Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] About rebuilding volume-backed instances.

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi, thanks all for replying, sorry I might be a bit unclear. > > We have user demands that we only change the root device of an > volume-backed instance for upper layer services. It's not cloudy but it is > quite

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, > Images, ..) in the next way: > > >>> resource =

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, michael mccune wrote: > On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > >> What if we add new API method that will just resturn resource status by >> UUID? Or even just extend get request with the new argument that returns >> only status? >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Cinder Mitaka Deadlines

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Cinder Release Schedule > > After some discussion at the Mitaka Design Summit, the Cinder team will be > altering our release schedule for this release to simplify deadlines and > closer align with the established

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Recording little everyday OpenStack successes

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hello everyone, > > OpenStack has become quite big, and it's easier than ever to feel lost, > to feel like nothing is really happening. It's more difficult than ever > to feel part of a single community, and to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

e time to fix their clients. Anyway, I > leave a very easy way to re-enable v1. > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Gorka Eguileor <gegui...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On 28/09, John Griffith wrote: >> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Mark Voelker wrote: > FWIW, the most popular client libraries in the last user survey[1] other > than OpenStack’s own clients were: libcloud (48 respondents), jClouds (36 > respondents), Fog (34 respondents), php-opencloud (21 respondents), >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The Absurdity of the Milestone-1 Deadline for Drivers

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > I can definitely see your logic, but we've a history in cinder of vendors > trying to cram drivers in at the last minute which we very much wanted to > stop dead. I might suggest that the second milestone, rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The Absurdity of the Milestone-1 Deadline for Drivers

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > I've always thought it was a bit strange to require new drivers to merge > by milestone 1. I think I understand the motivations of the policy. The > main motivation was to free up reviewers to review "other

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Recent proposal to remove NetApp drivers

Hey Everyone, So I've been kinda busy on IRC today with conversations about some patches I proposed yesterday [1], [2]. I thought maybe I should try and explain my actions a bit, because it seems that some think I just arbitrarily flew off the handle and proposed something drastic, or that I had

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Recent proposal to remove NetApp drivers

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:15 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > So I've been kinda busy on IRC today with conversations about some patches > I proposed yesterday [1], [2]. > > I thought maybe I should try and explain my actions a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] how to handle AZ bug 1496235?

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 9/23/2015 2:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> >> >> On 9/23/2015 1:46 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: >> >>> Hi Matt, >>> >>> In Liberty, we introduced allow_availability_zone_fallback [1] option in >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:17 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@outlook.com> > wrote: > >> A present: >> >> >>> import contextlib >> >>> import os

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > A present: > > >>> import contextlib > >>> import os > >>> > >>> @contextlib.contextmanager > ... def synced_file(path, mode='wb'): > ... with open(path, mode) as fh: > ... yield fh > ...

[openstack-dev] [CINDER] [PTL Candidates] Questions

​PTL nomination emails are good, but I have a few questions that I'd like to ask to help me in making my vote. Some of these are covered in the general proposal announcements, but I'd love to hear some more detail. It would be awesome if the Cinder candidates could spend some time and answer

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com > wrote: > On 09/18/2015 12:11 PM, John Griffith wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Chris Friesen < >> chris.frie...@windriver.com >> <mailto:chris.frie..

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/18/2015 01:01 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Chris Friesen < > chris.frie...@windriver.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On 09/18/2015 06:57 AM, E

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com > wrote: > On 09/18/2015 11:01 AM, John Griffith wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Chris Friesen < >> chris.frie...@windriver.com >> <mailto:chris.frie..

