Rob Crittenden wrote:
It looks like the switch to requests in python-glanceclient
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78269/) has broken nova when SSL is
enabled.
I think it is related to the custom object that the glanceclient uses.
If another connection gets pushed into the pool then things
Hey Kent,
Appreciate your effort and being pro-active for your patches. For future review
requests please join us at the #openstack-glance channel on Freenode.
Thanks,
-Nikhil
From: Wang, Kent [kent.w...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:20 PM
To:
On 07/17/2014 03:07 AM, Tailor, Rajesh wrote:
Hi all,
Why glance is not using Launcher/ProcessLauncher (oslo-incubator) for
its wsgi service like it is used in other openstack projects i.e. nova,
cinder, keystone etc.
Glance uses the same WSGI service launch code as the other OpenStack
On 07/17/2014 02:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greeting,
I'd like to announce that we finally got the glance.store repo created.
This library pulls out of glance the code related to stores. Not many
changes were made to the API during this process. The main goal, for
now, is to switch glance
On 07/17/2014 04:56 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 07/17/2014 02:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greeting,
I'd like to announce that we finally got the glance.store repo created.
This library pulls out of glance the code related to stores. Not many
changes were made to the API during this process.
On 07/17/2014 12:19 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 07/17/2014 04:56 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 07/17/2014 02:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greeting,
I'd like to announce that we finally got the glance.store repo created.
This library pulls out of glance the code related to stores. Not many
changes
: 11 July 2014 03:43
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Bug Days - July 15/16
As for the bug tagging, I just added some tags in the wiki for Glance:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bug_Tags#Glance, please feel free to complete
Hi Alexander,
I read through the artifact spec. Based on my reading it does not fix this
issue at all. [1] Furthermore, I do not understand why the glance
developers are focused on adding features like artifacts or signed images
when there are significant usability problems with glance as it
As for the bug tagging, I just added some tags in the wiki for Glance:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bug_Tags#Glance, please feel free to
complete it.
On 11/07/14 12:07, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
Hi All,
Glance is going to have bug days next week on July Tuesday 15 and
Wednesday 16. This is a
On 07/09/2014 01:32 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Recently looking at a gate failure, which was a 500 error from glance.
So I expected that glance would have a pretty clear trace in the logs.
Filtering at WARN level... it did not. Eventually through timestamp
mapping I found this:
On 07/09/2014 10:01 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 07/09/2014 01:32 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Recently looking at a gate failure, which was a 500 error from glance.
So I expected that glance would have a pretty clear trace in the logs.
Filtering at WARN level... it did not. Eventually through
On 07/09/2014 04:12 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/09/2014 10:01 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 07/09/2014 01:32 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Recently looking at a gate failure, which was a 500 error from glance.
So I expected that glance would have a pretty clear trace in the logs.
Filtering at WARN
On 07/09/2014 10:43 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 07/09/2014 04:12 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/09/2014 10:01 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 07/09/2014 01:32 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Recently looking at a gate failure, which was a 500 error from glance.
So I expected that glance would have a pretty
On 07/09/2014 04:52 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Sorry for over interpretting your response. I've had some frustration
recently with many projects that say 'file a bug', but it turns out
filing a bug doesn't actually get any results. If the only way to get
motion on a bug is to also send an email or
A
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Thanks Scott, that is a nice topic
In theory, I would prefer to have both owner_tenant and owner_user to be
persisted with an image, and to have a policy rule which allows to specify
if the users of a tenant have access to images owned by or shared with
other users of their tenant. But this will
On 06/11/2014 02:34 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
I think the tasks stuff is something different, though. A task is a
(potentially) long-running operation. So it would be possible for an
action to result in the creation of a task. As the proposal stands
today, the actions we've been looking at
Hey
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 17:43 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17 2014, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
@ZhiYan: I don't like the idea of removing the sample configuration file(s)
from the git repository. Many people do not want to have to checkout the
entire codebase and tox every time
-Original Message-
From: Mark McLoughlin [mailto:mar...@redhat.com]
Sent: 18 June 2014 06:58
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file
Hey
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 17:43 +0200, Julien Danjou
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 17:43 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17 2014, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
@ZhiYan: I don't like the idea of removing the sample configuration file(s)
from the git repository. Many
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 09:29 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 17:43 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17 2014, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
@Julien: I would be interested to understand the
On 17/06/14 15:59 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi guys,
So I've started to look at the configuration file used by Glance and I
want to switch to one configuration file only.
