Hi Melanie,
We recommend using novncproxy_base_url with vncserver_proxyclient_address set
to the dom0's management IP address.
We don't currently use nova-console, so deprecation would be the best approach.
Thanks,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: melanie witt [mailto:melwi...@gmail.com]
Hi Melanie,
We recommend using novncproxy_base_url with vncserver_proxyclient_address set
to the dom0's management IP address.
We don't currently use nova-console, so deprecation would be the best approach.
Thanks,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: melanie witt [mailto:melwi...@gmail.com]
> Yeah, the nova.CONF cpu_allocation_ratio is being overridden to 0.0:
The default there is 0.0[1] - and the passing tempest-full from Zuul on
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/590041/ has the same line when reading the
config[2]:
We'll have a dig to see if we can figure out why it's not
We're not running with [1], however that did also fail the CI in the same way -
see [2] for the full logs.
The first failing appeared to be around Aug 27 08:32:14:
Aug 27 08:32:14.502788 dsvm-devstack-citrix-lon-nodepool-1379254
devstack@placement-api.service[13219]: DEBUG
Hi Matt,
My understanding is that this is being used by Rackspace.
AFAIK the change isn't upstream because there was no sensible way to permit
reboot of a rescued instance for XenAPI users but prevent it for other drivers.
I'd be hesitant to permit reboot-from-rescue for all drivers as I'm not
As far as I remember this isn't a nova-network only feature; but I may be
missing something.
I believe the bandwidth counters may be being used at Rackspace.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Balázs Gibizer [mailto:balazs.gibi...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 16 April 2018 13:37
To: OpenStack-dev
Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2018 6:39 p.m.
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Debian OpenStack packages switching to Py3 for
Queens
2018-02-15 11:25 GMT+01:00 Bob Ball <bob.b...@c
Hi Thomas,
As noted on the patch, XenServer only has python 2 (and some versions of
XenServer even has Python 2.4) in domain0. This is code that will not run in
Debian (only in XenServer's dom0) and therefore can be ignored or removed from
the Debian package.
It's not practical to convert
Hi Adhi,
Do you mean that you can’t run two VMs each with 8 vCPUs, or do you mean that
you are trying to run one VM with more than 8 vCPUs?
I believe that the cpu_allocation_ratio means that you can re-use each physical
cpu (thread) up to 16 times with different VMs, but each VM is still
Hi Sahid,
> > a second device emulator along-side QEMU. There is no mdev
> > integration. I'm concerned about how much mdev-specific functionality
> > would have to be faked up in the XenServer-specific driver for vGPU to
> > be used in this way.
>
> What you are refering with your DEMU it's
Hi Sahid,
> Please consider the support of MDEV for the /pci framework which provides
> support for vGPUs [0].
From my understanding, this MDEV implementation for vGPU would be entirely
specific to libvirt, is that correct?
XenServer's implementation for vGPU is based on a pooled device model
Hi Adhi,
If the Neutron agents would normally run with the nova compute services, then
they would need to run in the compute VM when deploying with XenServer, not in
domain 0.
I would assume that the DHCP agents should also run in the compute VM.
Also added
Hi Adhi,
Please see bug report at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1693147 which I
believe covers your issue.
Huan is working on a fix at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467926
Thanks,
Bob
From: Adhi Priharmanto [mailto:adhi@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 May 2017 17:52
To: Bob Ball <bo
the compute will not start.
Bob
From: Adhi Priharmanto [mailto:adhi@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 May 2017 16:40
To: Bob Ball <bob.b...@citrix.com>
Cc: openstack <openstack@lists.openstack.org>; #OpenStack External Email
<openst...@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Ocata-Xenserver] Nov
Hi Adhi,
Very interesting. I suspect that self._get_vif_ref, below, is returning None.
This appears to be when the VM does not exist on the host - perhaps the VM was
renamed, deleted, or it has been migrated to a different host and Nova’s
records didn’t get updated?
I believe the issue is
On 2016-11-24 02:44, Bob Ball wrote:
> Please could the initial member or owner for os-xenapi-release be set to
> os-xenapi-core so we can modify the members of the group.
