Hi Vish,
I’m jumping in slightly late on this, but I also have an interest in this. I’m
going to preface this by saying that I have not read this whole thread yet, so
I apologize if I repeat things, say anything that is addressed by previous
posts, or doesn’t jive with what you’re looking
So, I'd like to nominate the following two additions to the ironic-core
team:
Max Lobur
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:mlobur%2540mirantis.com+project:openstack/ironic,n,z
Roman Prykhodchenko
On Tue, Feb 04 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
Ceilometer running a plugin in nova is bad (for all the reasons
previously discussed),
Well, I partially disagree. Are you saying that nobody is allowed to run
a plugin in Nova? So what are these plugins in the first place?
Or if you're saying that
Hi stackers,
I would like to:
1) Nominate Hugh Saunders to Rally core, he is doing a lot of good reviews
(and always testing patches=) ):
http://stackalytics.com/report/reviews/rally/30
2) Remove Alexei from core team, because unfortunately he is not able to
work on Rally at this moment. Thank
On 02/04/2014 09:42 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
So, I'd like to nominate the following two additions to the ironic-core
team:
Max Lobur
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:mlobur%2540mirantis.com+project:openstack/ironic,n,z
Roman Prykhodchenko
On 05/02/14 03:58, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi to everybody,
based on the feedback from last week [0] I incorporated changes in the
wireframes so that we keep them up to date with latest decisions:
http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-02-05_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf
Changes:
*
+1 for Hugh, but IMO no need to rush with Alexei's removalHi stackers,I would like to:1) Nominate Hugh Saunders to Rally core, he is doing a lot of good reviews (and always testing patches=) ):http://stackalytics.com/report/reviews/rally/30
2) Remove Alexei from core team, because unfortunately
Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
I am currently trying to backport the fix for
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1254246 to stable/havana. The current state of that
is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68929/
However, the fix requires a database migration to be applied (to add a unique
constraint to the
Hi Vish,
You're approach looks very interesting. I especially like the idea of 'walking
the tree of parent projects, to construct the set of roles'.
Here are some issues that came to my mind:
Regarding policy rules enforcement:
Considering the following projects:
* orga
* orga.projecta
*
On 4 February 2014 19:16, Jonathan Proulx j...@jonproulx.com wrote:
HI all,
Trying to get a little love on bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1227836
Short version is the instance migrates, but there's an RPC time out
that keeps nova thinking it's still on the old node mid-migration.
+1 for both:)
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Yuriy Zveryanskyy
yzveryans...@mirantis.com wrote:
On 02/04/2014 09:42 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
So, I'd like to nominate the following two additions to the ironic-core
team:
Max Lobur
Steve Gordon wrote:
From: Anne Gentle anne.gen...@rackspace.com
Based on today's Technical Committee meeting and conversations with the
OpenStack board members, I need to change our Conventions for service names
at
+1 for Hugh, he's doing excellent job moving the project forward.
--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Sergey Skripnick sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
+1 for Hugh, but IMO no need to rush with Alexei's removal
Hi stackers,
I would like to:
1) Nominate Hugh
Hi Tomas,
thanks for the questions, I am replying inline.
On 2014/05/02 11:19, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
On 05/02/14 03:58, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi to everybody,
based on the feedback from last week [0] I incorporated changes in the
wireframes so that we keep them up to date with latest
Hi,
Chris Behrens wrote:
Interesting thread. I have been working on a side project that is a
gevent/eventlet replacement [1] that focuses on thread-safety and
performance. This came about because of an outstanding bug we have with
eventlet not being Thread safe. (We cannot safely enable
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:31:55AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
I am currently trying to backport the fix for
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1254246 to stable/havana. The current state of
that
is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68929/
However, the fix
Hi-
Kindly share me the agenda for today weekly meeting on Neutron/ML2.
Best Regards,
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
By the way, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be DRYer to centralize the RBAC and
Quotas logic in a unique service (Keystone?). Openstack services (Nova, Cinder,
...) would just have to ask this centralized access management service whether
an action is authorized for a given token?
I agree on
snip
1. Are we doing node tags (page 4) for the first iteration? Where are
they going to live?
Yes, it's very easy to do, already part of Ironic.
Cool!
