Jay Lau wrote:
When I review a patch for OpenStack, after review finished, I want to
check more patches for this project and then after click the Project
content for this patch, it will **not** jump to all patches but project
description. I think it is not convenient for a reviewer if s/he
Hi,
Looks like the password supplied wasn't correct.
Have you changed the pasword given in local.conf after a devstack
installation? If yes, you need to purge mysql credentials stores in your
machine.
Regards,
Vineet Menon
On 1 December 2014 at 01:33, liuxinguo liuxin...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Kyle,
Gentle reminder.
Please suggest a good time when we can discuss on blueprint - L3 router
Service Type Framework
I am looking for a L3 driver and plugin to enable neutron L3 calls from OS
to ODL.
Best Regards
Priyanka
- Forwarded by Priyanka Chopra/TVM/TCS on 12/01/2014 03:44
detail=concise is not a media type and looking at the grammar in the RFC it
wouldn’t be valid.
I think the grammar would allow for application/json; detail=concise. See
the last line in the definition of the media-range nonterminal in the
grammar (copied below for convenience):
Accept
My proposal here, is, _let’s not deprecate this setting_, as it’s a valid use
case of a gateway configuration, and let’s provide it on the reference
implementation.
TL;DR
I’ve been looking at this yesterday, during a test deployment
on a site where they provide external connectivity with
Just correcting the tag and subject line in $subject, so that it gets the
attention of the right group of folks (from devstack).
thanx,
deepak
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Bharat Kumar bharat.kobag...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Regarding the patch Deploy GlusterFS Server (
I've mistakenly put issue #1 link in issue #3,
the correct link for the floating IPs issue is:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1397907
Gil
From: Gil Meir [mailto:gilm...@mellanox.com]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:19
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev]
I've made a temp fix for it by removing the logilab-common 0.63.2 from our
mirror and start full re-sync for mirrors, hopefully it'll fix everything.
Thanks to lifeless for help.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote:
On 12/01/2014 05:45 AM, Eli Qiao wrote:
Got
On 11/28/2014 05:15 PM, Ivan Kliuk wrote:
Hi, team!
Let me please present ideas collected during the unit tests
improvement meeting:
1) Rename class ``Environment`` to something more descriptive
2) Remove hardcoded self.clusters[0], e.t.c from ``Environment``.
Let's use parameters instead
Hey,
there was a pypi mirrors issue with downloading logilab-common 0.63.2 from
our mirrors:
HTTP error 404
while getting
http://pypi.IAD.openstack.org/packages/source/l/logilab-common/logilab-common-0.63.2.tar.gz#md5=2bf4599ae1f2ccf4603ca02c5d7e798e
(from
On 12/01/2014 05:36 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
detail=concise is not a media type and looking at the grammar in the RFC it
wouldn’t be valid.
I think the grammar would allow for application/json; detail=concise. See
the last line in the definition of the media-range nonterminal in the
Launchpad issue - https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1397931
Elastic search query:
- Original Message -
My proposal here, is, _let’s not deprecate this setting_, as it’s a valid use
case of a gateway configuration, and let’s provide it on the reference
implementation.
I agree. As long as the reference implementation works with the setting off
there's no need to
Hi Sergey,
AFAIU, the problem is that when Nova was designed initially, it had no
notion of shared storage (e.g. Ceph), so all the resources were
considered to be local to compute nodes. In that case each total value
was a sum of values per node. But as we see now, that doesn't work
well with
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
On 27 November 2014 at 12:11, Mohammad Hanif mha...@brocade.com wrote:
Folks,
Recently, as part of the L2 gateway thread, there was some discussion on
BGP/MPLS/Edge VPN and how to bridge any overlay networks to
From: Duncan Thomas [duncan.tho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 5:40 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Where should Schema files live?
Duncan Thomas
On Nov 27, 2014 10:32 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
We were thinking each
John:
States that the driver can/should do some cleanup work during the
transition:
attaching - available or error
detaching - available or error
error - available or error
deleting - deleted or error_deleting
Also in possibly wanted in future but much harder:
backing_up - available or error
Hi,
This is a reminder about team meeting that we’ll have today at
#openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC.
