[openstack-dev] [tempest][radosgw][devstack-ceph-plugin] tempest failure with radosgw as swift endpoint

Hi stackers, Facing some issue running tempest with ceph radosgw as the swift endpoint. I enabled radosgw as part of a test-only patch which configures it as the swift endpoint, the CI fails since tempest's verify-tempest-config fails Console logs are at [1], tempest logs @ [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][radosgw][devstack-ceph-plugin] tempest failure with radosgw as swift endpoint

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Deepak Shetty <dpkshe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi stackers, >Facing some issue running tempest with ceph radosgw as the swift > endpoint. > >I enabled radosgw as part of a test-only patch which configures it as > the >swift e

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mitaka Design Summit Recap

Thanks Sean for the nice recap, helps folks who couldn't attend the summit. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Cinder Mitaka Design Summit Summary > > Will the Real Block Storage Service Please Stand Up >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:32 PM, John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Deepak Shetty <dpkshe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:19 PM, John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 4:32 PM, John Spray wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ben Swartzlander > wrote: > > On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:

[openstack-dev] [nova] [FFE] Feature Freeze Exception Request for 'Volume Snapshot Improvements'

Hello Nova cores, I would like to request feature freeze exception for the volume snapshot improvements blueprint [1] This bp was proposed in Juno, but could not be implemented then, hence was pushed to Liberty, and the patches [2] for the same have been on review for the last 2+ months

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

Thanks Mike for the heads up I fixed it for GlusterFS CI [1] Post the fix, glusterfs CI jobs are running fine [2] See Jul 10, 10:43 AM onwards thanx, deepak [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200399/2 [2]: https://jenkins07.openstack.org/job/check-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs-nv/ On Fri, Jul

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 12:24 Jun 26, Matt Riedemann wrote: snip So the question is, is everyone OK with this and ready to make that change? Thanks for all your work on this Matt. +100, awesome debug, followup and fixing work by Matt I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

Oh, just to be clear, I don't mean to discard what you fixed My intention was to discuss what would be a better way to fix this in future thru a feature/blueprint, given there is a consensus thanx, deepak On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 7/2/2015 4:12 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com mailto:thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 12:24 Jun 26, Matt Riedemann wrote: snip So

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.org wrote: On 06/03/2015 12:43 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Valeriy Ponomaryov vponomar...@mirantis.com wrote: Deepak, transfer-* is not suitable in this particular case. Usage of share

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.org wrote: On 06/18/2015 07:08 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.org wrote: On 06/03/2015 12:43 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:42 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: I was able to narrow down to the scenario where it fails only when i do: ./run_tests.sh -N cinder.tests.unit.test_remotefs cinder.tests.unit.test_volume.VolumeTestCase and fails with: {0

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

on this, can you let me know pls ? ALternatively I am fine if you want to collaborate on my patch and add snapshot_admin_metadata object support too ? Let me know pls thanx, deepak On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Thang, Thanks! Its still not clear to me why

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

, deepak On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Thang, Since you are working on Snapshot Objects, any idea on why the testcase when run all by itself, works, but when run as part of the overall suite, fails ? This seems to be related to the Snapshot

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

Hi Thang, Since you are working on Snapshot Objects, any idea on why the testcase when run all by itself, works, but when run as part of the overall suite, fails ? This seems to be related to the Snapshot Objects, hence Ccing you. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 May 2015 at 13:03, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Isn't this similar to what cinder transfer-* cmds are for ? Ability to transfer cinder volume across

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

Hi All, I am hitting a strange issue when running Cinder unit tests against my patch @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172808/5 I have spent 1 day and haven't been successfull at figuring how/why my patch is causing it! All tests failing are part of VolumeTestCase suite and from the error

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 May 2015 at 13:03, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Isn't this similar to what cinder transfer-* cmds are for ? Ability to transfer cinder volume across tenants So Manila should be implementing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

Isn't this similar to what cinder transfer-* cmds are for ? Ability to transfer cinder volume across tenants So Manila should be implementing the transfer-* cmds, after which admin/user can create a clone then initiate a transfer to a diff tenant ? On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Valeriy

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Does Nova has a command line to restart an instance?

nova start existing instance name or uuid On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Lily.Sing lily.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, I setup an OpenStack multinode environment without Horizon installed. After host rebooting, the instances are in 'shutoff' status. I hope to re-use these instances,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][libvirt] Understand why we lookup libvirt domains by instance name

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Mathieu Gagné mga...@iweb.com wrote: On 2015-05-21 4:18 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: I guess it's for the reason I mentioned above: To not break all OpenStack installations on Earth running with default config values. So that's not breaking

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Do we have weekly meeting today ?