2. There are multiple node profiles per role on pages 11, 12, 17. Is
that just an oversight or do you intend on keeping those in? I
+1 for Hugh
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Sergey Skripnick sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
+1 for Hugh, but IMO no need to rush with Alexei's removal
Hi stackers,
I would like to:
1) Nominate Hugh Saunders to Rally core, he is doing a lot of good reviews
(and always testing patches=)
On Feb 5, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Florent Flament florent.flament-...@cloudwatt.com
wrote:
Hi Vish,
You're approach looks very interesting. I especially like the idea of
'walking the tree of parent projects, to construct the set of roles'.
Here are some issues that came to my mind:
Hi, folks!
Today Climate has been released first time and I'm really glad to say that
:)
This release implements following use cases:
- User wants to reserve virtual machine and use it later. He/she asks
Nova to create server, passing special hints, describing information like
lease
On Feb 5, 2014, at 12:27 AM, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote:
Hi Vish,
I’m jumping in slightly late on this, but I also have an interest in this.
I’m going to preface this by saying that I have not read this whole thread
yet, so I apologize if I repeat things, say anything
Great progress!
My congratulations.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi, folks!
Today Climate has been released first time and I'm really glad to say that
:)
This release implements following use cases:
- User wants to reserve virtual machine
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 12:36:16PM -0500, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
Hi Ralf, I see we're on the same boat for this.
It seems that a database migration introduces complications
for future upgrades. It's not an easy path.
My aim when I started this backport was trying to
victor stinner wrote:
[...]
The problem is that the asyncio module was written for Python 3.3, whereas
OpenStack is not fully Python 3 compatible (yet). To easy the transition I
have ported asyncio on Python 2, it's the new Trollis project which supports
Python 2.6-3.4:
Agreed, let's move on to the MySQL for savanna-ci to run integration tests
against production-like DB.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Lazarev alaza...@mirantis.comwrote:
Since sqlite is not in the list of databases that would be used in
production, CI should use other DB for testing.
I like the dot-separated name. There are several reasons for it:
* it'll not require changes in all Savanna subprojects;
* eventually we'd like to use not only Oozie for EDP (for example, if we'll
support Twitter Storm) and this new tools could require additional
'subtypes'.
Thanks for catching
Just to clarify, new migration scripts should be added. You can find
details on how to do it here -
https://github.com/openstack/savanna/blob/master/savanna/db/migration/alembic_migrations/README
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Ignatov aigna...@mirantis.comwrote:
Yes, you need
I'm currently working on moving on the MySQL for savanna-ci
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
Agreed, let's move on to the MySQL for savanna-ci to run integration tests
against production-like DB.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Lazarev
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 11:52 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Steve Gordon wrote:
From: Anne Gentle anne.gen...@rackspace.com
Based on today's Technical Committee meeting and conversations with the
OpenStack board members, I need to change our Conventions for service names
at
Hi
I'm currently working on moving on the MySQL for savanna-ci
We are working on same task in ceilometer so maybe you could use some of
our patches as reference:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59489/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63049/
Regards,
Alexei
On 02/05/2014 02:06 PM, Sergey
but IMO no need to rush with Alexei's removal
I'm not working actively on rally at this moment and already far behind
of the current code base.
Cause of this I'm ok to step down from core.
Regards,
On 02/05/2014 01:17 PM, Ilya Kharin wrote:
+1 for Hugh
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM,
Hugh,
welcome to Rally core team!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Ilya Kharin ikha...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1 for Hugh
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Sergey Skripnick
sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
+1 for Hugh, but IMO no need to rush with Alexei's
Hi,
Thierry Carrez wrote:
The problem is that the asyncio module was written for Python 3.3, whereas
OpenStack is not fully Python 3 compatible (yet). To easy the transition I
have ported asyncio on Python 2, it's the new Trollis project which
supports Python 2.6-3.4:
Thanks Boris, Sergey, Oleg Ilya,
Rally can be hard to keep up with (rebase, rebase, rebase, merge) but that
development pace also makes it exciting, each time you run rally, something
will have improved! This morning I was awed by Pierre's atomic actions
patches - great!
Thanks for appointing me
Thank you hugh and congratulations for your new assignment as core
reviewer, you're doing a great job!
Regards,
Pierre.
