You can instead use netaddr:
import netaddr
try:
netaddr.IPAddress(input)
except AddrFormatError:
logging.error('Nope!')
else:
doSomethingWith(input)
You could also:
if netaddr.IPAddress('10.0.0.1') in netaddr.IPNetwork('10.0.0.0/8'):
logging.error('Yup!')
Assaf Muller, Cloud
Can someone please respond to the following mail incase you are aware of any
document?
-Original Message-
From: Lalitha Maruthachalam
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:49 PM
To: Dnsbed Ops; openst...@lists.openstack.org;
openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-docs]
Hi fellow OpenStackers
I found that we could not create vms without ip address. But in the
telecom scene, the ip address usually managed by the telecom network
element themselves. So they need a vm without ip address and configurate
it through some specific method. How can we provide a kind of
On 20/01/14 17:43 +, Victor Joel Morales Ruvalcaba wrote:
I'm implementing an URL validation that checks if the external location value
provided exists and if it's reachable. To achieve that I'm using the method
urlopen of six.moves.urllib.request module which it seems similar like to the
Hello Boris,
I'll check Rally in order to see what tool is the best for my tests.
Best Regards,
Julien LELOUP
julien.lel...@3ds.com
From: Boris Pavlovic [mailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 5:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Document updated to talk about network aware scheduling (
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vadqmurlnlvZ5bv3BlUbFeXRS_wh-dsgi5plSjimWjU/edit#-
section just before the use case list).
Based on yesterday's meeting, rkukura would also like to see network-aware
scheduling to work for non-PCI cases
Hey Matt,
that's correct, we should bump paramiko version to = 1.9.0. It was
released more than year ago and so all of us use paramiko = 1.9.0
Thanks for catching this.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
jon,
please confirm a suspicion of mine.
the
Here is a change for global-requirements
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68088/
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hey Matt,
that's correct, we should bump paramiko version to = 1.9.0. It was
released more than year ago and so all of us use
So, I actually don't think the two concepts (reservations and
isolated instances) are competing ideas. Isolated instances are
actually not reserved. They are simply instances that have a
condition placed on their assignment to a particular compute node
that the node must only be
Feel free to tell me this is a bad idea and scold me for even asking, but
please help me figure out how to do it anyway. This is for a specific tenant in
a specific lab that was built specifically for that one tenant to do some
experimental work that requires VMs to route and other VMs to act
Hi Phil and Jay,
Phil, maybe you remember I discussed with you about the possibility of using
pclouds with Climate, but we finally ended up using Nova aggregates and a
dedicated filter.
That works pretty fine. We don't use instance_properties
but rather aggregate metadata but the idea
Brief update on where we stand on the gate (still not great)
- gate is currently 126 deep
- top of queue entered 51hrs ago
Bug 1270680 - v3 extensions api inherently racey wrt instances - patch
landed (seems to have helped though the exception is still showing up
quite a bit, so don't know if
Paul,
There's an extension for this that is, I think, presently only implemented
by the Nicira plugin. Look for portsecurity. Whatever they do is probably
the way you should do it too.
Cheers,
--
Ian.
On 21 January 2014 13:10, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote:
Feel free to tell me this
Hi Phil,
Le 21/01/2014 13:13, Day, Phil a écrit :
Hi Phil and Jay,
Phil, maybe you remember I discussed with you about the possibility of using
pclouds with Climate, but we finally ended up using Nova aggregates and a
dedicated filter.
That works pretty fine. We don't use instance_properties
I think there is a blueprint for that. Anyway, see idea for current releases
below:
Feel free to tell me this is a bad idea and scold me for even asking, but
please
help me figure out how to do it anyway. This is for a specific tenant in a
specific lab that was built specifically for that
Hi,
Libvert driver has the below code snippet, where it assumes that the Host
platform supports pit etc when libvirt is configured for KVM.
For PowerPC [Freescale] platform below code is causing issues.
Code snippet from driver.py:
if CONF.libvirt_type == kvm:
# TODO(berrange) One
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:19:32PM +, balaj...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi,
Libvert driver has the below code snippet, where it assumes that the Host
platform supports pit etc when libvirt is configured for KVM.
