Hi Gong,
Thanks so much for your answers
Just one more question: you wrote You can create networks with just one
subnet, but the vlan id will run out soon if vlan is used.
Sorry but: how can the Vlan ID run out soon?...is it really possible to
finish them?
Best Regards
Marco
From:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Marco Fornaro marco.forn...@huawei.comwrote:
Hi Gong,
** **
Thanks so much for your answers
** **
Just one more question: you wrote “You can create networks with just one
subnet, but the vlan id will run out soon if vlan is used.”
Sorry
Joe Gordon wrote:
[...]
This sounds like a very myopic solution to the issue you originally
raised, and I don't think it will solve the underlying issues.
Taking a step back, you originally raised a concern about how we
prioritize reviews with the havana-rc-potential tag.
[...]
I'm with
Hi Marco,
At least two of your questions clearly hint at the dichotomy between subnet
and network, which appear to be redundant.
A multi-homing use case on a single network is a potential use case for
this, albeit a very limited one, since one might argue that in a cloud
scenario instead of
Good morning,
Due to various issues detected in RC1 testing, we just created a new
Havana release candidate for OpenStack Metering (Ceilometer).
You can find the RC2 tarball and see the list of fixed bugs at:
https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/havana/havana-rc2
This is hopefully the last Havana
Dear Technical Committee Members and OpenStack Community,
after previous brainstorming, suggestions and discussions in community,
we came out with OpenStack User Experience incubation proposal [0] and
by this e-mail we would like to officially apply for incubation. The
official application is
I'm happy with that approach - again I've not seen any discussions about how
this should be done.
I've added [tempest] and [ceilometer] tags so we can hopefully get input from
the guys involved.
Bob
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: 13 October 2013 05:21
To: OpenStack
Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Dear Technical Committee Members and OpenStack Community,
after previous brainstorming, suggestions and discussions in community,
we came out with OpenStack User Experience incubation proposal [0] and
by this e-mail we would like to officially apply for incubation. The
Hi there:
When I perform some operations on servers with administrator role, using
CLI, I met tha same strage behavior as described:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1050901. I'm afraid the
Glance has the same issue.
What I want to figure out is, what is the expected behavior
Hi!
This is just a reminder about the regular meeting of Murano-team in IRC.
The meeting will be held in #openstack-meeting-alt channel at 8am Pacific.
The complete agenda of the meeting is available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda
--
Kind Regards,
Alexander
Hey Thierry,
thanks for your notes. Few comments are following inline.
On 2013/14/10 11:00, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Dear Technical Committee Members and OpenStack Community,
after previous brainstorming, suggestions and discussions in community,
we came out with OpenStack
Rackspace Australia
On 10/12/13 12:35 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:15 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
Hi there,
I've been reviewing this change which is currently proposed for master
and I think it needs to be considered for the next Havana RC.
Change I3e080c30: Fix resource length
Hi,
With a global cluster, you can have your replicas stored in different regions
within your cluster whereas container forwarding is about storing all objects
within a container in a different swift cluster than the one you contacted in
the first place. These two clusters could well be
On 14.10.2013, at 11:18, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
[...]
This sounds like a very myopic solution to the issue you originally
raised, and I don't think it will solve the underlying issues.
Taking a step back, you originally raised a concern about how
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:58:22 +
Alessandro Pilotti apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
As a an example we have a couple of critical bugs for Havana with
their fix already under review that nobody cared even to triage, let
alone review.
Anyone can join the nova-bugs team on launchpad
On 10/14/2013 04:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
[...]
This sounds like a very myopic solution to the issue you originally
raised, and I don't think it will solve the underlying issues.
Taking a step back, you originally raised a concern about how we
prioritize reviews with
Hi all,
I tried to install openstack via devstack, while including ceilometer.
The install of openstack is ok. The dashborad is accessible, and everything
seem to be fine.
However, I am not able to launch ceilometer services. For instance
ceilometer-collector returns the following error, that
Hello everyone!
Guys, now we have Nova dependency in Climate like:
-f http://tarballs.openstack.org/nova/nova-master.tar.gz#egg=nova-master
nova=master
That was done to implement Nova-based scheduler filter for physical
reservations and store its code in Climate project itself. Now Climate is
On Mon, Oct 14 2013, Dina Belova wrote:
That's why we have the following question: do you think it's normal to have
such dependency there, or it will be better to create separate repo like
climate-filters and put there any filters and their dependencies?
What can you advise?
We do this in
I agree that this needs to be fixed. It's very counterintuitive, if
nothing else (which is also my argument against requiring all-tenants
for admin users in the first place). The only question for me is whether
to fix it in novaclient or in Nova itself. The comments on the review
from the
Hi Folks,
In the weekly scheduler meeting we've been trying to pull together a
consolidated list of Summit sessions so that we can find logical groupings and
make a more structured set of sessions for the limited time available at the
summit.