Given folks are at the summit, is this mtg happening today ? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [Nova] gate-nova-python27 failure

Hi All, I am seeing the below failure for one of my patch (which i believe is not related to the changes i did in my patch) - Correct me if i am wrong :) 2015-05-04 07:22:06.116 http://logs.openstack.org/05/168805/8/check/gate-nova-python27/584359c/console.html#_2015-05-04_07_22_06_116 | {3}

Re: [openstack-dev] [SOLVED] [Nova] gate-nova-python27 failure

https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1451389 and the associated bugfix @ https://review.openstack.org/179746 should solve this. thanks garyk! thanx, deepak On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am seeing the below failure for one of my patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] plugin: Giving ability for plugin repo to override tempest tests

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andrey M. Pavlov andrey...@yandex.ru wrote: And another solution - make tempest job as non-voting for your project(glusterfs) like we did it for ec2-api. Andrey. We already do that for glusterfs its voting, but changes to tempest regex doesn't go thru the

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] plugin: Giving ability for plugin repo to override tempest tests

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 04/15/2015 01:51 AM, Andrey M. Pavlov wrote: Hi, We have similar situation with our stackforge/ec2-api project. Patches in openstack repos can break our plugin. But I don't see any possibility until our project not in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Query on adding new table to cinder DB

Thanks eOne! :) On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny e...@e0ne.info wrote: Hi Deepak, Your steps look good for e except #3.1 - add unit-tests for new migrations Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stackers

[openstack-dev] [devstack] plugin: Giving ability for plugin repo to override tempest tests

Hi Stackers, devstack-plugin doesn't have ability to override tempest settings. Currently it only provides a way to override localrc settings, but over time we have seen that many CI jobs fail due to many different issues (lack of support, new tempest test enabled recently which fails for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] plugin: Giving ability for plugin repo to override tempest tests

Forgot to mention the patch links.. see below On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stackers, devstack-plugin doesn't have ability to override tempest settings. Currently it only provides a way to override localrc settings, but over time we have

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Query on adding new table to cinder DB

Hi Stackers, As part of my WIP work for implementing https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/volume-snapshot-improvements I am required to add a new table to cinder (snapshot_admin_metadata) and I was looking for some inputs on whats are the steps to add a new table to existing DB From

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Regarding deleting snapshot when instance is OFF

Hi, Cinder w/ GlusterFS backend is hitting the below error as part of test_volume_boot_pattern tempest testcase (at the end of testcase when it deletes the snap) /usr/local/ lib/python2.7/dist-packages/libvirt.py, line 792, in blockRebase 2015-04-08 07:22:44.376 32701 TRACE

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Tempest] Regarding deleting snapshot when instance is OFF

+ [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 12:01 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Questions: 1) Is this a valid scenario being tested ? Some say yes, I am not sure, since the test makes

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] swift memory usage in centos7 devstack jobs

this. Cool, and its not related to glusterfs IMHO. Since it was happening even w/o glusterfs (with just the tempest all tests running with defaults) thanx, deepak On 04/01/2015 07:58 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: 1) So why did this happen on rax VM only, the same (Centos job)on hpcloud didn't seem

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] swift memory usage in centos7 devstack jobs

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/27/2015 08:47 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: But how come that same recent pyOpenSSL doesn't consume more memory on Ubuntu? Just to loop back on the final status of this ... pyOpenSSL 0.14 does seem to use about an order

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/25/2015 09:26 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/25/2015 09:26 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Had a question here, why is this source in the end ? More often than