>
> Link to group:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1650,members
> Review that cr
Hi,
Please could the initial member or owner for os-xenapi-release be set to
os-xenapi-core so we can modify the members of the group.
Link to group: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1650,members
Review that created group: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400153/
Thanks,
Bob
>> Side note: we should first have Xen third-party CI testing running
>
> It already is running
> Oh right. It does not validate the new change though. Would be nice to see
> the new ‘daemon’-ic mode behaves in real world.
100% agreed. I'll work with Jianghua to make sure we get automated
Hi Ihar,
> I am puzzled. Is Neutron the only component that need to call to dom0?
No it's not. Nova has similar code to call plugins in dom0[1], and Ceilometer
will also need to make the calls for some metrics not exposed through the
formal API.
We don't want code duplication, and are
> > Oslo.privsep seem try to launch a daemon process and set caps for this
> daemon; but for XenAPI, there is no need to spawn the daemon.
>
> I guess I'm lacking some context... If you don't need special rights, why use
> a
> rootwrap-like thing at all ? Why go through a separate process to
The os-xenapi-core[1] and os-xenapi-ci[2] gerrit groups were created as a
result of my review at https://review.openstack.org/386528
Please could the owner of os-xenapi-core be set to me (bob-ball) and the owner
of os-xenapi-ci be set to os-xenapi-core.
Many thanks,
Bob
[1] https
Hi Adhi,
Ccould you provide more details about how you’re installing Liberty, including
your local.conf (if using devstack) and the nova / neutron configuration files?
Also details about how you’re booting the instance and what security groups
you’re expecting to be applied.
Thanks,
Bob
> TL;DR: If you don’t want a mascot, you don’t have to. But Nova, you’ll be
> missed. :-)
It also seems from http://www.openstack.org/project-mascots that the majority
of OpenStack projects have selected a mascot. I think it would be a great
shame if the Nova project didn’t have an easily
The fuel-plugin-xenserver-ci gerrit group
(https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1450,info) was created as a result
of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334558/ - please could the owner of the
group be updated to be fuel-plugin-xenserver-core so we can modify the members
of the
The ACL at
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/gerrit/acls/openstack/fuel-plugin-xenserver.config
shows that, in order for our CI to vote on the fuel-plugins-xenserver project,
we need to be in the fuel-plugins-ci group.
As such, could I request that the "Citrix
Hi Masayuki,
We have been running against Tempest and commenting for many months (years?)
and run in the Rackspace public cloud so have no capacity issues.
Indeed the execution time is longer than other jobs, because we actually have
to use double nesting (Devstack running on Ubuntu in a VM
How should we expose Virtual GPUs to Nova?
Various discussions have happened on the original spec submission for Mitaka[1]
and the recent submission for Newton[2], however there are a few questions
which need further discussion. But before those question (at the end), some
thinking behind the
You need your own credentials where I put - I just didn’t want to
share my credentials with the whole OpenStack community ☺
Bob
From: Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhis...@cloudbyte.com]
Sent: 10 May 2016 10:04
To: Bob Ball <bob.b...@citrix.com>
Cc: openstack-in...@lists.opensta
You need your own credentials where I put - I just didn’t want to
share my credentials with the whole OpenStack community ☺
Bob
From: Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhis...@cloudbyte.com]
Sent: 10 May 2016 10:04
To: Bob Ball <bob.b...@citrix.com>
Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org;
Hi Abishek,
I use the following which works well:
oscc_file_contents: |
# Do Not Edit - Generated & Managed by Puppet
clouds:
rax:
profile: rackspace
regions:
The failure rate was indeed 100%; there were some requirements on packages not
installed in our CI environment (libssl-dev libffi-dev) which were causing all
failures.
This is now fixed and the CI is back to voting on passing changes. I have
re-queued all jobs which failed in less than 6
Hi Sean,
> [section "XenServer"]
> query = label:Code-Review>=1,bob.b...@citrix.com file:xenserver
I believe this should be file:xenapi?
