Hello,
as long as node won't be Production dependency, it shouldn't be a
problem, right? I give +1 to that
Regards
Ladislav
On 11/20/2013 05:01 PM, Maxime Vidori wrote:
Hi all, I know it is pretty annoying but I have to resurrect this subject.
With the integration of Angularjs into Horizon
Hi Yuriy, Dolph et al.
I'm implementing a climate.policy.check_is_admin(ctx) which will look at
policy.json entry 'context_is_admin' for knowing which roles do have
elevated rights for Climate.
This check must be called when creating a context for knowing if we can
allow extra rights. The
2013/11/20 Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com:
What about a hybrid solution?
There is data that is only used by the scheduler--for performance reasons
maybe it would make sense to store that information in RAM as described at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-scheduler
On 20/11/13 09:37 -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly
taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.netwrote:
Hi Yuriy, Dolph et al.
I'm implementing a climate.policy.check_is_admin(ctx) which will look at
policy.json entry 'context_is_admin' for knowing which roles do have
elevated rights for Climate.
This check must be
Hi,
Please let us know if anybody is having similar requirement as below.
Also any suggestions/comments on this approach will be helpful.
Regards,
Balaji.P
From: P Balaji-B37839
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:09 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Cc: Mannidi Purandhar Sairam-B39209;
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2013-11-21 00:16:04 -0800:
Clint,
The main idea is to have processed by human history of project.
It is really impossible to aggregate automatically all data from different
sources:
IRC (main project chat/dev chat/meetings), Mailing Lists, Code,
Le 21/11/2013 10:04, Yuriy Taraday a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sylvain Bauza
sylvain.ba...@bull.net mailto:sylvain.ba...@bull.net wrote:
Hi Yuriy, Dolph et al.
I'm implementing a climate.policy.check_is_admin(ctx) which will
look at policy.json entry
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 11/19/2013 09:33 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
The idea of this proposal is that every OpenStack project should have
story wiki page. It means to publish every week one short message that
contains most interesting updates for the last week, and high level road
map for
On Wed, Nov 20 2013, Gordon Chung wrote:
came across a question when reviewing
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56019... basically, in Samples, user_id
and project_id attributes are pretty self-explanatory and map to Keystone
concepts pretty well but what is the criteria for setting
Mark Washenberger wrote:
[...]
In order to mitigate that risk, I think it would make a lot of sense to
have a place to stage and carefully consider all the breaking changes we
want to make. I also would like to have that place be somewhere in
Gerrit so that it fits in with our current
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:46PM -0800,
Gary Duan gd...@varmour.com wrote:
Hi, Isaku and Edgar,
Hi.
As part of the effort to implement L3 router service type framework, I have
reworked L3 plugin to introduce a 2-step process, precommit and postcommit,
similar to ML2. If you plan to work
Hi,
Yes, it's briefly covered here:
http://docs.openstack.org/network-admin/admin/content/install_neutron-lbaas-agent.html
So basically you install lbaas agents on network controllers or compute
nodes (not VMs!). Upon startup those agents register themselves in neutron
and become available for
Meeting reminder!
Today, 14-00 UTC, #openstack-meeting
Agenda for the meeting:
1) Announcements
2) Progress with qa and third-party testing
3) Feature design discussions
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi folks,
Let's meet on
On 20/11/13 23:49, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 20/11/13 16:07, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
Hi All,
As a resumption of the Improving Ceilometer API query filtering session of the
HK Design Summit, I created a document about supporting complex query filters
in Ceilometer. The document contains a brief summary of the previously
suggested idea. The second part of the etherpad discuss
-Original Message-
From: ext Steven Hardy [mailto:sha...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:33 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through
Heat
On
Hi
Has a decision happened when this meeting is going to take place, assuming
it is still taking place tomorrow.
Regards
chuck
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Krishna Raman kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/2013 06:30
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler
I'm looking for 4-5 folk who have:
- modest Nova skills
- time to follow a fairly mechanical (but careful and detailed work
needed) plan to break the status quo around scheduler extraction
And of course, discussion galore about the
On Thu Nov 21 03:32:10 UTC 2013, Lei asked:
I just found the HUS is supported. But I have a old AMS storage machine and
want to use it.
