In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 21 May 2005 19:21:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim
Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
tim> On Fri, 20 May 2005, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
tim>
tim> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 19 May 2005 22:14:20 -0700 (PDT),
Tim Rice
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 21 May 2005 23:32:53 +0400 (MSD), Dmitry
Belyavsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
beldmit> Hello!
beldmit>
beldmit> On Sat, 21 May 2005, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
beldmit>
beldmit> > The following from CHANGES should
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 21 May 2005 10:07:23 -0700 (PDT), David
Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dwolfe5272> I suspect that no other platforms would break if this
dwolfe5272> change were made in the OpenSSL sources, as this seems to
dwolfe5272> be the standard-mandated behavior:
dwo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 21 May 2005 19:11:20 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> What about my question:
vinschen>
vinschen> >> What I'm not sure about is, if the engines shouldn't
vinschen> >> better be installed into /usr/bin. Otherwise they are
vinschen
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 20 May 2005 18:32:47 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> Ok, below is a patch which should solve the problems on
vinschen> Cygwin. It tweaks Makefile.org, Makefile.shared,
vinschen> engines/Makefile and util/cygwin.sh.
Applied.
Che
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 20 May 2005 14:45:01 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> Sorry for a possibly dumb question, but I don't quite
vinschen> understand the engines concept. Is there a good reason that
vinschen> the engine shared libs are created w/o ver
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 19 May 2005 22:14:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim
Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hmm... I personally do not support SCO products for political
reasons, so I'm not going to offer much about them. However, it looks
like the CC and CFLAGS variables do not follow along in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 20 May 2005 07:24:06 +0200, "Philippe
BOUGERET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
philippe.bougeret> In fact , this arrived when I compile with the
philippe.bougeret> -DZLIB option.
What platform, what platform version, what compiler, what compiler
version?
Cheers
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 20 May 2005 00:15:40 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> In both cases I'll send a patch to fix that. It's just
vinschen> rather late and especially the engine Makefile change needs
vinschen> some testing, so give me a couple of days
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 19 May 2005 22:46:57 +0200, "Matyas
Majzik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
openssl> http://www.openssl.org
openssl>
openssl> 19-may-2002:Beta 1 of OpenSSL 0.9.8 is now available, please
test
openssl> it now
openssl>
openssl>
openssl> I think it sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 1
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The first beta is now released.
The beta release is available for d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 07 May 2005 13:47:09 +0200, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > Actually, C on VMS/Alpha knows very well what a long long is, and
appro> > knows how to make use of it. So let's stop pretending the Alpha
appro> > doesn't know long lo
Hi,
We need to rethink pqueue a little bit. The trouble with it right now
is that it uses BN_ULLONG in the published API. Unfortunately,
BN_ULLONG doesn't work on all platforms we (pretend to?) support.
In the BIGNUM code, all uses of BN_LLONG and BN_ULLONG are wrapped in
a check for BN_LLONG.
Hold ye horses! I think you're fscking up VMS build of shared
libraries, which requires globaldef/globalref of all things that might
be reached from other shared libraries or programs.
I'll see what damage has been caused, if any, so far...
Cheers,
Richard
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.7g released
==
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 0.9.7g of our open so
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:53:21 +1000, "Steven
Reddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
smr> Moving such functionality out-of-process would improve stability,
smr> and this is obviously where prngd/egd comes in, but if these are
smr> seen as useful for more secure applications
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:14:25 -0600, "Douglas E.
Engert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
deengert> The OpenSSL ENGINE facilities had ENGINE_load_private_key,
deengert> and ENGINE_load_public_key, but do not have ENGINE_load_certificate.
deengert>
deengert> When the ENGINE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:17:29 -0600, "Stephen
Sprunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
stephen> AES is in the current snapshots, but it will not be in a
stephen> "release" until 0.9.8 comes out. Presumably documentation
stephen> will follow.
I think you want to take a clo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:50:25 -0800 (PST),
Prashant Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pkix2005> Is it possible to use the engine implementation with
pkix2005> statically linking the harware accelerator library with the
pkix2005> openssl instead of dynamic linking.
pkix
Hmm, does this mean we should add the SEED algorithm (it's defined in
RFC 4009)?
