to Linux+KVM or VMware where there is no caching
for vm guests.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Alessandro Pilotti
<apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com<mailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com>> wrote:
Hyper-V support in OpenStack is alive and well, see for example this blog
series compa
Hyper-V support in OpenStack is alive and well, see for example this blog
series comparing KVM and Hyper-V: [1].
The fact that SUSE / HPE might or might not support it, is just a matter of
commercial choices unrelated to the upstream projects (which is what matters in
this ML). Other vendors
Hi,
This is a matter of personal preference, most people use lightweight editors
like for example:
Visual Studio Code, Sublime Text, Notepad++, Atom or even vim.
Others prefer a full IDE with integrated debugger, like Visual Studio, PyCharm,
Komodo, etc.
Alessandro
On 2 mai 2016, at 11:22,
Hi Angus,
First thanks for your concern on code portability! It still happens that we
have to ask to revert patches on Oslo projects due to some Linux specific code
that we discover only when the actual Oslo modules are used by Nova, Neutron,
Cinder or other projects. Typically a running
has to be
easy for me or I'm just not going to be able to sustain the effort required :-/
)
- Gus
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 at 11:56 Alessandro Pilotti
<apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com<mailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com>> wrote:
Hi Angus,
First thanks for your concern on code
, just a 30s outline in an
email would be really useful :-/
- Gus
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 at 13:13 Alessandro Pilotti
<apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com<mailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com>> wrote:
Angus,
"I'm afraid this has to be easy for me or I'm just not going to be able to
Hi guys,
Just a quick note on the Windows editions support matrix updates for the Nova
Hyper-V driver and Neutron networking-hyperv ML2 agent:
We are planning to drop legacy Windows Server / Hyper-V Server 2008 R2 support
starting with Liberty.
Windows Server / Hyper-V Server 2012 and above
On 04 Aug 2015, at 17:56, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:34:19PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
Hi guys,
Just a quick note on the Windows editions support matrix updates for the Nova
Hyper-V driver and Neutron networking-hyperv ML2 agent
Hi Lily,
What version are you running, Icehouse, Juno, Kilo or master?
A full copy of the nova-compute.log and neutron_hyperv_agent.log on a pastebin
might be helpful. Additionally, your neutron.conf from the neutron server could
help along with your neutron network configuration.
Finally, the
Hi Matt,
We originally proposed a Juno spec for this blueprint, but it got postponed to
Kilo where it has been approved without a spec together with other hypervisor
specific blueprints (the so called “trivial” case).
The BP itself is completed and marked accordingly on launchpad.
Patches
I also absolutely agree that Mike did a great job on the communication
with the driver maintainers and a lot more, especially in the hectic days
around the K-3 deadline.
Removing any driver lacking CI testing was just the right thing to do, even if
this affected our SMB3 driver. Hopefully this is
Hi all,
I’d like to ask a FFE for the Hyper-V Rescue feature
Patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127159/
Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hyper-v-rescue
It’s a feature parity blueprint with no impact outside of the Hyper-V driver.
It already received a +2
Hi Michael,
On 25 Nov 2014, at 02:35, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 25 Nov 2014, at 01:57, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
First off, sorry for the slow reply. I
If you feel a change has been blocking on review for too long and is
important, then please do raise it in the Open Discussion section of
the nova meeting.
Michael
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Hi,
Not seeing any driver (Hyper-V
On 25 Nov 2014, at 02:35, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 25 Nov 2014, at 01:57, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
First off, sorry for the slow reply. I
Hi,
Not seeing any driver (Hyper-V, VMWare, etc) related priority in this etherpad
worries me a bit.
My concern is mostly related to the fact that we have in Nova a significative
number of driver related blueprints code already under review for Kilo and we
are already drifting into the old
AFAIK cloud-init is not handling it ATM, while Cloudbase-Init supports it out
of the box on Windows (and soon FreeBSD).
You need to deploy your instance with an SSH keypair and use HTTP metadata,
required for POSTing back the encrypted password.
It does not work with ConfigDrive.
Alessandro
Hi all,
This is an issue that has been discussed quite a few times. As I was fearing the
bottleneck effect is getting worse with each release.
Nova grew simply too much and even though features like networking and block
storage have been spun off at some point in time, it still lacks the
Hi Viktor,
I just submitted the patch, adding you as co-author with the email address
that you used here, please let me know if this is ok for you:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115782/
The patch is even easier compared to what you sent as all we need is to add
declaratively the requested
Hi Thiago,
Like for the Windows case, where we have Heat templates for AD DC and other
MSFT related workloads (Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint, etc) [1], the best
place in OpenStack for Samba 4 DC is a dedicated Heat template.