So I want to make sure is it possible?
The answer is that both AMS and HUS arrays are supported.
Steve Sonnenberg
Master Solutions Consultant
Hitachi Data
See inline,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:46PM -0800,
Gary Duan gd...@varmour.com wrote:
Hi, Isaku and Edgar,
Hi.
As part of the effort to implement L3 router service type framework, I
have
reworked L3
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com wrote:
How do we avoid this in the future? Step one is reviewers that are
approving changes (or reverifying them) should keep an eye on the gate
queue.
On 11/20/2013 9:35 PM, Lingxian Kong wrote:
hi Matt:
noticed there is no consensus there[1], any progress outside the ML?
[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/__pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-__October/016385.html
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-October/016385.html
On 22 November 2013 02:57, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
This is a really complex one because of the gate. It's not just about
the semver major version bump. I agree with earlier sentiment - the way
to handle breaking changes is to bump the major version, and on the
surface I
+1 for both!
- Original Message -
From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:38:27 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa] Proposals for Tempest core
It's post
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:12 PM
Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Zimin(e) | StackStorm
d...@stackstorm.com wrote:
Thanks Terry for highlighting this:
Yes, tenant isolation is the must. It's not reflected in the prototype - it
On 2013-11-21 10:20, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Nov 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Hi everyone,
How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly
taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was
hard
for UX sessions
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Ladislav Smola lsm...@redhat.com wrote:
Responses inline.
On 11/20/2013 07:14 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Responses inline.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Ladislav Smola lsm...@redhat.comwrote:
Ok, I'll try to summarize what will be done in
Meeting minutes and the logs for the Neutron IPv6 meeting has been
posted.
We will not meet next week, due to the Thanksgiving holiday in the US.
Our next meeting will be Thursday Dec 5th - 2100 UTC, where we will
review the goals from this week's meeting and look to create actionable
items for
Greetings,
There are some patches that add support for building wheels. The patch
adds a `[wheel]` section with `universal = True`
`universal=True` means the applications supports py2/py3 which is not
the case for most (all?) openstack projects. So, please, do not
approve those patches.
Glance
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sam Alba sam.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Krishna Raman kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sam Alba sam.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for
Friday
At the Neutron group-based policy proposal meeting today, we discussed whether
or not the proposal should include a concrete policy language. We decided to
send a note to the list to get additional feedback.
The proposed API extension includes the ability to insert/delete policy
statements.
Hello,
Please tell me if your experience is similar to what I experienced:
1. I would see *at most one* MySQL server has gone away error for
each process that was spawned as an API worker. I saw them within a
minute of spawning the workers and then I did not see these errors
anymore until I
On 11/21/2013 4:43 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
The trick is, such coverage requires editors with a deep technical
knowledge, both to be able to determine significant news from marketing
noise *and* to be able to deep dive into a new feature and make an
article out of it that makes a good read for
On 2013-11-21 13:59:16 +0100 (+0100), Salvatore Orlando wrote:
[...]
In its default configuration the traffic from the OS instance is
SNATed and the SRC IP will be rewritten to an address in the
neutron's public network range (172.24.4.224/28 by default). If
the OS instance is trying to reach
On 11/21/2013 01:55 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to check in on the status of this API addition:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40692/
The last comment is:
propose against stackforge as discussed at summit?
Yes, it was discussed in a small group, and not
Cool!
Thank you Kyle! I'll try to join the today's IPv6 meeting...
Cheers!
Thiago
On 20 November 2013 01:08, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.comwrote:
On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com
wrote:
One more thing...
I'm thinking about the use
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:12 PM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 17:24 +, Duncan Thomas wrote:
Random OSLO updates with no list of what changed, what got fixed etc
are
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Mark Washenberger wrote:
[...]
