Brian,
Thanks for the information, but it does not work. I will have another
look at the documentation, since I may be missing something in the new
release.
Andrew
pfexec was only intended for roles and not for ordinary users; the
Primary Administrator was dangerous but when it was
Can I ask if raidz is support on root with Solaris 11?
I am having problem doing it from auto-installer and I just thought that
may be the reason.
No possible; only a mirror is allowed (and only standard compression, not
gzip).
Casper
___
It's an issue in format. Don't relabel your disks and get an older
version of format.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi
After trying to svccfg import /var/svc/manifest/site/nag.xml
It is showing maintenance but not online
maintenance =A0 =A0 10:18:54 svc:/site/nag:default
What is this problem?
First start reading the log file; the system didn't start properly.
Casper
Hi,
I use solaris Unix .
I find there is some problem in application and it generate many close-wait
tcp connect and stay
in the server . it is generate by process id 7740
[CODE]
root@XX # netstat -an | grep CLOSE_WAIT | wc -l
285
root@XX # /usr/local/bin/lsof -i:34805
COMMAND
Hi
Now I try to use inetadm but there is no tcpwrapper there. inetadm |
grep tcpwrapper
Does it mean tcpwrapper is not in the system?
No. tcpwrappers is not a service, it a property of all of the other
services.
How can I install it?
It is part of the base OS.
For the firewall, can I use
Thank you
inetadm -p
The tcp_wrappers=3DFalse
How can I set it to TRUE? Any file is for this setting?
You do that with inetadm.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Nov 20 10:11:25 silence genunix: [ID 729207 kern.warning] WARNING: init(1M)
for zone router2 (pid 1326) core dumped on signal 12: restarting automatically
Nov 20 10:11:25 silence genunix: [ID 729207 kern.warning] WARNING: init(1M)
for zone buildbot (pid 1306) core dumped on signal 12:
I had a few minutes today to try an experiment, and I'm afraid
the idea of having ld always generate a PT_SUNWSTACK is a non-starter.
The problem is that it overrides the behavior of 'set noexec_user_stack=1'
in /etc/system, and can therefore quietly allow programs that would
not previously
I picture this somehow as being just a bit more functionality added to
mprotect(2):
/* following magic to identify operating on that segment, rather than
* a particular address
*/
#define ADDR_STACK (void *) (-1)
#define ADDR_HEAP (void *) (-2)
mprotect(ADDR_STACK, 0,
How does the trampoline work on architectures which have noexec bit
for stack by default, like sparcv9?
A long time ago, I made some changes to gcc; I'm not sure if the changes
are still in current gcc, but what happens is that we run mprotect() on
the parts of the stack where we need to
Which does the PT_SUNWSTACK header apply to?
It sets the fields in the proc structure which defines the stack
protection.
I'm not sure what point there would be in per-thread
control; if any one thread in an address space is exploitable,
the whole address space is potentially corruptible.
Looks to me like
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libc/port/threads/thr.c
checks sysconf(_SC_STACK_PROT) and honors it. The only problem is
that it caches the return value (static variable stackprot), which
would have to be invalidated by the mprotect() wrapper
Thanks for the info.
Doesn't help with existing binaries, but it's good to know for
when one can re-link. If there's a way to construct an
LD_PRELOAD'able shared object to do the trick for existing
binaries, I don't see how given the description of mprotect(2),
to specify the entire present
Here are the commands i've typed. And additionally, a image of my screen.
j...@opensolaris:~$ svcadm disable svc:/network/physical:nwam
j...@opensolaris:~$ svcadm enable svc:/network/physical:default
j...@opensolaris:~$ ifconfig
ppgsz(1) or mpss.so.1(1) can set preferred page size for
existing (ppgsz) or new (both) processes.
Is there anything that can similarly remove execute permission
from the stack of 32-bit processes, without do so on a system-wide
basis (i.e. without putting set noexec_user_stack=1 in
Hi,
yesterday I tried to set up the webservd as requested and I removed the
All:suser:cmd:::*:uid=0 from /etc/security/exec_attr, but after doing that I
couldn't access any low level system function in napp-it, like viewing the
discs or the zpools.