Agenda:
Review action items
Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans)
Release Kilo-1 progress
Open discussion
(see [0] to see the agenda as well as the meeting archieve)
[0]
As part of setting up version caps for Oslo and client libraries in the stable
branches, we discovered that the fact that we do not always create stable
branches of the Oslo libraries means the check-requirements-integration-dsvm
job in stable branches is actually looking at the requirements in
On Nov 30, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com wrote:
TL;DR: I think we can handle most of oslo.context with some additions to
auth_token middleware and simplify policy enforcement (from a service
perspective) at the same time.
There is currently a push to release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Are we going to have stable releases for those branches?
On 01/12/14 15:19, Doug Hellmann wrote:
As part of setting up version caps for Oslo and client libraries in
the stable branches, we discovered that the fact that we do not
always create
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed PGP part
Are we going to have stable releases for those branches?
We will possibly have point or patch releases based on those branches, as fixes
end up needing to be backported. We have already done this in a few
Hi all,
In order to enable or disable osprofiler in Glance, we currently have an
option:
[profiler]
# If False fully disable profiling feature.
enabled = False
However, all other services with osprofiler integration use a similar option
named profiler_enabled.
For consistency, I'm
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Are we going to have stable releases for those branches?
We will possibly have point or patch releases based on those branches, as
fixes end up needing to be backported. We have already done this
Just FYI. We have updated versions of nailgun-related packages in 6.0:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137886/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137887/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137888/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137889/
We need it in order to support packages updates both in
On 1 December 2014 at 04:43, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not entirely true, as soon as a reference implementation,
based on existing Neutron components (L2agent/L3agent...) can exist.
The specific thing I was saying is that that's harder with an edge-id
mechanism than
On 2014-12-01 12:45:04 +0800 (+0800), Eli Qiao wrote:
[...]
HTTP error 404 while getting http://pypi.IAD.openstack.org/
packages/source/l/logilab-common/logilab-common-0.63.2.tar.gz
[...]
This was reported as https://launchpad.net/bugs/1397931 and handled
a few hours ago.
--
Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-12-01 17:04:23 +0800 (+0800), Jay Lau wrote:
Cool, Thierry! I see. This is really what I want ;-)
Also note that we're not running a modified version of Gerrit, so if
a behavior change is desired it likely needs to be reported at
http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues instead.
--
Jeremy
Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested,
We'll have a cross-project meeting tomorrow at 21:00 UTC, with the
following agenda:
* Convergence on specs process (johnthetubaguy)
* Incompatible rework of client libraries (notmyname, morganfainberg)
* New work in openstack-sdk,
Hi all,
I'm sorry for the long delay on this I've been dragged into some other
stuff :) But anyway, now it's time
I've asked the core Ironic team to narrow down the name options (we had too
many, thanks to everyone that contributed) the list of finalists is in the
poll right here:
Ah forgot to say,
Please add your launchpad ID on the Name Field. And I will close the poll
on Wednesday at 18:00 UTC (I think it's enough time to everyone take a look
at it)
Cheers,
Lucas
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sorry for
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
On 1 December 2014 at 04:43, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not entirely true, as soon as a reference implementation,
based on existing Neutron components (L2agent/L3agent...) can exist.
The
Thanks for joining our team meeting today!
Meeting minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-12-01-16.00.html
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-12-01-16.00.html
Meeting log:
Okay, boiling my thoughts down further:
James's (valid, IMHO) concerns aside, I want to see one of two things
before I'm anything but -1 on this change:
1) A specific reason SHELLOPTS can't be used. Nobody has given me one
besides hand-wavy it might not work stuff. FTR, as I noted in my
I don't personally use the debugger much, but there is a helper script
that is supposed to allow debugging:
https://github.com/openstack/oslotest/blob/master/tools/oslo_debug_helper
On 11/30/2014 05:08 AM, Saju M wrote:
Hi,
How to debug test using pdb
I want to debug tests and tried
Link to the docs for the debugger script:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslotest/features.html#debugging-with-oslo-debug-helper
We have support for it in some of the Keystone related projects and folks
seem to find it useful. If may not fit your needs, but as Ben suggested,
give it a
Swagger is not related to test improvement, but we started to discuss it
here so..
@Przemyslaw, how hard it will be to integrate it with nailgun rest api
(web.py and handlers hierarchy)?