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/18/2015 03:33 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > >> On 09/18/2015 01:01 PM, John Griffith wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 09/18/2015 06:57 AM, Eric Harney wrote: > >> On 09/17/2015 06:06 PM, John Griffith wrote: >> > > Having the "global conf" settings intermixed with the backend sectio

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Anne Gentle < > annegen...@justwriteclick.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:15 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: > > > I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage > > people to not wait until the last minute. Waiting to see who is >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Eric Harney wrote: > On 09/17/2015 05:00 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > > On 16 September 2015 at 23:43, Eric Harney wrote: > > > >> Currently, at least some options set in [DEFAULT] don't apply to > >> per-driver sections,

Re: [openstack-dev] Pycharm License for OpenStack developers

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Joshua Harlow > wrote: > >> Anyone know about the impact of: >> >> - >> https://mmilinkov.wordpress.com/2015/09/04/jetbrains-lockin-we-told-you-so/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]Behavior when one cinder-volume service is down

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Eduard Matei < eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Let me see if i got this: > - running 3 (multiple) c-vols won't automatically give you failover > ​correct ​ > - each c-vol is "master" of a certain number of volumes > ​yes ​ > -- if the c-vol is

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Eric Harney wrote: > On 09/15/2015 01:00 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > > I'm currently trying to work around an issue where activating LVM > > snapshots created through cinder takes potentially a long time. > > (Linearly related to the amount of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]Behavior when one cinder-volume service is down

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Eduard Matei < eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This all started when we were testing Evacuate with our storage driver. > We thought we found a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1491276) > then Scott replied that we should be running

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [plugin] Release tagging

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:44 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> John, >> >> per ACL in project-config: >> >> http://git.openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran > > was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel

[openstack-dev] [fuel] [plugin] Release tagging

Hey All, I was trying to tag a release for v 1.0.1 on [1] today and noticed I don't have permissions to do so. Is there, a release team/process for this? [1] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-plugin-solidfire-cinder Thanks, John

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [plugin] Release tagging

o there's something else wrong..what error did you get? > > -- Dims > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:51 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hey All, >> >> I was trying to tag a release for v 1.0.1 on [1] today and noticed I >> don't have

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Using storage drivers outside of openstack/cinder

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > Hey Tony, > This has been a long running pain point/problem for some of the drivers > in Cinder. > As a reviewer, I try and -1 drivers that talk directly to the database as > I don't think > drivers *should* be

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > mordred@camelot:~$ neutron net-create test-net-mt > Policy doesn't allow create_network to be performed. > > Thank you neutron. Excellent job. > > Here's what that looks like at the REST layer: > > DEBUG:

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > On 2015-09-04 12:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 09/04/2015 10:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > >> > >> Obviously the translation of errors > >> would be more difficult if the enforcer is generating messages. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] L3 low pri review queue starvation

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Tom Barron wrote: > [Yesterday while discussing the following issue on IRC, jgriffith > suggested that I post to the dev list in preparation for a discussion in > Wednesday's cinder meeting.] > > Please take a look at the 10 "Low" priority

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Extending attached disks

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:48 PM, taylor.ber...@solnet.co.nz wrote: Hi everyone, Apologises for the duplicate send, looks like my mail client doesn't create very clean HTML messages. Here is the message in plain-text. I'll make sure to send to the list in plain-text from now on. In my

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Possible issues cryptography 1.0 and os-client-config 1.6.2

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:42 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 19 August 2015 at 03:51, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: So... I'm at Linux Con this week, meaning that things will be slow

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Possible issues cryptography 1.0 and os-client-config 1.6.2

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 19 August 2015 at 03:51, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: So... I'm at Linux Con this week, meaning that things will be slow. I think - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208582/ (slightly updated this

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote: +1 It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Restart openstack service

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Guo, Ruijing ruijing@intel.com wrote: If you can commit it to devstack, it will benefit everyone -Original Message- From: Tony Breeds [mailto:t...@bakeyournoodle.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 12:21 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Restart openstack service

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:03 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Guo, Ruijing ruijing@intel.com wrote: If you can commit it to devstack, it will benefit everyone -Original Message- From: Tony Breeds [mailto:t

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder and Nova availability zones

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote: Hi, In Kilo cycle [1] was merged. It started passing AZ of a booted VM to Cinder to make volumes appear in the same AZ as VM. This is certainly a good approach, but I wonder how to deal with an use case when

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:47 AM, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry if I missed something, since now we have supported backup in-use volumes in L, so I wonder is there some plan or design to support restoring on-line volumes. Thanks. -- Best Wishes For You!

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Tags, explain like I am five?

