Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel} Separating Ceph pools depending on storage type

2015-03-20 Thread Andrew Woodward
Right now, we create pools for images, compute, volumes, and radosgw creates a bunch, all are assigned to the default crush map. from the Ceph side, In order to create a pool where we could separate it from another pool is to create a ruleset in the cursh map to isolate the devices, then the

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Creating roles with fuel client

2015-03-20 Thread Dmitriy Shulyak
Hi team, I wasnt able to participate in fuel weekly meeting, so for those of you who are curious how to create roles with fuel client - here is documentation on this topic [1]. And here is example how it can be used, together with granular deployment, to create new roles and add deployment logic

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][horizon] Need help at debugging requirements issue

2015-03-20 Thread Matthias Runge
On 19/03/15 15:52, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155353/ Hi, it all comes to the fact that DEVSTACK_GATE_INSTALL_TESTONLY=1 is not specified in the requirements integration job. I think you need to set it at [1]. In that case, your test requirements will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel} Separating Ceph pools depending on storage type

2015-03-20 Thread Federico Michele Facca
hi, generally speaking it would be nice to have the possibility to define availability zones. and this could be used as well to group, not only computing resources, but also storage ones. for this if i am not wrong there is already a discussion or blueprint on this from mirantis folks. then i am

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN transparency support

2015-03-20 Thread Akihiro Motoki
API extension is the only way that users know which features are available unitl we support API microversioning (v2.1 or something). I believe VLAN transparency support should be implemented as an extension, not by changing the core resources attribute directly. Otherwise users (including Horizon)

[openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Kilo-3 development milestone available

2015-03-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, We just hit feature freeze[1], so please do not approve changes that add features or new configuration options unless those have been granted a feature freeze exception. This is also string freeze[2], so you should avoid changing translatable strings. If you have to modify a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron extenstions

2015-03-20 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Forwarding my reply to the other thread too... Multiple threads on the same topic is confusing. Can we use this thread if we continue the discussion? (The title of this thread looks approapriate) API extension is the only way that users know which features are available unitl we support API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] development tools

2015-03-20 Thread Przemyslaw Kaminski
It is something different from what I see. Repos can be called fuel-dev-utils and fuel-vagrant-dev. P. On 03/19/2015 09:43 PM, Andrew Woodward wrote: we already have a package with the name fuel-utils please see [1]. I -1'd the CR over it. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN transparency support

2015-03-20 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, So at the moment we have something that is half baked. Say we take the MTU support as an example: There is a configuration flag ‘advertise_mtu’ (the default value is False) – this is set by an admin, but a tenant can define the mtu setting when creating a network. So by default the tenant

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Designate performance issues

2015-03-20 Thread stanzgy
Hi Graham, thanks for your suggestion. But in fact the initial import was a simple while-curl scripts with no concurrency. With this script, a request will not be sent unless previous one gets reponse from designate-api. So I think it's not the rate of initial importing but the number of records

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] PTL elections

2015-03-20 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi John, Murano isn't official project and so we've started the election process earlier, you could see dates in the first email in this thread. There was only one candidate, so, voting itself was bypassed. till 05:59 UTC March 17, 2015: Open candidacy to PTL positions March 17, 2015 - 1300 UTC

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] One confirm about max fixed ips per port

2015-03-20 Thread Zou, Yun
Hello, Oleg Bondarev. Sir, I could not find out any merit of multi subnets on one network, except the following one. - Migrate IPv4 to IPv6, so we need both subnet range on one network. So I don't know very much the nesessery of max_fied_ips_per_port parameter. All I know is only DB module and

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Gnocchi 1.0.0a1 released

2015-03-20 Thread Julien Danjou
Hi there, Gnocchi 1.0.0a1 is out! You check it out at: https://launchpad.net/gnocchi/+milestone/1.0.0a1 https://pypi.python.org/pypi/gnocchi Happy hacking, Cheers, -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker http://julien.danjou.info */ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Common library for shared code

