Ahhh, that's bad. Do you think there is a need for pushing OSv integration
in OpenStack in Kilo cycle? Would you come to Paris Summit?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Gareth academicgar...@gmail.com wrote:
yes :)
I planed that if that topic were picked, I could apply that as a formal
Pusihng it into OpenStack is not a hard job, because for OpenStack
developers OSv image is a normal qcow2 image. What you need do is enabling
some Qemu flags in Nova libvirt driver.
yep, I will be there :)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ahhh, that's
Thanks Doug for your reminder/message!
Field https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1381870 for glance stuff.
btw, currently I prepared three patches to fix this defect, any input
are welcome:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127487/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127923/
Diego Parrilla Santamaría diego.parrilla.santama...@gmail.com writes:
May be it's a bit too late, but in mid 2012 the FIWARE team developed a
horizon clone 100% in Javascript. https://github.com/ging/horizon-js
Nice! I poked around a little in the repo and found no mention of Swift?
[...]
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 5:04 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Automatic evacuate
On 10/15/2014 05:07 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:03
Le 16/10/2014 05:04, Russell Bryant a écrit :
On 10/15/2014 05:07 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Am I making sense?
Yep, the downside is just that you need to provide a new set of flavors
for ha vs non-ha. A benefit though
(5) Let monitoring and orchestration services deal with these use
cases and
have Nova simply provide the primitive API calls that it already does
(i.e.
host evacuate).
That would arguably lead to an incredible amount of wheel reinvention
for node failure detection, service failure
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/15/2014 05:07 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Am I making sense?
Yep, the downside is just that you need to provide a new set of flavors
for ha
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Jastrzebski, Michal
michal.jastrzeb...@intel.com wrote:
In my opinion flavor defining is a bit hacky. Sure, it will provide us
functionality fairly quickly, but also will strip us from flexibility Heat
would give. Healing can be done in several ways, simple
Hey Glauber that would be great! See you in Paris then :)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Glauber Costa glom...@cloudius-systems.com
wrote:
Hello guys
Just to let you know, I won't be in the Summit because I am too busy due
to the fact I am relocating to a foreign country.
However, that
This still doesn't do away with the requirement to reliably detect
node failure, and to fence misbehaving nodes. Detecting that a node
has failed, and fencing it if unsure, is a prerequisite for any
recovery action. So you need Corosync/Pacemaker anyway.
Obviously, yes. My post
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Thomas Herve
thomas.he...@enovance.com wrote:
This still doesn't do away with the requirement to reliably detect
node failure, and to fence misbehaving nodes. Detecting that a node
has failed, and fencing it if unsure, is a prerequisite for any
recovery
Hi,
if you use a VLAN type driver, TOR switches should be configured in
trunk mode to allow VLAN specified in vlan_type section of
ml2_conf.ini.
vlan id range is defined in this section. Any tenant network will use
an id from this range, and it is totally independent from tenant id.
Some
In an analysis we recently did for managing lifecycle of neutron resources,
it also emerged that task (or operation) API are a very useful resource.
Indeed several neutron resources introduced the (in)famous PENDING_XXX
operational statuses to note the fact that an operation is in progress and
its
2014-10-16 17:57 GMT+08:00 Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com:
In an analysis we recently did for managing lifecycle of neutron
resources, it also emerged that task (or operation) API are a very useful
resource.
Indeed several neutron resources introduced the (in)famous PENDING_XXX
On 10/16/2014 04:29 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
(5) Let monitoring and orchestration services deal with these use
cases and
have Nova simply provide the primitive API calls that it already does
(i.e.
host evacuate).
That would arguably lead to an incredible amount of wheel reinvention
for node
On 10/16/2014 05:01 AM, Thomas Herve wrote:
This still doesn't do away with the requirement to reliably detect
node failure, and to fence misbehaving nodes. Detecting that a node
has failed, and fencing it if unsure, is a prerequisite for any
recovery action. So you need Corosync/Pacemaker
TL;DR: A proposal for a template for launchpad bug entries which asks
for the minimal needed data to work on a bug.
Hi,
As a new guy in OpenStack I find myself often in the situation that I'm
not able to work on a bug because I don't understand the problem itself.
If I don't understand
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
From an API guideline viewpoint, I understand that
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86938/ proposes the introduction of a
rather simple endpoint to query active tasks and filter them by resource
uuid or state, for
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/16/2014 04:29 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
(5) Let monitoring and orchestration services deal with these use
cases and
have Nova simply provide the primitive API calls that it already does
(i.e.
host evacuate).