In order to mitigate that risk, I think it would make a lot of sense to
have a place to stage and carefully consider all the breaking changes we
want to make. I also would like to
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Krishna Raman kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sam Alba sam.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for
Friday 9am pacific?
Friday 9am Pacific seems to be the best time for this
On 11/21/2013 08:48 PM, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 21.11.2013 00:00:47:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 21.11.2013 00:04
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design
Hi Clark,
2013/11/21 Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com:
Joe seemed to be on the same track with
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest+branch:master+topic:57578,n,z
but went far enough to revert the change that introduced that test. A
couple people were
There is a high priority approved blueprint for a Neutron PoolMember:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/loadballancer-pool-members
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Christopher Armstrong [chris.armstr...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 9:44 AM
With all tempest-core votes in, it's unanimous. Masayuki and Ken'ichi,
welcome to the team!
-Sean
On 11/21/2013 09:55 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
+1 for both!
- Original Message -
From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 20/11/13 23:49, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 20/11/13 16:07, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, Nov
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 10:43 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 11/19/2013 09:33 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
The idea of this proposal is that every OpenStack project should have
story wiki page. It means to publish every week one short message that
contains most
On 11/21/2013 10:52 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
On 21/11/13 15:49, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 11/21/2013 02:58 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2013/11/20 Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com:
What about a hybrid solution?
There is data that is only used by the scheduler--for performance
reasons
maybe
Hi,
The CLI example is capturing the requirement concisely. Thanks.
One suggestion, you could bring the --policy policy1 to the beginning of
create-lb-l7rule command.
Also, could rename associate-lb-pool-vip to associate-lb-vip-pool
It will be best to define the db model to reflect the cli.
++ on Fri. 9am PST.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Sam Alba sam.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for
Friday 9am pacific?
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com
wrote:
Hi
Has a decision happened
On 11/21/2013 01:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Mark Washenberger wrote:
[...]
In order to mitigate that risk, I think it would make a lot of sense to
have a place to stage and carefully consider all the breaking changes we
want to make. I also would like to have that place be somewhere in
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sam Alba sam.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for
Friday 9am pacific?
Friday 9am Pacific seems to be the best time for this meeting. Can we use
the #openstack-meeting channel for this?
If not, then I can
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 20/11/13 23:49, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/AutoScaling#LBMember.3F
Basically, the LoadBalancerMember resource (which is very similar to the
CinderVolumeAttachment) would be
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:29 AM, David Ripton drip...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/20/2013 02:06 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
I faced some social problems in community.
We started working on purge engine for DB (before HK summit)
This is very important, because at this moment we don't have any
Hi All,
I have configured OpenStack Grizzly to control ESX hypervisor. I can
successfully launch instances but unable to see its console using VNC.
Following is my configuration.
***Compute node :
nova.conf for vnc:
vnc_enabled = true
On 11/21/2013 02:58 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2013/11/20 Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com:
What about a hybrid solution?
There is data that is only used by the scheduler--for performance reasons
maybe it would make sense to store that information in RAM as described at
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Robert Kukura rkuk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/21/2013 04:20 AM, Stefan Apostoaie wrote:
Hello again,
I studied the portbindings extension (the quantum.db.portbindings_db and
quantum.extensions.portbindings modules). However it's unclear for me
who sets
On 21/11/13 18:44, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
2) It relies on a plugin being present for any type of thing you
might want to notify.
I don't understand this point. What do you mean by a plugin? I was
assuming OS::Neutron::PoolMember (not LoadBalancerMember -- I went and
looked up
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:53:45 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
2013/11/20 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the
past few
Forgive my ignorance, but I would like to make sure that packets generated
from Openstack instances on neutron private networks will actually be able
to reach public addresses.
In its default configuration the traffic from the OS instance is SNATed and
the SRC IP will be rewritten to an address
Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
People get heads-down in their own projects and what they are working
on and it's hard to keep up with what's going on in the infra channel
(or nova channel for that matter), so sending out a recap that
everyone can see in the mailing list is
On 11/3/2013 5:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Nov 1, 2013 6:46 PM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 29 October 2013 16:11, Eddie Sheffield
eddie.sheffi...@rackspace.com mailto:eddie.sheffi...@rackspace.com
wrote:
John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
On 11/19/13 at 08:04pm, haruka tanizawa wrote:
Hi stackers!!