2015-03-20 Thread Jan Provazník
On 03/18/2015 04:22 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 03/17/2015 09:13 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 16/03/15 16:38, Ben Nemec wrote: On 03/13/2015 05:53 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote: On 03/10/2015 05:53 PM, James Slagle wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Jan Provazník jprov...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, it

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] All Cinder Volume Drivers Must Have A Third Party CI by March 19, 2014

2015-03-20 Thread Erlon Cruz
Mike, for HDS and Hitachi, the contact person is the same: openstackdevelopm...@hds.com. Also, we have 5 drivers: - HDS HNAS NFS - HDS HNAS iSCSI - HBSD FC - HBSD iSCSI - HDS HUS This last one, HDS HUS, is deprecated by HBSD drivers and won't be maintained, so you can add it in the removal list.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

2015-03-20 Thread Erlon Cruz
I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I expected one change removing all drivers that does not report on CI. There's one of us (HUSDriver) that is not maintained and also should be deprecated/removed. Liu, the best argument here would be a report from your CI in this patch

[openstack-dev] openstack storage configaration file(cinder-service)

2015-03-20 Thread Kamsali, RaghavendraChari (Artesyn)
Hi, Anyone can help how to configure local.conf file for storage node via cinder service in devstack. Thanks and Regards, Raghavendrachari kamsali | Software Engineer II | Embedded Computing Artesyn Embedded Technologies | 5th Floor, Capella Block, The V, Madhapur| Hyderabad, AP 500081

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPAM reference driver status and other stuff

2015-03-20 Thread Salvatore Orlando
As pointed out by Pavel in yesterday's meeting, the refactor [1] cannot assume that the DB transaction for IPAM operations will occur in a scope different from the one for performing the API operation. This is because most plugins, including ML2, use inheritance to perform further operations on

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Designate performance issues

2015-03-20 Thread stanzgy
Hi vinod, thanks for you reply. I have report a bug with related log snippets here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1434479 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Vinod Mangalpally vinod.m...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi Zhang, Thank you for reporting the bug. The number of records does

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron extenstions

2015-03-20 Thread Ian Wells
On 20 March 2015 at 15:49, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: The MTU issue has been a long-standing problem for neutron users. What this extension is doing is simply, in my opinion, enabling API control over an aspect users were dealing with previously through custom made scripts.

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Tidwell, Ryan
Great suggestion Kevin. Passing 0.0.0.1 as gateway_ip_template (or whatever you call it) is essentially passing an address index, so when you OR 0.0.0.1 with the CIDR you get your gateway set as the first usable IP in the subnet. The intent of the user is to allocate the first usable IP

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI outage

2015-03-20 Thread Dan Prince
Short version: The RH1 CI region has been down since yesterday afternoon. We have a misbehaving switch and have file a support ticket with the vendor to troubleshoot things further. We hope to know more this weekend, or Monday at the latest. Long version: Yesterday afternoon we started seeing

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Salvatore Orlando
If we feel a need for specifying the relative position of gateway address and allocation pools when creating a subnet from a pool which will pick a CIDR from its prefixes, then the integer value solution is probably marginally better than the fake IP one (eg.: 0.0.0.1 to say the gateway is the

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Liberty Spec Proposals now being accepted

2015-03-20 Thread Morgan Fainberg
Hi everyone, This is a quick note that Spec proposals are now open for Keystone for the Liberty cycle. By open, this means that specs can be proposed against Liberty with the intention to kick-start the review cycle on specs for the next cycle a bit earlier and help prevent piling all the new

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Re-schedule Puppet OpenStack meeting

2015-03-20 Thread Colleen Murphy
A couple more responses were submitted but 1500 on Tuesdays is still in first place. Since there was no further discussion, we'll meet next week at 1500 on Tuesday in #openstack-meeting-4 (no Monday meeting). I've edited the meetings wiki to indicate this. If you have topics to discuss at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-20 Thread liuxinguo
Hi Mike, I think what we are talking is huawei-volume-ci, not huawei-ci. It is huawei-volume-ci that is on behalf of huawei 18000 iSCSI and huawei 18000 FC driver. Regarding to only report failures when a patch really does break your integration, I think huawei-volume-ci probaly should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron extenstions