Heat is the de facto workload orchestration standard for
Glad to see that the Bp is hypervisor independent.
We'll provide the Hyper-V implementation, based on this TODO comment:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99916/3/nova/virt/hyperv/driver.py
Thanks,
Alessandro
On 25.07.2014, at 03:08, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
Yep, I think
Hi guys,
In the Hyper-V driver camp we waited to add the boot from ISO feature because
of this issue.
Booting from ISO w/o local storage is almost useless for most scenarios.
It'd be great if we could reach consensus on this and propose some consistent
BPs for all supported drivers in early
Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose the following driver feature parity blueprint spec for an
expection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105042
This blueprint introduces rescue instance support in the Nova Hyper-V
driver for feature parity with other drivers.
The Hyper-V Nova driver is
Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose the following driver blueprint spec for an expection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102190
Currently, the Hyper-V driver only allows attaching volumes via iSCSI.
The purpose of this blueprint is to add support for attaching volumes
hosted on a SMB share.
The
Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose the following Hyper-V driver feature parity blueprint spec
for an expection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104630
The Nova Hyper-V driver is currently not implementing host power actions as
specified
in the driver interface.
The actions that can be
Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose the following Nova blueprint spec for an expection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105034
Nova keypairs are mostly used by Linux guests to handle user authentication via
SSH public key authentication without incurring in the management and security
overhead
Hi Om,
Great news! Looking forward for a link to a repo to check it out.
Thanks,
Alessandro
On 07.07.2014, at 11:03, Kumar, Om (Cloud OS RD)
om.ku...@hp.commailto:om.ku...@hp.com wrote:
Hi All,
We have just finished 1st version of Windows Disk Image Builder tool. This tool
is written in
Hi all,
Following up to various conversations during the Icehouse cycle, we’d like to
contribute the Heat templates work that we did at Cloudbase, partly available
at:
https://github.com/cloudbase/windows-heat-templates
There’s also a BP for that
Sysprep is independent from the Heat templates. Generally providing a
sysprepped (and generalized) Windows image in Glance is the best solution.
The Cloudbase-Init installer offers an option to run it [1] and our automated
OpenStack image building scripts do the same [2].
The official Windows
Hi Wayne,
Thanks for sharing this!
Alessandro
On 22/apr/2014, at 01:41, Foley, Wayne
wayne.fo...@hp.commailto:wayne.fo...@hp.com wrote:
Hello All,
For anyone interested in the Microsoft .NET side of things… The .NET SDK
project has a high level architecture document with details on our
Hi Joe,
We have issues with Nova resize that we are troubleshooting. If we don’t find
the root cause by today we’ll temporarily skip the resize tests.
Thanks,
Alessandro
On 01 Apr 2014, at 21:27, Joe Gordon
joe.gord...@gmail.commailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hyper-V CI
Talking about regressions, there’s one that forced us to move back to VHD disks
from VHDX in the Hyper-V CI: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1294682
The patch is up for review but I didn’t get any reply to my latest comments on
March 25th.
Thanks,
Alessandro
On 01 Apr 2014, at 21:27,
Due to an issue in Pbr 0.7 that prevents the installation of any Pbr based
package on Windows and due to the recent availability
of Pbr 0.8 [1] which includes the fix for this issue, I suggest that we should
upgrade the Pbr dependency in the global requirements [2]
or at least exclude version
On 31 Mar 2014, at 18:13, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote:
Building on what John said, I'm a bit wary of introducing semantics into the
Conductor's live migration code
that are VMWare-specific. The conductor's live-migration code is supposed to
be driver-agnostic. IMHO, it
would be
Those use cases are very important in enterprise scenarios requirements, but
there's an important missing piece in the current OpenStack APIs: support for
application consistent backups via Volume Shadow Copy (or other solutions) at
the instance level, including differential / incremental
Hi guys,
By checking the status of the patch at [1] by arezmerita, I noticed that it
didn’t get any reviews since the last upload on Jan 31th (after a comprehensive
round of reviews started on Dec 10th).
During a chat on #openstack-horizon, jpich noticed that the BP [2] was not
targetted, so
Hi guys,
We have a blocking issue on Hyper-V, the guru-meditation report fails on
Hyper-V due to missing signal handling, as a result Nova fails to start.
Bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1286528
Here’s a sample failed job:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74060
Direct link to the
Hi,
Did you install the VMWare tools and sysprepped the image before adding it to
Glance?
Here's how we automate the creation of Windows OpenStack images for KVM,
Hyper-V and VMWare (unattended setup, hypervisor drivers, windows updates,
Cloudbase-Init and sysprep):
Hi Akira,
Cloudbase-Init supports ConfigDrive v2 metadata provided as either:
- ISO in cdrom drive (any version of Windows starting with XP / 2003)
- ISO in raw HDD (starting with Windows 8 / Windows 2012)
As you correctly pointed out, Windows does not directly support mounting raw
disks
Please check also this bug fixed in Havana:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1155842
If you are running Grizzly you’ll need 2013.1.4.
On 22 Feb 2014, at 23:16, Alessandro Pilotti apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com
wrote:
Hi Akira,
Cloudbase-Init supports ConfigDrive v2 metadata
Hi guys,
Windows Heat templates are currently supported by using Cloudbase-Init.
Here’s the wiki document that I attached some weeks ago to the blueprint
referenced in this thread: http://wiki.cloudbase.it/heat-windows
There are a few open points that IMO require some discussion.
One topic
' returned exit status 1: ssh:
connect to host review.openstack.org port 29418: Network is unreachable
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
error: Could not fetch origin
On 10 Feb 2014, at 04:21 , Alessandro Pilotti apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
On 10 Feb 2014
Hi guys,
On 10 Feb 2014, at 03:59 , Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 18:17 -0700, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
Hi,
I think the hyper-v CI system is sometimes failing with this message
incorrectly:
This change was unable to be automatically merged with the
On 02 Feb 2014, at 23:10 , Alessandro Pilotti apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com
wrote:
On 02 Feb 2014, at 23:01 , Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
It seems like there were a lot of failing Hyper-V CI jobs for nova
yesterday. Is there some systemic problem or did all those patches
got from
the chat it is not possible as long as the CI is non voting independently from
the return status of the single jobs.
Alessandro
Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
On 25 Jan 2014, at 16:51 , Matt Riedemann
of this issue and looking into it. The issue happens in devstack
before the Hyper-V compute nodes are added and before tempests starts.
I’ll post an update as soon as we get it sorted out.
Thanks,
Alessandro
Michael
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com
On 25 Jan 2014, at 00:25 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/24/2014 04:41 PM, Peter Pouliot wrote:
Hello OpenStack Community,
I am excited at this opportunity to make the community aware that the
Hyper-V CI infrastructure
is now up and running. Let’s first start with
On 25 Jan 2014, at 16:51 , Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 1/24/2014 3:41 PM, Peter Pouliot wrote:
Hello OpenStack Community,
I am excited at this opportunity to make the community aware that the
Hyper-V CI infrastructure
is now up and running. Let’s first start
Being the gate one of those things that we all use (and abuse) everyday
whatever
project we work on, I wouldn’t sleep well by skipping this call. :-)
Myself and my fellow Cloudbasers ociuhandu and gsamfira are going to join in on
Monday.
We got our small share of “learning the hard way” on
+1
Nova's get-password is corrently the only safe way from a security perspective
to handle guest passwords.
This feature needs to be mirrored in Horizon, otherwise most users will
continue to resort to unsafe solutions like the clear text admin_pass due to
lack of practical alternatives.
Hi guys,
This patch breaks “setup.py install” on Windows due to the usage on symbolic
links: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64747/
error: can't copy 'etc\neutron\plugins\nicira\nvp.ini': doesn't exist or not a
regular file
I filed up a bug here:
Hi guys,
We have a couple of bug fix patches that already received a +2 review waiting
since some time for a second +2a.
Can some core rev please help in getting them reviewed and possibly merged?
Nova
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55449/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55975/
Neutron
Hi guys,
We got password-less authentication properly working in Windows, implemented
and included in Cloudbase-Init.
Here’s a blog post explaining how it works:
http://www.cloudbase.it/windows-without-passwords-in-openstack/
And the gory details:
18:39 , Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Alessandro Pilotti's message of 2013-12-13 07:13:01 -0800:
Hi guys,
This seems to become a pretty long thread with quite a lot of ideas. What do
you think about setting up a meeting on IRC to talk about what direction to
take?