I stumbled upon this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/use-oslo-config
w.r.t using
to mix reg and API configs together.
- Erno (jokke) Kuvaja
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: 17 June 2014 15:19
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file
On 17/06/14 15:59 +0200, Julien
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file
I do not like this idea. As now we are on 5 different config files (+ policy
and schema). One for each (API and Registry) would still be ok, but putting all
together
.
- Erno (jokke) Kuvaja
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: 17 June 2014 15:19
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file
On 17/06/14 15:59 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi guys,
So
: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 7:47:53 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file
Frankly I don't like the idea of using single configuration for all
service too, I think it will be cool if we can generate separated
configuration template files automatically for each Glance service. So
an api setting seem to add some overhead.
Thanks,
Arnaud
- Original Message -
From: Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 7:47:53 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance
On Tue, Jun 17 2014, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
@ZhiYan: I don't like the idea of removing the sample configuration file(s)
from the git repository. Many people do not want to have to checkout the
entire codebase and tox every time they have to verify a variable name in a
configuration file. I
To: Arnaud Legendre alegen...@vmware.com
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:43:38 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file
On Tue, Jun 17 2014, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
@ZhiYan: I
+100 it's about time!
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Mark Washenberger
mark.washenber...@markwash.net wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to nominate Nikhil Komawar to join glance-core. His code and
review contributions over the past years have been very helpful and he's
been taking on a very
+1
From: Alex Meade [mailto:mr.alex.me...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 June 2014 13:56
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core
+100 it's about time!
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Mark Washenberger
+1
From: Kuvaja, Erno [kuv...@hp.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:34 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core
+1
From: Alex Meade [mailto:mr.alex.me
+1 Good job Nikhil!
- Original Message -
From: Brian Rosmaita brian.rosma...@rackspace.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 10:15:07 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating
I think the tasks stuff is something different, though. A task is a
(potentially) long-running operation. So it would be possible for an action
to result in the creation of a task. As the proposal stands today, the
actions we've been looking at are an alternative to the document-oriented
PATCH
Hi Dmitry,
I wanted to confirm that the image is getting uploaded fine. Only horizon
is showing the 504 Gateway Timeout error after the upload is complete.
Thanks,
Tizy
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tizy Ninan tizy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Sorry for the late reply. I will try
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 05/30/2014 02:22 PM, Hemanth Makkapati wrote:
Hello All,
I'm writing to notify you of the approach the Glance community has
decided to take for doing functional API. Also, I'm writing to solicit
your feedback on this
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 05/30/2014 02:22 PM, Hemanth Makkapati wrote:
Hello All,
I'm writing to notify you of the approach the Glance community has
decided to take for doing
From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 7:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC] Glance Functional API and
Cross-project API Consistency
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM
Hi Dmitry,
Sorry for the late reply. I will try this version of fix and let you know
the status.
Thanks,
Tizy
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Here's a fix that increases haproxy server timeout for Horizon to 48h:
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [Heat] Glance Metadata Catalog for
Capabilities and Tags
Importance: High
Thanks, Zane and Georgy!
We’ll begin getting all the expected sections for the new Glance spec repo into
this document
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 18:22 +, Hemanth Makkapati wrote:
Hello All,
I'm writing to notify you of the approach the Glance community has
decided to take for doing functional API. Also, I'm writing to
solicit your feedback on this approach in the light of cross-project
API consistency.
At
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 18:03 -0700, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose the Images program to adopt a mission statement
[1] and then change it to reflect our new aspirations of acting as a
Catalog that works with artifacts beyond just disk images [2].
