Re: [openssl.org #444] Win32 crash in PEM_read_X509

2003-01-08 Thread Michael Hunley via RT
At 02:14 AM 1/9/2003 +0100, you wrote: >[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 8 22:09:03 2003]: > > > > > > >Please don't post using HTML... Sorry, I did not know that I had. Wasn't this post from the tracker on the OpenSSL site? If not, it must be some setting I have accidentally on in Eudora or

Re: [openssl.org #430] segementation fault with openssl 0.9.7

2003-01-08 Thread Patrik Karlsson via RT
Hi Steve, This line also gives me a crash, exactly as you describe it: openssl ca -infiles If I enter a passphrase for the above command or press ctrl-break to abort it crashes. Using configuration from /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf Enter pass phrase for ./demoCA/private/cakey.pem: aborted! u

RE: [openssl.org #436] openssl-0.9.7 inconsistency error

2003-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Is there something I can do, use a different file? Any help? Thanks much. Joseph A Amaturo President Amatech Solutions, Inc. AT Concepts, Inc. (P) 845-988-9876 (C) 845-590-7914 (F) 845-988-9899 www.amatechsolutions.com Microsoft Certified Partner -Original Message- From: Lutz Jaenicke

[openssl.org #444] Win32 crash in PEM_read_X509

2003-01-08 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 8 22:09:03 2003]: > > Please don't post using HTML... > Version 0.9.7 release version from Dec 31, 2002 > Compiled using MSVC6 sp6 with Masm Where is SP6 for MSVC6? I can only see SP5 on MS site... > OS: Windows XP Home > When PEM_read_X509 is called in certain

Re: [openssl.org #430] segementation fault with openssl 0.9.7

2003-01-08 Thread Kenneth R. Robinette
I just ran it on Windows XP, with OpenSSL-0.9.7 and do not get a crash. Ken > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 1 15:40:21 2003]: > > > Hi, > > > > I have trouble running the following command with openssl version 0.9.7 > > openssl ca -policy policy_anything -out newcert.pem \ > > -passin pass:

[openssl.org #430] segementation fault with openssl 0.9.7

2003-01-08 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 1 15:40:21 2003]: > Hi, > > I have trouble running the following command with openssl version 0.9.7 > openssl ca -policy policy_anything -out newcert.pem \ > -passin pass:whatever -key whatever -extensions xpserver_ext \ > -extfile xpextensions -infiles newreq.pem >

Re: crypto/perlasm/x86unix.pl

2003-01-08 Thread Tim Rice
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Andy Polyakov wrote: > > The existing rules (in HEAD) work fine for UnixWare 7.x, OpenUNIX 8.0.0, > > & SCO Open Server 5 (current shipping products) > > Great! Next and final question is why unixware-7, unixware-7-pentium, > unixware-7-pentium_pro, etc.? The point being is th

[openssl.org #438] SCEP

2003-01-08 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[levitte - Thu Jan 9 00:20:00 2003]: > You can find teh white paper here: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/sqsw/tech/scep_wp.htm Oh look, there's a draft too: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nourse-scep-06.txt -- Richard Levitte __

[openssl.org #438] SCEP

2003-01-08 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[jaenicke - Wed Jan 8 09:11:41 2003]: > I am not familiar with SCEP (yet), however would consider it a worthful > addition to the OpenSSL toolkit. You can find teh white paper here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/sqsw/tech/scep_wp.htm >From the looks of it, I get CMC vibes... We shou

Re: crypto/perlasm/x86unix.pl

2003-01-08 Thread Andy Polyakov
> > Options: > > > > 1. Move *-elf.[os] one level up, e.g.: > > > > dx86-elf.s: asm/des-586.pl ../perlasm/x86asm.pl ../perlasm/cbc.pl > > (cd asm; $(PERL) des-586.pl elf $(CFLAGS) > ../dx86-elf.s) > > This option didn't work out very well. > ... > making all in crypto/md5... > cc -

[openssl.org #444] Win32 crash in PEM_read_X509

2003-01-08 Thread Michael Hunley via RT
Version 0.9.7 release version from Dec 31, 2002 Compiled using MSVC6 sp6 with Masm OS: Windows XP Home When PEM_read_X509 is called in certain circumstances you get an unhandled exception. I thought it was universal, but I found a test case in the "how to reproduce" below that did not crash.  NO

Re: crypto/perlasm/x86unix.pl

2003-01-08 Thread Tim Rice
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Andy Polyakov wrote: > > > > > The cc on UnixWare 2.x doesn't handle -o asm/xx86-elf.o > > > > > It just creates it in the curent directory. > > > > > > ??? Does it mean that cc driver effectively ignores -o option? Or does > > > it mean that make doesn't pass -o option to cc d

[openssl.org #436] openssl-0.9.7 inconsistency error

2003-01-08 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 4 15:13:09 2003]: > Yes, sorry about that. I am running the most recent version of > Slackware Linux. I am running Apache webserver and looking to run secure > webpages from the server. I have the folder with the openssl and I can > run config fine, had to add full

pkcs#11 engine for openssl 0.9.7 & 0.9.6

2003-01-08 Thread afchine
This is a contribution for a generic pkcs#11 engine for openssl 0.9.7 and 0.9.6h. Thanks to add it to the openssl contibution page. Best regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bull TrustWay R&D trustway-pkcs11-openssl-0.9.7.patch.gz Description: Binary data trustway-pkcs11-openssl-engine-0.9.6h.patch.gz D

Re: [openssl.org #423] openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021229: lddproblems

2003-01-08 Thread Jeff A. Earickson
Hi, Here's the text I came up with: -- OpenSSL Shared Libraries have been installed in: [directory name] If this directory is not in a standard system path for dynamic/shared libraries, then you will have problems linking a

Re: [openssl.org #427] OpenSSL 0.9.7 FreeBSD/SPARC problems

2003-01-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 02:13:55PM +0100, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: > > > > > This patch appears to fix it (I stole the OpenBSD-sparc64 config > > > > target). OpenSSL builds and passes 'make test'. > > > > > > Looks not too bad. I'm a little worried with the following assumption, however. >

Re: [openssl.org #427] OpenSSL 0.9.7 FreeBSD/SPARC problems

2003-01-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 04:25:38AM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Dec 31 13:23:43 2002]: > > > This patch appears to fix it (I stole the OpenBSD-sparc64 config > > target). OpenSSL builds and passes 'make test'. > > Looks not too bad. I'm a little worried wit

Re: [openssl.org #443] gcc warning on dsl_dl.c function dl_load for OpenSSH 0.9.7 on HP- UX 11.0

2003-01-08 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:24:57PM +0100, Reiter, Robert W via RT wrote: > > > FYI ... possibly insignificant, but the following fragment from output of > running "make" shows the sole warning message that was generated during a > build/compile of OpenSSH 0.9.7 on an HP-UX 11.0 machine today, an

Re: [openssl.org #438] SCEP support

2003-01-08 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:41PM +0100, Massimiliano Pala via RT wrote: > forgive my ignorance but I am not at ease with your methods. You assigned > me this number but what about your impression about the SCEP support > integrated into OpenSSL ? The ticket number was automatically assigned by