2014-02-05 Hugh Saunders h...@wherenow.org:
Thanks Boris, Sergey, Oleg Ilya,
Rally can be hard to keep up with (rebase, rebase, rebase, merge) but that
development pace
Okay,
Thanks. I'll make a draft CR that sets up Savanna for dotted names,
and one that uses dotted names with streaming.
Best,
Trevor
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 15:58 +0400, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
I like the dot-separated name. There are several reasons for it:
* it'll not require changes
On 02/05/2014 01:09 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 11:52 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Steve Gordon wrote:
From: Anne Gentle anne.gen...@rackspace.com
Based on today's Technical Committee meeting and conversations with the
OpenStack board members, I need to change our
Bob, this is fantastic, I really appreciate all the detail. A couple of
questions ...
On Wed, Feb 05, at 2:16 am, Robert Kukura rkuk...@redhat.com wrote:
A couple of interrelated issues with the ML2 plugin's port binding have
been discussed over the past several months in the weekly ML2
It's about integration tests that aren't db-specific, so, just
DATABASE/connection should be fixed ;)
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
I'm currently working on moving on the MySQL for savanna-ci
We are working on same task in
Hi,
In parallel to Jarda's updated wireframes, and based on various discussions
over the past
weeks, here are the updated Tuskar requirements for Icehouse:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/TuskarIcehouseRequirements
Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks!
Tzu-Mainn Chen
It sounds little useful for dev/testing, I'm not really think that it's
needed, but not -1 such addition to the REST API.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Trevor McKay tmc...@redhat.com wrote:
My mistake, it's already there. I missed the distinction between set on
startup and set per
On 02/05/14 at 03:30am, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Feb 5, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Florent Flament florent.flament-...@cloudwatt.com
wrote:
Hi Vish,
You're approach looks very interesting. I especially like the idea of 'walking
the tree of parent projects, to construct the set of roles'.
Here
We don't have to add a new notification, but we have to add some
new datas in the nova notifications. At least for the delete
instance notification to remove the ceilometer nova notifier.
A while ago, I have registered a blueprint that explains which
datas are missing in the current nova
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 12:14, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 11:16, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/08/2014 12:06 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
snip
Yeah,
I am writing a virtualization driver on my own. And i need to change the
instance public IP address in the code? Is there any way I can go about it?
And also, how do I use the nova db package and also add a column into the
nova instance table? is there any way? Any help is highly appreciated.
Hi John and all,
Yunhong's email mentioned about the SR-IOV NIC support BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pci-passthrough-sriov
I'd appreciate your consideration of the approval of both BPs so that we
can have SR-IOV NIC support in Icehouse.
Thanks,
Robert
On 2/4/14 1:36 AM,
Re: [openstack-dev] about the bp cpu-entitlement
Oshrit Feder
to:
openstack-dev
05/02/2014 03:58 PM
Hi Sahid,
Thank you for your interest in the cpu entitlement feature. As Paul
mentioned, we are joining the extensible resource effort and will
integrate it on top of it. Will be glad to
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/05/2014 12:37 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:49 +, Sahid Ferdjaoui wrote:
Hello all,
It looks 100% of the pep8 gate
First, I don't think RollingUpdatePattern and CanaryUpdatePattern should be 2
different entities. The second just looks like a parametrization of the first
(growth_factor=1?).
Perhaps they can just be one. Until I find parameters which would need
to mean something different, I'll just use
Hi Steve!
I would say that we finally got to sort of stabilized state of
wireframes [0]. I am sure there will appear slight changes (as it is
always like this), but there shouldn't be bigger change of direction. We
are looking forward to see some high-fidelity mockups if you are willing
to
On 02/04/2014 06:34 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 5 February 2014 13:14, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
That's not a great example, because one DB server depends on the other,
forcing them into updating serially anyway.
I have to say that even in general, this whole idea about applying
Hi,
thanks for this great proposal
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:
Bob, this is fantastic, I really appreciate all the detail. A couple of
questions ...