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/15/2015 03:27 PM, John Griffith wrote: It's relatively limited right now I think, and part of the reason for that is we've tried to ensure that the information that we put on tags is subjective I think you mean

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Tags, explain like I am five?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: So I've been following the TC work on tags, and have been slightly confused by the whole work, so I am wondering if I can get a 'explainlikeimfive' (borrowing from reddit terminology) edition of it. I always thought

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Tags, explain like I am five?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: John Griffith wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com mailto:harlo...@outlook.com wrote: So I've been following the TC work on tags, and have been slightly confused

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Implementation of ABC MetaClasses

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Marc Koderer m...@koderer.com wrote: Am 08.07.2015 um 01:37 schrieb Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com: On 18:38 Jun 22, Marc Koderer wrote: Am 20.06.2015 um 01:59 schrieb John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com : * The BaseVD represents the functionality we

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][stable] Cinder client broken in Juno

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: We already have an environment variable for version... 'auto'? On 30 Jun 2015 07:57, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][stable] Cinder client broken in Juno

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: I too would prefer option 2. Would rather do the pack ports than remove the functionality. Jay On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:40 AM Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:49:55AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Duncan Thomas wrote: We are working on some sort of distributed replacement for the locks in cinder, since file locks are limiting our ability to do HA. I'm afraid you're unlikely to get any traction until that work

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance][nova] Python 3 coming!

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 06/26/2015 04:26 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, The Python 3.4 gate (py34) of cinder, glance and nova just became voting. You now have to write Python code compatible with Python 2.7 and 3.4. WOOHOO! Well

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Implementation of ABC MetaClasses

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:43 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: Anyway, maybe I'm missing a big advantage here, but without understanding what this gains it makes the code structure a bit hard to maintain

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Implementation of ABC MetaClasses

Hey Everyone, So I've talked a little in bits and pieces regarding the implementations that are going in for the ABC metaclass work. First off, I think the use of ABC is a good idea and has value, particularly as we approach/surpass 50 third party drivers. The only thing that I'm wondering if

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Re: [Openstack-operators] How do your end users use networking?

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Adding -dev because of the reference to the Neutron Get me a network spec. Also adding [nova] and [neutron] subject markers. Comments inline, Kris. On 05/22/2015 09:28 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote: During the Openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Is volume connection_info modeled/documented anywhere?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: While investigating/discussing bug 1463525 [1] I remembered how little I know about what can actually come out of the connection_info dict returned from the os-initialize_connection cinder API call. So we added

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Rebranded Volume Drivers

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: There are a couple of cases [1][2] I'm seeing where new Cinder volume drivers for Liberty are rebranding other volume drivers. This involves inheriting off another volume driver's class(es) and providing some config options

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][tc][ptl] Scaling up code review process (subdir cores)

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/03/2015 07:24 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Really it's hard to find cores that understand whole project, but it's quite simple to find people that can maintain subsystems of project. We are made wise not by the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Using depends-on for patches which require an approved spec

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Michael Still wrote: Hey, it would be cool if devs posting changes for nova which depend

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: This is long overdue, but it gives me great pleasure to nominate Sean McGinnis for Cinder core. Reviews: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:+%22Sean+McGinnis%22,n,z Contributions:

Re: [openstack-dev] rating talks (and keynotes) at the OpenStack summit

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Amrith Kumar amr...@tesora.com wrote: I attended a talk by Mark Baker today (http://sched.co/2qbJ) entitled “The OpenStack Summit Talk Selection Process is Broken” and I think it was an informative session. The statistics presented indicated that just

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] can we deprecate the volume CLIs in novaclient?

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: This came up while talking about bug 1454369 [1]. This also came up at one point in kilo when we found out the volume CLIs in novaclient didn't work at one point and we broke the cells devstack exercises job

Re: [openstack-dev] Who is using nova-docker? (Re: [nova-docker] Status update)

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Fawad Khaliq fa...@plumgrid.com wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: Good points, Dan and John. At this point it may be useful to see who is actually using nova-docker. Can folks who are using any version of

Re: [openstack-dev] Please stop reviewing code while asking questions

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/24/2015 04:33 PM, Ryan Brown wrote: On 04/24/2015 03:00 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: I like that point and I agree with you. The problem, as someone already stated, is that these people are rarely on IRC and sometimes

Re: [openstack-dev] The Evolution of core developer to maintainer?