For PowerPC [Freescale] platform below code is causing issues.
Code
On 01/20/2014 09:29 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd
devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen for us
to change the defaults around file injection so that it's disabled?
It should use libguestfs for file injection
Le 21/01/2014 12:57, Day, Phil a écrit :
So, I actually don't think the two concepts (reservations and
isolated instances) are competing ideas. Isolated instances are
actually not reserved. They are simply instances that have a
condition placed on their assignment to a particular compute node
On 01/03/2014 12:46 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure
has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with
devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does
it interact with infrastructure systems
Exactly - that's why I wanted to start this debate about the way forward
for the
Pcloud Blueprint, which was heading into some kind of middle ground. As
per
my original post, and it sounds like the three of us are at least aligned
I'm
proposing to spilt this into two streams:
i) A
I think there is clear water between this and the existing aggregate based
isolation. I also think this is a different use case from reservations.
It's
*mostly* like a new scheduler hint, but because it has billing impacts I
think it
needs to be more than just that - for example the
Hi folks,
when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles,
there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to
call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently
known as Role (= Resource Category).
Definition:
Role is a
Thanks for starting this! Comments in-line:
Hi folks,
when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles,
there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to
call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently
known as Role (= Resource
On 21/01/14 14:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles,
there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to
call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently
known as Role (= Resource Category).
This
Just one comment:
The devices allocated for an instance are immediately known after
the domain is created. Therefore it's possible to do a port update and
have the device configured while the instance is booting.
--Robert
On 1/19/14 2:15 AM, Irena Berezovsky ire...@mellanox.com wrote:
Hi
I want to explore the linkage between the proposed exclusive use filter
and scheduling a little more. At the Icehouse summit I heard the concern
that without advance preparation, there may well be zero hosts that are
acceptable. Why is that not a concern now?
What does the Nova scheduler do
Yunhong,
Just try to understand your use case:
-- a VM can only work with cards from vendor V1
-- a VM can work with cards from both vendor V1 and V2
So stats in the two flavors will overlap in the PCI flavor solution.
I'm just trying to say that this is something that needs to be
six 1.5.2 has been released on 2014-01-06, it provides urllib/urlparse
compatibility. Is there any plan to upgrade six to 1.5.2? (since it is
fresh new, may need some time to test)
six 1.4.1 is lack of urllib/urlparse support, so oslo-incubator/py3kcompat
is needed, and it is used in some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2014 07:14 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Brief update on where we stand on the gate (still not great) - gate
is currently 126 deep - top of queue entered 51hrs ago
Bug 1270680 - v3 extensions api inherently racey wrt instances -
patch landed
I don't see a second new attribute being proposed - I only see one new
one and the existing enable_dhcp attribute. Can we get a writeup of what
is being proposed?
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi Adrian, Jay and Raj
Thanks for your responses on relationship between Solum and Diesel. It does
sound like they are in the same domain. My feeling was that it was a very
different approach where Solum was aimed at developer, Diesel was aimed at
the cloud provider. In some companies these roles
-Original Message-
From: Khanh-Toan Tran [mailto:khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com]
Sent: 21 January 2014 14:21
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds
Exactly - that's why I wanted
On 01/21/2014 11:31 AM, Raymond, Rob wrote:
Hi Adrian, Jay and Raj
Thanks for your responses on relationship between Solum and Diesel. It does
sound like they are in the same domain. My feeling was that it was a very
different approach where Solum was aimed at developer, Diesel was aimed at
On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com wrote:
(I don't buy the problem with large amounts of dependencies, if you have a
meta-package you just have one line in requirements and pip will figure the
rest out.)
+1
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:06, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 17 January 2014 09:22, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote:
Since it’s pretty easy to get lost among all the opinions I’d like to
clarify/ask a couple of things:
Keeping all the clients physically
On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Renat Akhmerov
rakhme...@mirantis.commailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox
jamielen...@redhat.commailto:jamielen...@redhat.com wrote:
(I don't buy the problem with large amounts of dependencies, if you have a
meta-package
On 18 Jan 2014, at 07:48, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I also think auto generated clients have a lot of challenges in the same
way that full javascript pages in browsers have. If you screw up in a
subtle way you can just completely disable your clients from connecting
to your server
Hello folks,
At the end of the previous discussion on the topic [1] I've decided to make
a PoC based on oslo.messaging. Clint suggested and I agreed to make it for
os-collect-config. Actually I've made a PoC for Savanna first :-) but
anyway here is the one for os-collect-config [2].
