I am working with parcellite package that i downloaded from the following
link
¨http://sourceforge.net/search/?words=paracellitetype_of_search=softpmode=0words=parcelliteSearch=Search;
I am using solaris with following details
SunOS opensolaris 5.11 snv_101b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX was still intact.
This was with the development edition dev300_m53 (future v3.2).
http://download.openoffice.org/next/index.html
Awesome!
Now all we need to do is start lobbying all of the schools, universities, and
government agencies
I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX
was still intact.
This was with the development edition dev300_m53
(future v3.2).
How can I have both a stable OOo 3.1 and a development OOo version installed at
the same time in OpenSolaris 2009.06?
--
This message posted from
I dont know, but one way is to use IPS, then a new BE will be created. You
install them both via IPS, and will have in GRUB:
1. StableOOo31
2. DevOOo
And then you choose which to boot from.
Another way is to use Zones and install them in separate Zones - then you can
run them at the same time.
Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX
was still intact.
This was with the development edition dev300_m53
(future v3.2).
How can I have both a stable OOo 3.1 and a development OOo version installed at
the same time in OpenSolaris 2009.06?
Sorry, I stripped out a directory in /opt, is should have read:
$ ls -al /opt
...
...
drwxr-xr-x 4 root bin 512 Jul 24 11:54 ooo-dev
drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 512 Jul 24 11:52 ooo-dev3
drwxr-xr-x 5 root bin 512 Apr 30 12:29 openoffice.org
drwxr-xr-x 7
I was wondering if anyone might be able to give me some pointers on
troubleshooting extremely long startup times (2.5hrs). This is a problem that
has only manifest itself in 2009.06 and was not present in either 2008.05 or
2008.11. The hardware configuration has not changed.
The issue is
Andrew Turner wrote:
I was wondering if anyone might be able to give me some pointers on
troubleshooting extremely long startup times (2.5hrs). This is a problem that
has only manifest itself in 2009.06 and was not present in either 2008.05 or
2008.11. The hardware configuration has not
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in OpenSolaris 2009.06) and
with the development version of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of them. Can this just be
hearsay?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Thanks, I'll try that later tho I expect it to boot cleanly, as I have tried
rebuilding a clean version of 2009.06 in the past and then imported the pool.
Pre-Import it was snappy, post-import terrible. For the record, I upgraded the
pool to v14 when I moved to 2009.06.
Pulling the messages
Hi all -
where do we need to log issues with the dev repository???
I have tried to fetch some things and every fetch breaks in the same
way, even after flushing my download cache...
so i suspect broken files, because if it was network, it would not
likely be a break at the same place...
Rich Reynolds wrote:
Hi all -
where do we need to log issues with the dev repository???
Report them to the pkg-discuss mailing list.
I have tried to fetch some things and every fetch breaks in the same
way, even after flushing my download cache...
so i suspect broken files, because if it
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in
OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development version
of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of
them. Can this just be hearsay?
Hi Thommy,
A small correction I might add: the
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in
OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development version
of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of
them. Can this just be hearsay?
Hi Thommy,
A small correction I
Export completes successfully in 30s or so. Re-Importing now, same messages in
the log and it's been running 1h43m and counting.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon 27/07/09 02:38 , Andrew Turner andrew.tur...@spearpointsolutions.co.uk
sent:
Export completes successfully in 30s or so. Re-Importing now, same messages
in the log and it's been running 1h43m and counting.
How many filesystems are in the pool?
--
Ian.
Cleaning up the Thread..
Export completes successfully in 30s or so. Re-Importing now, same messages
in the log and it's been running 1h43m and counting.
How many filesystems are in the pool?
--
Ian.
Hi Ian
There's two zfs filesystems, one of 2.2T shared via CIFS and one of 500G which
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in
OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development
version
of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either
of
them. Can this just be hearsay?
Hi Thommy,
A small correction I
Ok this is bug 9909/bugster 6863859. Very frustrating!
Thanks for the help anyway!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ian, as this is orphaned from the main thread, can you delete the post?
Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Shawn -
thanx for the quick turn on this... frankly i had tried to send thw
original mail three time in the last week, and it never made to the list
so thanx also to Derek for fixing that...
yes, im running 118, was this in the release notes and i missed it(not
so unusual), or is it a
Rich Reynolds wrote:
Shawn -
thanx for the quick turn on this... frankly i had tried to send thw
original mail three time in the last week, and it never made to the list
so thanx also to Derek for fixing that...
yes, im running 118, was this in the release notes and i missed it(not
so
successfully installed 2009 06 on hp pavillion dv9000. i had linux before.
system has 2 harddrives.
has solaris installed on one and wanted to mirror the other one.
1. used format to delete the ext3 partition and create solaris2, on the second
drive.
2. trying to copy volume table of contents to
Although we don't use it in any of the data centers that I've worked at (we
either pay the exhorbitant, over-priced Red Hat support fees or use CentOS free
of charge), I suspect that Oracle's Unbreakable Enterprise Linux is probably
doing a lot better than people around here give it credit for
Santheep, I think you need to install the SUNWgnome-common-devel package from
the IPS repository in order for your software to build correctly.
Type in this command at the BASH command line:
pkg info SUNWgnome-common-devel
If the output of the command looks like this:
pkg: no packages
25 matches
Mail list logo