2015-03-20 Thread Rob Pothier (rpothier)
The MTU values are derived from the config values only. If the tenant tries to set the MTU directly, that is rejected. Rob From: Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.commailto:gkot...@vmware.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE backport IBP-reconnect to 6.0

2015-03-20 Thread Alexander Gordeev
Hello Fuelers, I'm kindly insisting on merging the following 2 patches into 6.0 [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161721/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161722/ These patches are going to implement IBP-reconnect [3]. Additionally, it closes one of customer-found bug [4] related to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

2015-03-20 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Mike, Looks like this removal may have been a mistake. We should readdress. Jay On 03/20/2015 05:59 AM, Erlon Cruz wrote: I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I expected one change removing all drivers that does not report on CI. There's one of us (HUSDriver) that

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] canceling meeting

2015-03-20 Thread Susanne Balle
Make sense to me. Susanne On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com wrote: Hi lbaas'ers, Now that lbaasv2 has shipped, the need for a regular weekly meeting is greatly reduced. I propose that we cancel the regular meeting, and discuss neutron-y things during

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][horizon] Need help at debugging requirements issue

2015-03-20 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/2015 09:01 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 19/03/15 15:52, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155353/ Hi, it all comes to the fact that DEVSTACK_GATE_INSTALL_TESTONLY=1 is not specified in the requirements

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Common library for shared code

2015-03-20 Thread James Slagle
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Jan Provazník jprov...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/18/2015 04:22 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: So is this eventually going to live in Tuskar? If so, I would point out that it's going to be awkward to move it there if it starts out as a separate thing. There's no good way

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] ironic-discoverd release plans

2015-03-20 Thread Imre Farkas
Hi Dmitry, Sounds good to me! ;-) Imre On 03/20/2015 01:59 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: This is an informational email about upcoming ironic-discoverd-1.1.0 [1]. If you're not interested in discoverd, you may safely skip it. Hi all! Do you know what time is coming? Release time! I'm hoping

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-20 Thread ClaytonLuce, Timothy
I'd like to point out that for NetApp FC drivers NetApp has been in discussions and updating progress on these drivers since their submission. I will point out a discussion in the Nov Core meeting where I brought up the challenge around FC environments and the response I received: 16:10:44

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] ironic-discoverd release plans

2015-03-20 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
This is an informational email about upcoming ironic-discoverd-1.1.0 [1]. If you're not interested in discoverd, you may safely skip it. Hi all! Do you know what time is coming? Release time! I'm hoping to align this ironic-discoverd release with the OpenStack one. Here's proposed plan,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron extenstions

2015-03-20 Thread Ian Wells
I agree with a lot of your desires, but not your reasoning as to why the changes are problematic. Also, your statements about API changes are pretty reasonable and probably want writing down somewhere so that future specs are evaluated against them. Firstly, if we add to the core Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] Stable/icehouse: oslo.messaging RPCClient segmentation fault core dumped

2015-03-20 Thread ZIBA Romain
Hello, For information, I solved my problem by uninstalling the package librabbitmq which is not installed in the stable icehouse release of Openstack RDO. This library causes my problem. Best regards, Romain Ziba. De : ZIBA Romain Envoyé : jeudi 19 mars 2015 18:11 À :

[openstack-dev] [oslo.utils] allow strutils.mask_password to mask keys dynamically

2015-03-20 Thread Matthew Van Dijk
I’ve come across a use case for allowing dynamic keys to be made secret. The hardcoded list is good for common keys, but there will be cases where masking a custom value is useful without having to add it to the hardcoded list. I propose we add an optional parameter that is a list of secret_keys

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] canceling meeting

2015-03-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
+1 For on demand meeting. On demand lbaas meetings will happen in neutron meeting and not in Octavia meetings, right? Sent from Surface From: Susanne Ballemailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎20‎ ‎March‎ ‎2015 ‎20‎:‎20 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] ironic-discoverd release plans