Can you match multiple files here? Most files are under the xenapi trees, but
it would miss some files in plugins/xenserver and not in
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Fuel] How to configure Xen + Libvirt using Fuel 8.0
From: Martinx - ジェームズ
To: Bob Ball
CC: Mike Scherbakov ,Ashish Yadav ,Fabrizio Soppelsa
,openstack@lists.openstack.org
>From time to time, randomly, XenServer loses all virtual machine definitions,
>and
XenServer is fully open source - XCP is no longer. You can download XenServer
for free from www.XenServer.org without any contact with Citrix.
For libvirt+Xen AFAIK that plugin doesn't exist and you would need to manually
configure each compute node after installation.
The XenServer plugin
I had a consistent issue with zuul-merger failing to merge due to incorrect
host keys set up by the community puppet modules.
See https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266041/ for the fix, but note that we must
have a newline at the end of the gerrit_ssh_host_key.
You can easily confirm if you are
This is indeed the wrong list to ask on, however check out
https://www.citrix.com/blogs/2015/11/30/integrating-xenserver-rdo-and-neutron/
for a step-by-step guide for installing XenServer + RDO
Thanks,
Bob
From: cac...@quantum-sci.com [mailto:cac...@quantum-sci.com]
Sent: 27 January 2016
Hi Mikhail,
Unfortunately I completely agree that using Glance with the XenServer plugin is
painful. As Keven pointed out, the current release of XenServer includes
python 2.4 in dom0 (where the plugin runs) so having a dependency on nova.image
or glanceclient is likely to introduce more pain
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Igor Kalnitsky
> wrote:
> > What about hypervisor "Qemu", and checkbox option on Settings tab -
> > "Use KVM extension"?
> Qemu is not a hypervisor This will be even more confusing.
> I think "Libvirt" + some tooltip which says "Qemu and
Sorry – just got to this mail.
Just to be clear, this was a transient failure on the 7th December, which is
now fixed.
The most recent recheck was successful and
http://zuul.openstack.xenproject.org/scoreboard/?project=openstack%2Fnova=jenkins%2CXenProject-CI=48==_size=100
shows the
Hi,
Devstack is intended for development, so when you reboot it is not expecting to
be able to preserve any information, and will give you a fresh environment to
continue development on.
The XenServer devstack installation uses a separate VM, but devstack is
automatically run at boot, as
Ah yes - I’d forgotten about OFFLINE=True (shows how often I use it!)
If you set this in your localrc file then yes, in theory it should work offline
– but will still generate a new environment when you reboot the VM.
Bob
From: yatin kumbhare [mailto:yatinkumbh...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 November
mode, but you may be able to use other services if you
remove tempest from ENABLED_SERVICES.
@jordan.pittier @Bob Ball
If I can ensure my IP address , localrc and everything else are not changed, is
there any way I can achieve my goal?
I don’t think I understand what your goal is – perhaps
There was a conversation a while ago around explicitly avoiding the empty
namespace - see
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/041238.html
The approach I have used since is "xenserver: recheck" and "xen: recheck".
I think the appropriate command should be "fuel:
> I noticed today that nova.console.xvp hits the database directly for
> console pools. We should convert this to objects so that the console
> service does not have direct access to the database (this is the only
> console I see that hits the database directly). However, rather than go
> through
> I noticed today that nova.console.xvp hits the database directly for
> console pools. We should convert this to objects so that the console
> service does not have direct access to the database (this is the only
> console I see that hits the database directly). However, rather than go
> through
I’ve consistently had the same problem.
A quick fix for me was to change the NTP servers to “10.20.0.1” (or whatever
the local IP address of your Fuel master is), then you only have to worry about
the NTP settings for the fuel master.
Bob
From: Adam Lawson [mailto:alaw...@aqorn.com]
Sent: 22
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: 25 August 2015 01:44
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][third-party][ci] Announcing CI Watch -
Third-party CI monitoring tool
We have a number of people working on
Hi Leandro,
It is true that the majority of development work, and the majority of
deployments, happen with the libvirt+KVM combination however there are some
major deployments that use XenServer highly effectively.