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead of writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from that patch [1]. Neutron tried to go from core to maintainer but after input

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [third-party-ci] Clarifications on the goal and skipping tests

for the feedback... I don't disagree per say, however Cinder is set up a bit different here in terms of expectations for base functionality requirements and compatibility but your points are definitely well taken. ​ Thanks, doug On Mar 30, 2015, at 2:54 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [third-party-ci] Clarifications on the goal and skipping tests

This may have already been raised/discussed, but I'm kinda confused so thought I'd ask on the ML here. The whole point of third party CI as I recall was to run the same tests that we run in the official Gate against third party drivers. To me that would imply that a CI system/device that marks

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [third-party-ci] Clarifications on the goal and skipping tests

rules when drivers should remove themselves from that blackout list. That is easier to track, can be cleanly used by defcore and for tagging. Thanks, Arkady *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griffi...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, March 30, 2015 8:12 PM *To:* OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [third-party-ci] Clarifications on the goal and skipping tests

a long way to smooth these out in the next round. --Rocky John Griffith on Monday, March 30, 2015 15:36 wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com wrote: A few reasons, I’m sure there are others: - Broken tests that hardcode something about

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Walter A. Boring IV wrote: Thanks Mike for all of your efforts on this, +1 I think Mike checked all the possible boxes to give fair warning to driver owners. It's hard to say no in the name of quality. It's so

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] PTL elections

Murano PTL election: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Murano/PTL_Elections_Kilo_Liberty Thanks. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:01 AM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Serg Melikyan smelik...@mirantis.com wrote: Thank you! On Wed, Mar 18, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] PTL elections

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Serg Melikyan smelik...@mirantis.com wrote: Thank you! On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com wrote: The PTL candidacy proposal time frame ended and we have only one candidate. So, Serg Melikyan, my congratulations!

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Questions re progress

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Adam Lawson alaw...@aqorn.com wrote: The aim is cloud storage that isn't affected by a host failure and major players who deploy hyper-scaling clouds architect them to prevent that from happening. To me that's cloud 101. Physical machine goes down, data

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] Ubuntu LVM hangs in gate testing

Hey Everyone, Thought I'd reach out to the ML to see if somebody might have some insight or suggestions to a problem I've been trying to solve. The short summary is: During a dsvm-full run in the gate there are times when /dev/sdX devices on the system may be created/deleted. The trick here

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Boris Bobrov bbob...@mirantis.com wrote: On Thursday 12 March 2015 12:24:57 Duncan Thomas wrote: ubuntu@devstack-multiattach:~/devstack$ cinder-manage db sync /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_db/_i18n.py:19: DeprecationWarning: The oslo namespace

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2015, at 05:24 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: ubuntu@devstack-multiattach:~/devstack$ cinder-manage db sync /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_db/_i18n.py:19: DeprecationWarning: The oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]difference between spec merged and BP approval

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Chen, Wei D wei.d.c...@intel.com wrote: Hi Stefano, Thanks so much for your detailed answer, I finally know the reason why those patches are not reviewed in this cycle. Actually, this BP (

Re: [openstack-dev] Avoiding regression in project governance

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: The TC is in the middle of implementing a fairly significant change in project governance. You can find an overview from Thierry on the OpenStack blog [1]. Part of the change is to recognize more projects as being

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:52 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com writes: A default query that edited out old, jenkins failing, and -2 stuff would be helpful. A default or easy query that highlighted things relevant to the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] volume's current host in retype [cinder]

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Nikesh Kumar Mahalka nikeshmaha...@vedams.com wrote: Hi, i was trying to understand below patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44881/24 What volume's current host means in this patch? I want to understand it with some examples. Regards Nikesh

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: I'm not expressing myself cleary enough. I don't advocate for the removal of anything because I like pretty charts. I'm changing the subject to be even more clear. On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 13:26 -0800, James E. Blair

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] 3rd Party CI failures ignored, caused driver to break

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote: Hey folks, Today we found out that a patch[1] that was made against our lefthand driver caused the driver to fail. The 3rd party CI that we have setup to test our driver (hp_lefthand_rest_proxy.py) caught

Re: [openstack-dev] H302 considered harmful

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 26 February 2015 at 08:54, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:51, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Is there anybody who'd like to step forward in defence of this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/24/2015 09:37 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote: That also provides a very concrete answer to will people show up. Because if they do, and we get this horizontal refactoring happening,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] qemu-img disk corruption bug to patch or not?