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/24/2015 03:17 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: For eg: Look at [1] [1] https://github.com/stackforge/devstack-plugin-glusterfs/blob/master

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/24/2015 03:17 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: For eg: Look at [1] [1] https://github.com/stackforge/devstack-plugin-glusterfs/blob/master/devstack/settings I would like ability to change these while I use

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: adding Mellanox CI to Wiki

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Lenny Verkhovsky len...@mellanox.com wrote: Hi All, Please add Mellanox Cinder CI to this page https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status Lenny, You should be able to edit and add this yourself, once you login with your ID on that page

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: I wasn't clear, let me try again: CINDER_ENABLED_BACKENDS=; set the value to the separator character semi-colon. That evaluates to not-empty for the shell :- but has no entries so is still effectively null for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, hit send before i could complete back to square one (unless we modify lib/cinder to *not* use default for CINDER_ENABLED_BACKENDS

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/25/2015 03:16 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Ian Wienand iwien

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/25/2015 03:16 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/25/2015 03:16 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/25/2015 03:16 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Ian Wienand iwien

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote: On 03/23/2015 01:50 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 12:59 Mon 23 Mar , Stefano Maffulli wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Updating 'scheduled_at' field of nova instances in the database.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Deepthi Dharwar deep...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 03/23/2015 09:00 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18:28AM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: All the VM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Updating 'scheduled_at' field of nova instances in the database.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Deepthi Dharwar deep...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 03/23/2015 09:00 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18:28AM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: All the VM information is stored in the instances table. This includes all the time related field

[openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

Hi all, I was wondering if there was a neat way to override the settings file present in the devstack plugin stackforge project. For eg: stackforge/devstack-plugin-glusterfs I plan to use `enable_plugin glusterfs repo` in my local to setup GlusterFS backend for openstack But I am forced to

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/23/2015 09:20 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if there was a neat way to override the settings file present in the devstack plugin stackforge project. For eg: stackforge/devstack-plugin

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cinder-GlusterFS CI update

Hi All, Quick update. We added GlusterFS CI job (gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs) to *check pipeline (non-voting)* after the patch @ [1] was merged. Its been running successfully ( so far so good ) on Cinder patches, few examples are in [2] I also updated the 3rd party CI status page

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

]: https://review.openstack.org/160664 [2]: https://jenkins07.openstack.org/job/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs/ [3]: https://jenkins02.openstack.org/job/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs/ thanx, deepak On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Luis Pabon lpa...@redhat.com wrote: What is the status on virtfs? I am not sure if it is being maintained. Does anyone know? The last i knew its not maintained. Also for what its worth, p9 won't work for windows guest (unless there is a p9 driver for windows

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de wrote: Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty: [...] For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS via p9 and NFS would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Need +A (workflow +1) for https://review.openstack.org/156940

: On 03/03/2015 02:17 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi all, Can someone give +A to https://review.openstack.org/156940 - we have the rest. Need to get this merged for glusterfs CI to pass the snapshot_when_volume_in_use testcases. thanx, deepak

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][glusterfs] Online Snapshot fails with GlusterFS

Duncan, Attila, Thanks for your response. We found a issue when using os_priviledge_user_name which is when we sent this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156940/ Post that we used admin user, its password and admin tenant in cinder.conf to make it work But we thought that using admin

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-25 17:02:34 +0530 (+0530), Deepak Shetty wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][glusterfs] Online Snapshot fails with GlusterFS

Thanks Bharat for starting this thread I would like to invite suggestions/opinions from tempest folks on whats the right way to get this to work ? 1) Use priviledge user in cinder.conf --or -- 2) Modify tempest volume snapshot_in_use testcase to bump the user to admin, run the test, revert

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-25 01:02:07 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote: [...] After running 971 test cases VM inaccessible for 569 ticks [...] Glad you're able to reproduce it. For the record that is running their 8GB performance

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-25 17:02:34 +0530 (+0530), Deepak Shetty wrote: [...] Run 2) We removed glusterfs backend, so Cinder was configured with the default storage backend i.e. LVM. We re-created the OOM here too So