Since the
On 06/06/2014 04:00 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 18:03 -0700, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose the Images program to adopt a mission statement
[1] and then change it to reflect our new aspirations of acting as a
Catalog that works with artifacts
Hi,
+1 for the mission statement, but indeed why 2 changes?
- Erno (jokke)
From: Mark Washenberger [mailto:mark.washenber...@markwash.net]
Sent: 05 June 2014 02:04
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [TC] Program Mission Statement and the Catalog
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote:
Hi,
+1 for the mission statement, but indeed why 2 changes?
I thought perhaps this way is more explicit. First we're adopting a
straightforward mission statement which has been lacking for some time.
Next we're proposing a
I will provide a little more context for the TC audience. I asked Hemanth
to tag this message [TC] because at the Juno summit in the cross-project
track there was discussion of cross-project api consistency [1]. The main
outcome of that meeting was that TC should recommend API conventions via
Hi Abishek,
download_image *should* apply to v2 in the same way as v1 I think.
If that's not what you're seeing can you enter a bug (with details) in
launchpad?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance
Typically you'd mark it with 'private security' but 'public security'
makes sense now.
Thanks!
Hi,
Tizy Ninan wrote :
We have an openstack deployment (Havana on CentOS) in HA mode with
nova-network service deployed using Mirantis Fuel v4.0 .
When uploading images with large filesize (more than 1 GB) from dashboard,
after upload is done the dashboard is showing 504 Gateway Timeout. What
Tizy Ninan wrote :
When uploading images with large filesize (more than 1 GB) from dashboard,
after upload is done the dashboard is showing 504 Gateway Timeout. What
Anyway we've launched a bug for fuel, thank you for the notice.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1326082
--
Regards,
Evgeny
Here's a fix that increases haproxy server timeout for Horizon to 48h:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97645/
I've marked the bug as Incomplete for now: we need a confirmation that
only Horizon is affected and Glance isn't. Please try the current
version of the fix, if gateway timeouts
On 29/05/14 18:42, Tripp, Travis S wrote:
Hello everyone!
At the summit in Atlanta we demonstrated the “Graffiti” project
concepts. We received very positive feedback from members of multiple
dev projects as well as numerous operators. We were specifically asked
multiple times about getting
I think this is a great feature to have it in Glance. Tagging mechanism for
objects which are not owned by Glance is complimentary to artifact
catalog\repository in Glance. As soon as we keep tags and artifacts
metadata close to each other the end-user will be able to use them
seamlessly.
Greetings!
The glance-specs repository is now opened!
- If you have a blueprint that is targeted for Juno-1 and Approved: you do not
need to create a spec. Only two blueprints seem to fall into this category. See
[1] for more details.
- If you have a blueprint in Launchpad (approved or not,
additional comments in the google doc.
Thanks,
Travis
From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov [mailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 1:19 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [Heat] Glance Metadata Catalog
Hello Hemanth,
Thanks for your summary, and raise it up in ML.
All of them are sensible to me, there is only one concern from
implementation perspective for me like to get folks notice.
If we follow 'POST /images/{image_id}/actions/{action_type}' approach,
I think we will hard to write common
I think you should restart the glance-api, because it will not reload the
policy.json like others.
2014-05-28 22:05 GMT+08:00 André Aranha andre.f.ara...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I have a question in Glance about its policy, I'm setting it to deny
all calls to images.list (get_image: !,
Worked fine, thank you!
On 28 May 2014 11:12, Guangyu Suo guan...@unitedstack.com wrote:
I think you should restart the glance-api, because it will not reload the
policy.json like others.
2014-05-28 22:05 GMT+08:00 André Aranha andre.f.ara...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I have a question in
Do you have a loadbalancer or something that limits the request time in the
path? That would be my guess, you probably need to raise the
request_termination_timeout.
Best,
Aaron
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Tizy Ninan tizy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We have an openstack deployment
This is a discussion that definitely belongs on the users list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Thanks.