See @PCM in-line…
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL p...@cisco.com
IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
TW @pmichali
On Oct 12, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I was wondering in general how providers can customize service features,
based on their
Hi Mike,
I read your email where you expressed concerns regarding create-time
dependencies, and I agree they are valid concerns to be addressed. But like we
all agree, as a starting point, we are just focusing on the APIs for now, and
will leave that aside as implementation details to be
Hey all!
Currently, nodepool does not work against the two TripleO clouds (well,
I'm trying against the grizzly POC cloud first) So far, the problems
have been combinations of bugs/assumptions in nodepool, along with at
least one actual config issue in the TripleO cloud.
I thought I'd share info
Mike,
Like I proposed in my previous email about the model and the APIs,
About the InstanceGroupPolicy, why not leave it as is, and introduce a new
abstract model class called Policy.
The InstanceGroupPolicy will be a reference to a Policy object saved separately.
and the policy field will
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday October 15th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone interested in
IMO, the three themes make sense, but I would suggest waiting until the
submission deadline and discuss at the following IRC meeting on the 22nd.
Maybe there will be more relevant proposals to consider.
Regards,
Alex
P.S. I plan to submit a proposal regarding scheduling policies, and maybe
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 17:49 +, Sangeeta Singh wrote:
Hi,
I had some questions about the trusted messaging project.
1. During your design did you consider a kerberos style
ticketing service for KDS? If yes what were the reasons
against it?
2. The
Thank you for your help and pointers Rob.
I followed instructions from the baremetal wiki and i am lost in the last
step.
First:
I setup pxelinux.cfg/default to point to my-initrd and my-vmlinuz for pxe
boot.
My baremetal node goes into this prompt:
(initramfs)
I dont know if the above is
No, I said if your machines are not IPMI, and are not Tilera based, then
they will not work.
If they are IPMI, they will work.
Excerpts from Ravikanth Samprathi's message of 2013-10-14 11:42:31 -0700:
You mean there is no power driver for anything other than tilera? I am
using supermicro
Updated list of outstanding reviews nodepool needs for happy making:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51687/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51644/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51641/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49833/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49639/
Hi OpenStackers,
I am proud to announce the official launch of the Mistral project. At Mirantis
we have a team to start contributing to the project right away. We invite
anybody interested in task service state management to join the initiative.
Mistral is a new OpenStack service designed for
Hi,
*We are an executive search firm based in Fremont CA and are currently
looking to help one of our Direct Client fill some open position which
seems to be a good match with your profile. We would appreciate if you
could review the same and let us know your interest to pursue with the
Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2013-10-14 12:40:28 -0700:
Hi OpenStackers,
I am proud to announce the official launch of the Mistral project. At
Mirantis we have a team to start contributing to the project right away. We
invite anybody interested in task service state
Why exactly aren't you just calling this Convection and/or collaborating
with the developers who came up with it?
We do actively collaborate with TaskFlow/StateManagement team who are also
the authors of Convection proposal. This is a joint project and we invite
you and other developers to join
Hi Clint,
This is done in collaboration with Joshua Harlow and the task flow team who
come up with the original proposal. We had a hangout session where we
defined a project scope and its relationship with task flow library.
We cant use name Convection as this is a trademark owned by Microsoft.
On 10/09/2013 08:43 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Thanks for the docs. It looks like I got through all of that already, its the
authentication module part that is throwing me.
I managed to manually get a token by putting mod_krb5 on Location
/keystone/main/v2.0/tokens and using curl against it,
+2 More collaboration the better :)
From: Stan Lagun sla...@mirantis.commailto:sla...@mirantis.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, October 14, 2013 1:20 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
I have setup openstack according to the baremetal wiki.
The hostname on which i am running baremetal openstack controller is ''os''
1 I have this baremetal-flavor:
=
| 9 | my-baremetal-flavor | 1024 | 10 | 0 | | 1 |
1.0 | True |
So from my understanding of the whole situation.
Convection doesn't exist (at the moment), and I think mistral will be an
implementation of what u call convection.
Its planned to be along the lines of convection, in fact I think we should
move https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Convection to
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote on 11.10.2013 21:02:38:
From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 11.10.2013 21:04
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration
proposal for workflows
On 10/11/2013
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:37:10 -0500
Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
I agree that this needs to be fixed. It's very counterintuitive, if
nothing else (which is also my argument against requiring all-tenants
for admin users in the first place). The only question for me is
whether to
Hi Adam,
I was trying to get both kerberos negotiate and kerberos basic auth working.
Negotiate does not seem to be supported by any of the clients so I think it
will be a fair amount of work to get working.
/keystone/main/v2.0/tokens can't support having an apache auth module on it, it
seems
This week's team meeting is cancelled since most of the active contributors
will all be together in Austin for the Swift hackathon during the regularly
scheduled meeting time.
Regular bi-weekly meetings will resume on October 30 at 1900UTC in
#openstack-meeting
--John
signature.asc
I was talking to Dan Smith today about a patch series I was starting to
work on. These changes affect people doing continuous deployment, so we
came up with the idea of tagging the commits with UpgradeImpact,
similar to how we use DocImpact for changes that affect docs.
This seems like a good
I think it's good to call that out, but also perhaps there should be
some discussion with such deployers such changes?