That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2014 03:25 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
What I can suggest is when looking at the menu (this is mandatory to put
it outside of the restaurant) and check for the word 'Végétarien'.
It's also always risky to ask for a vegetarian plate in a
Folks,
Just a quick reminder that we'll be considering the summit design
sessions proposals[1] at the weekly meeting today at 1500UTC.
We'll start the process of collaborative scheduling of topics with
each session proposer giving a short pitch for inclusion.
We've got 15 proposals already,
Le 16/10/2014 15:18, Ed Leafe a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2014 03:25 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
What I can suggest is when looking at the menu (this is mandatory to put
it outside of the restaurant) and check for the word 'Végétarien'.
It's also always
Hi Markus,
Thank you for bringing up this.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Markus Zoeller mzoel...@de.ibm.com wrote:
TL;DR: A proposal for a template for launchpad bug entries which asks
for the minimal needed data to work on a bug.
Hi,
As a new guy in OpenStack I find myself
Hi sahara folks,
I'm cancelling weekly irc meeting this week due to the release.
Thanks.
--
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Sahara Technical Lead
(OpenStack Data Processing)
Principal Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Is this the correct way to attach multiple NICs to an instance?
Thanks,
Danny
Hi,
run a dhcp client on second instance, it should get added IP.
if you want to add port to existing instance then create port in
neutron:
neutron port-create --fixed-ip ip_address=1.2.3.4 vm_network_name
- Original Message -
From: Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/16/2014 04:29 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
Dear all,
is Cinder capable today to use Barbican for encryption? If yes, can
you attach some useful doc?
Thank you,
Giuseppe
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
Running compute nodes as baremetal extensions of a different
Corosync/Pacemaker cluster (presumably the one that manages the other
Nova services) would potentially be an option, although vendors would
need to buy into
On 10/16/2014 09:00 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/16/2014 04:29 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
(5) Let monitoring and orchestration services deal with these use
cases and
have Nova simply provide the primitive API calls that
Have you seen the “how-to” wiki page?
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/DVR/HowTo
Yours,
Michael Smith
Hewlett-Packard Company
HP Networking RD
8000 Foothills Blvd. M/S 5557
Roseville, CA 95747
PC Phone: 916 540-1884
Ph: 916 785-0918
Fax: 916 785-1199
From: zhang xiaobin
On Thu, Oct 16 2014, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Sure thing Est-ce que ce plat contient de la viande ? (ε-s kə sə pla
kɔ̃tjε̃ də
la vjɑ̃d )
Be careful because that a lot of places would answer no to that while
it might be possible that the dish has things like fish in it… Many
people, even in
Hi all,
as discussed during today's l3-meeting, we keep on working on BGPVPN
service plugin implementation [1].
MPLS encapsulation is now supported in OVS [2], so we would like to
summit a design to leverage OVS capabilities. A first design proposal,
based on l3agent, can be found here :
On 10/16/2014 12:49 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16 2014, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Sure thing Est-ce que ce plat contient de la viande ? (ε-s kə
sə pla kɔ̃tjε̃ də la vjɑ̃d )
Be careful because that a lot of places would answer no to that
while it might be possible that the dish has
Be forewarned; here's my two cents before I've had my morning coffee.
It would seem to me that if we were seeking some level of resiliency
against host failures (if a host fails, evacuate the instances that were
hosted on it to a host that isn't broken), it would seem that host HA is a
good
Masayuki Igawa masayuki.ig...@gmail.com wrote on 10/16/2014 03:41:24 PM:
From: Masayuki Igawa masayuki.ig...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/16/2014 03:44 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Proposal: A
All,
I would like to get some feedback on a proposal to change to the
current sensor naming implemented in ironic and ceilometer.
I would like to provide vendor specific sensors within the current
structure for IPMI sensors in ironic and ceilometer, but I have found
that the current
Drago,
great news indeed! In the meantime I've started integrating Merlin PoC with
the MIstral Workbook builder into Horizon. In case you follow the
instructions at https://github.com/stackforge/merlin/blob/master/README.md
you'll get working Project-Orchestration-Mistral panel with the Workbook
On Oct 16, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Anita Kuno
ante...@anteaya.infomailto:ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
Heh, yeah didn't expect to take over the thread on this, sorry about
that. Perhaps we should form a group, vegetarians in Paris?
I know myself and at least one other Summit attendee who has
On 10/16/2014 01:03 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
Be forewarned; here's my two cents before I've had my morning coffee.