-Ben
On 05/23/2014 01:36 AM, Aaron Rosen wrote:
Do you have a loadbalancer or something that limits the request time in the
path? That would be my guess, you
On 07/05/14 22:45 -0700, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi folks,
Unfortunately, the leader for one of our proposed sessions is now unable to
attend the summit. The topic in question is Signed Images [1] and was
allocated a half-session slot. This is a call out to see if there are any other
folks who
This is an interesting topic indeed: we though about the very same
idea in Murano (checking the origin of app definitions is a good thing
for an application catalog). If there are similar ideas in other
projects, then this definitely should belong to Glance catalog.
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
Hi Mark,
I'd like to get ~ the same coverage for the api+reg as we have for
api+sqlalchemy. The problem is that currently we are not running any
functional tests against v2 api+reg. I tried to enable the v2 tests
there is for registry as well, but due to some fundamental differences
they
Hi Erno,
Just looking for a little more information here. What are the particular
areas around keystone integration in the v2 api+registry stack that you
want to test? Is the v2 api + v2 registry stack using keystone differently
than how v1 api + v1 registry stack uses it?
Thanks
On Fri, Apr
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the reminder. I'm not sure if there is anyone from Glance team
working this. But I would like to highlight this in tonight Glance weekly
meeting and I will see what I can do.
Thanks Best regards,
Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
On 09/04/14 12:10 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Due to the lack of response, I'm proposing to switch the documentation
back to using sql_connection. I hope there wasn't a plan to deprecate
this option any time soon :)
Sorry I missed your previous email.
TBH, I'd rather update the config sample.
On 04/09/2014 11:35 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/04/14 12:10 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Due to the lack of response, I'm proposing to switch the documentation
back to using sql_connection. I hope there wasn't a plan to deprecate
this option any time soon :)
Sorry I missed your previous
Due to the lack of response, I'm proposing to switch the documentation
back to using sql_connection. I hope there wasn't a plan to deprecate
this option any time soon :)
Regards,
Tom
On 02/04/14 10:22, Tom Fifield wrote:
Since it's missed RC1, I'm guessing that this confusion to users
confirmed
On 04/02/2014 06:51 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to submit myself as a candidate to continue in the role of Glance
PTL for the Juno release cycle.
A bit of history about me: I joined Rackspace's Team Titan back in February
2011, where were initially focused on
Since it's missed RC1, I'm guessing that this confusion to users will be
ongoing for another six months ? :)
Regards,
Tom
On 30/03/14 23:24, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Hi
We have no plan to update sample template in I release for it, but
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77379/ is on reviewing,
Hi
We have no plan to update sample template in I release for it, but
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77379/ is on reviewing, IFY.
zhiyan
Sent from my iPad
On 2014年3月30日, at 13:04, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 27/02/14 18:47, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 27/02/14 12:12 +0800,
On 27/02/14 18:47, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 27/02/14 12:12 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Hi,
As best I can tell, all other services now use this syntax for
configuring database connections:
[database]
connection = sqlite:///etc,omg
whereas glance appears to still use
[DEFAULT]
...
Hi there.
On Tue 17 Dec 2013 (21:23), Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
wrote:
I was able to pin down the image upload problem today:
The Store.add file input read loop using chunkreadable throws an error on the
very last read. Apparently the mod_wsgi.Input behaves differently
On 12/03/14 19:19 -0700, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to nominate Arnaud Legendre to join Glance Core. Over the past cycle
his reviews have been consistently high quality and I feel confident in his
ability to assess the design of new features and the overall direction for
+1. Nice work Arnaud!