Regarding Neutron support, yes there are a number of known areas where we need
.
If you want to use XenServer then community member Bob Ball
(bob.b...@citrix.commailto:bob.b...@citrix.com) can help you more with this.
Best regards,
Martins
On 2015.07.24. 05:03, Leandro Mendes wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to setup a 3 node (controller, neutron and compute) Openstack setup,
but i'm
Hi Leandro,
This is most likely that your compute VM has been created as an HVM guest,
rather than a PV guest. This will typically happen if you use the Other
Install Media template in XenServer rather than the template for the specific
Linux version.
The error reported is that we cannot
Hi Ivan,
XenAPINFSDriver was primarily useful for pooled scenarios (which in turn relied
on Nova aggregates) - however it's not the easiest way to consume Cinder
volumes. The XenServer Nova integration supports BFV and volume attach for
Cinder volumes presented over iSCSI, so however those
backend for Cinder.
Bob
From: Ivan Derbenev [mailto:ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com]
Sent: 14 July 2015 16:13
To: Bob Ball; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: xenserver and cinder
Well, we are migrating from cloudstack now and it has this feature
So, do I understand It right. In current
only? What's the use case here?
Bob
From: Ivan Derbenev [mailto:ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com]
Sent: 14 July 2015 14:50
To: Bob Ball; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: xenserver and cinder
So, do I understand it right - I can't get rid of additional layer for cinder
volumes, if I want
to particular VMs.
For example, you create the cinder volumes _before_ you attach it to a virtual
machine - so there is no knowledge of which VM or which hypervisor will be
attaching to the volume.
Bob
From: Ivan Derbenev [mailto:ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com]
Sent: 14 July 2015 15:10
To: Bob Ball
Hi Anthony,
The Xen script is simply calling those commands:
...
iptables -I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged --physdev-in $dev
-j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged --physdev-out
$dev -j ACCEPT
Are you saying that these two commands aren't needed to be
Hi all,
To be able to involve some new sub-team members in China, we've moved the
meeting times as discussed in the last two XenAPI meetings.
The new time is at 0930 UTC, Alternate Wednesdays, with the next meeting at
0930 UTC on 8th July.
See you there!
Bob
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
On 5 June 2015 at 15:29, Moshe Levi mosh...@mellanox.com wrote:
I talked also with John Garbutt and it seem that the recommendation is to
filter only doc and test folders,
but still I would like to filter some
Hi Gary,
It should have been included in the comment - what was the changeset that
failed?
For reference a recheck can be triggered with xen: recheck
Thanks,
Bob
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: 25 May 2015 16:21
To: OpenStack List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] xen
Hi Girija,
I can’t help with converting XenServer VMs to KVM but can I ask why running
XenServer under your OpenStack cloud isn’t considered an option?
Clearly there are some differences with VM setup (e.g. the VM may be set up to
use a specific disk name which won’t be present if you move to
Sorry all for this breakage; I've been on vacation and didn't set up adequate
cover.
Thanks for disabling it and we'll let everyone know when the job is ready to
start commenting and hopefully voting on changes in the very near future.
Regards,
Bob
We certainly care about this but converting the XenServer CI to Neutron+OVS has
been hitting a number of issues (notably a few concurrency ones – although
there are a few missing features) that we’ve been trying to sort through.
I am certainly hoping that we’ll have everything stable enough to
Hi,
The XenAPINFS driver has indeed been deprecated from Cinder and is not
currently under development. This driver was known broken (some required
functionality was missing) and only useful in a very specific use case.
The XenAPI nova driver can, of course, attach Cinder drives exposed over
This is likely https://launchpad.net/bugs/1415795 which is fixed by
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151506/
Make sure you have the above change in your devstack and it should work again.
Bob
From: liuxinguo [mailto:liuxin...@huawei.com]
Sent: 06 February 2015 03:08
To: OpenStack Development
Hi,
The next meeting will be tomorrow @ 15:00 UTC - We'd love to see you there and
we can talk about the CI and Terry's work.