On Wed, Feb 05, at 2:16 am, Robert Kukura rkuk...@redhat.com wrote:
A couple of interrelated issues
There is a task - device reconfiguration when boot instance from instance
snapshot. For example, one may want to change shutdown behaviour by
nova boot ... --image instance_snapshot --block_device
device=/dev/vda,shutdown=false
when originally shutdown attribute for /dev/vda is 'remove' in the
On 02/05/2014 06:06 AM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi-
Kindly share me the agenda for today weekly meeting on Neutron/ML2.
I just updated
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2#Meeting_February_5.2C_2014.
Mestery has a conflict for today's meeting.
-Bob
Goodday, OpenStack DВaaS community.
I'd like to start conversation about guestagent security issue related
to backup/restore process. Trove guestagent service uses AES with 256 bit
key (in CBC mode) [1] to encrypt backups which are stored at predefined
Swift container.
As you can
On 02/05/2014 09:10 AM, Henry Gessau wrote:
Bob, this is fantastic, I really appreciate all the detail. A couple of
questions ...
On Wed, Feb 05, at 2:16 am, Robert Kukura rkuk...@redhat.com wrote:
A couple of interrelated issues with the ML2 plugin's port binding have
been discussed over
(This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one
integrated project)
The DefCore subcommittee from the OpenStack board of directors asked the
Technical Committee yesterday about which code sections in each
integrated project should be designated sections in the sense of [1]
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com
To: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing
List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Jonathan Bryce jonat...@openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:17:39 AM
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it bizarre
that we have to put the same license into every single file of source code in
our projects. In my past experience, a single LICENSE file at the root-level
of the project has been sufficient to declare the license
On 2014/05/02 15:27, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
Hi,
In parallel to Jarda's updated wireframes, and based on various discussions
over the past
weeks, here are the updated Tuskar requirements for Icehouse:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/TuskarIcehouseRequirements
Any feedback is
Dear Horizoners,
in last days there were couple of interesting discussions about updating
to Bootstrap 3. In this e-mail, I would love to give a small summary and
propose a solution for us.
As Bootstrap was heavily dependent on Less, when we got rid of node.js
we started to use lesscpy.
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-02-04 16:14:09 -0800:
On 03/02/14 17:09, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-02-03 12:46:05 -0800:
So, I wrote the original rolling updates spec about a year ago, and the
time has come to get serious about
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 15:50 +0400, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Hi Jay,
it's really very easy to setup Zuul for it (we're using one for
Savanna CI).
Yes, I set up Zuul for ATT's gate system, thx.
There are some useful links:
* check pipeline as an example of zuul layout configuration
-
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
Including the config file in either the developer documentation or the
packaging build makes more sense. I'm still worried that adding it to the
sdist generation means you would have to have a lot of tools
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:29 +, Greg Hill wrote:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it bizarre
that we have to put the same license into every single file of source code in
our projects.
Meh, probably just habit and copy/paste behavior.
In my past
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 04:29:20PM +, Greg Hill wrote:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it
bizarre that we have to put the same license into every single file
of source code in our projects. In my past experience, a single
LICENSE file at the root-level of
It's nice when someone removes a file from the project. They get license
information transmitted automatically without needing to do extra work.
On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:29 +, Greg Hill wrote:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
Including the config file in either the developer documentation or the
packaging build makes more sense. I'm still worried that
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
(This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one
integrated project)
The DefCore subcommittee from the OpenStack board of directors asked the
Technical Committee yesterday about which code
On 2014-02-05 09:05, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 12:14, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 11:16, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/08/2014
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:40:13PM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
Including the config file in either the developer documentation or the
packaging build makes more sense. I'm still worried that adding it to the
On 02/05/2014 11:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
(This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one
integrated project)
The DefCore subcommittee from the OpenStack board of directors asked the
Technical Committee yesterday about which code sections in each
integrated project
Hi, stackers.
I believe Openstack services from all projects should support SIGHUP for
effective log/config files handling w/o unnecessary restarts.
(See https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1276694)
'Smooth reloads'(kill -HUP) are much better than 'disturbing restarts',
aren't they?
--
Best
Hi Sergey,
Is there a bug or a blueprint for this? I did a quick search but
didn't see one.
Thanks,
Trevor
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:06 +0400, Sergey Kolekonov wrote:
I'm currently working on moving on the MySQL for savanna-ci
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Sergey Lukjanov
Avoiding namespace packages is a good idea in general. At least until Python
3.whatever is baseline.