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/14 19:19 -0700, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to nominate Arnaud Legendre to join Glance Core. Over the past
cycle
his reviews have been consistently high quality and I
On 03/13/2014 08:00 AM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
Hi,
Right now you can select running either the v1 or v2 registries but not
both at the same time. I'd like to ask for an FFE for this functionality
(Erno's patch in progress here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79957/)
With v1 on the
On 13/03/14 09:32 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/13/2014 08:00 AM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
Hi,
Right now you can select running either the v1 or v2 registries but not
both at the same time. I'd like to ask for an FFE for this functionality
(Erno's patch in progress here:
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
so sorry for the list spam.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79710/
This change introduces a backward incompatible change to defaults with
Havana. If a user has chosen to
On 03/12/2014 06:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
so sorry for the list spam.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79710/
This change introduces a backward incompatible change to
On 12/03/14 07:18 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/12/2014 06:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
so sorry for the list spam.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79710/
This change
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
so sorry for the list spam.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79710/
This change introduces a backward incompatible change to defaults with
Havana. If a user has chosen to
On 03/12/2014 09:01 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
so sorry for the list spam.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79710/
This change introduces a backward incompatible change to
On 03/12/2014 01:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 07:18 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/12/2014 06:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
so sorry for the list spam.
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 13:21 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/12/2014 01:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 07:18 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/12/2014 06:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/12/2014 09:01 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
so sorry for the list spam.
+1 !!!
Thanks Best regards,
Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
-
Core of Glance and Marconi
IBM Cloud OpenStack Platform
Tel: 8610-82450513 | T/L: 905-0513
Email: flw...@cn.ibm.com
China Systems Technology Laboratory in Beijing
Hi Alexander, Thank you for your input.
I think we need to clearly define what a version means for an artifact.
First, I would like to comeback to the definition of an artifact: this broader
audience might not be aware of this concept.
As of today, my understanding is the following:
An
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Takemori, Seishi(武森, 清市)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova]improvement-of-accessing-to-glance
On 10/02/14 05:28 +, Eiichi Aikawa wrote:
Hi, all,
Thanks for your comment.
Please let me re-explain.
The main purpose of our blueprint is to use network
I have only played with Glance v2 locally on a devstack, so take what I write
with a graing of salt.
What's new in API v2?
-
+ registry: You don't need to run glance-registry anymore. Unless you still
support v1.
+ tags: Every image has a tag list metadata. A tag can be
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:57:03 +0100
Joe Hakim Rahme joe.hakim.ra...@enovance.com wrote:
Again, I have just spent a couple of days playing with it on a devstack. I'm
by
no means a reference on the subject of the API v2. I hope this will help you
get
a better idea of where it stands today.
Hi John,
I have made the changes you suggested.
And, yes, we've tested this out in a live system.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:43 AM, John Garbutt
john.garb...@rackspace.co.ukwrote:
Its too late for this cycle. We will have to wait until Juno for any
blueprints.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Sridevi K R Koushik
sridevi.kous...@thoughtworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to get some comments on
On 10/02/14 05:28 +, Eiichi Aikawa wrote:
Hi, all,
Thanks for your comment.
Please let me re-explain.
The main purpose of our blueprint is to use network resources more efficiently.
To complete this purpose, we suggested the method of using 2 lists.
We think, as I wrote before, by listing
:-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 4:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova]improvement-of-accessing-to-glance
On 03/02/14 12:44 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote
On 03/02/14 12:44 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 17:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/02/14 10:13 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
store nodes where the
On 4 February 2014 07:59, Mark Washenberger
mark.washenber...@markwash.net wrote:
1) Deprecate the registry deployment (done when v1 is deprecated)
2) v2 glance api talks directly to the underlying database (done)
3) Create a library in the images program that allows OpenStack projects to
On 03/02/14 06:09 +, Eiichi Aikawa wrote:
Hi,
Here is the blueprint about improvement of accessing to glance API server.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/improvement-of-accessing-to-glance
The summary of this bp is:
- Glance API Servers are categorized into two groups: Primary
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
store nodes where the image should be downloaded from. That is,
selecting the nearest location from the image locations and this is
something that perhaps should
On 03/02/14 10:13 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
store nodes where the image should be downloaded from. That is,
selecting the nearest location from the image locations and
I have a related BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/image-location-selection-strategy
IMO, as I mentioned in its description, it can be applied in glance
and consumer (glance's client) both sides: in glance internal, this
can be used for image-download handling and direct_url_
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 17:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/02/14 10:13 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
store nodes where the image should be downloaded from. That is,
1101 - 1200 of 1327 matches
Mail list logo