2015-03-20 Thread 高田唯子
Thank you, Dmitry. I agree! Best Regards, Yuiko Takada 2015-03-20 23:32 GMT+09:00 Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com: Hi Dmitry, Sounds good to me! ;-) Imre On 03/20/2015 01:59 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: This is an informational email about upcoming ironic-discoverd-1.1.0 [1]. If you're

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

2015-03-20 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
On 03/19/2015 07:13 PM, liuxinguo wrote: Hi Mike, I have seen the patch at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165990/ saying that huawei driver will be removed because “the maintainer does not have a CI reporting to ensure their driver integration is successful”. Looking at this patch,

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Bug Triage - Call for Participation

2015-03-20 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi OpenStack Developers! I want to remind you that bug triage [1] is important part of contribution to any project[2]. We've got a lot of not triaged bugs in Cinder [3]. Please, do not hesitate to triage bugs in Cinder [4] to make upcoming Kilo release better. You can ask any questions via

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack storage configaration file(cinder-service)

2015-03-20 Thread Asselin, Ramy
You can follow the basic instructions here in FAQ: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers Ramy From: Kamsali, RaghavendraChari (Artesyn) [mailto:raghavendrachari.kams...@artesyn.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:20 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject:

[openstack-dev] [magnum] updated Fedora Atomic image available - needs testing

2015-03-20 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Hey folks, I have manually updated the Fedora 21 Atomic image via rpm-ostree upgrade. This image includes kubernetes 0.11 which some people have said is required to use kubectl with current Magnum master. I don’t have time for the next week to heavily test, but if someone could run this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] [Delegation] Meeting scheduling

2015-03-20 Thread Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi)
Hi Tim, I think what you are saying is a reasonable goal in terms of high-level Congress policies not having to depend on the domain-specific solver / policy engines. As long as there are Congress adapters to transform the user’s policies to something that domain-specific solver understands

[openstack-dev] [third-party]Properly format the status message with gerrit trigger

2015-03-20 Thread Jordan Pittier
Hi guys, I am in charge of a third party CI (for Cinder). My setup is based on Jenkins + gerrit trigger plugin. As you may know, its hard to customize the message in the Gerrit Verified Commands config. In particular, its not possible to add white/empty line. And you need white lines if you have

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Pipeline for notifications does not seem to work

2015-03-20 Thread Tim Bell
I'm running Juno with ceilometer and trying to produce a new meter which is based on vcpus * F (where F is a constant that is different for each hypervisor). When I create a VM, I get a new sample for vcpus. However, it does not appear to fire the transformer. The same approach using cpu

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Barbican : Unable to send PUT request to store the secret

2015-03-20 Thread John Wood
Hello Asha, I missed this later email, sorry. The content type on the PUT call determines the type of the secret (the first POST call only creates the metadata for the secret). This older wiki page might help clarify things:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

2015-03-20 Thread liuxinguo
Yes, currently our CI is not stable now, but it is really reporting, and have a look at all the other CI’s report, I think some of them are really not stable too. The server of review.openstack.org is located at the United States (U.S.) and the network is really not good between our CI and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] ironic-discoverd release plans

2015-03-20 Thread Mitsuhiro SHIGEMATSU
Dmitry, Thank you! Great! pshige 2015-03-21 0:18 GMT+09:00 高田唯子 yuikotakada0...@gmail.com: Thank you, Dmitry. I agree! Best Regards, Yuiko Takada 2015-03-20 23:32 GMT+09:00 Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com: Hi Dmitry, Sounds good to me! ;-) Imre On 03/20/2015 01:59 PM, Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

2015-03-20 Thread liuxinguo
It is huawei-volume-ci that is on behalf of huawei 18000 iSCSI and huawei 18000 FC driver, not huawei-ci. I am sorry for these two ci names so similar. And I think the point is: Does the requirement is really a stable CI, and if one CI is not stable, can it make a exemption like NetApp FC

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Barbican : Unable to send PUT request to store the secret

2015-03-20 Thread John Wood
Hello Asha, First, please add '[barbican]' to the subject line to indicate this thread is of Barbican interest only. So for example, the revised subject line would look like: Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Unable to send PUT request to store the secret You appear to be doing a two step secret

[openstack-dev] [nova] how to handle vendor-specific API microversions?

