is present in /opt/SUNWspro/contrib/vim/
But:
1) It's version 6.3
2) It is compiled with xlibs, not with GTK , making it look very ugly.
Has anyone compiled GVIM 7.0 with GTK on SXDE/SXCE ?
If yes is there a package
I have been trying to use pfil/IPfilter to intercept packets in solaris but
couldn't do so successfully. I am basically trying to develop something like a
NAT-PT to intercept ip v4 packets and translate them to v6 and reinject them to
the network and vice versa. I know there's some work related
Hi ,
I have a program which takes lots of memory. So, i wanted that to run on
clusters.But how do i visualize the memory used by my program. Not only that ,
i want to see how much memory left .
Thanks,
Vikrant
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
54 matches
Mail list logo
