-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2014 08:31 PM, Michael Basnight wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Mark McClain wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Russell Bryant
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Last cycle we had A "feature proposal deadline" across so
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Florent Flament <
florent.flament-...@cloudwatt.com> wrote:
> I understand that not everyone may be interested in such feature.
>
> On the other hand, some (maybe shallow) Openstack users may be
> interested in setting quotas on users or projects. Also, this featur
Matt et al,
Yes, "swift-internal" was meant as a marker to distinguish it from
"swift-external" someday. I agree, this could be indicated by setting
other fields.
Little bit of implementation detail for scope:
In the current EDP implementation, SWIFT_INTERNAL_PREFIX shows up in
essentially
>what about having swift:// which defaults to the configured tenant and
auth url for what we now call swift-internal, and we allow for user input
to change tenant and auth url for what would be swift-external?
I like the proposal.
Andrew.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Matthew Farrellee wrot
>> Would it make more sense for an operator to configure a "time window", and
>> then let users choose a slot within a time window (and say there are a
>> finite number of slots in a time window). The slotting would be done behind
>> the scenes and a user would only be able to select a window,
I agree that I'd like to see a set of use cases for this. This is the second
time in as many days that I've heard about a desire to have such a thing but I
still don't think I understand any use cases adequately.
In the physical world it makes perfect sense, LACP, MLT,
Etherchannel/Portchannel,
Hi Ceilometer guys,
We are implementing a complex query functionality for Ceilometer. We got a
comment to our implementation that using JSON in a string for representing the
query filter expression, is probably not the best solution.
The description of our current API design can be found here:
On Jan 24, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
> andrew,
>
> what about having swift:// which defaults to the configured tenant and auth
> url for what we now call swift-internal, and we allow for user input to
> change tenant and auth url for what would be swift-external?
I like this
In going through the bug list, I spotted this one and would like to discuss
it:
"can't disable file injection for bare metal"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1178103
There's a #TODO in Ironic's PXE driver to *add* support for file injection,
but I don't think we should do that. For the var
I agree its oddly inconsistent (you'll get used to that over time ;-) - but to
me it feels more like the validation is missing on the attach that that the
create should allow two VIFs on the same network. Since these are both
virtualised (i.e share the same bandwidth, don't provide any additi
Hello, Nilakhya Chatterjee.
I would suggest you to ping trove -core team and ask them if there's any
need of keeping it at codebase.
Also, i suggest you to analyze how python-trove client installed while
building dev. env. in trove-integration project.
Fast research gave me next resalts:
[novacli
Hi Phil,
Le 24/01/2014 14:13, Day, Phil a écrit :
HI Sylvain,
The change only makes the user have to supply a network ID if there is
more than one private network available (and the issue there is that
otherwise the assignment order in the Guest is random, which normally
leads to all sorts
Hello All,
I have not received any reply on my mail,
I will wait one more day for your comments on the same and proceed with a
checkin, that removes the given file from python-troveclient.
Let me know your thoughts.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Nilakhya <
nilakhya.chatter...@globallogic.co
Hi Justin,
I can see the value of this, but I'm a bit wary of the metadata service
extending into a general API - for example I can see this extending into a
debate about what information needs to be made available about the instances
(would you always want all instances exposed, all details, e
Things are still not good, but they are getting better.
Current Gate Stats:
* Gate Queue Depth - 79
* Check Queue Depth - 18
* Top of gate entered - ?? (we did a couple zuul restarts, so numbers
here are inaccurate)
* Gate Fail Categorization Rate: 73%
== Major Classes of Issues ==
The bigge
So looking at the gate this morning, stable/* nova is failing on unit
test a lot. Russell has fixes for those things in master.
I'd ask the stable team to pull all the nova stable/* changes out of the
gate (grab the change, and push a new version, which will kick it back
to check) and rebase them
HI Sylvain,
The change only makes the user have to supply a network ID if there is more
than one private network available (and the issue there is that otherwise the
assignment order in the Guest is random, which normally leads to all sorts of
routing problems).
I'm running a standard Devstack
Hi Trinath,
Jenkins is not directly related to proposing a new code.
The process to contribute the code is described in the links
Andreas pointed. There is no difference even if you are writing
a new ML2 mech driver.
In addition to the above, Neutron now requires a third party testing
for all new
andrew,
what about having swift:// which defaults to the configured tenant and
auth url for what we now call swift-internal, and we allow for user
input to change tenant and auth url for what would be swift-external?
in fact, we may need to add the tenant selection in icehouse. it's a
pretty
Hi Andreas -
Thanks you for the reply.. It helped me understand the ground work required.
But then, I'm writing a new Mechanism driver (FSL SDN Mechanism driver) for ML2.
For submitting new file sets, can I go with GIT or require Jenkins for the
adding the new code for review.