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Friesen
Hi, I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I noticed something that may be problematic. The way microversions are handled, there is a monotonically increasing MAX_API_VERSION value in nova/api/openstack/api_version_request.py. When you want to make a change you

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Announcing Bifrost

2015-03-20 Thread Julia Kreger
At present, the only configuration in which ironic is tested is as part of a complete OpenStack cloud. While this is also the most common usage, there has been significant interest in running Ironic outside of OpenStack contexts as an independent service for provisioning hardware in trusted

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] canceling meeting

2015-03-20 Thread Brandon Logan
That is correct. On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:11 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: +1 For on demand meeting. On demand lbaas meetings will happen in neutron meeting and not in Octavia meetings, right? Sent from Surface From: Susanne Balle Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎20‎ ‎March‎ ‎2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)

2015-03-20 Thread Mike Perez
On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote: Hi MIke, My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we are in the process of going

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty specs are now open

2015-03-20 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi Michael, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com writes: For specs approved in Juno or Kilo, there is a fast track approval process for Liberty. The steps to get your spec re-approved are: - Copy your spec from the specs/oldrelease/approved directory to the specs/liberty/approved directory.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-20 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/11/2015 06:48 PM, John Belamaric wrote: This has been settled and we're not moving forward with it for Kilo. I agree tenants are an administrative concept, not a networking one so using them for uniqueness doesn't really make sense. In Liberty we are proposing a new grouping mechanism, as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][FFE] - Reseller Implementation

2015-03-20 Thread Geoff Arnold
Glad to see this FFE. The Cisco Cloud Services team is very interested in the Reseller use case, and in a couple of possible extensions of the work. http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/kilo/reseller.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron extenstions

2015-03-20 Thread Armando M.
In order to track this, and for Kyle's sanity, I have created these two RC1 bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1434667 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1434671 Please, let's make sure that whatever approach we decide on, the resulting code fix targets those two bugs.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-20 Thread Mike Perez
On 12:33 Fri 20 Mar , ClaytonLuce, Timothy wrote: I'd like to point out that for NetApp FC drivers NetApp has been in discussions and updating progress on these drivers since their submission. I will point out a discussion in the Nov Core meeting where I brought up the challenge around

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: 2) Is the action of creating a subnet from a pool better realized as a different way of creating a subnet, or should there be some sort of pool action? Eg.: POST /subnet_pools/my_pool_id/subnet {'prefix_len': 24} which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-20 Thread Carl Baldwin
+1 Would like to hear feedback hoping that deprecation is viable. Carl On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: Hello everyone, The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/20/2015 02:51 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: What about this instead? POST /v2.0/subnets { 'network_id': 'meh', 'gateway_ip_template': '*.*.*.1' 'prefix_len': 24, 'pool_id': 'some_pool' } At least that way it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

2015-03-20 Thread Mike Perez
On 09:41 Fri 20 Mar , Jay S. Bryant wrote: Mike, Looks like this removal may have been a mistake. We should readdress. This was not a mistake. As Walt has mentioned that CI run failed anyways. Also if you take a look at Huawei's CI reporting history, it's not that often AND not reliable

[openstack-dev] [Heat] vnic_type in OS::Neutron::Port

2015-03-20 Thread Rob Pothier (rpothier)
Hi All, It was brought to my attention that the recent changes with the vnic_type possibly should not include the colon in the property value. In the earlier versions of the review the colon was not in the property, and was appended later.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)

2015-03-20 Thread Alka Deshpande
On 3/20/15 2:19 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote: Hi MIke, My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: What about this instead? POST /v2.0/subnets { 'network_id': 'meh', 'gateway_ip_template': '*.*.*.1' 'prefix_len': 24, 'pool_id': 'some_pool' } At least that way it's clear the gateway attribute is not an IP,

