Re: [openssl.org #438] SCEP support

2003-01-08 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:41PM +0100, Massimiliano Pala via RT wrote: forgive my ignorance but I am not at ease with your methods. You assigned me this number but what about your impression about the SCEP support integrated into OpenSSL ? The ticket number was automatically assigned by

Re: [openssl.org #443] gcc warning on dsl_dl.c function dl_load for OpenSSH 0.9.7 on HP- UX 11.0

2003-01-08 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:24:57PM +0100, Reiter, Robert W via RT wrote: FYI ... possibly insignificant, but the following fragment from output of running make shows the sole warning message that was generated during a build/compile of OpenSSH 0.9.7 on an HP-UX 11.0 machine today, and I

Re: [openssl.org #427] OpenSSL 0.9.7 FreeBSD/SPARC problems

2003-01-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 04:25:38AM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Dec 31 13:23:43 2002]: This patch appears to fix it (I stole the OpenBSD-sparc64 config target). OpenSSL builds and passes 'make test'. Looks not too bad. I'm a little worried with the

Re: [openssl.org #427] OpenSSL 0.9.7 FreeBSD/SPARC problems

2003-01-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 02:13:55PM +0100, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: This patch appears to fix it (I stole the OpenBSD-sparc64 config target). OpenSSL builds and passes 'make test'. Looks not too bad. I'm a little worried with the following assumption, however. Can you be sure

Re: [openssl.org #423] openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021229: lddproblems

2003-01-08 Thread Jeff A. Earickson
Hi, Here's the text I came up with: -- OpenSSL Shared Libraries have been installed in: [directory name] If this directory is not in a standard system path for dynamic/shared libraries, then you will have problems linking

[openssl.org #436] openssl-0.9.7 inconsistency error

2003-01-08 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 4 15:13:09 2003]: Yes, sorry about that. I am running the most recent version of Slackware Linux. I am running Apache webserver and looking to run secure webpages from the server. I have the folder with the openssl and I can run config fine, had to add full

[openssl.org #444] Win32 crash in PEM_read_X509

2003-01-08 Thread Michael Hunley via RT
html body Version 0.9.7 release version from Dec 31, 2002br Compiled using MSVC6 sp6 with Masmbr OS: Windows XP Homebrbr When PEM_read_X509 is called in certain circumstances you get an unhandled exception. I thought it was universal, but I found a test case in the quot;how to reproducequot;

Re: crypto/perlasm/x86unix.pl

2003-01-08 Thread Andy Polyakov
Options: 1. Move *-elf.[os] one level up, e.g.: dx86-elf.s: asm/des-586.pl ../perlasm/x86asm.pl ../perlasm/cbc.pl (cd asm; $(PERL) des-586.pl elf $(CFLAGS) ../dx86-elf.s) This option didn't work out very well. ... making all in crypto/md5... cc -c

[openssl.org #438] SCEP

2003-01-08 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[jaenicke - Wed Jan 8 09:11:41 2003]: I am not familiar with SCEP (yet), however would consider it a worthful addition to the OpenSSL toolkit. You can find teh white paper here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/sqsw/tech/scep_wp.htm From the looks of it, I get CMC vibes... We should

[openssl.org #438] SCEP

2003-01-08 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[levitte - Thu Jan 9 00:20:00 2003]: You can find teh white paper here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/sqsw/tech/scep_wp.htm Oh look, there's a draft too: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nourse-scep-06.txt -- Richard Levitte

Re: crypto/perlasm/x86unix.pl

2003-01-08 Thread Tim Rice
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Andy Polyakov wrote: The existing rules (in HEAD) work fine for UnixWare 7.x, OpenUNIX 8.0.0, SCO Open Server 5 (current shipping products) Great! Next and final question is why unixware-7, unixware-7-pentium, unixware-7-pentium_pro, etc.? The point being is that

[openssl.org #430] segementation fault with openssl 0.9.7

2003-01-08 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 1 15:40:21 2003]: Hi, I have trouble running the following command with openssl version 0.9.7 openssl ca -policy policy_anything -out newcert.pem \ -passin pass:whatever -key whatever -extensions xpserver_ext \ -extfile xpextensions -infiles newreq.pem It

Re: [openssl.org #430] segementation fault with openssl 0.9.7

2003-01-08 Thread Kenneth R. Robinette
I just ran it on Windows XP, with OpenSSL-0.9.7 and do not get a crash. Ken [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 1 15:40:21 2003]: Hi, I have trouble running the following command with openssl version 0.9.7 openssl ca -policy policy_anything -out newcert.pem \ -passin pass:whatever

[openssl.org #444] Win32 crash in PEM_read_X509

2003-01-08 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 8 22:09:03 2003]: html body Please don't post using HTML... Version 0.9.7 release version from Dec 31, 2002 Compiled using MSVC6 sp6 with Masm Where is SP6 for MSVC6? I can only see SP5 on MS site... OS: Windows XP Homebrbr When PEM_read_X509 is called in

RE: [openssl.org #436] openssl-0.9.7 inconsistency error

2003-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Is there something I can do, use a different file? Any help? Thanks much. Joseph A Amaturo President Amatech Solutions, Inc. AT Concepts, Inc. (P) 845-988-9876 (C) 845-590-7914 (F) 845-988-9899 www.amatechsolutions.com Microsoft Certified Partner -Original Message- From: Lutz

Re: [openssl.org #430] segementation fault with openssl 0.9.7

2003-01-08 Thread Patrik Karlsson via RT
Hi Steve, This line also gives me a crash, exactly as you describe it: openssl ca -infiles If I enter a passphrase for the above command or press ctrl-break to abort it crashes. Using configuration from /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf Enter pass phrase for ./demoCA/private/cakey.pem: aborted!

Re: [openssl.org #444] Win32 crash in PEM_read_X509

2003-01-08 Thread Michael Hunley via RT
At 02:14 AM 1/9/2003 +0100, you wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 8 22:09:03 2003]: html body Please don't post using HTML... Sorry, I did not know that I had. Wasn't this post from the tracker on the OpenSSL site? If not, it must be some setting I have accidentally on in Eudora or