I've made a
python-savannaclient 0.4.1 will be available in savanna repos after
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66723/ will be merged.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
0.4.1 python-savannaclient released.
pypi:
FWIW +1
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 01/03/2014 12:46 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure
has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with
devstack-gate, which is the
James, do you have any thoughts on it?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi folks,
I think that we can enable hacking checks for python infra projects to
help themselves write better code. Probably we should enable only specific
subset of
On 01/21/2014 11:54 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com
mailto:jamielen...@redhat.com wrote:
(I don't buy the problem with large amounts of dependencies, if you
have a meta-package you just have one line in requirements and pip
will
Hi,
For step 3/5, is the right procedure. Or is there a way to use a cmd to
run all the tests and use a different mechanism to specify a filter for the
tests to be run.
I don't know if Tempest allows you to filter for the tests to be run.
I'm following these steps to configure Jenkins but I
On 01/03/2014 09:46 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure
has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with
devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does
it interact with infrastructure systems
On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
wrote:
On 2014-01-16 13:48, John Griffith wrote:
Hey Everyone,
A review came up today that
Hello,
I would like to end this requirements talk cause it doesn't make any sense
in term of python clients.
Initially the discussion was about many clients projects with separate
requirements VS single client project with single requirements list.
At that moment we should have stop and actually
On Jan 18, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Wangshen (Peter) pete...@huawei.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:01 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Jinbo (Justin)
Subject:
On 01/21/2014 01:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
mailto:openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On
I would like to propose to use this thread to gather and discuss software
requirements that our clients should meet.
Later we'll summarize all the requirements and use them during our work of
improving the clients.
By reaching listed requirements we'll be able to evaluate the success of
our
On Jan 21, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.commailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to end this requirements talk cause it doesn't make any sense in
term of python clients.
Initially the discussion was about many clients projects with separate
For vmware minesweeper ,we filter tests following way:
1. testr list-tests alltests
2. exclude-tests (file with test names we want to filter)
3. alltests - excludetests = tests_to_be_run
4. testr run —load-list=tests_to_be_run
hope that helps
On Jan 21, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Lucas Eznarriaga
don't do this here - the thread is way too deep already.
If we get into discussing individual points let's do one question per thread
and prefix the emails with [client] or something to tie it all together
- Original Message -
From: Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.com
To:
It is when most openstack clouds don’t just run keystone. Or nova, or
swift. Or when each client acts, smells and behaves differently. It matters
a LOT when you’re trying to write applications on top of a mature openstack
deployment.
I still don't understand the problem here. Installed packages
Darragh O'Reilly wrote:
Neutron does not know about flavors or images. But it has ports which have a
name attribute that can be set to an arbitrary string, e.g. 'anti_spoof_off'.
The
name does not need to be unique within the tenant. Then your overridden
methods
could check for that string.
On Jan 21, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.commailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote:
It is when most openstack clouds don’t just run keystone. Or nova, or swift.
Or when each client acts, smells and behaves differently. It matters a LOT
when you’re trying to write
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
wrote:
On 2014-01-16 13:48, John
On 2014-01-21 12:28, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/21/2014 01:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:07, Jesse Noller jesse.nol...@rackspace.com wrote:
Do you use any other platform than Linux? Even donald - one of the python
packaging leads and PyPI leads said this is a bad end-user experience for
consumers of openstack clouds.
That fact that someone (even very
On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:40, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/21/2014 11:54 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com
mailto:jamielen...@redhat.com wrote:
(I don't buy the problem with large amounts of dependencies, if you
have a
Hi folks,
As we are moving towards incubation application, I took a closer look at
what is going on with our repositories.