All should be exacty like:
Uros Nedic ur...@live.com wrote:
I'm wondering if it possible that Solaris Development could be op=
ened at least on a binary
level so we could update on a bi-weekly basis our builds as we did =
with OpenSolaris?
If Oracle did this, Oracle would be in conflict with the CDDL.
No.
If they
Oracle does not own the complete Copyright on the code, so they need to follow
the CDDL.
All the code where Sun added the CDDL are owned by Sun, now Oracle, *including*
all the contributed files through SCAs.
Which files are you referring to where Sun/Oracle doesn't have the
copyright?
Additionally, even though zpool and zfs get version display the true and
updated versions, I'm not convinced that the problem is zdb, as the label
config is almost certainly set by the zpool and/or zfs commands. Somewhere,
something is not happening that is supposed to when initiating a zpool
hi all
I'm using a custom snaopshot scheme which snapshots every hour, day,
week and month, rotating 24h, 7d, 4w and so on. What would be the best
way to zfs send/receive these things? I'm a little confused about how
this works for delta udpates...
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
The
* SVR4 packages vs IPS vs whatever packaging scheme Nexenta uses
(there too there's a problem, inasmuch as other tools like beadm and zonecfg
are also involved, although I gather it ought to be possible to come up with
different versions of them for each packaging scheme that some distro or
Cloning somewhat helps with the disk footprint, but
the savings there will
get lower over time as more and more binaries are
upgraded. We clearly
have to work on that. The memory saving of sparse
root zones was nothing
to sniff at.
So a share-able executable, library, or object had
There's also a public good argument. When you patent something, yes, you get
a temporary monopoly -- but the tradeoff is you have to publicly reveal it.
In the absence of patents, more technological advances would be treated as
trade secrets and kept out of the public eye.
I do think there
casper@sun.com wrote:
Also, the law should be changed to disallow patent trolls: if you don't
ship or plan to ship a product using your patent, then clearly you're not
suffering when someone else is using a similar invention.
This is against the original intention for patents:
Patents
You'll notice something similar, once you point your MS Windows based brows=
er
to a CIFS server that's build using ZFS and ZFS-snapshots...
MS is also capable of interpreting the CIFS versioning/ZFS snapshot/history=
...
Thanks for pointing this out; I'm using my Solaris server as a CIFS home
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle.
This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks.
see: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix
I just tried booting this image on my Acer Aspire AspireAS3810T-6827
Let me guess what the Solaris 11 Express will be:
The demo version of commercial Solaris 11.
Utilizing only limited amount of RAM, disk space, and limited number of CPU
cores.
Name one downloadable Oracle product which is limited in some way.
(Other than the license)
Casper
Let me guess what the Solaris 11 Express will be:
The demo version of commercial Solaris 11.
Utilizing only limited amount of RAM, disk space, and
limited number of CPU cores.
I've never heard of any version of Solaris, commercial or otherwise,
that was purposely crippled to use only
Dmitry G. Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com wrote:
I've never heard of any version of Solaris, commercial or otherwis=
e,
that was purposely crippled to use only limited RAM, disk space,
and CPU cores.
That's because Solaris was under Sun, not under Oracle.
In 1990 Sun did tell costomers that
On 08/19/10 10:09 AM, usafverteran wrote:
What's your point? IBM has had DB2 Express for quite some time.
The point was the statement Name one downloadable Oracle product which
is limited in some way. (Other than the license).
Dmitry simply found one example.
He was right; it's
Hi,
I am able to understand how libmtmalloc works from the documentation of
libmtmalloc.c source file.
However, I am unable to find proper documentation for libumem. Could someone
provide the key diffe
rences between libmtmalloc and liumem, please? Please also provide me links to
the
And the other operating systems I printed release dates for are RELEASES.
I'm not talking about development releases like you mentioned. If I were
to do that the list would be too long. All of those are RELEASES. OpenSolaris
hasn't had a RELEASE in 13 months (and it's 14 months old). z/OS has
So, basically with out clear communication from Sun, Sun has abandoned a
key functional component?
