Hello,
Thank you very much for 1.0.1 release.
It builds and works perfect on OpenVMS Alpha and IA64 architectures - as long I
could test it.
Unfortunately, it is still not possible to build on VAX architecture, because
the [openssl.org #2653] [BUG] OpenSSL 1.0.1 OpenVMS issues on VAX is sill
Hello,
Please find the included patch that solves [openssl.org #2670] [BUG] OpenSSL
1.0.1 beta 1 released (on VMS FAILED)
TITAN2_ZAY $ diff USRDSK:ZAY.WORK.OPENSSL-101-BETA3.CRYPTO.BIOBIO.H;1
USRDSK:ZAY.WORK.OPENSSL-101-BETA3.CRY
PTO.BIOBIO.H;4
File
From: Michael Tuexen [michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 7:49 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2730] [PATCH] solving #2670 BUG
On Feb 24, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Arpadffy Zoltan via RT wrote:
Hello,
Please find
Hello,
I have tested the OpenSSL 1.0.1 beta 1 release on OpenVMS Alpha and IA64 and
the build fails with the following error:
Compiling The mem_dbg.c File. (LIBRARY,LIB)
#include stdint.h
.^
%CC-F-NOINCLFILEF, Cannot find file stdint.h specified in #include directive.
at line number 72 in
Hello,
I have tested the OpenSSL 1.0.1 beta 1 release on OpenVMS Alpha and IA64 and
the build fails with the following error:
Compiling The mem_dbg.c File. (LIBRARY,LIB)
#include stdint.h
.^
%CC-F-NOINCLFILEF, Cannot find file stdint.h specified in #include directive.
at line number 72 in
Hello,
I have tested OPENSSL-1.0.1-STABLE-SNAP-20111209 on AXP and IA64 with 32 and 64
bist pointer size and found few OpenVMS related problems.
The following patches are needed in order to get clean compile and successful
build.
1. missing srtp.h header file
TITAN2_ZAY $ diff MAKEVMS.COM;1
Hello,
In my earlier mail I have sent a patch that is needed for OpenVMS AXP and IA64.
Here is a list of issues on OpenVMS VAX
1. %CC-E-NOLONGLONG, In this declaration, 64-bit integral types are not
supported issue
cbc128.c
typedef long long i64;
^
Hello,
I have tested both the new 1.0.0e and the recent snapshot
OPENSSL-1.0.1-STABLE-SNAP-20110907 on Alpha, IA64 platforms with both 32 and 64
bit pointer size and on a VAX.
The release builds perfect. All test pass.
The 1.0.1-stable snapshot needed those patches below to build, but after
warning(s), and
1 informational messages.
At line number 357 in DKA400:[ZOLI.OPENSSL-101-STABLE-SNAP-20110
907.CRYPTO.SRP]SRP_LIB.C;1.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Arpadffy Zoltan via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: den 9 september 2011 09:12
Cc
Hello Steven,
I'm having a good time, even if no one else cares.
I do care.
I apologize for being silent, but I have been very busy with less open source
issues.
I have tested your changes on IA64 and they work well, indeed.
It was a bit tricky with the unusual extra 64 parameter for tests
Steven,
I am sorry, I could not test your changes yet - I'll do it, hopefully, during
this week.
...but to be honest, I am more curious what is Richard's opinion about your
changes.
Regards,
Z
From: Steven M. Schweda [s...@antinode.info]
Sent: Sunday,
Hello,
I seem to have 1.0.0d builds working on VMS
Great news, I would be happy to try the build with your changes.
Could you please send some instructions where the patch can be found?
Or it would be the best to post the diffs here, making available for Richard to
merge into the code.
Thank
@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and
ACCVIO on OpenVMS
From: Arpadffy Zoltan via RT r...@openssl.org
I have tested 1.0.0d release on OpenVMS and found many warnings during th=
e build with 64bits pointer size that produced many annoying
opinion?
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info]
Sent: den 15 februari 2011 14:48
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and
ACCVIO on OpenVMS
From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad
[mailto:s...@antinode.info]
Sent: den 15 februari 2011 15:40
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and
ACCVIO on OpenVMS
From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se
Then, after all, I think, the best solution would
: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se
Why have a build option which doesn't work?
Actually, it works good enough to keep, as we can still use the following o=
ptions:
- 32 for build with /POINTER_SIZE=3D32 - that is used often together with o=
lder applications.
- for build
Hello,
I have tested 1.0.0d release on OpenVMS and found many warnings during the
build with 64bits pointer size that produced many annoying warning messages
during linking against the library - like:
Building The BNTEST Test Program.