We're currently meeting fortnightly and skipped one due to travel, which is why
there haven't been minutes recently.
Thanks,
Bob
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Abhishek,
This is bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1415795 introduced by
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142967/ because Swift doesn't use olso.config.
The fix is at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151506/ which has not yet been
approved, but if you can cherry-pick it for your CI it should
Hi John,
That’s a very interesting error – one I’ve not seen before personally.
A quick way to get up and running is to use the nightly XVAs we build from
devstack, see http://downloads.vmd.citrix.com/OpenStack/. The blog explaining
how to use these is at
Hi Yamamoto,
XenAPI and Neutron do work well together, and we have an private CI that is
running Neutron jobs. As it's not currently the public CI it's harder to
access logs.
We're working on trying to move the existing XenServer CI from a nova-network
base to a neutron base, at which point
Hi Dhanesh,
Yes, this should be possible – there is no additional coupling between the
compute node and the network node when running with XenServer and as such they
can easily be running as two separate virtual machines.
In terms of the setup, you might want to look at
Hi Xing,
It may be that the dom0 qemu helper process is not running. It seems a very
similar issue was tracked down to this on the thread at
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2014-05/msg00134.html
Ian C pointed out that this helper process is normally started by the
xencommons
Hi Daniel,
The following is an example return value from one of my hosts
{host_name-description: Default install of XenServer, host_hostname:
ciceronicus, host_memory: {total: 17169604608, overhead: 266592256,
free: 16132087808, free-computed: 16111337472}, enabled: true,
host_capabilities:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 25 July 2014 12:36
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] recheck no bug and comment
Would that still allow us to only trigger 3rd party CI ? eg if we do
'recheck xenserver' I
Hi Afef,
There was a regression in Icehouse that broke XenAPI aggregates. This has been
fixed in Juno, however we would recommend you use live migrate with block
migration (using XCP 1.6 or XenServer 6.2 – which is Free as well now, see
Hi Afef,
There was a regression in Icehouse that broke XenAPI aggregates. This has been
fixed in Juno, however we would recommend you use live migrate with block
migration (using XCP 1.6 or XenServer 6.2 – which is Free as well now, see
it.
Thanks.
Sisu
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Bob Ball
bob.b...@citrix.commailto:bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
Nothing should be downloading files to DevStackOSDomU; they get downloaded
straight into dom0 when you create an image.
Why do you think the missing disk space is related to mysql
Nothing should be downloading files to DevStackOSDomU; they get downloaded
straight into dom0 when you create an image.
Why do you think the missing disk space is related to mysql, or to /var?
Bob
From: xs-devel-requ...@lists.xenserver.org
[mailto:xs-devel-requ...@lists.xenserver.org] On
It seems that this was historically provided by nova-compute-xcp but this
does not appear on my installation.
Given this is lacking in the Ubuntu packaging, you may need to install Nova
from source rather than relying on the packaging.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs
Hi Sisu,
2014-06-05 16:33:27.509 TRACE nova.api.openstack.compute.contrib.admin_actions
File /opt/stack/nova/nova/virt/xenapi/vmops.py, line 1840, in
check_can_live_migrate_source
2014-06-05 16:33:27.509 TRACE nova.api.openstack.compute.contrib.admin_actions
raise
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2014 20:57
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Bob Ball; Euan Harris
Subject: Re: xenserver-core not working with openstack
In addtion, there is an error message when running run.sh in domU.
Error: Service n-cpu is not running
Thanks,
Qin
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:53 PM
Hi Jeremy,
Can we request citrix_xenserver_ci to be moved to the Voting third party CI
group please.
Nova PTL has confirmed he's happy for the XenServer CI to have voting rights:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-03-06-14.00.log.html
14:35:41 BobBall In which case
Hi David,
That's a very strange error - it basically means the node has been used for
running a test already (both the first error in run_tests.log about the git
repository also existing, and the more fatal error about vif 3 existing)
I believe this was my fault - I should have purged all
- thanks for letting us know.