I'd like to ask for your opinions about my idea of identifying request.
Challenges
==
We have no way to know the final result of an API request.
Indeed we can continuously get the status of allocated resources,
but this is
On Nov 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly
taken into account into OpenStack development ? Historically it was hard
for UX sessions (especially the ones that affect multiple
Hello,
I'm in the process of writing a new scheduling algorithm for openstack
nova.
I have a set of compute nodes that I'm going to filter and weigh according
to some metrics collected from these compute nodes.
I saw nova.compute.resource_tracker and metrics (ram, disk and cpu) that it
collects
The Barbican team has been taking a look at the KDS feature and the
proposed patch and I think this may be better placed in Barbican rather
than Keystone. The patch, from what I can tell, seems to require that a
service account create use a key under its own tenant. In this use case,
Barbican can
Hello Neutron:
Just wanted to extend a hearty pat on the back to all of Neutron for
helping to comply with yesterdays gate prioritization:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/019949.html
We had a lot of really good activity in the -neutron channel:
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Savanna team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt
channel.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_November.2C_21
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Savanna+Meetingiso=20131121T18
Sincerely yours,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm working on the implementation of instance-tasks-api[0] in Nova and
this is what I've been moving towards so far.
Yes, I know. I think that is good idea.
The API will accept a string to be a part of the task but it will have
meaning only to the client, not to Nova.
Did you test on it?
That's meaning the CLI on both AMS and HUS are the same? Right?
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Steven Sonnenberg
steven.sonnenb...@hds.com wrote:
On *Thu Nov 21 03:32:10 UTC 2013, Lei asked:*
I just found the HUS is supported. But I have a old AMS storage machine
I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for
Friday 9am pacific?
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi
Has a decision happened when this meeting is going to take place, assuming
it is still taking place tomorrow.
Regards
On 21/11/13 18:44 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
There are some patches that add support for building wheels. The patch
adds a `[wheel]` section with `universal = True`
`universal=True` means the applications supports py2/py3 which is not
the case for most (all?) openstack projects.
Please do not cross-post messages to multiple mailing lists. The
openstack-dev list is for development discussion only, so this belongs
on the general openstack list.
Thanks.
-Ben
On 2013-11-21 07:33, Rajshree Thorat wrote:
Hi All,
I have configured OpenStack Grizzly to control ESX
On 11/21/2013 03:08 PM, Jarret Raim wrote:
The Barbican team has been taking a look at the KDS feature and the
proposed patch and I think this may be better placed in Barbican rather
than Keystone. The patch, from what I can tell, seems to require that a
service account create use a key under
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 20 November 2013 10:40, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose an idea around a simplified and complimentary version of
devtest that makes it easier for someone to get started and try
Hi,
I also don't see an issue with using nodejs in Horizon development
environment. Is the problem in Django not differentiating the
development and production environments by default?
Could the problem be resolved by having two different environments with
the two requirements files etc.
On Nov 21, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2013-11-21 10:20, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Nov 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
How should we proceed to make sure UX (user experience) is properly
taken into account into
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Elena Ezhova eezh...@mirantis.com wrote:
20.11.2013, 06:18, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 17:24 +, Duncan Thomas wrote:
Random OSLO
Abbass MAROUNI wrote on 2013-11-21:
Hello,
I'm in the process of writing a new scheduling algorithm for openstack nova.
I have a set of compute nodes that I'm going to filter and weigh according to
some metrics collected from these compute nodes.
I saw nova.compute.resource_tracker and
Can we make sure that the costs for the end users are also considered as part
of this ?
- Configuration management will need further modules
- Dashboard confusion as we get multiple tabs
- Accounting, Block Storage, Networking, Orchestration confusion as
the
HI all!