It would seem to me that if we were seeking some level of resiliency
against host failures (if a host fails, evacuate the instances that were
hosted on it to a host that isn't
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Adam Lawson alaw...@aqorn.com wrote:
Be forewarned; here's my two cents before I've had my morning coffee.
It would seem to me that if we were seeking some level of resiliency against
host failures (if a host fails, evacuate the instances that were hosted on
You can always try:
http://www.timeout.com/paris/en/food-and-drink/vegetarian-restaurants-in-pa
ris.
On 10/16/14, 8:02 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 10/16/2014 12:49 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16 2014, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Sure thing Est-ce que ce plat contient de
On Thu, Oct 16 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
This structure would provide the ability for a consumer to do a ceilometer
resource list using the Ironic Node ID as the Resource ID to get all the
sensors
in a given platform. The consumer would then then iterate over each of the
sensors to get
Hi,
Currently we have two ways of doing Identity Auth backends, these are
sql and ldap.
The SQL backend is the default and is for situations where Keyston is
the canonical Identity provider with username / password being
directly compared to the Keystone database.
LDAP is the current option if
I think it depends on what you mean by
'external identity provider'
- I assume it's capable of speaking some sort of federation protocol. So
I'd rather explore adding more support for additional federation protocols/standards,
rather than making our own third backend.
Steve
Dave Walker
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
While one of us (Jay or me) speaking for the other and saying we agree
is a distributed consensus problem that dwarfs the complexity of
Paxos
You've always had a way with words, Florian :)
I knew you'd like that one. :)
,
Hi All,
The Barbican team is proud to announce the final release of the Barbican Key
Management Service for Juno:
https://launchpad.net/barbican/juno/2014.2
This release includes 9 Blueprints and 47 bug fixes. Check the link above
for the full details. Many thanks to all the contributors who
Okay the coffee kicked in.
I can see how my comment could be interpreted that way so let's take a step
backward so I can explain my perspective here.
Amazon was the first to implement a commercial-grade cloud IaaS, Openstack
was developed as an alternative. If we avoided wheel re-invention as a
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your response. I am talking generally about the external
auth support. One use case is Kerberos, but for the sake of argument
this could quite easily be Apache Basic auth. The point is, we have
current support for entrusting AuthN outside of Keystone.
What I was trying to
Dave
when federation is used, the user's group is stored in a mapping rule.
So we do have a mechanism for storing group memberships without using
LDAP or creating an entry for the user in the SQL backend. (The only
time this is kinda not true is if we have a specific rule for each
federated user,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Dave Walker em...@daviey.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your response. I am talking generally about the external
auth support. One use case is Kerberos, but for the sake of argument
this could quite easily be Apache Basic auth. The point is, we have
On 16 October 2014 20:07, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote:
SNIP
I may be missing something, but can you use the external auth method with
the LDAP backend?
No, as the purpose of the LDAP backend is to validate user/pass
combination are valid. With the external auth plugin, these are
Hi,
I think I considered the Federated plugin as a mismatch as it dealt
with 'remote' auth rather than 'external' auth. I thought it was for
purely handling SSO / SAML2, and not being subordinate to auth with
the webserver.
I'll dig into the federation plugin more, thanks.
--
Kind Regards,
On 10/16/2014 02:40 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
Question: is host HA not achievable using the programs we have in place
now (with modification of course)? If not, I'm still a champion to see
it done within our four walls.
Yes, it is achievable (without modification, even).
That was the primary
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/16/2014 02:40 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
Question: is host HA not achievable using the programs we have in place
now (with modification of course)? If not, I'm still a champion to see
it done within our four walls.
The format has changed slightly this summit, to help encourage a more
collaborative design experience, rather than rapid fire mass-inclusion
summit sessions. So we have two 40-minute long slots, and one whole day
of contributor meetup.[1]
Our etherpad topics page has received quite a few
Thanks you for this script!
Status of novaclient: Work around porting to use oslo.i18n is finished.
Also, latest code from incubator is synced.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
I’ve put together a little script to generate a report of the projects
On 9/25/2014 11:09 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Jay,
So just to be clear, are you saying that we should generate 2
notification messages on Rabbit for every DB update? That feels
like a big overkill for me. If I follow that login then the current
state transition notifications should also be
On 10/14/2014 05:19 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I am really in favor of this. The implementation looks great! Nova can
surely benefit from this and we can make Neutron allocations at the API
level and save a ton of complexity at the compute level.
Kudos!