Yes, better ACL integration would be nice but to use CIFS I have to setup
a WIndows domain controller?
I use CIFS at home and I don't have a AD controller.
Casper
Does anybody know of a way to exclude a service that netservices limited would
stop.
I'm thinking along the lines of having the ftp service running all the time
even
if netservices limited is executed. I know I can start the service afterwards
but I would like to if possible exclude it.
Oh look ... snv_138 appears quite suddenly out of nowhere .. cool.
Thanks to whomever made that happen.
Oh, I see one of the big sources of delay. Its good to see the branding
process is going well.
r...@aequitas:/root# uname -a
SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_138 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
Dear All,
Having enabled pam_list in /etc/pam.conf I can then happily control who can
log on via ssh and that works fine.
HOWEVER, once pam_list is included in /etc/pam.conf then console logins ALL
fail with messages such as
A 32-bit process _can't_* be bigger than 4GB, and as far as the kernel
is concerned, AFAIK won't be bigger than 2GB in terms of regular memory
(although it could have a frame buffer or something mapped in the
part of the address space reserved for I/O devices, making its total
size perhaps appear
bsd mascotgr...@yahoo.com wrote:
The way he states it in his article is that Sun made significant changes =
after buying SVR4, which is incorrect, because changes to SVR4 were made af=
ter Solaris was open sourced. Significant changes were made when SVR4 was =
developed, not after. Solaris
casper@sun.com wrote:
The SVR4 kernel was developed from SunOS-4.0, but SunOS-5.x (Solaris-2.x)
was developed from SunOS-4.1.x.
I don't think that that is correct; SVR4 was developed with ATT from
SunOS 4.x and SVr3; the SCCS files proof that. Unfortunately, the code
was copied as
Using an Osol b 133 nfs server. When working from a linux client I
sometimes see files like: .nfs2def0002
.nfs2f6b0001
Appear on the filesystem as I'm working... any attempt to remove them
(from the linux client) fails, with the
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:45:01 PDT, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com
wrote:
I was wondering if i would be voiding the laptop warranty by erasing
windows and installing opensolaris either on a m10 or a portege ?
Warranties for general-purpose computer hardware that dictate what
Hi
I get an error
ERROR: Roles must be modified with ''rolemod''.
when running /usr/sbin/usermod -c 'Super-User' -d /sub_home/root -e '
' -f 0 -g 0 -u 0 -s /usr/bin/ksh root
And Users must be modified with ``usermod''.
When running /usr/sbin/rolemod -c 'Default tut' -d /export/home/tut
-e '
Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ?
Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one
would be dropped?
Which OS supports both?
Linux support brtfs, Solaris supports ZFS.
Casper
___
brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even
complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS
is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs
reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM.
Both have license issues; Oracle can now re-license
Not sure, if this is the correct group.
I'll give it a shot anyway.
sshing into the gloabl zone and editing a file there with vi (TERM set to
xterm) is no problem.
However- zlogin to a zone (TERM is xterm here too - set by .profile) WYSINWYG.
Only when I position the curser to the left column
Hello
Does anyone know which package libzonecfg.h is in and how to find out?
I'm not able to find the file in sxce 127.
Any ideas are welcome
Part of the source, not distributed. Why do you need it?
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Saw someone in opensolaris-help having trouble building syslog-ng,
and it got me to wondering why that hasn't been integrated (perhaps
with any changes needed to support doors rather than a Unix domain
socket for local communication).
AFAIK, the existing syslog has a lot less functionality.
casper@sun.com wrote:
Clearly syslog-ng needs to be able to pick up such messages *and* create a
door where it can say yes, I'm still running.
Wouldn't it be better to use SMF for that now instead of a custom door
solution for just that one service?
Considering that we need to call that
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
C, the standard network stack runs on CPU0 (along
with many other
kernel items), though it might need some tuning for
your particular app.
[...]
I thought that at least since FireEngine, the network stack could
use multiple CPUs!
Oooh! I just looked
Mike,
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
gagging order might be present.
This is just too funny.