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Tony Breeds t...@bakeyournoodle.com wrote: Hi all, In September I started working on a simple (but controvertial) fix in nova[1] to avoid some disk corruption issues. John kindly ran with a similar fix to cinder[2]. John's review ended up in merge

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [gate tests] Cinder drivers being set up as jobs in infra

Hey Everyone, Anteaya was kind enough to ask in the Cinder channel about some tests that were added to the gate for SheepDog [1]. I would like to know why there's no process for the projects that are impacted by these changes to have input? At the very least if someone is adding test

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [gate tests] Cinder drivers being set up as jobs in infra

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 04:38 PM, John Griffith wrote: Hey Everyone, Anteaya was kind enough to ask in the Cinder channel about some tests that were added to the gate for SheepDog [1]. I would like to know why

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] FFE driver-private-data + pure-iscsi-chap-support

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 14:50 Sun 15 Feb , Patrick East wrote: Hi All, I would like to request a FFE for the following blueprints: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/driver-private-data

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] juno is fubar in the gate

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 2/9/2015 12:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Dave Walker [mailto:em...@daviey.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 15:10 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging On 13

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-01-13 18:02:41 + (+), Louis Taylor wrote: This would be great, since it avoids the scheduling and which channel have we moved to questions when a different slot is required. Yep, once every team has its

Re: [openstack-dev] Kilo devstack issue

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Nikesh Kumar Mahalka nikeshmaha...@vedams.com wrote: Hi, We deployed a kilo devstack on ubuntu 14.04 server. We successfully launched a instance from dashboard, but we are unable to open console from dashboard for instance.Also instacne is unable to get ip

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: All, We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to stable/icehouse for Cinder. The cores were discussing what was ok to put into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to

Re: [openstack-dev] [3rd-party-ci] Cinder CI and CI accounts

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Alon Marx alo...@il.ibm.com wrote: Hi All, In IBM we have several cinder drivers, with a number of CI accounts. In order to improve the CI management and maintenance, we decided to build a single Jenkins master that will run several jobs for the drivers we

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Logging formats and i18n

Lately (on the Cinder team at least) there's been a lot of disagreement in reviews regarding the proper way to do LOG messages correctly. Use of '%' vs ',' in the formatting of variables etc. We do have the oslo i18n guidelines page here [1], which helps a lot but there's some disagreement on a

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Logging formats and i18n

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 12/22/2014 09:42 AM, John Griffith wrote: Lately (on the Cinder team at least) there's been a lot of disagreement in reviews regarding the proper way to do LOG messages correctly. Use of '%' vs ',' in the formatting

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] ratio: created to attached

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Tom Barron t...@dyncloud.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone have real world experience, even data, to speak to the question: in an OpenStack cloud, what is the likely ratio of (created) cinder volumes to attached cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Cinder] Driver stats return value: infinite or unavailable

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Eduard Matei eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com wrote: Hi everyone, We're in a bit of a predicament regarding review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130733/ Two days ago it got a -1 from John G asking to change infinite to unavailable although the docs clearly

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] localrc for mutli-node setup

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Danny Choi (dannchoi) dannc...@cisco.com wrote: Hi, I would like to use devstack to deploy OpenStack on a multi-node setup, i.e. separate Controller, Network and Compute nodes What is the localrc for each node? I would assume, for example, we don’t need to

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing the openstack ansible deployment repo

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com wrote: Hello all, The RCBOPS team at Rackspace has developed a repository of Ansible roles, playbooks, scripts, and libraries to deploy Openstack inside containers for production use. We’ve been running this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]

cinder service-list will show all the backends Cinder knows about and their status. On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Pradip Mukhopadhyay pradip.inte...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there a way to find out/list down the backends discovered for Cinder? There is, I guess, no API for get the list of

<    1   2   3   4   5   >