Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Steve! I would say that we finally got to sort of stabilized state of wireframes [0]. I am sure there will appear slight changes (as it is always like this), but there shouldn't be bigger change of direction. We are looking forward to see some high-fidelity mockups if you are willing to he

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-05 Thread Tomas Sedovic
1. Are we doing node tags (page 4) for the first iteration? Where are they going to live? Yes, it's very easy to do, already part of Ironic. Cool! 2. There are multiple node profiles per role on pages 11, 12, 17. Is that just an oversight or do you intend on keeping those in? I though the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Tomas, thanks for the questions, I am replying inline. On 2014/05/02 11:19, Tomas Sedovic wrote: On 05/02/14 03:58, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi to everybody, based on the feedback from last week [0] I incorporated changes in the wireframes so that we keep them up to date with latest decisions

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-05 Thread Tomas Sedovic
On 05/02/14 03:58, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi to everybody, based on the feedback from last week [0] I incorporated changes in the wireframes so that we keep them up to date with latest decisions: http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-02-05_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf Changes: *

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-04 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi to everybody, based on the feedback from last week [0] I incorporated changes in the wireframes so that we keep them up to date with latest decisions: http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-02-05_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf Changes: * Smaller layout change in Nodes Registrati

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-22 Thread Tzu-Mainn Chen
Thanks for the update! One question - is it possible to move the "Deploying Status" bar from page 12 to page 14? The reason is that the former looks like a "Deployment Creation" page, while the latter is a "Deployment Detail" page. For me, the former is about sending parameters to the API to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-22 Thread Liz Blanchard
On Jan 20, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > Hello everybody, > > based on feedback which I received last week, I am sending updated > wireframes. They are still not completely final, more use-cases and smaller > updates will occur, but I believe that we are going forward pretty well.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey everybody, I am sending updated wireframes. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-22_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf Updates: * p15-18 for down-scaling deployment Any questions are welcome, I am happy to answer them. -- Jarda On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi f

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-20 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello everybody, based on feedback which I received last week, I am sending updated wireframes. They are still not completely final, more use-cases and smaller updates will occur, but I believe that we are going forward pretty well. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Sure Steve, that would be awesome! The only blocker for now is that there are still happening some changes based on feedback of what is doable / what is not. So right when we get more confident on stable(-ish) version (or at least I'll try to sort out widgets which should stay how they are), i

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-16 Thread Steve Doll
Looking good, let me know if I can be of help to make some high-fidelity mockups. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Jay Dobies wrote: > This is a really good evolution. I'm glad the wireframes are getting > closer to what we're doing for Icehouse. > > A few notes... > > On page 6, what does the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-16 Thread Jay Dobies
This is a really good evolution. I'm glad the wireframes are getting closer to what we're doing for Icehouse. A few notes... On page 6, what does the Provisioning Status chart reflect? The math doesn't add up if that's supposed to reflect the free v. deployed. That might just be a sample data

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-16 Thread Hugh O. Brock
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > Hi folks, > > thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes > and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. > > http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui-icehouse.p

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf Hopefully we are able to deliver described set of features. But if yo