Thanks
Gary
On 10/13/14, 11:31 PM, Chuck
We've planned a online + IRC mini-summit for discussing Glance topics prior to
the Paris summit. Please find the agenda as well as the topics which are
currently included for the same in this [0] etherpad. If you've a topic in mind
just for this virtual summit, please feel free to add so in the
Hello Giuseppe,
There have been blueprints related to this, such as here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/encryption-with-barbican
I don't think all the necessary pieces for this feature have landed as of yet
though...cc-ing Joel and Nate in case they wanted to weigh in here.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Mike Scherbakov
mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
The idea is not simply deny or hang requests from clients, but provide them
we are in maintenance mode, retry in X seconds
You probably would
As part of an effort to deprecate our specialized testing platform
for Python 3.3, many of us have been working to confirm projects
which currently gate on 3.3 can also pass their same test sets under
Python 3.4 (which comes by default in Ubuntu Trusty). For the vast
majority of projects, the
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:19:03 PM Clint Byrum wrote:
I think it would be a good idea for containers' filesystem contents to
be a whole distro. What's at question in this thread is what should be
running. If we can just chroot into the container's FS and run
apt-get/yum
install our
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:44:50PM +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
You just need to find the pid of a process in the container (perhaps using
docker inspect to go from container name - pid) and then:
nsenter -t $pid -m -u -i -n -p -w
Note also that the 1.3 release of Docker (any day now) will sport
On 10/16/2014 12:30 PM, Dave Walker wrote:
Hi,
I think I considered the Federated plugin as a mismatch as it dealt
with 'remote' auth rather than 'external' auth. I thought it was for
purely handling SSO / SAML2, and not being subordinate to auth with
the webserver.
I'll dig into the
Hi all
I came across some tools [1] [2] that we could use to make sure we don't
increase our code complexity.
Has anyone had any experience with these or other tools?
radon is the underlying reporting tool and xenon is a monitor - meaning
it will fail if a threshold is reached.
To save you
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi all
I came across some tools [1] [2] that we could use to make sure we don't
increase our code complexity.
Has anyone had any experience with these or other tools?
Flake8 (and thus hacking) has built in
I ran this tool on Keystone and liked the results - the two methods that
ranked D should certainly be refactored. It also matched a few methods in
openstack/common.
But flake8 supports complexity checking already, using mccabe. Just enable
complexity checking with:
$ flake8 --max-complexity 20
I agree we should use flake8 built-in if at all possible. I complexity checking
will definitely help us in the long run keeping code maintainable.
+1 from me.
—
Morgan Fainberg
On October 16, 2014 at 20:45:35, Joe Gordon (joe.gord...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Angus
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for the heads up. Is there a bug opened to track this? If not,
I'm going to open one and dig into it. Cheers.
On 17/10/14 14:17, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
As part of an effort to deprecate our specialized testing platform
for Python 3.3, many of us have been working to confirm
I think nova wins. We have:
./nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py:3736:1: C901
'LibvirtDriver._get_guest_config' is too complex (67)
Michael
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran this tool on Keystone and liked the results - the two methods that
ranked D
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi all
I came across some tools [1] [2] that we could use to make sure we
don't increase our code complexity.
Has anyone had any
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree we should use flake8 built-in if at all possible. I complexity
checking will definitely help us in the long run keeping code maintainable.
Well this is scary:
./nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py:3736:1: C901
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Morgan Fainberg
morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree we should use flake8 built-in if at all possible. I complexity
checking will definitely help us in the long run keeping code
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Morgan Fainberg
morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree we should use flake8 built-in if at all possible. I complexity
checking will definitely help us in the long run keeping code
On 17/10/14 15:23, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Thanks for that, I mostly copied your patch for Heat:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129126/
I wish it would print out the value for all the modules tho', that is
what is nice about radon.
It's a little horrible, but we can do the same thing:
I like the idea of measuring complexity. I looked briefly at `python -m
mccabe`. It seems to measure each method independently. Is this really
fair? If I have a class with some big methods, and I break it down into
more numerous and smaller methods, then the largest method gets smaller,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I like the idea of measuring complexity. I looked briefly at `python -m
mccabe`. It seems to measure each method independently. Is this really
fair?
I think it is a good starting point. You still need to write
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
First step in fixing this, put a cap on it: http://goog_106984861
https://review.openstack.org/129125
Thanks Joe - I've just put up a similar patch for Ironic:
https://review.openstack.org/129132
--
Michael Davies
80 matches
Mail list logo