%ILINK-W-COMPWARN, compilation warnings
module:
Hello,
I am happy to inform you that I have successfully build latest 1.0.1 STABLE
snapshot on IA64, Alpha and VAX platform both with 64 and 32 pointer size.
All tests pass well except:
signed content test streaming BER format, DSA key: OK
Fatal VMS error (status=1409588) at
Hello,
VMS build fails with
%LINK-W-NUDFSYMS, 3 undefined symbols:
%LINK-I-UDFSYM, BUF_STRDUP
%LINK-I-UDFSYM, BUF_STRLCAT
%LINK-I-UDFSYM, BUF_STRLCPY
...because buf_str is not listed among BUFFER files in .cryptoCRYPTO-LIB.COM
Please, find the patch that solves the
Hello,
I forward again a VAX related part of the mail to RT in hope that this issue
will not be forgotten.
While the VMS build on IA64 and ALPHA architecture works perfect on VAX the
APPS and ENGINES build fails (openssl-1.0.1-stable-SNAP-20101215)
A bit weird, that on VAX during APPS build
: Richard Levitte via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: den 16 december 2010 01:18
To: Arpadffy Zoltan
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: [openssl.org #2099] [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release (OpenVMS)
Is parts of this still an issue or can I simply close this ticket?
[zoltan.arpad
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: den 16 december 2010 01:12
To: Arpadffy Zoltan
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: [openssl.org #2393] [PATCH] 32/64 bit pointer_size choice in the VMS
build
I've now tested to build with the pointer size arguments
(@polarhome.com), Alpha and IA64 as well.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: den 14 december 2010 11:01
To: Arpadffy Zoltan
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: [openssl.org #2393] [PATCH] 32/64 bit pointer_size choice in the VMS
build
Hello
I'm sending again to RT - otherwise it might be forgotten.
I would appreciate any comment.
Thank you.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Arpadffy Zoltan [mailto:zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se]
Sent: den 7 december 2010 12:54
To: Richard Levitte; openssl-dev@openssl.org
Hello Richard,
I am sorry for delay, but I am quite busy nowadays.
Zoltan.Arpadffy Zoltan.Arpadffy ...I am dreaming of the possibility to choose
between the 64 and the 32 bit version build and reuse this not-used option in
MAKEVMS.COM
Zoltan.Arpadffy Zoltan.Arpadffy During the summer I have
also problems in
the multithreaded (AST) network application running under VMS 8.3, therefore it
was needed to turn off (SSL_SESS_CACHE_OFF)
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Arpadffy Zoltan [mailto:zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se]
Sent: den 1 december 2010 12:56
To: openssl-dev
Hello,
this is a very much VMS related question.
I have recently noticed that a VMS executable is sensitive to VMS upgrade if
statically linked with an OpenSSL library.
OpenSSL (0.9.8.h) is build under VMS 7.3-2 and statically linked with an
executable.
This runs perfect on a VMS 7.3-2
[mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 29 november 2010 21:59
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: buid STABLE-SNAP-20101124 on platform: VMS IA64 V8.3
In message fa849bbcfec13e42a34ae60ebc2d724720d4ad5...@sgmail1 on Thu, 25 Nov
2010 16:55:21 +0100, Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad
Hello,
I have tested the OPENSSL-1.0.1-STABLE-SNAP-20101124 on platform: VMS IA64 V8.3
Here are the results and the patches.
The build went fine except the following informational messages...
These are not VMS specific issues, but regardless good to keep in mind and fix
soon or later.
Hello,
I have checked both the 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 20100414 snapshots and it look
much-much better.
Thank you very much Richard and Steven.
I got almost clean compile in both branches
On OPENSSL-098-STABLE-SNAP-20100414 got the following informational message and
a warning.
bss_dgram.c
Hello,
I am happy that 1.0.0 is released. Thank you all for the hard work and time
spent for the community.
I was really hoping and looking for a VMS ready 1.0.0 release.
Some of us have sent many patches, suggestions - unfortunately, not all of
those changes have got through to the released
Hello,
I just simply can not believe, that in an open source project, vital, port
related changes needs to be submitted so many times... and nothing happens.
I suggest taking Steven M. Schweda into the OpenSSL project team with shared
OpenVMS responsibility (and commit rights) beside Richard
Hello,
Also if it is not too late, it would be nice to add 32 at the end of the
sharable images if the are build with 32 bits pointer size (64 is the
default).
I mean to have like this:
LIBCRYPTO32.OLB;1
LIBSSL32.OLB;1
LIBCRYPTO.OLB;1
LIBSSL.OLB;1
SSL_LIBCRYPTO_SHR32.EXE;1
Richard,
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 29 januari 2010 11:51
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta5 release v. VMS
In message 10012822544299_20205...@antinode.info on Thu, 28 Jan 2010
22:54:43 -0600 (CST), Steven
Hello,
I have tested OPENSSL-100-STABLE-SNAP-20100128 and the build went well.