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:25:15 +0100, Nils Larsch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nils.larsch> wouldn't it be cleaner to change the first parameter of
nils.larsch> the local function load_iv from "unsigned char **" to
nils.larsch> "char **" (and than change "from" in load_i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:49:42 +0100 (CET), "Dr.
Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> Give an assertion error for applications that ignore FIPS
steve> digest errors.
Ah, you hit that too :-).
BTW, we need to redesign the creation of certificates
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:05:58 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > Hmm, I guess there's a conflict between $(LDFLAGS) being used
appro> > for $(LD) and $(LDFLAGS) being used for $(CC).
appro>
appro> I've never seen LDFLAGS set to anything... How c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:27:50 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > appro> --- openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl 13 Dec 2004 17:28:42 -
1.144
appro> > appro> +++ openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl 25 Jan 2005 22:09:10 -
1.145
appro> > appro>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:09:12 +0100 (CET), "Andy
Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> Log:
appro> Please BSD make...
[...]
appro> Index: openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl
appro>
app
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:03:13 -0600, Samuel Meder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
meder> Got a question: It seems that OpenSSL allows the cert chain to
meder> be any number of certificates which it then treats as a pool to
meder> build the cert chain from whereas RFC 2246
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:37:12 +0100, Nils Larsch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nils.larsch> --- openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 2004-09-06 21:00:17.0 +0200
nils.larsch> +++ head.org/ssl/ssl_lib.c 2005-01-12 12:52:59.330980352 +0100
nils.larsch> @@ -1602,7 +1602,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:03:30 -0800 (PST),
Lincoln <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
denverhwu> Does openssl really retrieve CRL from
denverhwu> id-ce-cRLDistributionPoints
denverhwu> field (CRD field) contained in a certificate?
Not automatically. The method to do that
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:02:28 -0800 (PST), Marius
Schilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
marius_schilder> Any chance a patch like this can make it into the
marius_schilder> dist, eventually?
Not chance for the 0.9.7 series, since it changes a public structure.
For 0.9.8
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 3 Dec 2004 01:10:59 +0100 (CET), "Dr.
Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> Log:
steve> V1 certificates that aren't self signed can't be accepted as CAs.
OK, I suspected that. This means that some checks for the return
value 2 just became
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:45:01 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> I'd agree with that assessment now that I've analysed the patch
steve> in more detail so I've no complaints on that score any more.
steve>
steve> The only case remaining is an
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:45:01 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> The only case remaining is an application that defines a custom
steve> purpose which includes its own broken CA tolerator. I've never
steve> heard of such a thing being used so
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:10:17 +0100 (CET),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
richard> ... unless you're hit with proxy certificates,
For those going "what the fsck is he talking about?", a little bit of
informatio
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:14:04 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> I'll check it through more thoroughly. If you never get that
steve> new error code then I agree there wont be any incompatibility
steve> on that basis.
... unless you're hit w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:45:38 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
steve>
steve> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:3
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:30:41 +0100 (CET),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
richard> OK, that's actually quite easy, I'll have a patch prepared
richard> for review within an hour or so.
I've got something t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:45:54 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
steve>
steve> > However, I don't think this is a proper path to follow
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:26:33 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> You should be able to get the 'verify' utility to reject such a
steve> chain on the command line.
steve>
steve> If you set the purpose to 'ocsphelper' (this is used by the
ste
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:17:01 +0100, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
steve>
steve> > I'm looking through the code in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c and
I'm looking through the code in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c and
crypto/x509v3/v3_purp.c, both in the 0.9.7 branch and the main trunk,
to try to find the code that checks if the issuer certificate is a CA
certificate (i.e. is v3 and has CA:TRUE in basicConstraint) during
validation. I can't find the cod
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:51:46 +0100 (MET), "Jens
Elkner via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> 'Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:'
rt> >
rt> >
rt> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET),
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e
rt> it fails with:
rt>
rt> ..
rt> + gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET),
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e
rt> it fails with:
rt>
rt> ..
rt> + gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 7 Nov 2004 05:36:48 -0700, The Doctor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
doctor> The test is looking for /libssl.so .
doctor>
doctor> should it not be looking for ../libssl.so ?
Please send us a log and tell us what platform and how you configured.