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-25 01:02:07 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote: [...] After running 971 test cases VM inaccessible for 569 ticks [...] Glad you're able to reproduce it. For the record that is running their 8GB performance

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

FWIW, we tried to run our job in a rax provider VM (provided by ianw from his personal account) and we ran the tempest tests twice, but the OOM did not re-create. Of the 2 runs, one of the run used the same PYTHONHASHSEED as we had in one of the failed runs, still no oom. Jeremy graciously agreed

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Feb 21, 2015 12:20 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-20 16:29:31 +0100 (+0100), Deepak Shetty wrote: Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for OOM. At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java processes have the most RAM hence OOM selects mysqld

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Feb 21, 2015 12:26 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jeremy, Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for OOM. At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java processes have the most

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

, deepak On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-19 17:03:49 +0100 (+0100), Deepak Shetty wrote: [...] For some reason we are seeing the centos7 glusterfs CI job getting aborted/ killed either by Java exception or the build getting aborted due

[openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

Hi clarkb, fungi, As discussed in http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2015-02-19.log ( 2015-02-19T14:51:46 onwards), I am starting this thread to track the abrupt job failures seen on cinder-glusterfs CI job in the recent past. A small summary of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila]Question about gateway-mediated-with-ganesha

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Li, Chen chen...@intel.com wrote: Hi list, I’m trying to understand how manila use NFS-Ganesha, and hope to figure out what I need to do to use it if all patches been merged (only one patch is under reviewing, right ?). I have read:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila]Question about gateway-mediated-with-ganesha

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Li, Chen chen...@intel.com wrote: Hi Deepak, Ø When you say VM, its confusing, whether you are referring to service VM or Ø tenant VM. Since you are also saying share-server, I presume you mean Ø service VM! Ø IIUC each share-server VM (also

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila]Question about gateway-mediated-with-ganesha

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Li, Chen chen...@intel.com wrote: Yes, I’m asking about plans for gateway-mediated-with-ganesha. I want to know what would you do to achieve “*And later the Ganesha core would be extended to use the infrastructure used by generic driver to provide network

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack-gate] How to pass through devstack config

Putting the right tag in the subject to see if somone can help answer the below thanx, deepak On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Bharat Kumar bharat.kobag...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I have seen Sean Dague's patch [1], if I understood correctly, by this patch we can reduce the number of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

Just so that people following this thread know about the final decision, Per https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Deadlines the deadline for CI is extended to Mar. 3, 2015 for all volume drivers. snip Deadlines All volume drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

Yuck ! its Mar. 19, 2015 (bad copy paste before) On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Just so that people following this thread know about the final decision, Per https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Deadlines the deadline

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Devstack plugins and gate testing

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, With [1] merged, we now have people working on creating external plugins for devstack. The devstack plugin concept seems logical and useful to me. GlusterFS Cinder CI is probably the first one implementing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Driver modes, share-servers, and clustered backends

Some of my comments inline prefixed with deepakcs On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Li, Chen chen...@intel.com wrote: Thanks for the explanations! Really helpful. My questions are added in line. Thanks. -chen -Original Message- From: Ben Swartzlander

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy

Raildo, Thanks for putting the blog, i really liked it as it helps to understand how hmt works. I am interested to know more about how hmt can be exploited for other OpenStack projects... Esp cinder, manila On Dec 23, 2014 5:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Raildo,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][infra] Ceph CI status update

://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status (one of column is status column) How are the 2 different ? Do we need to update both ? thanx, deepak On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 12/12/2014 03:28 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: On Thu, Dec 11

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][infra] Ceph CI status update

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 12/11/2014 09:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote: Heya, quick Ceph CI status update. Once the test_volume_boot_pattern was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing. I have submitted a patch to nova for

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Need reviews for Deploy GlusterFS server patch

Just correcting the tag and subject line in $subject, so that it gets the attention of the right group of folks (from devstack). thanx, deepak On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Bharat Kumar bharat.kobag...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, Regarding the patch Deploy GlusterFS Server (

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org But isn't *-specs comes very early