An here is what I found. We currently have 11 repositories at stackforge:
- murano-api
- murano-conductor
- murano-repository
- murano-dashboard
-
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday January 21st, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting minutes and log:
Minutes:
+1 for opening new threads regarding specific questions.
On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:54, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:40, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/21/2014 11:54 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox
On Jan 19, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-01-19 01:52:56 -0800:
Hi,
I haven’t read through those (need to go spend time with family so replying
quickly) but given the dates the planning phases for Quantum/Neutron LBaaS
Hi,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1270646 - we've triaged
this as critical in TripleO, because by default GRE overlay networks
will cause huge fragmentation in the datacentre LAN.
We're looking for someone to 'own' this bug (in tripleo) and drive
getting a real, permanent fix /
Currently, NeutronDbPluginV2._validate_allocation_pools() does some very
basic checking to be sure the specified subnet is valid. One thing that's
missing is checking for a CIDR of /32. A subnet with one IP address in it
is unusable as the sole IP address will be allocated to the gateway, and
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Genin, Daniel I.
daniel.ge...@jhuapl.eduwrote:
Hello Nova core team,
I have three small patches implementing ephemeral storage encryption for
LVM backed instances.
Wouldn't be easier just to check if:
cidr is 32?
I believe it is a good idea to not allow /32 network but this is just my
opinion
Edgar
From: Paul Ward wpw...@us.ibm.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:35 PM
To: OpenStack List
/30 is the minimum allowable mask, not /31.
On 21 January 2014 22:04, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Wouldn't be easier just to check if:
cidr is 32?
I believe it is a good idea to not allow /32 network but this is just my
opinion
Edgar
From: Paul Ward wpw...@us.ibm.com
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Koderer, Marc m.kode...@telekom.de wrote:
Hi all,
first part of the negative test framework is ready for review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64733/
Please have a look.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
1. each driver must adhere to the existing driver interfaces.
2. each driver must have comprehensive unit test coverage and
Using a /32 has use cases. When trying to build a L3 only routed network
/32 routes are required. While it can be inconvenient for the more
generic L2 network use case, I wouldn't remove it since there are other
use cases where it is useful.
-Carl
On 01/21/2014 12:35 PM, Paul Ward wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com
wrote:
OK, it looks like the concensus is that we don't try and keep the gantt
tree in sync with nova instead we:
1) Get the current gantt tree to pass unit tests
2) Get gantt to pass integration tests (e.g. get
[CC'ed libguestfs author, Rich Jones]
Heya,
On 01/21/2014 07:59 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd
devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen for us
to change the defaults around file injection so that it's
On 22 January 2014 10:50, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com wrote:
[CC'ed libguestfs author, Rich Jones]
Heya,
On 01/21/2014 07:59 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd
devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen
Hi Folks,
As the debate about PCI flavor versus host aggregate goes on, I'd like to move
forward with the SRIOV side of things in the same time. I know that tomorrow's
IRC will be focusing on the BP review, and it may well continue into Thursday.
Therefore, let's start discussing SRIOV side of
On 22 January 2014 03:03, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/20/2014 09:29 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd
devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen for us
to change the defaults around file injection
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been thinking about how we should treat third-party drivers in
Ironic for a while, and had several discussions at the
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:57:29AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
I'm a bit surprised that file injection is on by default. I thought
it was disabled by default upstream. (Just checked and it is enabled
as you say.) So yes, file injection should be off by default, but
read below.
There's
I have some hints which the people looking at neutron failures might find
useful.
# 1 - in [1] a weird thing happens with DHCP. A DHCPDISCOVER with for
fa:16:3e:cc:d9:c7
is pretty much simultaneously received by two dnsmasq instances, which are
listening on ports belonging to two distinct
I almost have the unit tests for gantt working except for one problem - is
there a way to have the test infrastructure allow the gantt tree to import
objects from the nova tree.
The problem is that we want to break out just the scheduler code into the gantt
tree without duplicating all of
On 22 January 2014 10:01, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
On 21 January 2014 21:23, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
In OpenStack we've got documentation[1] that advises setting a low MTU
for tenants to workaround this issue (but the issue itself is
unsolved) - this is
On Jan 21, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Dougal Matthews dou...@redhat.com wrote:
On 21/01/14 14:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles,
there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to
call for action and think a bit about
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 08:29 +0530, iKhan wrote:
I am worried which one is better in terms of performance? iniparse or
ConfigParser?