Cheers,
Richard
I've just had a quick look at your proposal, and my first impression
is that it's interesting, at least as an idea. I'm going to re-read
it more thoroughly tomorrow evening, and will have more comments then.
This should stop others from reading what you wrote and make their own
comments on it.
Ch
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 31 Oct 2004 23:00:50 +0100, Riccardo Mottola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rollei> > Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
[...]
rollei> > OK, the two preceding lines show this:
rollei> >
rollei&
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:21:12 +0100, Riccardo Mottola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rollei> I try to get openssl on my old SGI box with its original compiler.
rollei> OpenSSL version 0.9.7d
rollei> (I tried also older and very old versions up to 0.9.3 and they seem all
r
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:26:50 -0700 (PDT), prakash babu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
prakash_openssl> In OpenSSL 0.9.7e
prakash_openssl> links(libfips.sl,libfips.sl.0) for the new library
prakash_openssl> libfips.sl.0.9.7 is created in the lib directory
pr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:00:21 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
richard> deengert> One of the problems is that different sub releases of
richard> deengert> OpenSSL use the same library names 0.9.7
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:44:56 +0200 (METDST), "[EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> This may be old news, but there is a typo in openssl.cnf included with
rt> the latest version of openssl that will error out the cert creation.
rt>
rt> line 46 is
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:43:57 -0500, "Douglas E. Engert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
deengert> The man pages for ld on Linux say -rpath is used first. This
deengert> is unfortunate ...
but makes sense from a security point of view (look up LD_LIBRARY_PATH
with google
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:18:35 +0200 (METDST), "Andreas
M. Kirchwitz via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi,
I just found an email discussion that seems to cover what's happening
to you:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-glibc/2000-01/msg00046.html
rt> On Solaris, LD
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:18:35 +0200 (METDST), "Andreas
M. Kirchwitz via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi,
I just found an email discussion that seems to cover what's happening
to you:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-glibc/2000-01/msg00046.html
rt> On Solaris, LD_
If you wanna jinx someone, do it in CVS, eh? :-):-)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:01:39 +0200 (CEST), "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> Log:
steve> Only add fips/dh once...
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:09:24 -0500, "P. George" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
invest> what's with the "inc32" folder?
invest>
invest> i'm on win32. does that mean i should use "inc32" instead of
invest> "include"?
Yes. This is something we've inherited from SSLeay,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:07:20 +0200, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> On Sun, Oct 17, 2004, Ng Pheng Siong wrote:
steve>
steve> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 02:32:54PM +, Paolo Serra wrote:
steve> > > crytpo/objects/obj_dat.num
steve> > > crypt
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:09:44 +0800, Ng Pheng Siong
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ngps> On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 02:32:54PM +, Paolo Serra wrote:
ngps> > crytpo/objects/obj_dat.num
ngps> > crypto/objects/objects.txt
ngps>
ngps> Did you modify these two files to give
[I'm keeping this in openssl-dev, as it feels that's where it belongs]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:32:54 +, "Paolo Serra"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
paolino55> I'm trying to integrate a new cipher (aes-ccm) into the
paolino55> crypto lib. I want to have the new algor
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:11:57 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Subramanyan.Koduvayur> Is there an api in openSSL that would work in
Subramanyan.Koduvayur> the same way as select() in unix, to read from
Subramanyan.Koduvayur> incoming socket connections.
Not currently,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:41:48 -0400, Jeffrey Altman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jaltman> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
jaltman>
jaltman> > gianni> If I think hard enough, I could probably think of ways that
jaltman> > gianni&
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 06:31:43 -0700, Gianni Mariani
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
gianni> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
gianni>
gianni> >hyc> It would be best to avoid any non-standard formats...
gianni> >
gianni> >Thank
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 02:41:24 -0700, Howard Chu <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
hyc> The "Cisco" solution *is* the standard solution:
hyc> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2732.txt
hyc>
hyc> It would be best to avoid any non-standard formats...
Thanks! Decision made (and I'll
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:33:46 -0700, Lev Walkin <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
vlm> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
[...]
vlm> > So, I'm looking for proposals on a new syntax to separate IP address
vlm> > from port number. Any su
Hi,
I've just been hacking around a little bit to add IPv6 capability, and
I thought of syntax for host and port specifications.