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-20 Thread Assaf Muller
Hello everyone, The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP agent, or if the agent manages only a single resource. Are the setups out there *not* using the use_namespaces option? I'm curious

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

2015-03-20 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 03/20/2015 04:48 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: [...] *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152401/ Post time: 3-18 23:08:45 This patch also has NO Huawei Volume CI check results. It has results on patches 5, 6, 7, 25, 26, 28, and 45. 45 was the only successfull one. To see all of them

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: I thought about doing *s but in the world of Classless Inter-Domain Routing where not all networks are /24, /16, or /8 it seemed a bit imprecise. But, maybe that doesn't matter. So do a CIDR host address: 0.0.0.1/24 can

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/09/2015 09:05 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: POST /v2.0/subnets {'network_id': 'meh', 'gateway_ip': '0.0.0.1', 'prefix_len': 24, 'pool_id': 'some_pool'} would indicate that the user wishes to use the first address in the range as the gateway IP, and the API would return something like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty specs are now open

2015-03-20 Thread Neil Jerram
Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com writes: Hi Michael, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com writes: For specs approved in Juno or Kilo, there is a fast track approval process for Liberty. The steps to get your spec re-approved are: - Copy your spec from the specs/oldrelease/approved

[openstack-dev] Barbican : Unable to send PUT request to store the secret

2015-03-20 Thread Asha Seshagiri
Hi All , I am unable to send the PUT request using the CURL command for storing the secret . root@barbican:~# curl -X POST -H 'content-type:application/json' -H 'X-Project-Id: 12345' -d '{secret: {name: secretname, algorithm: aes, bit_length : 256, mode: cbc}}'

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Invalid import in tempest v2 api tests

2015-03-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi: The LBaaS API tests are failing to run because test_pools.py(and other tests as well) are importing data_utils from tempest.common.utils. Looks like data_utils is moved to tempest_lib now and the API tests need to change to import from tempest_lib. Is someone tracking this? We are

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] FFE request for Firewall Router insertion BP

2015-03-20 Thread Abishek Subramanian (absubram)
Dear Horizon community, I would like to request an FFE for the review we have out currently for the firewall feature in the project dashboard. The review is at - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162552/ This feature is very important for the neutron FWaaS community to move the firewall feature

Re: [openstack-dev] About Sahara EDP New Ideas for Liberty

2015-03-20 Thread Andrew Lazarev
Hi Weiting, 1. Add a schedule feature to run the jobs on time: This request comes from the customer, they usually run the job in a specific time every day. So it should be great if there is a scheduler to help arrange the regular job to run. Looks like a great feature. And should be quite easy

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.utils] allow strutils.mask_password to mask keys dynamically

2015-03-20 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Matthew Van Dijk's message of 2015-03-20 15:06:08 +: I’ve come across a use case for allowing dynamic keys to be made secret. The hardcoded list is good for common keys, but there will be cases where masking a custom value is useful without having to add it to the hardcoded

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron extenstions

2015-03-20 Thread Armando M.
On 19 March 2015 at 23:59, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote: Forwarding my reply to the other thread too... Multiple threads on the same topic is confusing. Can we use this thread if we continue the discussion? (The title of this thread looks approapriate) API extension is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Pipeline for notifications does not seem to work

2015-03-20 Thread Igor Degtiarov
Hi Tim I've check your case on my devstack. And I've received new hs06 meter in my meter list. So something wrong with your local env. Cheers, Igor D. Igor Degtiarov Software Engineer Mirantis Inc www.mirantis.com On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: I’m

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)

2015-03-20 Thread Alka Deshpande
Hi MIke, My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we are in the process of going through internal security review, which is expected to

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Igor Malinovskiy for core team

2015-03-20 Thread Valeriy Ponomaryov
+1 from me. On 03/18/2015 03:04 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: Igor (u_glide on IRC) joined the Manila team back in December and has done a consistent amount of reviews and contributed significant new core features in the last 2-3 months. I would like to nominate him to join the Manila core