Also is there any way to use auth with swagger?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday December 2nd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
hey neutron -
Just an FYI, I’ve added https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137989/ /
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1397796 to refer to an issue in neutron’s “heal”
script that is going to start failing when I put out Alembic 0.7.1, which is
potentially later today / this week.
The issue is pretty
Hi Fuel Devs,
I'm not entirely sure why we are running our own infrastructure Gerrit
for Fuel, as opposed to using the main review.openstack.org site that
all OpenStack and Stackforge projects use (including Fuel repositories
on stackforge...). Could someone please advise on why we are doing
On 2014-12-01 13:24:43 -0500 (-0500), Mike Bayer wrote:
[...]
for users on the outside of immediate Openstack use cases I’d
prefer if they can continue working towards moving to Alembic; the
major features I’ve introduced in Alembic including the SQLite
support are intended to make transition
One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to
start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from
non-North American time zones.
Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The
current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2014-11-30 23:02:29 -0800:
On 27-Nov-14 18:03, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi Zane,
At this stage our implementation (as mentioned in wiki
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/ConvergenceDesign) achieves your
design goals.
1.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
My proposal here, is, _let’s not deprecate this setting_, as it’s a valid use
case of a gateway configuration, and let’s provide it on the reference
implementation.
I agree. As long as the
On 13/11/14 13:59, Clint Byrum wrote:
I'm not sure we have the same understanding of AMQP, so hopefully we can
clarify here. This stackoverflow answer echoes my understanding:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17841843/rabbitmq-does-one-consumer-block-the-other-consumers-of-the-same-queue
Not
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of oslo.serialization
1.1.0. This is primarily a bug fix and requirements update release.
Further details of the changes included are below.
For more details, please see the git log history below and
On 12/01/2014 06:19 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Indeed, the review queue is non-responsive. There are other patches in
the queue that bit rot there:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z
I did +2 some of the patches which I thought were totally
Thanks Mike!
I've left some comments on the patch.
Just out of curiosity, since now alembic can autogenerate foreign keys, are
we be able to remove the logic for identifying foreign keys to add/remove
[1]?
Salvatore
[1]
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/11/14 02:33, Qiming Teng wrote:
Dear all,
Auto-Scaling is an important feature supported by Heat and needed by
many users we talked to. There are two flavors of AutoScalingGroup
resources in Heat today: the
On Mon Dec 01 2014 at 2:06:18 PM henry hly henry4...@gmail.com wrote:
My suggestion is that starting with LB and VPN as a trial, which can
never be distributed.
.. Sure they can! Loadbalancing in particular _should_ be distributed if
both the clients and backends are in the same cluster...
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-11-28 11:27:20 -0800:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sullivan, Jon Paul
jonpaul.sulli...@hp.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com]
Sent: 26 November 2014 17:03
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
Hi,
From what I can see it seems like the developer documentation available
on the OpenStack website is generated from the git repositories.
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/openstack-projects.html
Are older versions of this documentation currently generated and hosted
somewhere? Or is it
Renat,
Alternately, what do you think if mistral just post the events to given
exchange(s) on the same transport backend and let the subscribers decide
how to consume the events (i.e post to webhook, etc.) from these
exchanges? This will simplify implementation somewhat. The engine can
just
I hope we all understand how edge VPN works and what interactions are
introduced as part of this spec. I see references to neutron-network mapping
to the tunnel which is not at all case and the edge-VPN spec doesn’t propose
it. At a very high level, there are two main concepts:
1.
On Mon Dec 01 2014 at 4:18:42 PM Thai Q Tran tqt...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I agree that keeping the API layer thin would be ideal. I should add that
having discrete API calls would allow dynamic population of table. However,
I will make a case where it *might* be necessary to add additional APIs.
Hi,
Seems like you don't have available devices for allocation.
What's the output of:
#echo 'use nova;select hypervisor_hostname,pci_stats from
compute_nodes;' | mysql -u root
Itzik
On 12/02/2014 08:21 AM, Murali B wrote:
Hi
we are trying to bring-up the SRIOV on set-up.
facing the below
Hi Winson,
On 02 Dec 2014, at 09:10, W Chan m4d.co...@gmail.com wrote:
To clarify on the shortcut solution, are you saying 1) we add an adhoc event
subscription to the workflow spec OR 2) add a one time event subscription to
the workflow execution OR both?
Not sure what you mean by
57 matches
Mail list logo