As it is now, the syntax used a little everywhere in OpenSSL is
{host}:{port}. Unfortunately, if we're to support IPv6 numeric
addresses, I find myself in a little bit
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:15:04 +1000, "Steven Reddie"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
smr> I'm surprised that nobody has responded.
I feel I need to raise a little bit of awareness here. The OpenSSL
Project is entirely volunteer driven, and as such, we (those having
write
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:04:10 +0200, "Gisle Vanem"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
giva> I tried compiling for MingW and with OPENSSL_EXPORT_VAR_AS_FUNCTION
giva> defined. But struck a gcc 3.4.1 error because of "extern static ...".
giva> Patch:
giva>
giva> --- orig/e_o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:55:56 +0200, Corinna Vinschen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> would some kind person from the core developer team mind to
vinschen> apply the following patch to the util/cygwin.sh file? A
vinschen> while ago, Cygwin moved from installing
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:42:04 -0400, Geoff Thorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
geoff> BTW, on a related note - the logic that decides whether this
geoff> code gets built or not (independently of whether it will
geoff> operate at run-time due to autodetection) hinges off
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:33:32 -0400, Geoff Thorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
geoff> Quick reaction without checking the code properly. No, I think
geoff> the issue is that further down there is other preprocessor
geoff> logic that checks whether the compiler is gcc, w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:47:35 +0200, Leonard den
Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
leonard> Hello,
leonard>
leonard> Looking through all the patches for RHL 7.3 I noticed an oddity when
leonard> comparing against openssl-0.9.6m. Taken from RHL 7.3's
leonard> open
The fix is already present in current 0.9.7 snapshots.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:37:47 +0100, "David C.
Partridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
David.Partridge> I'm cross posting this from openssl-users as I am now certain I found
a bug.
David.Partridge>
David.Partridg
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:37:32 +0200, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
eugen> Which crypto hardware is supported by the OpenSSL engine
eugen> version? I've spent some time Googling, to no avail.
eugen>
eugen> Can someone point me to a list of supported hardware?
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 4 Aug 2004 21:05:20 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dkaufman> The DJGPP version of make was unable to handle the shell
dkaufman> comparators in the Makefiles in the subdirectories of fips
dkaufman> where $(EXHEADER) is null, despite the f
[ I've changed the way I handle mail. From now on, I use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for correspondance about free software.
Previously, I used [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this project ]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:02:31 +0200, Mathias Brossard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mathias.br
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:53:34 +0530, "BELLIAPPA, ASHITH
MUDDIANA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ashith-muddiana.belliappa> Hi all,
ashith-muddiana.belliappa> I am calling the SSL_accept( args);
ashith-muddiana.belliappa> function from the openssl source. It
ashith-muddia
Hi guys (and gals),
I've a couple of questions regarding -rpath.
1. If you look in 0.9.8-dev (the current CVS HEAD), you'll find that
Makefile.shared uses -rpath for all link_*.tru64* targets, while
not using them at all in the link_*.alpha-osf1 targets. Is it
correct assumption that OS
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:16:25 -0700, Kai-Min Sung
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kaisung> I'm using the base64 BIO to generate an email MIME
kaisung> attachment. According to the MIME RFC, lines must be
kaisung> separated by CRLF sequences. Most clients are robust enoug
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:46:27 +0200, Andy Polyakov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > appro> Log:
appro> > appro> Win64 placeholder targets. This is merely naming suggestion. As we
know
appro> > appro> Win64 comes in two flavors, IA-64/Itanium and AMD64/Op
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:04:59 -0700, Kai-Min Sung
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kaisung> I emailed the list a couple weeks ago asking if anyone had
kaisung> implemented a patch to change the EOLs in the base64 BIO code
kaisung> from '\n' to '\r\n'. I went ahead and took
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 21:18:21 +0200 (CEST), "Andy
Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> Log:
appro> Win64 placeholder targets. This is merely naming suggestion. As we know
appro> Win64 comes in two flavors, IA-64/Itanium and AMD64/Opteron. The
appro>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:53:08 +0200, Oliver Welter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mail> One Idea is, not to store the full key but the derived chunks
mail> and produce some "noise" around the parts - so you are unable to
mail> read the whole key. Using your "approach" to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:08:32 +0200 (CEST), "Andy
Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> Log:
appro> WinCE should always be compiled as UNICODE, even debugging version...