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][FFE] - Reseller Implementation

2015-03-20 Thread Raildo Mascena
Hi Geoff, I'm very happy to know that companies like Cisco wants to use Reseller. When we start the Hierarchical Multitenancy implementation we had some use cases in mind, there is: - Organize a divisional department of a company. - Reseller - Merge/Acquisition - Contracting parties The first

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Feature Freeze Exceptions

2015-03-20 Thread Serg Melikyan
Hi, folks! Today we released third milestone of Kilo release - 2015.1.0b3 [1], in this milestone we completed 11 blueprints and fixed 13 bugs. We finally completed a number of big features that we were working whole cycle: Integration with Congress, Environment Templates and so on. Release of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty specs are now open

2015-03-20 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Neil, yes, see example - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155116/ - you file against the /approved directory -- dims On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com writes: Hi Michael, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty specs are now open

2015-03-20 Thread Neil Jerram
Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com writes: Neil, yes, see example - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155116/ - you file against the /approved directory Thanks! Neil __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: Template is totally the wrong word. It is a host address without a network. The prefix is there for the same purpose, to OR it back into a network address. I just want us to stop inventing things that already exist. You

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-20 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: This is a question purely out of curiousity. Why is Neutron averse to the concept of using tenants as natural ways of dividing up the cloud -- which at its core means multi-tenant, on-demand computing and networking? From

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/20/2015 03:02 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: 2) Is the action of creating a subnet from a pool better realized as a different way of creating a subnet, or should there be some sort of pool action? Eg.: POST

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-20 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/20/2015 03:37 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: This is a question purely out of curiousity. Why is Neutron averse to the concept of using tenants as natural ways of dividing up the cloud -- which at its core means multi-tenant,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-20 Thread Neil Jerram
Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com writes: Hello everyone, Hi Assaf, The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP agent, or if the agent manages only a single resource. Are the setups

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-20 Thread Neil Jerram
Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com writes: Hello everyone, Hi Assaf, The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP agent, or if the agent manages only a single resource. Are the setups

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-20 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-03-20 13:37:49 -0600 (-0600), Carl Baldwin wrote: From what I've heard others say both in this thread and privately to me, there are already a lot of cases where a tenant will use the same address range to stamp out identical topologies. It occurred to me that we might even being

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Pipeline for notifications does not seem to work

2015-03-20 Thread gordon chung
i can confirm it works for me as well... are there any noticeable errors in the ceilometer-agent-notifications log? the snippet below looks sane to me though. cheers, gord From: idegtia...@mirantis.com Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:35:56 +0200 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Unable to send PUT request to store the secret

2015-03-20 Thread Asha Seshagiri
Hi All , Now the command for put request has been successful .the content type for the header needs to be text/plain. I thought that the datatype for the data parameters would determine the content type of the header. For ex : In this case the data is passed in the following format

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-20 Thread Assaf Muller
- Original Message - Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com writes: Hello everyone, Hi Assaf, The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP agent, or if the agent manages

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][congress] Stack lifecycle plugpoint as an enabler for cloud provider's services

2015-03-20 Thread Zane Bitter
On 19/03/15 06:17, VACHNIS, AVI (AVI) wrote: Hi, I'm looking at this interesting blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-lifecycle-plugpoint and I hope you can easily clarify some things to me. I see the following statements related to this BP: * [in problem description

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] vnic_type in OS::Neutron::Port

2015-03-20 Thread Zane Bitter
On 20/03/15 14:33, Rob Pothier (rpothier) wrote: Hi All, It was brought to my attention that the recent changes with the vnic_type possibly should not include the colon in the property value. In the earlier versions of the review the colon was not in the property, and was appended later.

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/20/2015 02:51 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: What about this instead? POST /v2.0/subnets { 'network_id': 'meh', 'gateway_ip_template':

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-20 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: How is 0.0.0.1 a host address? That isn't a valid IP address, AFAIK. It isn't a valid *IP* address without the network part. However, it can be referred to as the host address on the network or the host part of the IP address.

  1   2   >