Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-11-22 Thread Xuhan Peng
:*Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:53 PM >> *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack >> >> >> >> Thiago, >> >> My old setup was dual-st

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-11-21 Thread Harm Weites
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:53 PM > *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack > > > > Thiago, > > My old setup was dual-stacked, simply using a flat linuxbridge. It's > just that I now real

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-29 Thread Harm Weites
port hasn't been added yet. I should be adding this soon. > > > > There was a request for a Juno feature freeze exception for this > blueprint, but there's been no response, so this may not get > approved until K release. > > > > -Dane > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-19 Thread Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
:53 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack Thiago, My old setup was dual-stacked, simply using a flat linuxbridge. It's just that I now realy would like to separate multiple tenants using L3 routers, which should be easy

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-19 Thread Harm Weites
> > > > -Original Message- > > From: Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com <mailto:h...@weites.com>] > > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
-Dane > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com] > > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack > > > > Hi, > &

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
August 16, 2014 3:21 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack Hi Dane, Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6 addresses on gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go. Should it work just fine wit

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Harm Weites
-Dane > > -Original Message- > From: Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack > > Hi, > > Given the work on [1] has been aband

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
[mailto:h...@weites.com] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack Hi, Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the current status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutro

[openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Harm Weites
Hi, Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the current status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutron got something like that on it's roadmap. The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse, and I'm unaware of something similar to achieve a dual stack network. Wha