On 03.12.2013, at 21:20, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 04:27 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:23:19PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On 02 Dec 2013, at 04:52 , Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com
wrote:
This is very cool
On 02 Dec 2013, at 04:52 , Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Hi all,
At Cloudbase we are heavily using VMware Workstation and Fusion for
development, demos and PoCs, so we thought
On Dec 1, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.commailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Hi all,
At Cloudbase we are heavily using VMware Workstation and Fusion for
development, demos and PoCs, so we thought: why not replacing our automation
scripts with a fully
On 02/dic/2013, at 23:47, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.commailto:vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.commailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
On 02 Dec 2013, at 20:54 , Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana
Hi all,
At Cloudbase we are heavily using VMware Workstation and Fusion for
development, demos and PoCs, so we thought: why not replacing our automation
scripts with a fully functional Nova driver and use OpenStack APIs and Heat for
the automation? :-)
Here’s the repo for this Nova driver
On Oct 16, 2013, at 05:48 , Dan Smith
d...@danplanet.commailto:d...@danplanet.com wrote:
The last thing that OpenStack needs ANY more help with is velocity. I
mean, let's be serious - we land WAY more patches in a day than is
even close to sane.
Thanks for saying this -- it doesn't get said
On Oct 16, 2013, at 08:45 , Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm going to top post because my response is general. I totally agree that we
need people that understand the code base and we should encourage new people
to be cross-functional. I guess my main issue
On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:19 , Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netmailto:robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 16 October 2013 20:14, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.commailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com
wrote:
Drivers are IMO not part of the core of Nova, but completely
On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez
thie...@openstack.orgmailto:thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
The Linux kernel process works for a couple of reasons...
1) the subsystem maintainers have known each other for a solid decade
(i.e. 3x the lifespan of the OpenStack
, 2013 at 10:42:45AM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez
thie...@openstack.orgmailto:thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
The Linux kernel process works for a couple of reasons...
1) the subsystem maintainers have known each other
On Oct 16, 2013, at 15:16 , Sean Dague s...@dague.net
wrote:
On 10/16/2013 01:19 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
snip
Sean, you got called out in the meeting not because you asked to put a
refernce link to the specs which was perfectly reasonable, but because
after we did what you asked
On Oct 15, 2013, at 18:14 , Duncan Thomas
duncan.tho...@gmail.commailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 October 2013 15:41, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.commailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Current reviews require:
+1 de facto driver X mantainer(s)
+2 core
On Oct 15, 2013, at 19:18 , Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 13 October 2013 00:19, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
If you don't like any of the options that this already long thread is
providing, I'm absolutely open to discuss any constructive
On Oct 15, 2013, at 19:03 , Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 11 October 2013 20:51, Rochelle.Grober rochelle.gro...@huawei.com wrote:
Proposed solution:
There have been a couple of solutions proposed. I’m presenting a
merged/hybrid solution that may work
·
Phone: 1-507-253-7622 | Mobile: 1-507-990-1889
E-mail: mrie...@us.ibm.commailto:mrie...@us.ibm.com
Mail Attachment.gif
3605 Hwy 52 N
Rochester, MN 55901-1407
United States
From:Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.commailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com
On Oct 16, 2013, at 02:36 , Sean Dague s...@dague.netmailto:s...@dague.net
wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This is
a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and
On 14.10.2013, at 11:18, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
[...]
This sounds like a very myopic solution to the issue you originally
raised, and I don't think it will solve the underlying issues.
Taking a step back, you originally raised a concern about how
On Oct 13, 2013, at 14:54 , Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 09:30:30 -0700
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
If the idea is to gate with nova-extra-drivers this could lead to a
rather painful process to change the virt driver API. When all the
drivers are
On 12.10.2013, at 20:04, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
From the user perspective, splitting off the projects seems to be focussing
on the ease of commit compared to the final user experience. An 'extras'
project without *strong* testing co-ordination with packagers such as SUSE
On 12.10.2013, at 20:22, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
From the user perspective, splitting off the projects seems to be
focussing on the ease of commit compared to the final user
experience.
I think what you describe is specifically the desire that originally
spawned the thread:
On 13.10.2013, at 01:26, Joe Gordon
joe.gord...@gmail.commailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.commailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
On 12.10.2013, at 20:22, Dan Smith
d...@danplanet.commailto:d
On 13.10.2013, at 01:09, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
4) Periodically, code from the new project(s) must be merged into Nova.
Only Nova core reviewers will have obviously +2a rights here.