-Rob
On 15 October 2013 12:32, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
I was talking to Dan Smith today about a patch series I was starting to
work on. These changes affect
On 10/14/2013 8:37 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
I agree that this needs to be fixed. It's very counterintuitive, if
nothing else (which is also my argument against requiring all-tenants
for admin users in the first place). The only question for me is
whether to fix it in novaclient or in Nova itself.
Hello,
I am working on a Heat plugin that makes a new resource available in a
template. It's working great and I will opensource it this week if I
can get the packaging right...
Right now, I am linking my module.py file in /usr/lib/heat to get it
loaded when heat-engine starts. But according to
That is, we're now deploying a trunk KVM based OpenStack using heat +
nova baremetal on a continuous basis into the test rack we have *and*
there are users setup on it for any TripleO ATC that want's an
account, and networking is setup: you can access instances over the
internet, and the endpoint
On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Joshua Hesketh joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Rackspace Australia
On 10/12/13 12:35 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:15 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
Hi there,
I've been reviewing this change which is currently proposed for master
and I think
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Caitlin Bestler
caitlin.best...@nexenta.com wrote:
On 10/14/2013 8:37 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
I agree that this needs to be fixed. It's very counterintuitive, if
nothing else (which is also my argument against requiring all-tenants
for admin users in the
I think this could be a significant win for all projects (I'd like to see
it adopted beyond nova). This should help ferret out the upgrade impacts
that sometimes sneak up on us (and cause issues later on).
+1 from me.
Cheers,
Morgan Fainberg
IRC: morganfainberg
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:51
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 14:31 -0700, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Hi Adam,
I was trying to get both kerberos negotiate and kerberos basic auth working.
Negotiate does not seem to be supported by any of the clients so I think it
will be a fair amount of work to get working.
Hi Angus,
Thanks for detailed reply. I have a few comments that I have written below
in the context.
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote on 10/13/2013 06:40:01 PM:
- INPUTS: all the attributes that are consumed/used/read by that
resource
(currently, we have Ref, GetAttrs that can give
Consider the example at
https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1nridrUUwNaDrHQoGwSJ_KXYC7ik09wUuV3vXw1MyvlY
We could indeed have distinct policy objects. But I think they are policy
*uses*, not policy *definitions* --- which is why is prefer to give them
less prominent lifecycles. In the example
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 18:36 -0700, Bhuvan Arumugam wrote:
Just making sure i'm not the only one facing this problem.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1239894
Yep, we thought this may raise some issues but insecure by default was
just not acceptable.
keystoneclient v0.4.0 was released
That came through beautifully formatted to me, but it looks much worse in
the archive. I'm going to use crude email tech here, so that I know it
won't lose anything in handling.
Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) yud...@cisco.com wrote on 10/14/2013 01:17:47
PM:
I read your email where you expressed
Thanks all for attending the IRC meeting today for the Neutron advanced
services discussion. We have an etherpad for this:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/NeutronAdvancedServices
It was also felt that we need to have more ongoing discussions, so we will
have follow up meetings. We will try to
Hi,
I'd like to know what validation feature is really needed for Nova v3 API,
and I hope this mail will be a kick-off of brain-storming for it.
Introduction
I have submitted a blueprint nova-api-validation-fw[1].
The purpose is comprehensive validation of API input parameters.
32% of Nova v3
To follow up on this, I've decided to give running a meetup a go. The
details are at http://sites.rcbops.com/lca2014_openstack/?p=38
Cheers,
Michael
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
If you're coming to linux.conf.au 2014, would you be interested in a
Hi Phil
Good summary ...
I was wondering if we are shooting for too much to discuss by clubbing
i) Group Scheduling / Smart Placement / Heat and Scheduling (1),
(2), (3), (7)
- How do you schedule something more complex that a single VM ?
I think specifying something more complex
On 10/14/2013 09:39 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
That is, we're now deploying a trunk KVM based OpenStack using heat +
nova baremetal on a continuous basis into the test rack we have *and*
there are users setup on it for any TripleO ATC that want's an
account, and networking is setup: you can
Yes, Rethinking Scheduler Design
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/34 is not the same as the
performance issue that Boris raised. I think the former would be a
natural consequence of moving to an optimization-based joint
decision-making framework, because such a thing necessarily takes
Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) yud...@cisco.com wrote on 10/14/2013 11:43:34
PM:
...
For the policy model, you can expect rows in the DB each
representing different policy instances something like-
{id: , uuid: SOME-UUID-1, name: anti-colocation-1, type:
anti-colocation, properties:
I would suggest not to generalize too much.. e.g., restrict the discussion
to PlacementPolicy. If anyone else would want to use a similar construct
for other purposes -- it can be generalized later.
For example, the notion of 'policy' already exists in other places in
OpenStack in the context
Dear all,
we are in progress of implementing a new driver for cinder services
, we have a scenario where we need volume name for creation of snapshot. In
detail , we designed the driver in such a way that it communicates with our
server through http calls , and now we need the volume name
66 matches
Mail list logo