The Neutron Policy sub-team had it's first IRC meeting today [1].
Relevant logs from the meeting are here [2]. We're hoping to
continue the discussion going forward. I've noted action items
in both the meeting logs and on the wiki page. We'll cover those
for the next meeting we have.
In all cases, these are free string fields. `user_id' and `project_id'
map to Keystone _most of the time_,
i'm sort of torn between the two -- which is why i brought it up i guess.
i like the flexibility of having resource as a free string field but the
difference between resource and
Hi Stefan,
HOST_ID is set by the client. In most usual case nova compute set
binding:host_id.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Stefan Apostoaie ioss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again,
I studied the portbindings extension (the quantum.db.portbindings_db and
quantum.extensions.portbindings
Hi Stackers,
First of all: I am not a TripleO/baremetal expert.
I am looking at ways how to fit Type 1 hypervisors to TripleO. I am not
sure how other such hypervisors integrate with OS, but in my case -
XenServer - ,I have a VM that runs nova - let's call it domU - , and
that's talking to the
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 21/11/13 18:44, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
2) It relies on a plugin being present for any type of thing you
might want to notify.
I don't understand this point. What do you mean by a plugin? I was
Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote on 11/21/2013 02:48:14
AM:
...
Now thinking more about update scenarios (which we can leave for an
iteration after the initial deployment is working),
I recommend thinking about UPDATE from the start. We should have an
implementation in which
Robert,
It is nice that community like idea of making one scheduler as a service.
But I saw in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-schedulersome
misleading about
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-scheduler
Approach no-db-scheduler is actually base step that
On 22 November 2013 15:57, Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com wrote:
Robert,
It is nice that community like idea of making one scheduler as a service.
But I saw in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler
some misleading about
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:53:45 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Joe,
2013/11/20 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
On 11/20/2013 02:06 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
I faced some social problems in community.
We started working on purge engine for DB (before HK summit)
This is very important, because at this moment we don't have any working
way to purge DB... so admins should make it by hand.
And we made
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Zimin(e) | StackStorm
d...@stackstorm.com wrote:
Thanks Terry for highlighting this:
Yes, tenant isolation is the must. It's not reflected in the prototype -
it queries
On 22 November 2013 05:55, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Robert Collins
Right now I think we need to continue the two primary arcs we have:
CI/CD integration and a CD HA overcloud so that we are being tested,
and then work on making the artifacts
On 11/21/2013 04:20 AM, Stefan Apostoaie wrote:
Hello again,
I studied the portbindings extension (the quantum.db.portbindings_db and
quantum.extensions.portbindings modules). However it's unclear for me
who sets the portbindings.HOST_ID attribute. I ran some tests with OVS:
called quantum
All,
This month, docs reaches 500 bugs, making it the 2nd-largest project by
bug count in all of OpenStack. Yes, it beats Cinder, Horizon, Swift,
Keystone and Glance, and will soon surpass Neutron.
In order to start the new year in a slightly better state, we have
arranged a bug squash day:
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
Hello,
Please tell me if your experience is similar to what I experienced:
1. I would see *at most one* MySQL server has gone away error for
each process that was spawned as an API worker.
Hi,
Are we having IRC meeting every week. Can anyone please update me on the
current plan based on the discussions we had at Havana Design Summit.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Balaji.P
From: Regnier, Greg J [mailto:greg.j.regn...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 3:30 AM
To: OpenStack
HI all,
I have submitted patches for tempest. I have also addressed review comments
given on patches.
It will be great if someone can review the following patches.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47078/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47079/
Thanks,
Abhijeet Malawade
Hi, I'm glad that you are contributing patches and want to see them
landed. We discourage sending reminders to this list because:
- reviewers often already have emails sent to them by gerrit
- or they review by polling on a regular basis
- if everyone did this we'd have hundreds of emails a
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 21.11.2013 21:19:07:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 21.11.2013 21:25
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design summit discussions
On 11/21/2013 08:48 PM, Thomas
98 matches
Mail list logo