Casper
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:34:15PM +0100, casper@sun.com wrote:
Thanks for that explanation of why there is no failsafe boot option for
OpenSolaris. I had wond
ere
d about that, since I'd seen it in Solaris Nevada/Express.
Ok, except that the CD boot is much slower.
Why is that a
On 03/18/10 10:20 AM, homerun wrote:
Greetings
Just asking , is there interest to port MythTV to OpenSolaris.
http://www.mythtv.org/
How long will the supported list of video capture cards be useful?
The notices I've been receiving from Comcast sound like they are
moving to most
I have a storage server running on snv_129. When trying to reboot my server
it was stuck in the perpetual loop of the happy face boot screen. After
trying to boot in single-user mode, I got this error message:
WARNING: The following lines in / differ from the boot archive:
changed
Thanks for that explanation of why there is no failsafe boot option for
OpenSolaris. I had wondere
d about that, since I'd seen it in Solaris Nevada/Express.
Ok, except that the CD boot is much slower.
Why is that a problem? Why should one worry about the boot time for a
rescue procedure?
Assuming you mean Firefox, remember that (Open)Solaris x86 runs on
both 32-bit and 64-bit with a single binary distro (unlike Linux, where AFAIK
a 64-bit kernel normally runs only 64-bit binaries, so 32-bit and 64-bit are
separate binary distros*). So to have 64-bit Firefox and still be able to
Thanks for the suggestions, but I think this is my own fault. I think
I've shot myself in the foot by enabling compression on rpool.
So: `root (TAB'
gives you a nice clue about how to proceed, it says there's a ZFS
filesystem at partition 2.
`findroot (pool_rpool, 2, a)'
succeeds, and finds
Thank you! Hum...
j...@opensolaris:~$ pfexec beadm list
BEActive Mountpoint Space Policy Created
---- -- - -- ---
opensolaris - - 20.48M static 2010-03-05 14:00
opensolaris-1 - - 13.75M static
I've been upgrading a new systems and compare them with SXDE (118 or
later)
Output: time, I/O done
Ultra 40, sufficient memory
SXDE 28m16 read 924M write 6192M
OSOL 29m44 sd1 read 4305M write 2243M
M3000, sufficient memory
SXDE (+/- 16 minutes, between the upgrade_script was
For example, on my system, when I did an image-update from build 110 to
build 111, with all of the data to be installed downloaded already, it
only took about five minutes to upgrade 666 packages and move around 480
megabytes worth of data. That's not too shabby if you ask me.
Compare
It only *looks* like it downloads everything again -- this is purely a
misleading display issue that we're hoping to improve at a future point.
It did take a reasonable amount of time. Not less than downloading the
first time, but I can't be sure. The ips server is local, though.
What
* efficient update operations
-- Because pkg(5) only retrieves the files that have changed between
package versions between updates, the client only downloads exactly
what it needs to perform update operations. Other systems have chosen
to implement this by pre-generating deltas
For example, on my system, when I did an image-update from build 110 to
build 111, with all of the data to be installed downloaded already, it
only took about five minutes to upgrade 666 packages and move around 480
megabytes worth of data. That's not too shabby if you ask me.
Compare
well the whole install took 2 hours
for 1 pkg !!
it seems that disk read/write here is the bottleneck (?).
iostat -D 2 shows my hd busy at around 100%
iosnoop reports a lot of access by pkg :
How much memory? It is possible that you're paging to death.
Casper
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, casper@sun.com wrote:
well the whole install took 2 hours
for 1 pkg !!
it seems that disk read/write here is the bottleneck (?).
iostat -D 2 shows my hd busy at around 100%
iosnoop reports a lot of access by pkg :
How much memory? =A0It is possible that
They are not available in IPS. You can install the SVR4 packages on your
system, but I am not sure what you need the live upgrade user package
for. We don't use the old live upgrade on OpenSolaris, we have 'Snap
Upgrade', which is managed via beadm(1M).
I don't think they'll work properly
I noticed that :
# /bin/ps --help
/bin/ps: illegal option -- help
usage: ps [ -aAdefHlcjLPyZ ] [ -o format ] [ -t termlist ]
[ -u userlist ] [ -U userlist ] [ -G grouplist ]
[ -p proclist ] [ -g pgrplist ] [ -s sidlist ] [ -z zonelist ] [-h
lgrplist]
On second thought it seems the ps command is switchning between bsd behaviour
(old /usr/ucb/ps) if
options are not preceded with '-' and new solaris behaviour if there is a '-'
Is that correct ?
Almost.
This is what the main routine in ps look like today:
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:33:27 -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
PLEASE GO READ THE MAILING LIST ARCHIVES.
This question has been asked, discussed, and answered by several folks
(myself included) in fairly exhaustive detail, a large number of times.
Most recently, I think, LAST WEEK.
Google
Mtmalloc Linked? Calls per secondContext SwitchesUser
CPU % System CPU
%
no 90017,000-19,000 66
32
yes 1,40014,000-15,000 66
28
Was it also
So I have lots of files with weird characters in the name. Those F6,
F4, etc characters are listed as ?, for instance
Making?Food?Recipe.doc. The version of CIFS I use, (b125) does not
allow listing of files with those characters in WinXP clients. I must
stay with b125 because of issues in later
SMF is already filled up with so much stuff that at a
certain point, it starts to become overwhelming from
a sysadmin persective just to parse through the
output of svcs -a and now the goal is to add even
more stuff to it by getting rid of scripting during
package installation and
Super Micro has an attractive board for low power home systems:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=3DH
Has anyone already put his hands on that thing, or knows, if the actual
OpenSolaris build will/does support the compleet hardware? (Aka: Network,
Hi Matthias,
have you also evaluated going the AMD route? I am also looking into
setting up a home server, and I have seen that with AMD one can get ECC
RAM for much less money.
Which systems are you thinking of?
Additionally, there seem to be not much difference power consumption
wise when
Cyril Plisko wrote:
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/blades/index.html
Oh well...
I don't see it. Maybe it's been fixed already?
It looked at it again, saw SPARK; refreshed it and now it says SPARC.
Casper
___
Well, it's a good thing that for marketing purposes, Sun starting calling
SunOS Solaris, startin
g with SunOS 5. If they hadn't done that, we'd have to to call Solaris
OracleOS now!
No, really, there was a Solaris 1.0.1 (SunOS 4.1.4)
Casper
___
Experiencing very strange behaviour with upgraded OpenSolaris machine ( from
snv_124 to snv_130 )
Machine gets panic, with the following error:
trap: Unknown trap type 8 in user mode.
panic[cpu0]/thread = fbc2e3a0: mutex_enter: bad mutex, lp=20
owner=f000e987f000fea0 thread
casper@sun.com wrote:
I've noticed that more and more things have stopped working in SXCE;
specifically X which is now only partially delivered (no Xnest) and,
We've always only delivered the Xnest built on Xsun, so it's there on
SPARC, been gone on x86 since we removed Xsun on x86 in
Hi Brian,
I tried as you said, I placed the actual file 'dummy' in /usr/kernel/dummy
and the conf file 'dummy.conf' also in the same folder.
But then also its not working.
It asks me to place the driver file (dummy) in correct directory. and to
reboot.
The device driver must be in
Hi Casper,
I placed the files in the directories according to your instructions.
I got the following messages in /var/adm/messages when I try to do
#add_drv dummy
--
Jan 4 20:58:39
Happy new year every1!
130 is the final SXCE release planned though, as previously announc=
ed.
Which is too bad, really. Maybe the infrastructure to build SXCE
can be kept in place a little bit longer. The final release of SXCE
could then be cut in sync with the official OS 2010.02
Hi,
I have a Sun Sparc T5240 server. I want to open the cover to hook my test
instruments. But, if the
cover is open, then the server won't boot up.
How do I cheat the server that cover is always closed?
If you run the system with an open cover, you will disturb the airflow and
the system
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Eugene Vilensky evilen...@gmail.com=
wrote:
Hi,
Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise? =
=A0If
I were to build it, is there an easy metapackage for the build
system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debia=
n's
Solaris Syslog doesn't log using a door.
Solaris logs on /dev/conslog but uses the door only
to determine if the
syslogd is running.