Kindly help me i
> On 01/22/2014 12:17 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> > I've been thinking a bit more about how TripleO updates are developing
> specifically with regards to compute nodes. What is commonly called the
> "update story" I think.
> >
> > As I understand it we expect people to actually have to reboot a compute
It may feel like it's been gate bug day all the days, but we would
really like to get people together for gate bug day on Monday, and get
as many people, including as many PTLs as possible, to dive into issues
that we are hitting in the gate.
We have 2 goals for the day.
** Fingerprint all the bu
Periodically I've seen people submit big coding style cleanups to Nova
code. These are typically all good ideas / beneficial, however, I have
rarely (perhaps even never?) seen the changes accompanied by new hacking
check rules.
The problem with not having a hacking check added *in the same commit*
> >
> > Cool. I like this a good bit better as it avoids the reboot. Still, this is
> > a rather
> large amount of data to copy around if I'm only changing a single file in
> Nova.
> >
>
> I think in most cases transfer cost is worth it to know you're deploying what
> you tested. Also it is pret
Hi-
While running unit test case for test the ML2 mechanism driver, I have got
this error.
Command: tox -epy27 --
neutron.tests.unit.ml2.drivers.test_fslsdn_mech.TestFslSdnMechanismDriver.test_create_network_postcommit
Error output:
...
...
byte-compiling
/root/neutron_icehouse/neutron-20
tempest defines some sets of tests like "smoke-serial" in tox.ini [1].
We can use "tox -e smoke-serial" or corresponding testr command like
testr run '(?!.*\[.*\bslow\b.*\])((smoke)|(^tempest\.scenario))'
to run a specific set of tests.
The command runs tests with "smoke" tag and all tests fr
(2014/01/22 2:56), Lucas Eznarriaga wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> For step 3/5, is the right procedure. Or is there a way to use a cmd to
> run all the tests and use a different mechanism to specify a filter for the
> tests to be run.
>
>
> I don't know if Tempest allows you to filter for the tests to
And it is worth mentioning activity report in Stackalytics, the link to it
is located in contribution summary block on user's statistics screen. The
report looks like http://stackalytics.com/report/users/zaneb and contains
all reviews, posted patches, commits, emails and blueprints.
Thanks,
Ilya
On 01/24/2014 12:10 PM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
> Hi-
>
>
>
> Need support for ways to contribute code to Neutron regarding the ML2
> Mechanism drivers.
>
>
>
> I have installed Jenkins and created account in github and launchpad.
>
>
>
> Kindly guide me on
>
>
>
> [1]
Hi-
Need support for ways to contribute code to Neutron regarding the ML2 Mechanism
drivers.
I have installed Jenkins and created account in github and launchpad.
Kindly guide me on
[1] How to configure Jenkins to submit the code for review?
[2] What is the process involved in pushing the code
2014/1/24 Matt Riedemann :
> Stable is OK again apparently so for anyone else waiting on a response here,
> go ahead and 'recheck no bug' stable branch patches that were waiting for
> this.
Note that there are still sporadic "Timed out waiting for thing..." failures
e.g.
http://logs.openstack.or
Tim,
w.r.t. different tenants I might be missing something - why should policies
remain stored per-user? In general, when the user creates something, wouldn't
the user's policies (more like preferences/template) be applied to and saved
for the tenant/created elements they're active in? IMHO you
On 24 January 2014 22:26, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> This enourmous amount of repositories adds too much infrustructural
>> complexity, and maintaining the changes in in consistent and reliable
>> manner becomes a really tricky tasks. We often have changes which require
>> modifing two or more reposit
Excerpts from Prasad Vellanki's message of 2014-01-24 00:21:06 -0800:
> I have a question on agent as part of cfninit that communicates with heat
> about config done state indication or config tool agent such as chef or
> puppet communicating with chef server.
>
> Since the VM resides on the data
Excerpts from Alexander Tivelkov's message of 2014-01-21 11:55:34 -0800:
> Hi folks,
>
> As we are moving towards incubation application, I took a closer look at
> what is going on with our repositories.
> An here is what I found. We currently have 11 repositories at stackforge:
>
>- murano-a
Hi all,
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 01:13:53PM +, Derek Higgins wrote:
> It looks like we have some duplication and inconsistencies on the 3
> os-*-config elements in the tripleo repositories
>
> os-apply-config (duplication) :
>We have two elements that install this
> diskimage-builder/
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 2014-01-23 12:03, Florian Haas wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> thanks for taking this to the list. Apologies for my brevity and for HTML,
> I'm on a moving train and Android Gmail is kinda stupid. :)
>
> I have some experience with the quirks of phone GMa
I have a question on agent as part of cfninit that communicates with heat
about config done state indication or config tool agent such as chef or
puppet communicating with chef server.
Since the VM resides on the data network, how does it reach the heat server
that is on openstack management netwo
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