I propose to do it on scheduled days before every milestone, differentiated
per driver to
On Oct 11, 2013, at 14:15 , Sean Dague s...@dague.net
wrote:
On 10/10/2013 08:43 PM, Tim Smith wrote:
snip
Again, I don't have any vested interest in this discussion, except that
I believe the concept of reviewer karma to be counter to both software
quality and openness. In this particular
On Oct 11, 2013, at 17:17 , Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
OpenStack is organized differently: there are lots of separate projects (Nova,
Neutrom, Glance, etc) instead of a single one (which is a good thing
On Oct 11, 2013, at 18:02 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 10:41 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 17:17 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
OpenStack
On Oct 11, 2013, at 18:36 , Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com
wrote:
I think that all drivers that are officially supported must be
treated in the same way.
Well, we already have multiple classes of support due to the various
states of testing that the drivers have.
If we are going to
On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:04 , John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.commailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Bob Ball
bob.b...@citrix.commailto:bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant
On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:29 , Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 12:04 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Bob Ball
bob.b...@citrix.commailto:bob.b...@citrix.com
mailto:bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original
On 11.10.2013, at 22:58, Rochelle.Grober
rochelle.gro...@huawei.commailto:rochelle.gro...@huawei.com wrote:
Pardon me for cutting out most of the discussion. I’d like to summarize a bit
here and make a proposal.
Issues:
· Driver and Plugin writers for Nova (and other Core
Hi all,
As the Havana release date is approaching fast, I'm sending this email to sum
up the situation for pending bugs and reviews related to the Hyper-V
integration in OpenStack.
In the past weeks we diligently marked bugs that are related to Havana features
with the havana-rc-potential
On Oct 10, 2013, at 23:50 , Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/10/2013 02:20 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
Hi all,
As the Havana release date is approaching fast, I'm sending this email
to sum up the situation for pending bugs and reviews related
Hi everyone,
Today’s Hyper-V meeting minutes.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.txt
Log:
The RemoteFX feature allows Hyper-V compute nodes to provide GPU acceleration
to instances by sharing the host's GPU resources.
Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hyper-v-remotefx
This feature provides big improvements for VDI related scenarios based on
OpenStack and
On Sep 6, 2013, at 14:26 , Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.commailto:berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:56:10AM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
The RemoteFX feature allows Hyper-V compute nodes to provide GPU acceleration
to instances by sharing the host's GPU resources
On Sep 6, 2013, at 15:36 , Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.commailto:berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:22:27PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Sep 6, 2013, at 14:26 , Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.commailto:berra...@redhat.commailto:berra...@redhat.com
wrote
This is an FFE request for adding console support for Hyper-V. Unlike most
other hypervisors, Hyper-V guest console access is based on RDP instead of VNC.
This blueprint adds RDP support in Nova, implemented in a way consistent with
the existing VNC and SPICE protocols.
It's an essential
On Aug 27, 2013, at 18:52 , Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2013 10:53 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
That's IMO a different story: backporting a driver is usually quite
trivial as it affects only one service (nova-compute) and one
interaction point
On Aug 27, 2013, at 18:40 , Joe Gordon
joe.gord...@gmail.commailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.commailto:berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:55:03AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/27/2013 10:43 AM,
Today's Hyper-V meeting minutes:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-27-16.06.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-27-16.06.txt
Log:
Today's Hyper-V meeting minutes:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-20-16.06.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-20-16.06.txt
Log:
Hi Brian,
On the Hyper-V side we have Remote-Fx support in the works for Havana:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hyper-v-remotefx
The code will be ready for review around next week.
Thanks,
Alessandro
On Aug 14, 2013, at 01:07 , Brian Schott
Based on an intial run of the Hyper-V Nova tests with pymox
(https://github.com/emonty/pymox), only 2 of the tests required some minor
adjustements while the rest was running perfectly fine by just replacing the
mox import line.
If we plan to support pymox in Havana, I'd be happy to send a
Hy Russell,
Yep, we are on track with the development, I have to update the BP status.
There's a fairly big one up for review now
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38160/, the other Nova ones are faster to get
ready for review.
Thanks,
Alessandro
On Jul 23, 2013, at 19:47 , Russell Bryant
It seems that numad is libvirt specific - is that the case?
Hi, Hyper-V 2012 supports NUMA as well. It'd be great to plan an hypervisor
independent solution from the start.
On 21.06.2013, at 11:13, Bob Ball bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
It seems that numad is libvirt specific - is that the
98 matches
Mail list logo