OK, so here's a question: should we do the same with Win32, or is that
too risky?
--
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:53:26 +0200 (CEST), "Andy
Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> Log:
appro> #include is required at least on HP-UX and IRIX. And what's
appro> with HP-UX offering 14 for NAME_MAX?
Hmm, I recall that there was a 14 character li
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:00:15 -0600, "Gary Walters"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
garwal> I have been working on porting OpenSSL to the THEOS Operating
garwal> System. The C compiler is ANSI C compliant and "mostly" ISO
garwal> C99 compliant. However, it is not as feat
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:20:37 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
levitte> Hi again,
levitte>
levitte> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:59:41 +0200 (CEST),
Richard Levitte - VM
Hi again,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:59:41 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
levitte> This makes me wonder if time() returns local time or GMT
levitte> time.
I just verified. time() returns the number of second
Hi again,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:59:41 +0200 (CEST), Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
levitte> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:48:09 -0400, "Greaney,
Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> s
Hi Kevin,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:48:09 -0400, "Greaney, Kevin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kevin.greaney> I have been having some problems with the
kevin.greaney> startdate and dnddate in my certificates being skewed
kevin.greaney> since I upgraded from 0
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:36:42 +0200, "philippe bougeret"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
philippe.bougeret> When I compile openssl-stable, under windows, it
philippe.bougeret> doesn't find in "crypto/o_str.c"line 60.
philippe.bougeret>
philippe.bougeret> But it compile fi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:46:35 +0200 (METDST), "Roman
Pletka via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> | Your patch is flawed. At that point, there has been a test to check if
rt> | ctx->buf_len is non-zero already, and an error is generated if it is.
rt> | At the point
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:46:35 +0200 (METDST), "Roman
Pletka via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> | Your patch is flawed. At that point, there has been a test to check if
rt> | ctx->buf_len is non-zero already, and an error is generated if it is.
rt> | At the point
Ah, I figured out what happened. The following patch should help:
cvs diff: Diffing fips/dh
Index: fips/dh/fips_dh_check.c
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/fips/dh/Attic/fips_dh_check.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
diff -u -r1.1
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:45:57 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
BTrout> I get the following with 9.7.d and 9.7e snap shot for 062804
BTrout> ( I am using AIX 4.3 and gcc )
BTrout>
BTrout> installing man3/ERR_put_error.3
BTrout> ERR_add_error_data.3 => ERR_put_error.3
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:14:36 -0600, The Doctor <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
doctor> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:40:45PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
doctor> > Try the following:
doctor> >
doctor> > make clean;
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:30:44 -0700, Lev Walkin <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
vlm> Marcus Carey via RT wrote:
vlm> > Windows 2000
vlm> > MS VC++ .NET
vlm> > OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004
vlm> >
vlm> >
vlm> > FILE *fp;
vlm> > X509 *cert;
vlm> >
vlm> >
vlm> > fp = fopen(
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:30:44 -0700, Lev Walkin <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
vlm> Marcus Carey via RT wrote:
vlm> > Windows 2000
vlm> > MS VC++ .NET
vlm> > OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004
vlm> >
vlm> >
vlm> > FILE *fp;
vlm> > X509 *cert;
vlm> >
vlm> >
vlm> > fp = fopen("
Try the following:
make clean; make
Cheers,
Richard (OpenSSL doctor :-))
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:09:50 -0600, The Doctor <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
doctor> Script started on Mon Jun 28 05:57:31 2004
doctor> doctor.nl2k.ab.ca//usr/source/openssl-0.9.7-stable
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:18:37 +0400, Maxim Patlasov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
maxim> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:24:19 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
maxim>
maxim> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:34:55
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:34:55 +0400, Maxim Patlasov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
maxim> openssl-0.9.7d/crypto/des/VERSION wrote:
maxim>
maxim> >CHANGED des_ede3_cbc_encrypt() so that it too now overwrites the iv.
maxim>
maxim> What purpose of this change was? Was it t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:43:48 -0400, Kevin Stefanik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kstef> On Wednesday 16 June 2004 12:46 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
kstef> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 16 Jun 2004
kstef> > 12:30
101 - 200 of 2021 matches
Mail list logo