On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-02-05 09:05, Doug
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Greg Hill greg.h...@rackspace.com wrote:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it bizarre
that we have to put the same license into every single file of source code in
our projects. In my past experience, a single LICENSE file at
On 02/05/2014 11:55 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
(This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one
integrated project)
The DefCore subcommittee from
Excerpts from Greg Hill's message of 2014-02-05 08:29:20 -0800:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it bizarre
that we have to put the same license into every single file of source code in
our projects. In my past experience, a single LICENSE file at the
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2014-02-05 07:35:37 -0800:
On 02/04/2014 06:34 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 5 February 2014 13:14, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
That's not a great example, because one DB server depends on the other,
forcing them into updating serially
On 02/05/2014 11:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 04:29:20PM +, Greg Hill wrote:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it
bizarre that we have to put the same license into every single file
of source code in our projects. In my past
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 17:22 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
(This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one
integrated project)
The DefCore subcommittee from the OpenStack board of directors asked the
Technical Committee yesterday about which code sections in each
On 04/02/14 20:34, Robert Collins wrote:
On 5 February 2014 13:14, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
That's not a great example, because one DB server depends on the other,
forcing them into updating serially anyway.
I have to say that even in general, this whole idea about applying
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:29 +, Greg Hill wrote:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it
bizarre that we have to put the same license into every single file of
source code in our projects. In my past experience, a single LICENSE
file at the root-level of the
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:56:35AM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
Including the config file in either the developer documentation
Hi Chris,
Looking at your requirements, seems my solution (see attached email) is pretty
much aligned. What I am trying to propose is
1. One root domain as owner of virtual cloud. Logically linked to n leaf
domains.
2. All leaf domains falls under admin boundary of virtual cloud owner.
3. No
On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com
To: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing
List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Jonathan Bryce
On 2014-02-05 10:58, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
Hi, stackers.
I believe Openstack services from all projects should support SIGHUP
for
effective log/config files handling w/o unnecessary restarts.
(See https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1276694)
'Smooth reloads'(kill -HUP) are much better than
On Wed 05 Feb 2014 09:32:54 AM MST, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Dear Horizoners,
in last days there were couple of interesting discussions about
updating to Bootstrap 3. In this e-mail, I would love to give a small
summary and propose a solution for us.
As Bootstrap was heavily dependent on Less,
Russell Bryant wrote:
Who gets final say if there's strong disagreement between a PTL and the
TC? Hopefully this won't matter, but it may be useful to go ahead and
clear this up front.
I suspect that would be as usual. PTL has final say over his project
matters. The TC can just wield the
On Feb 5, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't have a big issue with the way the Foundation currently enforces
you must use the code - anyone who signs a trademark agreement with
the Foundation agrees to include the entirety of Nova's code. That's
very vague,
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
(This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one
integrated project)
The DefCore subcommittee from the OpenStack board of directors asked the
Technical Committee yesterday about which code sections
On 02/05/2014 12:54 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
On Feb 5, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't have a big issue with the way the Foundation currently enforces
you must use the code - anyone who signs a trademark agreement with
the Foundation agrees to include the
On 05/02/14 11:39, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-02-04 16:14:09 -0800:
On 03/02/14 17:09, Clint Byrum wrote:
UpdatePolicy in cfn is a single string, and causes very generic rolling
Huh?
Greetings,
In the TC we have been going through a process to better define our
requirements for incubation and graduation to being an integrated
project. The current version can be found in the governance repo:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 07:52:22AM -0600, Anne Gentle wrote:
Currently the docs contributor sign the same CLA as code contributors. I'd
encourage you to use the docs to really explain not just link to slide
decks. There's a better chance of maintenance over time.
Agreed - I plan on writing up
On 2014-02-05 10:58, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-02-05 09:05, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 12:14, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed,
On 01/23/2014 11:28 AM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
Would appreciate feedback / opinions on this
blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/first-discover-your-peers
The blueprint starts out with:
When running a clustered service on Nova, typically each node needs
to find
On Jan 30, 2014, at 5:55 AM, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote:
I'm of the opinion that the scheduler should use objects, for all the reasons
that Nova uses objects, but that they should not be Nova objects. Ultimately
what the scheduler needs is a concept of capacity,
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