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

/ In conclusion I can say that it is question more to the organization of creation such docs than possibility to create it in general. Regards, Valeriy Ponomaryov On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi stackers, I was having this thought which i

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

27, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

Hi stackers, I was having this thought which i believe applies to all projects of openstack (Hence All in the subject tag) My proposal is to have examples or usecase folder in each project which has info on how to use the feature/enhancement (which was submitted as part of a gerrit patch) In

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 09/22/2014 01:29 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Thats incorrect, as i said in my original mail.. I am usign devstack+manila and it wasn't very clear to me that mysql-devel needs to be installed and it didn't get

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

in the prerequisites on a webpage somewhere .. :) I might even try and update/add that myself as it caught me out a few times too.. Alex On 20 Sep 2014 12:44, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote: On 09/20/2014 09:34 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: thanks , that worked. Any idea why it doesn't install

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

Even better, whenever ./run_tests fail... maybe put a msg stating the following C libs needs to be installed, have the user check the same..something like that would help too. On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Thats incorrect, as i said in my original

[openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

I keep hitting this issue in my F20 based devstack env ... ./run_tests.sh -V . gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

mysql-devel sudo pip install MySQL-python On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: I keep hitting this issue in my F20 based devstack env ... ./run_tests.sh -V . gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Debug data for the NFS v4 hang issue

Per yesterday's IRC meeting, I have updated the debug data I had collected in the github issue @ https://github.com/csabahenk/cirros/issues/9 It has data for both : 32bit nfs client accessing 64bit cirros nfs server 64bit nfs client accessing 64bit cirros nfs server thanx, deepak

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Request to review cert-based-access-type blueprint

Hi List, I just proposed a new bp @ https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/cert-based-access-type Looking for your feedback/comments. thanx, deepak ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Query on docstrings and method names

Hi All, With respect to the comment made by xian-yang @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102496/1/manila/share/drivers/glusterfs.py for _update_share_status and the docstring that the method has, which is Retrieve status info from share volume group. I have few questions based on the

[openstack-dev] [devstack][Manila][docs] Setting up Devstack with Manila on Fedora 20

Hi List, I have created a new wikipage with the goal to document the steps needed to setup DevStack with Manila on F20. Added some troubleshooting tips based on my experience. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/docs/Setting_up_DevStack_with_Manila_on_Fedora_20 Pls have a look and provide

Re: [Openstack] Tenant List

I think --tenant is not a supported option for nova I don't see it under nova -h What i see is this... --os-tenant-name auth-tenant-name So maybe --tenant is just being ignored and hence the cmd reduces to `nova list` hence it shows only admin instance as u r logged in as admin On Fri, Jun 13,

Re: [Openstack] Tenant List

Sorry! My bad.. i was wrong :) nova help list does show the option Maybe you can raise a bug in LP if its not working. My 2 cents On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Georgios, Why do you think its present ? Can you justify your claim pls

Re: [Openstack] Tenant List

:16, Deepak Shetty wrote: I think --tenant is not a supported option for nova I don't see it under nova -h What i see is this... --os-tenant-name auth-tenant-name So maybe --tenant is just being ignored and hence the cmd reduces to `nova list` hence it shows only admin instance as u r logged

[openstack-dev] [Manila] GenericDriver cinder volume error during manila create

I am trying devstack on F20 setup with Manila sources. When i am trying to do *manila create --name cinder_vol_share_using_nfs2 --share-network-id 36ec5a17-cef6-44a8-a518-457a6f36faa0 NFS 2 * I see the below error in c-vol due to which even tho' my service VM is started, manila create errors out

[Openstack] [Manila] GenericDriver cinder volume error during manila create

(Sending to users list, as realised this may not be a -dev list related) --- I am trying devstack on F20 setup with Manila sources. When i am trying to do *manila create --name

Re: [Openstack] [Neutron]Installing openstack on a machine with single interface

Ageeleshwar, This was a good article for neutron beginners like me, thanks Looking fwd to more articles on neutron, its internals, and how to use them w/ some good explanations of the networking concepts For eg: In the above article, it would have been even better, if concepts like bridge, veth,

  1   2   >