Bob
From: Bob Ball
Sent: 23 February 2014 20:29
To: David Kranz; #OpenStack External Email
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: RE: [qa] Can't interpret failure from XenServer CI
Hi David,
That's a very strange error
...@redhat.com]
Sent: 23 February 2014 21:17
To: Bob Ball; #OpenStack External Email
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [qa] Can't interpret failure from XenServer CI
On 02/23/2014 03:29 PM, Bob Ball wrote:
Hi David,
That's a very strange error - it basically means the node has
From: Russell Bryant [rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 17 February 2014 22:41
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Meetup Summary
5) Driver CI - We talked about the ongoing effort to set up CI for all
of the compute drivers. The discussion was mostly a status
Hi Thomas,
This means that it will also be impossible to support XCP support in
OpenStack, unfortunately (the support for XCP was removed a few months
ago because that was blocking migration to Debian testing anyway).
Just a quick note - there are two separate issues here which some might
Hi Sisu,
You can easily convert a VM running all services in devstack to one running
just the services needed for compute (nova-compute and nova-network in the case
of the stock method for setting up devstack with XenServer).
There is a script at
+1 here too - I'd love to be able to attend alternate weeks.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: 18 December 2013 14:36
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Future meeting times
-Original Message-
From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:mart...@hostnet.lv]
Sent: 18 December 2013 11:06
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack] XenServer support
I want to create small cloud but in testing I faced with many
issues and it looks like OpenStack +
This issue seems to have been fixed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15910 -
so to get it fixed in your environment, try cherry-picking the change using:
git fetch https://review.openstack.org/openstack/nova refs/changes/10/15910/1
git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD
I’ll look at trying to get these
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 19:33
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to re-add Dan Prince to nova-core
I would like to propose that we re-add Dan Prince to the nova-core
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 25 November 2013 22:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hypervisor CI requirement and
deprecation plan
On 11/25/2013 05:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I'll play
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 13:56
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Sean Dague
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hypervisor CI requirement and
deprecation plan
On 11/26/2013 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
I
Yes. You should set the SCREEN_LOGDIR and LOGFILE parameters - the former is
for all of the services that are started and the latter is for stack.sh itself.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:lbalba...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 12:05
To:
Hi Alvin,
Yes, we typically do expect Nova to be running in a DomU. It's worth checking
out
http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/introduction-to-xen.html
just to make sure you've got everything covered there.
I say typically because in some configurations
November 2013 14:31
To: Bob Ball; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Openstack and xen issues.
I have put Openstack on a separate machine to try and separate and isolate the
various components I need to work with in the interests of making my debugging
easier.
This in retrospect may
Hi,
Ceilometer is currently KVM specific.
I hope this will get fixed during the icehouse cycle, however ceilometer and
XenServer/XCP do not work together quite yet.
Bob
Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I followed this document:
The trace below seems to be wanting to access the console log, rather than the
VNC console.
I believe there is a blog post about how to enable this, but basically you need
a cronjob to run in dom0 to rotate the logs. This is because the Xen console
logging is not ring-based, and therefore
The trace below seems to be wanting to access the console log, rather than the
VNC console.
I believe there is a blog post about how to enable this, but basically you need
a cronjob to run in dom0 to rotate the logs. This is because the Xen console
logging is not ring-based, and therefore
Hi Simon,
Yes, I believe you are right.
We were already planning to discuss this very topic at the XenAPI roadmap
session at the summit. Hopefully someone will take on tying up this loose end
there.
Security group support is the only thing we are aware of that is missing from
the XenAPI
Hi Parikshit,
More details can be extracted by setting debug=true in /etc/nova/nova.conf or
setting default_log_levels to include nova.virt.xenapi.driver=debug.
This is likely to be a mis-configured nova.conf - check
I'm happy with that approach - again I've not seen any discussions about how
this should be done.
I've added [tempest] and [ceilometer] tags so we can hopefully get input from
the guys involved.
Bob
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: 13 October 2013 05:21
To: OpenStack
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo