On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo, sunfreeware,
etc...all build their own userland. GNU/OpenSolaris does the same in it's own
way.
this is why I built my own
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 16:08, Dennis Clarke wrote:
A build system is being worked on that results in scripts and diffs
being available also.
good to know!
As for not being open. Just join. You can shell account and look
around. How closed is that?
the just join part is what makes it closed.
On 11/21/05, Patrick Mauritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 16:08, Dennis Clarke wrote:
A build system is being worked on that results in scripts and diffs
being available also.
good to know!
As for not being open. Just join. You can shell account and look
around. How
On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo, sunfreeware,
etc...all build their own userland.
Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:25 am, Eric Boutilier wrote:
With this in mind, I'm thinking maybe SchilliX, Nexenta, and JDS won't
suffer from the problem Alan sites above...?
The key will be in getting the core libs into a common location. The more
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 15:23, Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo, sunfreeware,
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 00:29 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
On 11/21/05, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo,
Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 11/21/05, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snipped...]
Right. But ultimately if we want to really work together, it would be nice if
we had a common set of libraries that everyone could use, and so that we
shouldn't have so many sets of libs floating around our
Erast Benson wrote:
Also putting too much in OSOL LCD(OpenSolaris least common denominator)
will break distribution's individuality. So, please lets be careful
here.
Then maybe there needs to be another distribution. Solaris LCD. Or
maybe, when installing software, you would check for
Roberto Pereyra wrote:
Hi
An option that I believe that it has not been considered in the news
distributions based on Opensolaris is to use the system of packages of
called NetBSD pkgsrc.
http://www.pkgsrc.org/
http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/pkgsrc/platforms.html#solaris
Pkgsrc support
Hi
An option that I believe that it has not been considered in the news
distributions based on Opensolaris is to use the system of packages of
called NetBSD pkgsrc.
http://www.pkgsrc.org/
http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/pkgsrc/platforms.html#solaris
Pkgsrc support Solaris well and use
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 14:23, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
Why not use it?
there are people using it.
As for the GPL requirement, I assume you refer to the debian based
distro. It seems, they want to have a debian-style distro, and pkgsrc
won't help them in any way.
As for why not using pkgsrc, there
On Thursday 17 November 2005 05:58 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
As for why not using pkgsrc, there are many things to consider: eg. that
pkgsrc builds basically your whole userland again (at least the large
chunks: yet another perl installation, yet another python, ..)
This is currently a
14 matches
Mail list logo