I am aware iniparse will do a better job of maintaining INI file's
structure, but I am more interested in performance.
The parsing of INI files is the last
Hi Don,
Look at how Climate is doing this [1]. The idea is to pull the master
tarball as an eggfile. That works fine, the only issues we have is when we
register opts to CONF where we could get DuplicateOpt if we try to register
opt with same name when importing.
-Sylvain
[1] :
I think there may be some confusion between the two concepts: subnet
and allocation pool. You are right that an ipv4 subnet smaller than
/30 is not useable on a network.
However, this method is checking the validity of an allocation pool.
These pools should not include room for a gateway nor
Hi, Anthony:
I think we are saying the same thing. Yes, there must be two parameters, and
they are independent. What I mean of simplifying referred to the CLI. If user
provides RA mode, then the 2nd parameter will have default value if user
doesn't specify it. However, user can also indicate
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2014-01-21 09:30:17 -0800:
Hello folks,
At the end of the previous discussion on the topic [1] I've decided to make
a PoC based on oslo.messaging. Clint suggested and I agreed to make it for
os-collect-config. Actually I've made a PoC for
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Tom Leaman t...@tomleaman.co.uk wrote:
I'm looking at a possible bug here but I just want to confirm
that I'm not missing something obvious.
I'm currently working with Devstack on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Once Devstack is up and running, I'm creating a file
On Jan 21, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Dougal Matthews dou...@redhat.com wrote:
On 21/01/14 14:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles,
there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to
call for action and think a bit
On 22 January 2014 11:57, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote:
I almost have the unit tests for gantt working except for one problem – is
there a way to have the test infrastructure allow the gantt tree to import
objects from the nova tree.
The problem is that we want to break
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 08:29 +0530, iKhan wrote:
I am worried which one is better in terms of performance? iniparse or
ConfigParser?
I am aware iniparse will do a better job of maintaining INI file's
structure, but I am more
Well, the first goal is to get the scheduler code into a separate tree, even
though that code is still utilizing common code from nova. Right now just
about every scheduler file includes some nova modules. Ultimately yes, we want
to remove the depency on nova but that is a future effort and
Sylvain-
Tnx, that worked great.
(Now if I can just find a way to get the affinity tests working, all the other
tests pass. I only have 17 tests failing out of 254.)
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
From: Sylvain Bauza
Hi,
for whoever may be interested for the version 3.2.1 of Fuel we documented a
process to extend the set-up of fuel and related puppet scripts to deploy
nagios services
and use nagios to monitor “openstack” infrastructure status. We are working out
also and iso (but will include also other
Possibly, though I don't see code that checks the actual CIDR length. It
seems to check CIDR correctness via IP correctness. ie, things like the
ending IP not being smaller than the starting IP, etc.
One change to my original message on what the fix is, we'd have to compare
subnet_first_ip and
You beat me to it. :) I just responded about not checking the allocation
pool start and end but rather, checking subnet_first_ip and subnet_last_ip,
which is set as follows:
subnet = netaddr.IPNetwork(subnet_cidr)
subnet_first_ip = netaddr.IPAddress(subnet.first + 1)
Hi Vinod,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Vinod Kumar Boppanna
vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
My name is Vinod Kumar Boppanna and I was testing the quota part in the
OpenStack Havana Release. I had installed the Havana Release in a single
VM through RDO process. During testing,
Hi folks,
Does anyone have an idea why the run_tests.sh script fails when I run it with
a run_tests.sh -v in Ubuntu.
I have provided the output of the run_tests.sh -V.
It tries to install python-mimeparse and then it raises an exception. See the
exception below:
Console log:
Requirement
I created a new PDF file to show two parameters (i.e. not referring
“enable_dhcp”). Here is the link. I also updated BP too.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rq8xmbruqthef38/IPv6%20Two%20Modes%20v2.0.pdf
Shixiong
On Jan 21, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com
wrote:
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
