Re: [opensource-dev] Questions about unit test for "hg policy"

2011-08-16 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
On 2011-08-16 17:25, Boroondas Gupte wrote: Heya Oz Thanks for making Bos' hg hooks public! I've looked at the unit test you've written for hg policy and have two questions about it: 1. Is it by purpose that the return code isn't checked after the hg policy invocation on line 23

[opensource-dev] Snowstorm team review build

2011-08-16 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/hg/repo/oz_viewer-poreview/rev/238624/index.html STORM-632 URL-like resident display name is shown as clickable HTTP URL in various places STORM-782

Re: [opensource-dev] opensource-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 41

2011-08-16 Thread malachi
and a developer who has >>>> contributed >>>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>>> to various TPVD Clients and am now finding myself >>>> cautious to >>>>>> even >>>>>>>&g

Re: [opensource-dev] opensource-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 41

2011-08-16 Thread John Jackson
t; policy >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> is requiring every compiled client that connects to >>> second >>>>> life to >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> l

[opensource-dev] Questions about unit test for "hg policy" (was: Mercurial hook checking for well-formed XML)

2011-08-16 Thread Boroondas Gupte
Heya Oz Thanks for making Bos' hg hooks public! I've looked at the unit test you've written for hg policy and have two questions about it: 1. Is it by purpose that the return code isn't checked after the hg policy invocation on line 23

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-793 Offered URL-like named object is displayed as a HTTP URL in the llGiveInventory

2011-08-16 Thread Vadim ProductEngine
> On Aug. 16, 2011, 1:19 p.m., Boroondas Gupte wrote: > > indra/newview/skins/default/xui/en/notifications.xml, lines 5901-5906 > > > > > > Shouldn't the same change be made in the translations? Ah, right. Thanks, wi

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-793 Offered URL-like named object is displayed as a HTTP URL in the llGiveInventory

2011-08-16 Thread Boroondas Gupte
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/442/#review979 --- indra/newview/skins/default/xui/en/notifications.xml

Re: [opensource-dev] OS X Lion

2011-08-16 Thread Yoz Grahame
I've never seen that *myself*, and I've run a number of different viewer builds since installing Lion dev preview 4. -- Yoz On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Lee ponzu wrote: > i have heard two people report that they cannot *initiate* an IM. They can > receive them, but not *start* a

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread malachi
the only viewers on this computer are singularity and viewer-developments source code. On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:12:13 -0700, Brian McGroarty wrote: > What were some of the viewers you tested on that account? Typically, > the trigger would have been within the last month. > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread Brian McGroarty
What were some of the viewers you tested on that account? Typically, the trigger would have been within the last month. On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Erin Mallory wrote: > im just like wtf? the account i got hit by (which i sent the name of to > oz) is still showing active... in search...

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread Brian McGroarty
I looked at a few of the accounts from people who contacted security@ to ask if this was a phishing message. In the cases I've seen, this corresponds to accounts warned, suspended or banned for using features that violate the TPV, such as copybotting, payment impersonation, or spamming features. Us

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread Erin Mallory
im just like wtf? the account i got hit by (which i sent the name of to oz) is still showing active... in search... but its one i rarely use. mostly for hiding and/or testing stuff. Im hearing the same from other people too now though in other groups im in... > Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:0

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread malachi
I knew it couldnt be just a single event. There is something going on at Linden Lab and honest developers are losing their accounts over it. On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:46:29 -0400, Erin Mallory wrote: > I have been hit with this as well on one of my alts. interestingly, I > have only ever logged that

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread Erin Mallory
I have been hit with this as well on one of my alts. interestingly, I have only ever logged that account in with v-d builds or firestorm. I've sent an abuse report asking for clarification. im about to contact support. > From: jess...@trinityenterprises.ca > To: opensource-dev@lists.secondl

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread Jessica Trinity
This is interesting as our support team has had reports of this from some of our own users. We figured it was phishing and suggested said users contact LL. I don't know the results however... Jessica Lyon -Original Message- From: opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com [mailto:opensou

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread malachi
I am sure. It was a fresh pull from viewer-development as requested by a fellow dev. 3 days later the email came and the accounts were terminated. The point of the matter is, No where does it say that a client MUST BE LISTED IN THE TPVD in order to comply with that policy. Yet they are banning

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread Celierra Darling
It might be that the explanation message is mistaken, and it's supposed to reference the TPVP instead of the TPVD (or even a different policy altogether, if, say, someone clicked the wrong message). Are you sure that, whatever viewer(s) was being used, it conformed to the TPVP, and there wasn't an

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread malachi
I thought it was a phishing attempt as well. But the account has been removed from second life. POOF. so unless some phisher has the ability to terminate accounts this is as real as it gets. On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:21:48 +0200, Marine Kelley wrote: > Careful, it could be a phishing attempt. Do N

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread Marine Kelley
Careful, it could be a phishing attempt. Do NOT click on any of the links inside this email (unless you're certain it comes from Linden Lab, but then again emails can be spoofed). On 16/08/2011, mala...@tamzap.com wrote: > exactly which is why this message is so disturbing. accounts have been > t

Re: [opensource-dev] OS X Lion

2011-08-16 Thread Lee ponzu
i have heard two people report that they cannot *initiate* an IM. They can receive them, but not *start* a session. On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Yoz Grahame wrote: > Not speaking for the team here (especially because I'm not in viewer > development), just myself as a Lion user (Mid-2009 MB

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread malachi
exactly which is why this message is so disturbing. accounts have been terminated from second life for using a viewer not listed in the directory. "This email is notification that Linden Lab has terminated your access to the Second Life virtual world due to severe or repeated violations of the

Re: [opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread Erin Mallory
Last I checked there is no requirement to use an approved tvp. even on the tvp listing page. Looking at the policy and the directory pages, no where does it say that the viewer must be listed in the tvp... http://secondlife.com/corporate/tpv.php http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Third_Party_Vie

[opensource-dev] Unjust Banning of residents?

2011-08-16 Thread malachi
Violation: Third Party Viewer Usage You are connecting to the grid with a viewer that is not in the third party viewer directory. However... A viewer does not need to be on the Third Party Viewer Directory in order for development or usage of it to be compliant with the Third Party Viewer Poli

[opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-793 Offered URL-like named object is displayed as a HTTP URL in the llGiveInventory

2011-08-16 Thread Vadim ProductEngine
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/442/ --- Review request for Viewer. Summary --- Disallowed parsing HTTP URLs in

Re: [opensource-dev] Mercurial hook checking for well-formed XML

2011-08-16 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
In response to my earlier note on this list about my Mercurial hook to check for well-formed XML at commit time, CG kindly pointed me to the hooks written by Bos for a more extensive set of LL policy checks (including well-formed XML). Needless to say, the version Bos wrote is more elegant than