Casper
I always wondered at the sanity of using a door for this purpose.
My biggest problem with the code is that syslogd_ok() is always called,
even
Yes Casper. This is not open source application.
Rather it is Server administration application and while installing, it
checks for server id
to check whether installation is done on supported server system.
My doubt is that server ids are stored in predefine memory location of
particular server
I've tried to reproduce it. Unsucessfully. Everything updated normally. Maybe
because this time pa
ckage was taken from cache...
Can't happen when you install a SVr4 package; if exec_attr is empty, then
it is either:
a SVr4 package with a non-standard i.rbac install script
or
Will keep reading so any ouput from system logger is displayed... but
a regular kind of command like:
cat named-pipe
cat will close after the first line is read.
Not my experience; cat works.
Similar for something like awk '/REGEX/{print}' named-pipe some.log
awk will close after the
Can anyone tell me how to make the system logger write to a fifo?
I've tried this in /etc/syslog.conf
*.debug |/var/adm/flt
Where `flt' is a fifo and the two elements are separated by tabs.
I'm assuming that flt is a named pipe; doesn't it work when
you use /var/adm/flt?
I
can we run objective-c programming language in solaris,because it will be run
only in Mac os
You will need an Objective-C compiler.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi, all.
I'd like to limit number of file-descriptors in system.
What do I set a parameter?
In process level, I know rlim_fd_max paramter.
There's no system wide limit.
Why do you want this?
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi Casper.
I'd like to run hundreds process, and they have thousands file-descriptors.
Therefore, I'd like to limit them in system.
So that processes will fail?
What problem are you trying to solve?
Sorry, I don't know max number of them in system level.
There is no such limit so you cannot
Hi,
I have recently bought this motherboard and I was plaining use
OpenSolaris so I went and installed release 2009/06 but it seems
the release doesn't support video/network card.
http://www.pointofview-online.com/showroom.php?shop_mode=product_detailproduct_id=97
So I installed svn_123b
i was trying to achieve the speeds mentioned according to the usb 2.0 specs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_2.0#USB_2.0
Hi Arun,
What is the speed that you are expecting?
Line speed for USB Hi speed is 480 Mbits/s.
So it is 60 MB/s.
(Note the differences ib M*Bits* and M*Bytes*)
You are
All;
This weekend I installed osol 0906 on my laptop and in the process of
copying
files and testing configurations found that there is no rarpd. I need
rarpd for
performing Jumpstart/JET builds on SPARC based systems.
How can I get this installed on my laptop asap?
Why not using DHCP (boot
I tried also with format (on an Opensolaris 64-bit where I can see th=
e
disk), then connected the disk back on the 32-bit system, same error.
Any other ideas?
Disks 1TB will just not work on a 32 bit Solaris.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss
thank you,
can you tell me what does it mean {} + ?
can you suggest me a tutorial or an online manual for beginners?
--
man find.
{} - expanded to the name of the files found
+ - call the command with multiple file arguments
Casper
As far as I know there are closed binaries drivers
produced by hardware vendors for Linux world. To be
able to run such drivers on Linux there is a piece of
code licensed under LGPL allowing such thing. That is
the purpose of LGPL. Some hardware vendors still do
not want to write open source
It's not just search that's slow - most pkg operations feel slow.
And SVR4 performance is pretty dire - performance is one of the main criticisms
of SVR4 packaging. The code is old and hasn't had much TLC, and there's a
fair amount of low hanging fruit. I had some fixes for pkgchk that
made it
Ghee Teo wrote:
So what is your 'supports' for doing the things the ways you are doing
that are supposed to be helpful to Solaris users to migrate/upgrade to
OpenSolaris. Have you considered also the hundreds of ISV for Solaris
will now to adapt to the new paradigm?
I can't answer that as
Shawn Walker wrote:
The popularity of the OpenSolaris 200x releases vs. that of the
Solaris Express releases in terms of usage speaks for itself IMO.
Do you have the numbers?
I certainly would want to know those, also because of the number of
the SPARC vs the x86 downloads now that we have
1 - 100 of 1175 matches
Mail list logo