But the tests still fail:
1. the rootssl issue, that worked well after changing to your patch
2. The tests fails and ends with seed related issue. Do yo8 have any
idea how to solve this? There is a .rnd file in the
. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info]
Sent: den 27 januari 2010 22:13
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta5 release v. VMS
From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se
Could you please write that DEFINE/NOLOG SSLROOT [...]
_You_'re the one with all the 00
Thank you Richard,
I'm am testing
openssl-1.0.0-stable-SNAP-20100127.tar.gz 3.8 MB 27/01/2010
06:15:00
It builds correctly.
During tests I go the following errors:
1. SSLROOT is not defined correctly
in .testtests.com sslroot definition is replaced
$ sslroot =
27 januari 2010 15:08
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta5 release v. VMS
From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se
I have been forced to do it on more old fashioned way in order to get
this work
$ ROOT =3D F$PARSE(__here,[]A.;0,,,SYNTAX_ONLY
Hello,
I have downloaded openssl-1.0.0-stable-SNAP-20100125.tar.gz and tested and it
looks much better then earlier.
Thank you.
However there are still some issues left with tests.
1. in .testtests.com sslroot definition does not work
$ sslroot =
Hello,
I have applied the following changes:
TITAN2_ZAY $ diff .cryptosymhacks.h
File USRDSK:ZAY.WORK.OPENSSL-100-BETA5.CRYPTOSYMHACKS.H;2
179 #undef ssl_parse_serverhello_renegotiate_ext
180 #define ssl_parse_serverhello_renegotiate_ext
ssl_parse_servhello_reneg_ext
181
,
than structure and good coding practice.
Thank you.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 13 november 2009 09:44
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release
In message
Hello,
Can you (and others in this thread) please submit bug fix patches to the
request tracker (r...@openssl.org) so they don't get overlooked??
Please note this is the official submit to RT (mail already submitted to the
list)
Additionally to SMS's changes (below)... here are the changes
@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release
In message 839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae5...@sgstmail.scigames.at
on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:26:57 +0100, Arpadffy Zoltan
zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se said:
Zoltan.Arpadffy Hello,
Zoltan.Arpadffy
Zoltan.Arpadffy Additionally
Hello,
I have already made the correction off all remaining issues... 32/64 bit
pointer size handling.
I still have some minor issues around tests.com... but in about an hour
I will be able to submit a patch.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte
: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 25 augusti 2009 10:09
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
In message 839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae4...@sgstmail.scigames.at
on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:36:08 +0200, Arpadffy
Hello Richard,
If those who do commit to the repository, I believe I'm the only one
dealing with the VMS parts of the kit...
I tested OPENSSL-VMS_64BIT-SNAP-20090821 as I was expecting that my
changes would be there.
I was wrong :(
I wonder, where do you apply the patches and patch
Hello,
I haven't had a VAX account for a long time... someone give me one
and I'll play...
You can create your own account at
http://www.polarhome.com/service/shell/
... and just drop me a mail informing me what is you username.
Regards,
Z
Message-
From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info]
Sent: den 15 augusti 2009 18:39
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se
This patch corrects build on OpenVMS systems.
I
Hello,
No.
OK.
...seems SMS is also against... and I am keen to bow in front of
democracy :)
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 17 augusti 2009 10:37
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL
/timeb.h
+ #endif
Should not be there - please ignore it.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 17 augusti 2009 11:10
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
In message
Hello,
I have put some effort and succeeded to build version 1.0.0 Beta 3 on
OpenVMS.
... actually the lion part of the job was already done by SMS and
properly merged up to 1.0.0 Beta - as you can read at
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/notes_0_9_8j.txt
I was forced to change few make
Hello,
It would be my pleasure to work with you.
As redesign and create the make files for the VMS build is a bigger
task,
I suggested earlier making a design together and splitting the tasks.
I am very interested in VMS build - to be independent from HP SSL
releases.
Regards,
Z
a
permanent solution in no time.
Thank you.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 29 maj 2009 21:56
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: OpenVMS build issues
I'll be honest with you; I've wanted to redo the whole build
Hello,
I have made an attempt to build 0.9.8k on OpenVMS - and this is a
disaster :(
This was the very first time that tried to build openssl on VMS from
original openssl.org release and I find out that provided VMS build
scripts are not up to date.
Some ten years ago extremely lot of
54 matches
Mail list logo
